[1. Albors-Garrigos, J., Barrera, R. R. (2011), “Impact of Public Funding on A Firm's Innovation Performance: Analysis of Internal and External Moderating Factors”, International Journal of innovation management, Vol. 15, No. 6, pp. 1297-1322.10.1142/S136391961100374X]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Almus, M., Czarnitzki, D. (2003), “The effects of public R&D subsidies on firms' innovation activities: the case of Eastern Germany”, Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 226-236.10.1198/073500103288618918]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[3. Arvanitis, S., Woerter, M. (2013), “Firm characteristics and the cyclicality of R&D investments”, Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 23, No. 5, pp. 1141-1169.10.1093/icc/dtt013]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[4. Atalay, M., Anafarta, N., Sarvan, F. (2013), “The relationship between innovation and firm performance: An empirical evidence from Turkish automotive supplier industry”, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 75, pp. 226-235.10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.04.026]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Becheikh, N., Landry, R., Amara, N. (2006), “Lessons from innovation empirical studies in the manufacturing sector: A systematic review of the literature from 1993–2003”, Technovation, Vol. 26, No. 5-6, pp. 644-664.10.1016/j.technovation.2005.06.016]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Becker, W., Dietz, J. (2004), “R&D cooperation and innovation activities of firms—evidence for the German manufacturing industry”, Research policy, Vol. 33, No. 2, pp. 209-223.10.1016/j.respol.2003.07.003]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Bérubé, C., Mohnen, P. (2009), “Are firms that receive R&D subsidies more innovative?”, Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue Canadienne d'économique, Vol. 42, No. 1, pp. 206-225.10.1111/j.1540-5982.2008.01505.x]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Beugelsdijk, S., Cornet, M. (2002), “’A far friend is worth more than a good neighbor’: proximity and innovation in a small country”, Journal of Management and Governance, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 169-188.10.1023/A:1015775321949]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Bozic, L., Mohnen, P. (2016), “Determinants of innovation in Croatian SMEs–comparison of service and manufacturing firms”, Market/Tržište, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp. 7-27.]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Branstetter, L. G., Sakakibara, M. (2002), „When do research consortia work well and why? Evidence from Japanese panel data”, American Economic Review, Vol. 92, No. 1, pp. 143-159.10.1257/000282802760015649]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Bronzini, R., Piselli, P. (2016), “The impact of R&D subsidies on firm innovation”, Research Policy, Vol. 45, No. 2, pp. 442-457.10.1016/j.respol.2015.10.008]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Buson Piquer, I. (1991), “Impacto de las ayudas públicas a las actividades de I+ D de las empresas: un análisis empírico”, Herri ekonomiaz, No. 11, pp. 47-66.]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Cainelli, G., Evangelista, R., Savona, M. (2004), „The impact of innovation on economic performance in services”, The Service Industries Journal, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 116-130.10.1080/02642060412331301162]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Caliendo, M., Kopeinig, S. (2008), “Some Practical Guidance for the Implementation of Propensity Score Matching”, Journal of Economic Surveys, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 31-72.10.1111/j.1467-6419.2007.00527.x]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Carboni, O. A. (2017), “The effect of public support on investment and R&D: An empirical evaluation on European manufacturing firms”, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 117, pp. 282-295.10.1016/j.techfore.2016.11.017]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Cozza, C., Malerba, F., Mancusi, M. L., Perani, G., Vezzulli, A. (2012), „Innovation, profitability and growth in medium and high-tech manufacturing industries: evidence from Italy”, Applied Economics, Vol. 44, No. 15, pp. 1963-1976.10.1080/00036846.2011.556594]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[17. Czarnitzki, D., Fier, A. (2001), “Do R&D subsidies matter?–evidence for the German service sector”, available at: ftp://ftp.zew.de/pub/zew-docs/dp/dp0119.pdf (10 January 2018)10.2139/ssrn.331066]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Czarnitzki, D., Fier, A. (2002), “Do innovation subsidies crowd out private investment? Evidence from the German service sector”, available at: ftp://ftp.zew.de/pub/zew-docs/dp/dp0204.pdf (10 January 2018)10.2139/ssrn.331066]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Czarnitzki, D., Hanel, P., Rosa, J. M. (2011), “Evaluating the impact of R&D tax credits on innovation: A microeconometric study on Canadian firms”, Research Policy, Vol. 40, No. 2, pp. 217-229.10.1016/j.respol.2010.09.017]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[20. Czarnitzki, D., Licht, G. (2006), “Additionality of public R&D grants in a transition economy”, Economics of Transition, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 101-131.10.1111/j.1468-0351.2006.00236.x]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Czarnitzki, D., Lopes-Bento, C. (2014), “Innovation subsidies: Does the funding source matter for innovation intensity and performance? Empirical evidence from Germany”, Industry and Innovation, Vol. 21, No. 5, pp. 380-409.10.1080/13662716.2014.973246]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Doh, S., Kim, B. (2014), “Government support for SME innovations in the regional industries: The case of government financial support program in South Korea”, Research Policy, Vol. 43, No. 9, pp. 1557-1569.10.1016/j.respol.2014.05.001]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Duchêne, V., Lykogianni, E., Verbeek, A. (2009), “EU-R&D in Services Industries and the EU-US R&D Investment Gap”. available at: http://iri.jrc.ec.europa.eu/documents/10180/b218443f-8cf0-4c86-b25b-64dce0119ade (10 January 2018)]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Elche, D. M., González, Á. (2008), „Influence of innovation on performance: analysis of Spanish service firms”, The Service Industries Journal, Vol. 28, No. 10, pp. 1483-1499.10.1080/02642060802250294]Search in Google Scholar
[25. Fernández, E., Junquera, B., Vazquez, C. (1995), “La política de I + D en la empresa no financier”, Información Comercial Espanola, Vol. 81, pp. 104-117.]Search in Google Scholar
[26. Gunday, G., Ulusoy, G., Kilic, K., Alpkan, L. (2011), “Effects of innovation types on firm performance”, International Journal of production economics, Vol. 133, No. 2, pp. 662-676.10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.05.014]Search in Google Scholar
[27. Hall, B. H., Lotti, F., Mairesse, J. (2009), “Innovation and productivity in SMEs: empirical evidence for Italy”, Small Business Economics, Vol. 33, No. 1, pp. 13-33.10.1007/s11187-009-9184-8]Search in Google Scholar
[28. Haned, N., Mothe, C., Nguyen-Thi, T. U. (2014), “Firm persistence in technological innovation: the relevance of organizational innovation”, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Vol. 23, No. 5-6, pp. 490-516.10.1080/10438599.2014.895509]Search in Google Scholar
[29. Hanzl-Weiss, D., Stehrer, R. (2010), „The role of services in the new member states: a comparative analysis based on input-output tables”, The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, No. 366.]Search in Google Scholar
[30. Heckman, J. D., Ichimura, H., Todd P. E., (1997), “Matching as an Econometric Evaluation Estimator: Evidence from Evaluating a Job Training Programme”, Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 64, No. 4, pp. 605-654.10.2307/2971733]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[31. Heckman, J. J., Ichimura, H., Todd, P. (1998), “Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator”, The review of economic studies, Vol. 65, No. 2, pp. 261-294.10.1111/1467-937X.00044]Search in Google Scholar
[32. Herrera, L., Nieto, M. (2008), “The national innovation policy effect according to firm location”, Technovation, Vol. 28, No. 8, pp. 540-550.10.1016/j.technovation.2008.02.009]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[33. Hussinger, K. (2008), “R&D and subsidies at the firm level: An application of parametric and semiparametric two-step selection models”, Journal of applied econometrics, Vol. 23, No. 6, pp. 729-747.10.1002/jae.1016]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[34. Johne, A., Davies, R. (2000), “Innovation in medium-sized insurance companies: how marketing adds value”, International Journal of Bank Marketing, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 6-14.10.1108/02652320010315316]Search in Google Scholar
[35. Keizer, J. A., Dijkstra, L., Halman, J. I. (2002), „Explaining innovative efforts of SMEs.: An exploratory survey among SMEs in the mechanical and electrical engineering sector in The Netherlands”, Technovation, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 1-13.10.1016/S0166-4972(00)00091-2]Search in Google Scholar
[36. Kim, S. J., Kim, E. M., Suh, Y., Zheng, Z. (2016), „The effect of service innovation on R&D activities and government support systems: the moderating role of government support systems in Korea”, Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, Vol. 2, No. 5, pp. 1-13.10.1186/s40852-016-0032-1]Search in Google Scholar
[37. Lam, A. (2005), “Organizational Innovation”, Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D. C., Nelson, R. R. (Eds), The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 115-147.]Search in Google Scholar
[38. Le, T., Jaffe, A. B. (2016), „The impact of R&D subsidy on innovation: evidence from New Zealand firms”, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Vol. 26, No. 5, pp. 429-452.10.1080/10438599.2016.1213504]Search in Google Scholar
[39. Li, P., Wang, C. H. (2010), “The Nonlinear Study of Public S&T Subsidies to Business Innovation: A Threshold Regression Analysis Based on Panel Data in 2001-2008”, China Soft Science Magazine, Vol. 8, pp. 138-147.]Search in Google Scholar
[40. Liu, R., Rammer, C. (2016), “The Contribution of Different Public Innovation Funding Programs to SMEs’ Export Performance”, available at: http://ftp.zew.de/pub/zew-docs/dp/dp16078.pdf (10 January 2018)10.2139/ssrn.2878755]Search in Google Scholar
[41. Lokshin, B., Belderbos, R., Carree, M. (2008), “The productivity effects of internal and external R&D: Evidence from a dynamic panel data model”, Oxford bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 70, No. 3, pp-399-413.10.1111/j.1468-0084.2008.00503.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[42. Otero-Neira, C., Tapio Lindman, M., Fernández, M. J. (2009), “Innovation and performance in SME furniture industries: An international comparative case study”, Marketing Intelligence & Planning, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp. 216-232.10.1108/02634500910944995]Search in Google Scholar
[43. Peters, B., Roberts, M. J., Vuong, V. A., Fryges, H. (2013). “Firm R&D, Innovation, and Productivity in German Industry”, Center for European Economic Research (ZEW).]Search in Google Scholar
[44. Polder, M., Leeuwen, G. V., Mohnen, P., Raymond, W. (2010), „Product, process and organizational innovation: drivers, complementarity and productivity effects”, MERIT Working Papers 035, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology.10.2139/ssrn.1626805]Search in Google Scholar
[45. Reinkowski, J., Alecke, B., Mitze, T., Untiedt, G. (2010), „Effectiveness of Public R&D Subsidies in East Germany–Is it a Matter of Firm Size?”, available at: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.408.136&rep=rep1&type=pdf (10 January 2018)]Search in Google Scholar
[46. Rogers, M. (1998). The definition and measurement of productivity, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research.]Search in Google Scholar
[47. Romer, P. (1989), “Endogenous technological change”, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 98, No. 5, pp. 71-102.10.1086/261725]Search in Google Scholar
[48. Romijn, H., Albaladejo, M. (2002), “Determinants of innovation capability in small electronics and software firms in southeast England”, Research Policy, Vol. 31, No. 7, pp. 1053-1067.10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00176-7]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[49. Rosenbaum, P. R., Rubin, D. B. (1983), „The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects”, Biometrika, Vol. 70, No. 1, pp. 41-55.10.1093/biomet/70.1.41]Search in Google Scholar
[50. Rubin, D. (1974), “Estimating Causal Effects of Treatments in Randomized and Non-randomized Studies”, Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 66, No. 5, pp. 688-701.10.1037/h0037350]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[51. Sandvik, I. L., Sandvik, K. (2003), “The impact of market orientation on product innovativeness and business performance”, International journal of Research in Marketing, Vol. 20, No. 4, pp. 355-376.10.1016/j.ijresmar.2003.02.002]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[52. Souitaris, V. (2002), “Technological trajectories as moderators of firm-level determinants of innovation”, Research Policy, Vol. 31, No. 6, pp. 877-898.10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00154-8]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[53. Van Riel, A. C., Lemmink, J., Ouwersloot, H. (2004), “High-technology service innovation success: a decision-making perspective”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 21, No. 5, pp. 348-359.10.1111/j.0737-6782.2004.00087.x]Search in Google Scholar
[54. Wang, Y., Li, J., Furman, J. L. (2017), „Firm performance and state innovation funding: Evidence from China’s innofund program”, Research Policy, Vol. 46, No. 6, pp. 1142-1161.10.1016/j.respol.2017.05.001]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar