Technology as a Threat or a Solution? The Challenges of Responding to Synthetic Media

1 Alvarez, León, Luis F. and Rosen Jovanna. “Technology as Ideology in Urban Governance.” Annals of the American Association of Geographers 110, no. 2 (2020): 497–506. Search in Google Scholar

2 Audry, Sofian. Art in the Age of Machine Learning. Cambridge (MA) and London: The MIT Press, 2021. Search in Google Scholar

3 Bass, Dina. “OpenAI Chatbot So Good It Can Fool Humans, Even When It’s Wrong.” Bloomberg (December 2022) // https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-12-07/openai-chatbot-so-good-it-can-fool-humans-even-when-it-s-wrong?leadSource=uverify%20wall. Search in Google Scholar

4 Bogost, Ian. “ChatGPT Is Dumber Than You Think.” The Atlantic (December 2022) // https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2022/12/chatgpt-openai-artificial-intelligence-writing-ethics/672386/. Search in Google Scholar

5 Bontridder, Noémi and Yves Poullet. “The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Disinformation.” Data & Policy 3 (2022): 1–21. Search in Google Scholar

6 Brown, Oliver. Beyond the Creative Species: Making Machines that Make Art and Music. Cambridge (MA) and London: The MIT Press, 2021. Search in Google Scholar

7 Chesney, Robert and Danielle Citron. “Deepfakes and the New Disinformation War: The Coming of Age of Post-Truth Geopolitics.” Foreign Affairs 98, no. 1 (2019): 147–155. Search in Google Scholar

8 Çiftçi, Umur A., Gokturk Yuksek and Ilke Demir. “My Face My Choice: Privacy Enhancing Deepfakes for Social Media Anonymization.” arXiv (Accessed 13 December, 2022) // https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.01361. Search in Google Scholar

9 Coeckelbergh, Mark. AI Ethics. Cambridge (MA) and London: The MIT Press, 2020. Search in Google Scholar

10 Constine, Josh. “ByteDance and TikTok Have Secretly Built a Deepfakes Maker.” TechCrunch (January 2020) // https://techcrunch.com/2020/01/03/tiktok-deep-fakes-face-swap/. Search in Google Scholar

11 Cover, Rob. “Deepfake Culture: The Emergence of Audio-Video Deception as an Object of Social Anxiety and Regulation.” Continuum 36, no. 4 (2022): 609–621. Search in Google Scholar

12 De Souza, Siddharth Peter. “The Spread of Legal Tech Solutionism and the Need for Legal Design.” European Journal of Risk Regulation 13, no. 3 (2022): 373–388. Search in Google Scholar

13 Di Gregorio, Giovanni. Digital Constitutionalism in Europe: Reframing Rights and Powers in the Algorithmic Society. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 2022. Search in Google Scholar

14 Diakopoulos, Nicholas and Deborah Johnson. “Anticipating and Addressing the Ethical Implications of Deepfakes in the Context of Elections.” New Media & Society 23, no. 7 (2021): 2072–2098. Search in Google Scholar

15 Diresta, Renee. “AI-Generated Text Is the Scariest Deepfake of All.” Wired (July 2020) // https://www.wired.com/story/ai-generated-text-is-the-scariest-deep-fake-of-all/. Search in Google Scholar

16 Du Sautoy, Marcus. The Creativity Code: How AI Is Learning to Write, Paint and Think. London: 4^th Estate, 2020. Search in Google Scholar

17 Edwards, Benj. “AI Image Generation Tech Can Now Create Life-Wrecking Deep-fakes with Ease.” Ars Technica (December 2022) // https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2022/12/thanks-to-ai-its-probably-time-to-take-your-photos-off-the-internet/. Search in Google Scholar

18 Fallis, Don. “The Epistemic Threat of Deepfakes.” Philosophy and Technology 34 (2020): 223–243. Search in Google Scholar

19 Feingold, Spencer. “Artificial Intelligence Image Generators Bring Delight – and Concern.” World Economic Forum (October 2022) // https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2022/10/ai-artist-systems-bring-delight-and-concern/. Search in Google Scholar

20 Galston, William A. “Is Seeing Still Believing? The Deepfake Challenge to Truth in Politics.” Brookings (January 2020) // https://www.brookings.edu/research/is-seeing-still-believing-the-deepfake-challenge-to-truth-in-politics/. Search in Google Scholar

21 Gapper, John. “ChatGPT Is Fluent, Clever and Dangerously Creative.” Financial Times (December 2022) // https://www.ft.com/content/86e64b4c-a754-47d6-999c-fcc54f62fb5d. Search in Google Scholar

22 Giles, Keir, Kim Hartmann and Munira Mustaffa. The Role of Deepfakes in Malign Influence Campaigns. Riga: NATO StratCom COE, 2019. Search in Google Scholar

23 Ging, Debbie. “Alphas, Betas, and Incels: Theorizing the Masculinities of the Manosphere.” Men and Masculinities 22, no. 4 (2019): 638–657. Search in Google Scholar

24 Goldman, Sharon. “The Hidden Danger of ChatGPT and Generative AI.” Venture-Beat (December 2022) // https://venturebeat.com/ai/the-hidden-danger-ofchatgpt-and-generative-ai-the-ai-beat/. Search in Google Scholar

25 Guadamuz, Andres. “Do Androids Dream of Electric Copyright? Comparative Analysis of Originality in Artificial Intelligence Generated Works.” In Artificial Intelligence & Intellectual Property, edited by Jyh-An Lee, Reto Hilty and Kung-Chung Liu. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2021, 147–176. Search in Google Scholar

26 Harrington, Carol. “What is ‘Toxic Masculinity’ and Why Does it Matter?” Men and Masculinities 24, no. 2 (2021): 345–352. Search in Google Scholar

27 Harsin, Jayson. “Aggro-Truth: (Dis-)Trust, Toxic Masculinity, and the Cultural Logic of Post-Truth Politics.” The Communication Review 24, no. 2 (2021): 133–166. Search in Google Scholar

28 Harsin, Jayson. “Toxic White Masculinity, Post-Truth Politics and the COVID-19 Infodemic.” European Journal of Cultural Studies 23, no. 6 (2020): 1060–1068. Search in Google Scholar

29 Heilweil, Rebecca. “AI Is Finally Good at Stuff, and that’s a Problem.” Vox (December 2022) // https://www.vox.com/recode/2022/12/7/23498694/ai-artificial-intelligence-chat-gpt-openai. Search in Google Scholar

30 Helmus, Todd C. “Artificial Intelligence, Deepfakes, and Disinformation: A Primer.” RAND Corporation (July 2022) // https://www.rand.org/pubs/perspectives/PEA1043-1.html. Search in Google Scholar

31 Hern, Alex. “AI Bot ChatGPT Stuns Academics with Essay-Writing Skills and Usability.” The Guardian (December 2022) // https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2022/dec/04/ai-bot-chatgpt-stuns-academics-with-essay-writing-skills-and-usability. Search in Google Scholar

32 Heslep, Daniel G. and P. S. Berge. “Mapping Discord’s Darkside: Distributed Hate Networks on Disboard.” New Media & Society, online first // DOI: 10.1177/14614448211062548. Search in Google Scholar

33 Honigberg, Bradley. “The Existential Threat of AI-Enhanced Disinformation Operations.” Just Security (July 2022) // https://www.justsecurity.org/82246/the-existential-threat-of-ai-enhanced-disinformation-operations/. Search in Google Scholar

34 Illia, Laura, Elanor Colleoni and Stelios Zyglidopoulos. “Ethical Implications of Text Generation in the Age of Artificial Intelligence.” Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility 32, no. 1 (2022): 201–210. Search in Google Scholar

35 Jacobs, Harrison. “Getty Images Bans AI-Generated Images due to Copyright Worries.” ARTnews (September 2022) // https://www.artnews.com/art-news/news/getty-images-bans-ai-generated-images-due-to-copyright-1234640201/. Search in Google Scholar

36 Kalpokas, Ignas. “Posthuman Urbanism: Datafication, Algorithmic Governance and Covid-19.” In The Routledge Handbook of Architecture, Urban Space and Politics Volume I: Violence, Spectacle and Data. Edited by Nikolina Bobic and Farzaneh Haghighi. London and New York: Routledge, 2023, 496–508. Search in Google Scholar

37 Kalpokas, Ignas. “Problematising Reality: The Promises and Perils of Synthetic Media.” SN Social Sciences 1, no. 1 (2021b): 1–11. Search in Google Scholar

38 Kalpokas, Ignas. Algorithmic Governance: Law and Politics in a Post-Human Era. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2019. Search in Google Scholar

39 Kalpokas, Ignas. Malleable, Digital, and Posthuman: A Permanently Beta Life. Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited, 2021a. Search in Google Scholar

40 Kietzmann, Jan, Linda W. Lee, Ian P. McCarthy, and Tim C. Kietzmann. “Deep-fakes: Trick or Treat.” Business Horizons 63, no. 2 (2020): 135–146. Search in Google Scholar

41 Knight, Will. “This Copyright Lawsuit Could Shape the Future of Generative AI.” Wired (November 2022) // https://www.wired.com/story/this-copyright-lawsuit-could-shape-the-future-of-generative-ai/. Search in Google Scholar

42 Knight, Will. “This Uncensored AI Art Tool Can Generate Fantasies – and Nightmares.” Wired (September 2022b) // https://www.wired.com/story/the-joy-and-dread-of-ai-image-generators-without-limits/. Search in Google Scholar

43 Kreps, Sarah, McCain, R. Miles and Brundage, Miles. “All the News That’s Fit to Fabricate: AI-Generated Text as a Tool of Media Misinformation.” Journal of Experi mental Political Science 9 (2022): 104–117. Search in Google Scholar

44 Lin, Connie. “How to Easily Trick OpenAI’s Genius New ChatGPT.” Fact Company (December 2022) // https://www.fastcompany.com/90819887/how-to-trick-openai-chat-gpt. Search in Google Scholar

45 Loizos, Connie. “Is ChatGPT a ‘Virus that Has Been Released into the Wild’?” Tech-Crunch (December 2022) // https://tcrn.ch/3W7IZUY. Search in Google Scholar

46 Lovato, Juniper et al. “Diverse Misinformation: Impacts of Human Biases on Detection of Deepfakes on Networks.” arXiv (Accessed 13 December, 2022) // https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.10026. Search in Google Scholar

47 Marelli, Luca, Kieslich, Katharina and Geiger, Susi. “COVID-19 and Technosolutionism: Responsibilization without Contextualization?” Critical Public Health 32, no. 1 (2022): 1–4. Search in Google Scholar

48 Massanari, Adrienne. “#Gamergate and The Fappening: How Reddit’s Algorithm, Governance, and Culture Support Toxic Technocultures.” New Media & Society 19, no. 3 (2015): 329–346. Search in Google Scholar

49 McCosker, Anthony. “Making Sense of Deepfakes: Socializing AI and Building Data Literacy on GitHub and YouTube.” New Media & Society (2022) // https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221093943. Search in Google Scholar

50 McGowran, Leigh. “‘Legal Minefield’: The Risk of Commercialising AI-Generated Images.” SiliconRepublic (September 2022) // https://www.siliconrepublic.com/machines/ai-generated-images-legal-risks-copyright. Search in Google Scholar

51 Metz, Cade. “The New Chatbots Could Change the World. Can You Trust Them?” The New York Times (December 2022) // https://www.nytimes.com/2022/12/10/technology/ai-chat-bot-chatgpt.html. Search in Google Scholar

52 Metz, Rachel. “Anyone Can Now Use Powerful AI Tools to Make Images. What Could Possibly Go Wrong?” CNN (October 2022) // https://edition.cnn.com/2022/09/30/tech/image-generating-ai-publicly-available/index.html. Search in Google Scholar

53 Miller, Arthur I. The Artist in the Machine: The World of AI-Powered Creativity. Cambridge (MA) and London: The MIT Press, 2019. Search in Google Scholar

54 Morozov, Evgeny. To Save Everything, Click Here: The Folly of Technological Solutionism. New York: Public Affairs, 2014. Search in Google Scholar

55 Mullen, Molly. “New Reality: Deepfake Technology and the World Around Us.” Mitchell Hamline Law Review 48, no. 1 (2022): 210–234. Search in Google Scholar

56 Newton, Olivia B. and Mel Stanfill. “My NSFW Video Has Partial Occlusion: Deep-fakes and the Technological Production of Nonconsensual Pornography.” Porn Studies 7, no. 4 (2020): 398–414. Search in Google Scholar

57 Nightingale, Sophie J. and Hany Farid. “AI-Synthesized Faces Are Indistinguishable from Real Faces and More Trustworthy.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 119, no. 8 (2022): 1–3. Search in Google Scholar

58 Pawelec, Maria. “Deepfakes and Democracy (Theory): How Synthetic Audio-Visual Media for Disinformation and Hate Speech Threaten Core Democratic Functions.” Digital Society 1 (2022): 1–37. Search in Google Scholar

59 Potts, John. The Near-Death of the Author: Creativity in the Internet Age. Toronto: The University of Toronto Press, 2022. Search in Google Scholar

60 Robinson, Rebekah. “AI Image Generators Enable the Creation of Fake Pictures to Support Fake News.” Coda (October 2022) // https://www.codastory.com/disin-formation/ai-image-generators-fake-news/. Search in Google Scholar

61 Salter, Anastasia and Bridget Blodgett. Toxic Geek Masculinity in Media: Sexism, Trolling, and Identity Policing. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017. Search in Google Scholar

62 Simonite, Tom. “Forget Politics: For Now, Deepfakes are for Bullies.” Wired (September 2019) //https://www.wired.com/story/forget-politics-deepfakes-bullies/. Search in Google Scholar

63 Stokel-Walker, Chris. “AI Bot ChatGPT Writes Smart Essays — Should Professors Worry?” Nature (December 2022) // https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-022-04397-7. Search in Google Scholar

64 Sullivan, Mark. “Meta’s New AI Video Generator Could Be a Dangerous Misinformation Tool.” FastCompany (September 2022) // https://www.fastcompany.com/90793071/metas-new-ai-video-generator-could-be-a-dangerous-misinformation-tool. Search in Google Scholar

65 Taylor, Linnet. “There Is an App for That: Technological Solutionism as COVID-19 Policy in the Global North.” In The New Common: How the COVID-19 Pandemic Is Transforming Society. Edited by Emile Aarts et al. Cham: Springer, 2021, 209–215. Search in Google Scholar

66 Ten Oever, Niels. “This Is not how We Imagined It: Technological Affordances, Economic Drivers, and the Internet Architecture Imaginary.“ New Media & Society 23, no. 2 (2021): 344–362. Search in Google Scholar

67 Thomas, Elise. “In the Battle Against Deepfakes, AI Is Pitted against AI.” Wired (November 2019) // https://www.wired.co.uk/article/deepfakes-ai. Search in Google Scholar

68 Tolosana, Ruben et al. “An Introduction to Digital Face Manipulation.” In Handbook of Digital Face Manipulation and Detection: From DeepFakes to Morphing Attacks. Edited by C. Rathgeb et al., 3–26. Cham: Springer, 2022. Search in Google Scholar

69 Trott, Verity Anne. “Gillette: The Best a Beta Can Get. Networking Hegemonic Masculinity in the Digital Sphere.” New Media & Society 24, no. 6 (2022): 1417–1434. Search in Google Scholar

70 Vaccari, Christian and Chadwick, Andrew. “Deepfakes and Disinformation: Exploring the Impact of Synthetic Political Video on Deception, Uncertainty, and Trust in News.” Social Media + Society 6. No. 1 (January-March 2020) // https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120903408. Search in Google Scholar

71 van der Nagel, Emily. “Verifying Images: Deepfakes, Control, and Consent.” Porn Studies 7, no. 4 (2020): 424–429. Search in Google Scholar

72 van der Sloot, Bart and Yvette Wagensveld. “Deepfakes: Regulatory Challenges for the Synthetic Society.” Computer Law & Security Review 46 (2022): 1–15. Search in Google Scholar

73 Vincent, James. “Getty Images Bans AI-Generated Content over Fears of Legal Challenges.” The Verge (September 2022b) // https://www.theverge.com/2022/9/21/23364696/getty-images-ai-ban-generated-artwork-illustration-copyright. Search in Google Scholar

74 Vincent, James. “The Lawsuit that Could Rewrite the Rules of AI Copyright.” The Verge (November 2022) // https://www.theverge.com/2022/11/8/23446821/microsoft-openai-github-copilot-class-action-lawsuit-ai-copyright-violation-training-data. Search in Google Scholar

75 Vizoso, Ángel, Martín Vaz-Álvarez and Xosé López-García. “Fighting Deepfakes: Media and Internet Giants’ Converging and Diverging Strategies Against Hi-Tech Misinformation.” Media and Communication 9, no. 1 (2022): 291-300. Search in Google Scholar

76 Waling, Andrea. “Problematising ‘Toxic’ and ‘Healthy’ Masculinity for Addressing Gender Inequalities.” Australian Feminist Studies 34, no. 101 (2019): 362–375. Search in Google Scholar

77 Whittaker, Lucas, et al. “All Around Me Are Synthetic Faces: The Mad World of AI-Generated Media.” IT Professional 22, no. 5 (2020): 90–99. Search in Google Scholar

78 Woolley, Samuel. The Reality Game: How the Next Wave of Technology Will Break the Truth and What We Can Do About It. London: Endeavour, 2020. Search in Google Scholar

79 Zeilinger, Martin. Tactical Entanglements: AI Art, Creative Agency, and the Limits of Intellectual Property. Lüneburg: Meson Press, 2021. Search in Google Scholar