The Brexit Fiasco and the Failure of Article 50 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

1. Barron, N. Emanuel. Game Theory: An Introduction. 2^nd ed., New Jersey: Wiley, 2013.10.1002/9781118547168Search in Google Scholar

2. Biard, G. Douglas, Robert H. Gertner, and Randal C. Picker. Game Theory and the Law. Boston: Harvard University Press, 1994.Search in Google Scholar

3. Boin, Arjen, Allan McConnell, and Paul t’Hart. “Crisis exploitation: political and policy impacts of framing contests.” Journal of European Public Policy 16:1 (2009): 81–106.10.1080/13501760802453221Search in Google Scholar

4. Bovens, Mark, and Paul t’Hart. “Revisiting the study of policy failures.” Journal of European Public Policy 23:5 (2016): 653–666.10.1080/13501763.2015.1127273Search in Google Scholar

5. Coase, A. Ronald. “The Nature of the Firm.” Economica 4:16 (1937): 386–405.10.1111/j.1468-0335.1937.tb00002.xSearch in Google Scholar

6. Dixit, Avinash, and Barry Nalebuff. Thinking Strategically: The Competitive Edge in Business, Politics and Everyday Life. New York: Norton, 1991.Search in Google Scholar

7. Downs, Anthony. Inside Bureaucracy. New York: Little, Brown and Company, 1967.10.7249/CB156Search in Google Scholar

8. Dunleavy, Patrick. Bureaucracy and Public Choice: Economic Explanation in Political Science. London: Harvester, Wheatsheaf, 1991.Search in Google Scholar

9. Faure, Michael, and Johnston S. Jason. “The Law and Economics of Environmental Federalism: Europe and the United States Compared.” Virginia Environmental Law Journal 27:3 (2009): 205–274.Search in Google Scholar

10. Faure, Michael. “Harmonisation of Environmental Law and Market Integration: Harmonising for the Wrong Reasons?” European Environmental Law Review 7:6 (1998): 169–175.10.54648/EELR1998027Search in Google Scholar

11. Grant, Wyn. Pressure Groups, Politics and Democracy in Britain. London: Philip Allan, 1989.Search in Google Scholar

12. Henderson, Ailsa, Charlie Jeffery, Daniel Wincott, and Richard Jones Wyn. “How Brexit was made in England.” British Journal of Politics and International Relations 19:4 (2017): 631–646.10.1177/1369148117730542Search in Google Scholar

13. Hix, Simon. “Brexit: Where is the EU–UK Relationship Heading?” Journal of Common Market Studies 56:4 (2018): 11–27.10.1111/jcms.12766Search in Google Scholar

14. Hopkin, Jonathan. “When Polanyi met Farage: Market Fundamentalism, Economic Nationalism, and Britain’s Exit from the European Union.” British Journal of Politics and International Relations 19:3 (2017): 465–478.10.1177/1369148117710894Search in Google Scholar

15. Inman, P. Robert, and Daniel L. Rubinfeld. “Economics of Federalism”: 84–106. In: Francesco Parisi, ed. The Oxford Handbook of Law and Economics, Volume 3: Public Law and Legal Institutions. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.Search in Google Scholar

16. Inman, P. Robert, and Daniel L. Rubinfeld. “Rethinking Federalism.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 11:4 (1997a): 43–64.10.1257/jep.11.4.43Search in Google Scholar

17. Inman, P. Robert, and Daniel L. Rubinfeld. “The Political Economy of Federalism”: 73–105. In: Dennis C. Mueller, ed. Perspectives on Public Choice: A Handbook. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997b.10.1017/CBO9780511664458.005Search in Google Scholar

18. Jackson, Howell, Louis Kaplow, Steven Shavell, Kip Viscusi, and Daniel Cope. Analytical Methods for Lawyers. 2^nd ed. New York: Foundation Press, 2010.Search in Google Scholar

19. Klick, Johnatan. The Law and Economics of Federalism. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2017.10.4337/9781786433602Search in Google Scholar

20. Leitzel, Jim. Concepts in Law and Economics: A Guide for the Curious. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190213978.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

21. Magen, Stefan. “Game theory and collective goods”: 61–96. In Emanuel V. Towfigh and Niels Petersen, eds. Economic Methods for Lawyers. Cambridge: Edward Elgar, 2015.10.4337/9781783471676.00009Search in Google Scholar

22. McCarty, Nolan. Political Game Theory: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

23. McLean, Iain. Public Choice – An Introduction. 1^st ed. New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell, 1991.Search in Google Scholar

24. Miles, Lee and Redmond John. “Enlarging the European Union: The Erosion of Federalism?” Cooperation and Conflict 3:31 (1996): 285–309.10.1177/0010836796031003002Search in Google Scholar

25. Mueller, C. Dennis. Public Choice III. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Search in Google Scholar

26. Niskanen, A. William. Bureaucracy and Public Economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1994.Search in Google Scholar

27. Niskanen, A. William. Bureaucracy and Representative Government. Chicago: Aldine, 1971.Search in Google Scholar

28. Noam, Eli. “The Choice of Governmental Level in Regulation.” Kyklos 35:2 (1982): 278–291.10.1111/j.1467-6435.1982.tb00167.xSearch in Google Scholar

29. Oates, E. Wallace. “An Essay on Fiscal Federalism.” Journal of Economic Literature 37:1 (1999): 1120–1149.10.1257/jel.37.3.1120Search in Google Scholar

30. Oates, E. Wallace. Fiscal federalism. London: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1972.Search in Google Scholar

31. Ogus, Anthony. “Competition between National Legal Systems: A Contribution of Economic Analysis to Comparative Law.” International and Comparative Law Quarterly 48:2 (1999): 405–418.10.1017/S0020589300063259Search in Google Scholar

32. Ogus, Anthony. Cost and Cautionary Tales: Economic Insights for the Law. Folly Bridge: Hart Publishing, 2006.Search in Google Scholar

33. Ogus, Athony. Regulation: Legal Form and Economic Theory. Cambridge: Hart Publishing, 2004.Search in Google Scholar

34. Olson, Mancur. The Logic of Collective Action. Boston: Harvard University Press, 1965.Search in Google Scholar

35. Oppermann, Kai and Alexander Spencer. “Fiascos in Public Policy and Foreign Policy.” Journal of European Public Policy 23:5 (2016): 643–652.10.1080/13501763.2015.1128228Search in Google Scholar

36. Pelkmans, Jacques. “The Assignment of Public Functions in Economics Integration.” Journal of Common Market Studies 21:2 (1982): 97–121.10.1111/j.1468-5965.1982.tb00864.xSearch in Google Scholar

37. Pochet, Philippe, and Christophe Degryse. “Monetary union and the stakes for democracy and social policy.” European Review of Labour and Research 19:1 (2013): 103–116.10.1177/1024258912469915Search in Google Scholar

38. Posner, Richard A. Economic Analysis of Law. 8^th ed. Wolters Kluwer International, 2011.Search in Google Scholar

39. Rasmusen. Eric. Games and Information: An Introduction to Game Theory. 4th ed., Victoria: Blackwell Publishing, 2007.Search in Google Scholar

40. Richardson, Jeremy. “Brexit: The EU Policy-Making State Hits the Populist Buffers.” Political Quarterly 89:1 (2018): 118–126.10.1111/1467-923X.12453Search in Google Scholar

41. Sampson, Thomas. “Brexit: The Economics of International Disintegration.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 31:4 (2017): 163–184.10.1257/jep.31.4.163Search in Google Scholar

42. Schecter, Stephen, and Herbert Gintis. Game Theory in Action: An Introduction to Classical and Evolutionary Models. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 2016.10.1515/9781400880881Search in Google Scholar

43. Schelling, Thomas. The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1960.Search in Google Scholar

44. Tadelis, Steven. Game Theory: An Introduction. Princeton University Press, 2013.Search in Google Scholar

45. Thompson, Helen. “Inevitability and Contingency: The Political Economy of Brexit.” British Journal of Politics and International relations 19:3 (2017): 434–449.10.1177/1369148117710431Search in Google Scholar

46. Tiebout, M. Charles. “A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures.” Journal of Political Economy 64:5 (1956): 416–424.10.1086/257839Search in Google Scholar

47. Towfigh, V. Emanuel, and Petersen Niels. “Public and Social Choice Theory”: 121–146. In: Emanuel V. Towfigh and Niels Petersen, eds. Economic Methods for Lawyers. Cambridge: Edward Elgar, 2015.10.4337/9781783471676.00011Search in Google Scholar

48. Van den Bergh, Roger. “Economic Criteria for Applying the Subsidiarity Principle in the European Community: The Case of Competition Policy.” International Review of Law and Economics 16:3 (1996): 363–383.10.1016/0144-8188(96)00022-1Search in Google Scholar

49. Van den Bergh, Roger. “Farewell Utopia? Why the European Union should take the Economics of Federalism Seriously.” Maastricht Journal of International and European Law 23:6 (2016): 937–964.10.1177/1023263X1602300603Search in Google Scholar

50. Van den Bergh, Roger. “The Subsidiarity Principle in European Community Law. Some Insights from Law and Economics.” Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 1:2 (1994): 337–366.10.1177/1023263X9400100402Search in Google Scholar

51. Van den Bergh, Roger. “Towards an Institutional Legal Framework for regulatory Competition in Europe.” Kyklos 53:4 (2000): 435–466.10.1111/1467-6435.00129Search in Google Scholar

52. Vaubel, Roland. “Principal-agent Problems in International Organizations.” The Review of International Organisations 1:2 (2006): 125–138.10.1007/s11558-006-8340-zSearch in Google Scholar

53. Von Hayek, Friedrich A. “Competition as a Discovery Procedure”: 57–68. In: Friedrich A. von Hayek. New Studies in Philosophy, Politics, Economics and the History of Idea. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1978.Search in Google Scholar

54. Wincott, Daniel, John Peterson, and Alan Convery. “Introduction: Studying Brexit’s Causes and Consequences.” British Journal of Politics and International relations 19:3 (2017): 429–433.10.1177/1369148117713481Search in Google Scholar

55. Wincott, Daniel. “Federalism and the European Union: The Scope and Limits of the Treaty of Maastricht.” International Political Science Review 17:4 (1996): 403–415.10.1177/019251296017004005Search in Google Scholar

56. Wittman, Donald. Economic Foundation of Law and Organization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Search in Google Scholar

1. Council Directive 2000/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 June 2000 relating to cocoa and chocolate products intended for human consumption. OJ L 197, 3.8.2000.Search in Google Scholar

2. Council Directive 2001/113/EC of 20 December 2001 relating to fruit jams, jellies and marmalades and sweetened chestnut purée intended for human consumption. OJ L 10, 12.1.2002.Search in Google Scholar

3. Council Directive 2012/12/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 April 2012 amending Council Directive 2001/112/EC relating to fruit juices and certain similar products intended for human consumption. OJ L 115, 27.4.2012.Search in Google Scholar

4. Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. Official Journal C 326, 26/10/2012 P. 0001 – 0390.Search in Google Scholar