The Largest Paracentric Inversion, The Highest Rate Of Recombinant Spermatozoa. Case Report: 46,Xy, Inv(2)(Q21.2Q37.3) And Literature Review

1. Fryns JP, van den Berghe H. Paracentric inversion in man: personal experience and review of the literature. Hum Genet. 1980; 54(3): 413-416.10.1007/BF00291590Search in Google Scholar

2. Hook EB, Schreinemachers DM, Willey AM, Cross PK. Inherited structural cytogenetic abnormalities detected incidentally in fetuses diagnosed prenatally: frequency, parental-age associations, sex-ratio trends and comparisons with rates of mutants. Am J Hum Genet. 1984; 36(2): 422-443.Search in Google Scholar

3. Therman E. Human Chromosomes, Structure, Behavior, Effects. New York, NY: Springer- Verlag, 1980.10.1007/978-1-4684-0107-3Search in Google Scholar

4. Munné S. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis of structural abnormalities. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2001; 183 (Suppl 1): S55-S58.10.1016/S0303-7207(01)00578-0Search in Google Scholar

5. Worsham MJ, Miller DA, Devries JM, Mitchell AR, Babu VR, Surli V, et al. A dicentric recombinant 9 derived from a paracentric inversion: Phenotype, cytogenetics, and molecular analysis of centromeres. Am J Hum Genet. 1989; 44(1): 115-123.Search in Google Scholar

6. Phelan MC, Stevenson RE, Anderson EV Jr. Recombinant chromosome 9 possibly derived from breakage and reunion of sister chromatids within a paracentric inversion loop. Am J Med Genet. 1993; 46(3): 304-308.10.1002/ajmg.13204603138488876Search in Google Scholar

7. Lefort G, Blanchet P, Belgrade N, Rivier F, Chaze AM, Sarda P, et al. Stable dicentric duplication-deficiency chromosome 14 resulting from crossing-over within a maternal paracentric inversion. Am J Med Genet A. 2003; 118A(2): 333-338.10.1002/ajmg.b.1072012457404Search in Google Scholar

8. Madan K. Paracentric inversions: A review. Hum Genet. 1995; 96(5): 503-515.10.1007/BF001974038529995Search in Google Scholar

9. Madan K, Nieuwint AW. Reproductive risks for paracentric inversion heterozygotes: Inver sion or insertion? That is the question. Am J Med Genet. 2002; 107(4): 340-343.10.1002/ajmg.1017311840494Search in Google Scholar

10. Bhatt S, Moradkhani K, Mrasek K, Puechberty J, Manvelyan M, Hunstig F, et al. Breakpoint mapping and complete analysis of meiotic segregation patterns in three men heterozygous for paracentric inversions. Eur J Hum Genet. 2009; 17(1): 44-50.10.1038/ejhg.2008.144298595418685557Search in Google Scholar

11. Martin RH. Sperm chromosome analysis in a man heterozygous for a paracentric inversion of chromosome 7 (q11q22). Hum Genet. 1986; 73(2): 97-100.10.1007/BF002915943721507Search in Google Scholar

12. Brown GM, Leversha M, Hulten M, Ferguson- Smith MA, Affara NA, Furlong RA. Genetic analysis of meiotic recombination in humans by use of sperm typing: Reduced recombination within a heterozygous paracentric inversion of chromosome 9q32-q34.3. Am J Hum Genet. 1998; 62(6): 1484-1492.10.1086/30186313771429585591Search in Google Scholar

13. Martin RH. Sperm chromosome analysis in a man heterozygous for a paracentric inversion of chromosome 14 (q24.1q32.1). Am J Hum Genet. 1999; 64(5): 1480-1484.10.1086/302363Search in Google Scholar

14. Devine DH, Whitman-Elia G, Best RG, Edwards JG. Paternal paracentric inversion of chromosome 2: A possible association with recurrent pregnancy loss and infertility. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2000; 17(5): 293-296.10.1023/A:1009466501616Search in Google Scholar

15. Anton E, Vidal F, Egozcue J, Blanco J. Genetic reproductive risk in inversion carriers. Fertil Steril. 2006; 85(3): 661-666.10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.09.023Search in Google Scholar

16. Vialard F, Delanete A, Clement P, Simon-Bouy B, Aubriot FX, Selva J. Sperm chromosome analysis in two cases of paracentric inversion. Fertil Steril. 2007; 87(2): 418.e1-418.e5.10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.05.087Search in Google Scholar

17. Kahraman S, Findikli N, Biricik A, Oncu N, Ogur C, Sertyel S, et al. Preliminary FISH studies on spermatozoa and embryos in patients with variable degrees of teratozoospermia and a history of poor prognosis. Reprod Biomed Online. 2006; 12(6): 752-761.10.1016/S1472-6483(10)61087-5Search in Google Scholar

18. Martin RH, Rademaker A. Reliability of aneuploidy estimates in human sperm: Results of fluorescence in situ hybridization studies using two different scoring criteria. Mol Reprod. 1995; 42(1): 89-93.10.1002/mrd.1080420112Search in Google Scholar

19. Findikli N, Kahraman S, Kumtepe Y, Donmez E, Biricik A, Sertyel S, et al. Embryo devel opment characteristics in Robertsonian and reciprocal translocations: a comparison of results with non-translocation cases. Reprod Biomed Online. 2003; 7(5): 563-571.10.1016/S1472-6483(10)62073-1Search in Google Scholar

20. Palermo G, Joris H, Devroey P, van Steirteghem AC. Pregnancies after intracytoplasmic injection of single spermatozoon into an oocyte. Lancet. 1992; 340(8810): 17-18.10.1016/0140-6736(92)92425-FSearch in Google Scholar

21. Greger V, Knoll JH, Wagstaff J, Woolf E, Lieske P, Glatt H, et al. Angelman syndrome associated with an inversion of chromosome 15q11.2q24.3. Am J Hum Genet. 1997; 60(3): 574-580.Search in Google Scholar

22. Saito-Ohara F, Fukuda Y, Ito M, Agarwala KL, Hayashi M, Matsuo M, et al. The Xq22 inversion breakpoint interrupted a novel Ras-like GTPase gene in a patient with Duchenne muscular dystrophy and profound mental retardation. Am J Hum Genet. 2002; 71(3): 637-645.10.1086/34220837919912145744Search in Google Scholar

23. Anton E, Blanco J, Egozcue J, Vidal F. Sperm studies in heterozygote inversion carriers: A review. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2005; 111(3-4): 297-304.10.1159/00008690316192708Search in Google Scholar

24. Morel F, Laudier B, Guérif F, Couet ML, Royère D, Roux C, et al. Meiotic segregation analysis in spermatozoa of pericentric inversion carriers using fluorescence in-situ hybridization. Hum Reprod. 2007; 22(1): 136-141.10.1093/humrep/del31716917123Search in Google Scholar

25. Bhatt SS, Manvelyan M, Moradkhani K, Hunstig F, Mrasek K, Puechberty J, et al. Inverted segment size and the presence of recombination hot spot clusters matter in sperm segregation analysis. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2014; 142(2): 145-149.10.1159/00035614224217531Search in Google Scholar

26. Batanian J, Hulten MA. Electron microscopic investigations of synaptonemal complexes in an infertile human male carrier of a pericentric inversion inv(1) (p32q42). Regular loop formation but defective synapsis including a possible interchromosomal effect. Hum Genet. 1987; 76(1): 81-89.Search in Google Scholar

27. Fiorentino F, Spizzichino L, Bono S, Biricik A, Kokkali G, Rienzi L, et al. PGD for reciprocal and Robertsonian translocations using array comparative genomic hybridization. Hum Reprod. 2011; 26(7): 1925-1935. 10.1093/humrep/der08221489979Search in Google Scholar

28. Boklage CE. Survival probability of human conceptions from fertilization to term. Int J Fertil. 1990; 35 (2): 75, 79-80, 81-94.Search in Google Scholar

29. Schmid M, Hofmann R, Köhler J, Jannek U. Familial paracentric inversion: inv(2)(q31q36). Hum Genet. 1985; 71(3): 270-272. 10.1007/BF002845904065899Search in Google Scholar

30. Donti E, Rosetti A, Carloni I, Venti Donti G. A new case of familial paracentric inversion of chromosome 2. Hum Genet. 1987; 75(2): 195.10.1007/BF005910873817813Search in Google Scholar

31. Lin CC, Bowen P, Hoo JJ. Familial paracentric inversions inv(2)(q31q35) and inv(8)(q22.3q24.13) ascertained through reproductive abnormalities. Hum Genet. 1987; 75(1): 84-87. 10.1007/BF00273848Search in Google Scholar