[1. Blooma, Jessica de, Sabine A.E. Geurtsa, Toon W. Tarisa, Sabine Sonnentaga, Carolina de Weertha, and Michiel A.J. Kompiera. “Effects of vacation from work on health and well-being: Lots of fun, quickly gone.” An International Journal of Work, Health & Organisations 24 (2) (2010): 196-216 // DOI: 10.1080/02678373.2010.493385.10.1080/02678373.2010.493385]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Bogg, Alan. “Article 31”: 833-868. In: Hervey Peers and Ward Kenner, eds. The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights. A commentary. Beck-Nomos-Hart, 2014.]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Council of Europe. Digest of the Case Law of the European Committee of Social Rights. December 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Council of Europe. Digest of the Case Law of the European Committee of Social Rights. September 2008.]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Davulis, Tomas. Comment on Labor Code of the Republic of Lithuania. Vilnius: Centre of Registers, 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Green, Francis. “Union Recognition and Paid Holiday Entitlement.” BJIR 35 (2) (1997): 243-255 // DOI: 10.1111/1467-8543.00050.10.1111/1467-8543.00050]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Kilpatrick, Claire. “Article 21”: 579-604. In: Hervey Peers and Ward Kenner, eds. The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights. A commentary (Beck-Nomos-Hart, 2014).]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Syrek, Christine J., Oliver Weigelt, Jana Kühnel, and Jessica de Bloom. “All I want for Christmas is recovery – changes in employee affective well-being before and after vacation.” An International Journal of Work, Health & Organisations 32 (4) (2018): 313-333 // DOI: 10.1080/02678373.2018.1427816.10.1080/02678373.2018.1427816]Search in Google Scholar
[1. AA v UAB “Lautra Motors”. Supreme Court of the Republic of Lithuania, 2008, no 3K-3-437.]Search in Google Scholar
[2. B.B. v. UAB “Keback Vilnius”. Supreme Court of the Republic of Lithuania, 2012, no 3K-7-149.]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Bundesurlaubsgesetz (The Federal Law on leave) of 8 January 1963, as amended on 7 May 2002. BGBl. 1963, p. 2.; BGBl. 2002 I, p. 1529.]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. OJ C 326, 26.10.2012, p. 391–407.]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Concepción Maestre García v Centros Comerciales Carrefour SA. Court of Justice of the European Union, 2013 no C-194/12.]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Decision of the Kaunas district court of 21 September 2017. Civil case no. e2A-1471-259/2017.]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time. OJ L 299, 18.11.2003, p. 9–19.]Search in Google Scholar
[8. European Social Charter of the Council of Europe (Turin, 18.X.1961), (Revised). Strasbourg, 3.V.1996.]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Federatie Nederlandse Vakbeweging v. Staat der Nederlanden. Court of Justice of the European Union, 2006, no C-124/05.]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Gerhard Schultz-Hoff v Deutsche Rentenversicherung Bund and Stringer and Others v Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs. Court of Justice of the European Union, 2006, no C-350/06 and no C-520/06.]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Hans Maschek v. Magistratsdirektion der Stadt Wien – Personalstelle Wiener Stadtwerk. Court of Justice of the European Union, 2016, no C-341/15. https://rm.coe.int/168007cf93.]Search in Google Scholar
[12. KHS AG v Winfried Schulte. Court of Justice of the European Union, 2011, no C-214/10.]Search in Google Scholar
[13. L.D. v UAB “Alzida”. Supreme Court of the Republic of Lithuania, 2017, no e3k-3-405-1075.]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Labour Code of the Republic of Lithuania. TAR, 2016, no 23709.]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Law on Occupational Safety and Health of the Republic of Lithuania. Official Gazette, 2003, no 70-3170.]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Max-Planck-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der Wissenschaften eV v. Tetsuji Shimizu. Court of Justice of the European Union, 2018, no C-684/16 (Opinion of AG Bot.).]Search in Google Scholar
[17. On remuneration of the mayor and its deputy and on their leave. Constitutional Court of the Republic of Lithuania, 2013, no 50/2010.]Search in Google Scholar
[18. R. B. v. UAB “Semitransa”. Vilnius Regional Court, Chamber of Trakai, 2016, no 2-964-983.]Search in Google Scholar
[19. R.K. v “Pico line”. Kaunas district court, 2018, no e2A-1339-773.]Search in Google Scholar
[20. The Employment Rights (Employment Particulars and Paid Annual Leave) (Amendment) Regulations. 2018, no. 1378 // http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2018/1378/contents/made.]Search in Google Scholar
[21. V.A. v “Miesto šiluma”. Kaunas district court, 2017, no e2A-1471-259.]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Vicente Pereda v. M. M. SA. Court of Justice of the European Union, 2009, no C-277/08.]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Zentralbetriebsrat der Landeskrankenhäuser Tirols v. Land Tirol. Court of Justice of the European Union, 2010, no C-486/08.]Search in Google Scholar
