[1. Kalla, H. Génération Automatique de Distributions/Ordonnancements Temps Réel Fiables et Tolérants aux Fautes. PhD Thesis, Mathematics, Sciences and Technologies of the Information, L’INPG, 2004. 179 p.]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Zhang, Y., K. Chakrabarty. Energy-Aware Adaptive Checkpointing in Embedded Real-Time Systems. – IEEE Computer Society Washington, DC, USA, Vol. 1, 2003, p. 10918.]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Liu, X., H. Ding, K. Lee, L. Sha, M. Caccamo. Feedback Fault Tolerance of Real-Time Embedded Systems – Issues and Possible Solutions, ACM New York, NY, USA, Vol. 3, April 2006, No 2, pp. 23-28.10.1145/1143489.1143495]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Dependability: Basic Concepts and Terminology. – In: J. C. Laprie, Ed. Dependability: Basic Concepts and Terminology. Dependable Computing and Fault-Tolerant Systems, Springer, Vienna, Vol. 5, 1992, pp. 3-245.10.1007/978-3-7091-9170-5_1]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Jalote, P. Fault-Tolerance in Distributed Systems. Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1994.]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Krakowiak, S. Tolérance aux fautes – 1 Introduction, techniques de base. Joseph Fourier University Sardes Project (INRIA and IMAG-LSR), 2004.]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Lopez, P. Approche par contraintes des problèmes d’ordonnancement et d’affectation: structures temporelles et mécanismes de propagation. Paris, France, Ellipses Marketing Edition S. A., 2004.]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Marouf, M. Ordonnancement temps réel dur multiprocesseur tolérant aux fautes appliqué à la robotique mobile. PhD Thesis, Real Time Computing, Robotics and Automation, Mines Paris Tech, 2012. 212 p.]Search in Google Scholar
[9. de Rauglaudre, D. Vérification formelle de conditions d’ordonnançabilité de tâches temps réel périodiques strictes. JFLA – Francophone Days of Business Languages, 2012, February 2012, Carnac, France, 2012.]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Girault, A., H. Kalla. A Novel Bicriteria Scheduling Heuristics Providing a Guaranteed Global System Failure Rate. – IEEE Trans. Dependable Sec. Comput., Vol. 6, 2009, No 4, pp. 241-254.10.1109/TDSC.2008.50]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Arar, C., M. S. Khireddine. An Algorithm Based on Replication and Deallocation Efficient Fault-Tolerant Multi-Bus Data Scheduling Algorithm Based on Replication and Deallocation. – Cybernetics and Information Technologies, Vol. 16, 2016, No 2, pp. 69-84.10.1515/cait-2016-0021]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Priyanka, M., S. Anisha, R. Sakthi Prabha. VLSI Design for a PSO-Optimized Real-Time Fault-Tolerant Task Allocation Algorithm in Wireless Sensor Network. – ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Vol. 11, July 2016, No 13, pp. 8226-8230.]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Garg, R., S. A. Kumar. Fault Tolerant Task Scheduling on Computational Grid Using Checkpointing under Transient Faults. – Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, Vol. 39, 2014, No 12, pp. 8775-8791.10.1007/s13369-014-1455-2]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Nagarajan, K., J. P. Hayes, B. T. Murray. Task Scheduling Algorithms for Fault Tolerance in Real-Time Embedded Systems. – In: D. R. Avresky, Ed. Dependable Network Computing. The Springer International Series in Engineering and Computer Science. Vol. 538. Boston, MA, Springer, 2000, pp. 395-412.10.1007/978-1-4615-4549-1_18]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Wilwert, C. Influence des Fautes Transitoires et des Performances Temps Réel sur la Sûreté des Systèmes X-by-Wire. PhD Thesis, Networks and Telecommunications [cs. NI]. National Polytechnic Institute of Lorraine – INPL, France 2005. 131 p.]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Donadeo, R. Tivoli Workload Scheduler for z/OS Conditional and Step Dependencies: When and How to Use Them to Shorten Workload Execution Time or to Automatically Handle Branching Scenarios. – IBM Rome Tivoli Lab Via Sciangai, 53 00144, Rome, Italy 2011, p. 21.]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Fan, W., F. Geerts, X. Jia. Conditional Dependencies: A Principled Approach to Improving Data Quality. – In: A. P. Sexton, Ed. Dataspace: The Final Frontier. BNCOD 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Vol. 5588. Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer, 2009, pp. 8-20.10.1007/978-3-642-02843-4_4]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Montresor, A. Distributed Algorithms Consistency & Replication. University of Trento, Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, Italy 2016.]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Holroyd, C. B., N. Yeung, M. G. H. Coles, J. D. Cohen. A Mechanism for Error Detection in Speeded Response Time Tasks. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, Vol. 134, 2005, No 2, pp.163-191.10.1037/0096-3445.134.2.16315869344]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Hashimoto, K., T. Tsuchiya, T. Kikuno. Effective Scheduling of Duplicated Tasks for Fault Tolerance in Multiprocessor Systems. – IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems, Vol. E85-D, 2002, No 3, pp. 525-534.]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Oh, Y., S. H. Son. Scheduling Real-Time Tasks for Dependability. – Journal of Operational Research Society, Vol. 48, 1997, pp. 629-639.10.1057/palgrave.jors.2600413]Search in Google Scholar
[22. http://www.syndex.org]Search in Google Scholar