Interpreting the Interoperability of the Nato’s Communication and Information Systems

Barry, C. L. (2003). Transforming NATO Command and Control for Future Missions. WA, USA: National Defense University Press – Defense Horizons.10.21236/ADA422451Search in Google Scholar

Binnendijk, H., Gompert, D. C., & Kugler, R. L. (2005). A New NATO Military Framework. WA, USA: National Defense University Press – Defense Horizons.Search in Google Scholar

Burita, L. (2010). Command and Control Information Systems Interoperability in NATO, Conference ICMT’10-IDEB’10, Vol. 1, Bratislava, Slovak: TnUAD, available at: https://www.researchgate.net/figure/The-environment-for-achieving-C2IS-systems-interoperability-in-NATO-To-facilitate-C2IS_fig1_288446125.Search in Google Scholar

Farkas, T., & Hronyecz, E. (2017). Info-communication areas of modernizing field C2 systems and command posts in the interest of successful home defense-peace operations- and disaster-management tasks. NY, USA: IEEE 15th International Symposium on Intelligent Systems and Informatics: SISY 2017.10.1109/SISY.2017.8080582Search in Google Scholar

Munk, S. (2002). An analysis of basic interoperability related terms, system of interoperability types. Budapest, Hungary: National University of Public Service – AARMS.Search in Google Scholar

Munk, S. (2018). Interoperability Services Supporting Information Exchange Between Cybersecurity Organisations. Budapest, Hungary: National University of Public Service – AARMS.10.32565/aarms.2018.3.9Search in Google Scholar

North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO). (1999). The Reader’s Guide to the NATO Summit in Washington. Brussels, Belgium: Author.Search in Google Scholar

North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO). (2003). The Prague Summit and NATO’s Transformation. A Reader’s Guide. Brussels, Belgium: Author.Search in Google Scholar

North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO). (2005). NATO Network Enabled Capability Feasibility Study. Executive Summary: Version 2.0. Brussels, Belgium: Author.Search in Google Scholar

North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO). (2016). FMN for Coalition Operations. Brussels, Belgium: Author.Search in Google Scholar

North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO). (2017). Allied Joint Doctrine for communication and information systems. Brussels, Belgium: Author.Search in Google Scholar

North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO). (2018). ACT engagement in Federated Mission Networking (FMN). Brussels, Beligum: Author.Search in Google Scholar

North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO). (2019). Coalition Warrior Interoperability exercise, available at: https://www.act.nato.int/cwix.Search in Google Scholar

North Atlantic Treaty Organisation. Establishing a HLA certification process in NATO, available at: https://www.mscoe.org/nmsg-134-ivct-integration-verification-certification-tool/.Search in Google Scholar

North Atlantic Treaty Organisation. Mission. Brussels, Belgium: Author, available at: https://lc.nato.int/about-us/mission.Search in Google Scholar

Sciore, E., Siegel, M, & Rosenthal, A. (1994). Using Semantic Values to Facilitate Interoperability Among Heterogeneous Information Systems. Journal ACM Transactions on Database Systems (TODS), Vol. 19, Issue 2, NY, USA: ACM Digital Library.10.1145/176567.176570Search in Google Scholar

Shilovitsky, O. (2014). IoT and PLM have common problem – data interoperability, available at: http://beyondplm.com/2014/09/26/iot-and-plm-have-common-problem-data-interoperability/.Search in Google Scholar