[1. Anderlini, Luca, Leonardo Felli, and Alessandro Riboni. “Statute Law or Case Law?” LSE STICERD Research Paper No. TE/2008/528 (August 2008) // https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1401783.10.2139/ssrn.1168662]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Antonopoulos, Andreas M. Handbook of Digital Currencies: Bitcoin, Innovation, Financial instruments, and Big Data (Elsevier, 2015).]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Antonopoulos, Andreas M. Mastering Bitcoin: Unlocking Digital Cryptocurrencies (O’Reilly, 2014).]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Bennett Moses, Lyria. “Understanding legal responses to technological change: the example of in vitro fertilization.” Minnesota Journal of Law, Science and Technology Volume 6, Issue 2 (2005) // https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1337&context=mjlst.]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Butenko, Anna, and Pierre Larouche. “Regulation for innovativeness or regulation of innovation?” Law, Innovation and Technology 7:1 (2015): 52–82 // DOI: 10.1080/17579961.2015.1052643.10.1080/17579961.2015.1052643]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[6. Chang, Sue. “Here’s all the money in the world, in one chart.” MarketWatch.com (28 November 2017) // https://www.marketwatch.com/story/this-is-how-much-money-exists-in-the-entire-world-in-one-chart-2015-12-18.]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Clinton, William J., and Jr. Albert Gore. “Framework for Global Electronic Commerce” // https://clintonwhitehouse4.archives.gov/WH/New/Commerce/read.html.]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Carys J. Craig. “Technological Neutrality: (Pre)Serving the Purposes of Copyright Law.” Osgoode Legal Studies Research Paper Series 45 (2014): 275–276 // https://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://www.google.com/&httpsredir=1&article=1044&context=olsrps.]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Cuccuru, Pierluigi. “Beyond bitcoin: an early overview on smart contracts.” International Journal of Law and Information Technology Volume 25, Issue 3 (1 September 2017): 179–195 // DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ijlit/eax003.10.1093/ijlit/eax003]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[10. De Filippi, Primavera, and Aaron Wright. Blockchain and the Law: the rule of code (Harvard University Press, 2018).10.2307/j.ctv2867sp]Search in Google Scholar
[11. “Euroopa Kohus: bitcoinidega kauplemine on maksuvaba” (European Court: trading with bitcoins is tax free). Äripäev.ee (23 October 2015) // https://www.aripaev.ee/uudised/2015/10/23/euroopa-kohus-bitcoinidegakauplemine-on-maksuvaba.]Search in Google Scholar
[12. FATF. “Virtual Currencies Key Definitions and Potential AML/CFT Risks” (June 2014) // http://www.fatf-gafi.org/media/fatf/documents/reports/Virtual-currency-key-definitions-and-potential-aml-cft-risks.pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Financial Supervisory Authority. “Virtuaalraha pakkujad ei kuulu järelevalve alla” (Providers of virtual currency do not fall under supervision), Website of the Financial Supervisory Authority (05 February 2014) // http://www.fi.ee/index.php?id=21561.]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Gervais, Daniel J. “Towards a new core international copyright norm: the reverse three-step test.” Marquette International Property Law Review 9 (2005) // https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=499924.]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Greenberg, Brad A. “Rethinking Technology Neutrality.” Minnesota Law Review 100 (2016): 1495–1562.]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Hojnik, Janja. “Technology neutral EU law: digital goods within the traditional good/services distinction.” International Journal of Law and Information Technology Volume 25, Issue 1 (1 March 2017): 63–84 // https://doi.org/10.1093/ijlit/eaw009.10.1093/ijlit/eaw009]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[17. Inselberg, Kadri. “Tavid kaalub Bitcoiniga kauplemise alustamist” (Tavid is considering trading bitcoins). Postimees.ee (23 January 2014) // https://majandus24.postimees.ee/2671592/tavid-kaalub-bitcoinigakauplemise-alustamist.]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Kamecke, Ulrich, and Torsten Körber. “Technological Neutrality in the EC Regulatory Framework for Electronic Communications: A Good Principle Widely Misunderstood. Technological Neutrality in the EC Regulatory Framework.” E.C.L.R. (2008): 330–339 // http://www.unigoettingen.de/de/document/download/65b9d0d841b831596888f8fb208e838b.pdf/Kamecke-Koerber_ECLR08_29%285%29.]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Koops, Bert-Jaap. “Should ICT Regulation be Technology neutral?”: 77–108. In: Bert-Jaap Koops, et al. Starting Points for ICT Regulation. Deconstructing Prevalent Policy One-Liners. The Hague: TMC Asser, 2006.10.1007/978-90-6704-665-7_4]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Lätt, Priit. “Complaint of de Voogd’s representative” (21 April 2014) // http://btc.ee/documents.html.]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Nakamoto, Satoshi. “Bitcoin: A Peer-to-peer Electronic Cash System” (2008) // https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Saad, Rainer. “Mida arvab Eesti Pank bitcoinist?” (What does the Bank of Estonia think of bitcoin?). Äripäev (18 December 2013) // https://www.aripaev.ee/uudised/2013-12-18/mida_arvab_eesti_pank_bitcoinist.]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Reed, Chris. “Taking Sides on Technology Neutrality.” SCRIPTed Volume 4, Issue 3 (September 2007): 263–284 // http://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/scripted4&i=281.10.2966/scrip.040307.263]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Reyes, Carla L. “Moving Beyond Bitcoin to an Endogenous Theory of Decentralized Ledger Technology Regulation: An Initial Proposal.” 61 Vill. L. Rev. 191 (2016) // https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/vlr/vol61/iss1/5.]Search in Google Scholar
[25. VAT Committee (Article 398 of Directive 2006/112/EC). “Subject: CJEU Case C-264/14 Hedqvist: Bitcoin.” Working Paper No. 892 (February 4, 2016) // https://circabc.europa.eu/sd/a/add54a49-9991-45ae-aac5-1e260b136c9e/892%20-%20CJEU%20Case%20C-264-14%20Hedqvist%20-%20Bitcoin.pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
[26. VAT Committee (Article 398 of Directive 2006/112/EC). “Subject: Question concerning the application of EU VAT provisions.” Working Paper No. 811 (July 29, 2014) // https://circabc.europa.eu/sd/a/4adc83f8-a7ab-48ee-b907-468459c0dad7/49%20-%20VAT%20treatment%20of%20Bitcoin.pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
[27. Wheatley, Alan. “Cash Is Dead, Long Live Cash.” Finance & Development Vol. 54, No. 2 (June 2017) // https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/2017/06/wheatley.htm.]Search in Google Scholar
[1. 137 SE Eelnõu seletuskiri Seletuskiri rahapesu ja terrorismi rahastamise tõkestamise seaduse eelnõu juurde (Explanatory Memorandum of Draft law 137 SE on Money Laundering and Terrorism Financing Prevention Act 2007) // https://www.riigikogu.ee/tegevus/eelnoud/eelnou/046802d9-335d-415bc4a1-650aa487eb33/Rahapesu%20ja%20terrorismi%20rahastamise%20t%C3%B5kestamise%20seadus.]Search in Google Scholar
[2. 232 SE Eelnõu seletuskiri Isikut tõendavate dokumentide seaduse, krediidiasutuste seaduse ning rahapesu ja terrorismi rahastamise tõkestamise seaduse muutmise seaduse juurde (Explanatory Memorandum of Draft law 232 SE on the Act Amending Identification Documents Act, Credit Institutions Act and Money Laundering and Terrorism Financing Prevention Act 2016) // https://www.riigikogu.ee/tegevus/eelnoud/eelnou/954a096c-722d-4e9a-8000-e292026f8156/Isikut%20t%C3%B5endavate%20dokumentide%20seaduse,%20krediidiasutuste%20seaduse%20ning%20rahapesu%20ja%20terrorismi%2 0rahastamise%20t%C3%B5kestamise%20seaduse%20muutmise%20seadus.]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Advocate General’s Opinion of 16 June 2016 in Vereniging Openbare Bibliotheken v Stichting Leenrecht Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Den Haag, CJEU Case C-174/15 (Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 10 November 2016).]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright, Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden, CJEU Case C-419/13, (Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 22 January 2015).]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Article 5(3) of Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 on jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters. Official Journal of the European Union, L 12, 16.1.2001, p. 1–23.]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Belgacom SA and Others v État belge. CJEU Case C-375/11 (Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 21 March 2013).]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Bolagsupplysningen OÜ and Ingrid Ilsjan v Svensk Handel AB. CJEU Case C-194/16 (Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) 17 October 2017).]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. Official Journal of the European Communities C 326:391–407 (26.10.2012) // http://www.europarl.europa.eu/charter/pdf/text_en.pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Christiane Urbing-Adam v Administration de l’enregistrement et des domaines. CJEU Case C-267/99 (Judgment of 11 October 2001), paragraph 36.]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Comunidad Autónoma del País Vasco, Itelazpi SA (C-66/16 P), Comunidad Autónoma de Cataluña, Centre de Telecomunicacions i Tecnologies de la Informació de la Generalitat de Catalunya (CTTI) (C-67/16 P), Navarra de Servicios y Tecnologías SA (C-68/16 P), Cellnex Telecom SA, formerly Abertis Telecom SA, Retevisión I SA (C69/16 P) v European Commission, SES Astra SA. Joined CJEU Cases C-66/16 P to C-69/16 P and Cases C-70/16 P and C-81/16 P (Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 20 December 2017).]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (VAT Directive). Official Journal of the European Union, L 347, 11.12.2006, p. 1–118 // ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2006/112/oj.]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Court documents // http://btc.ee/appeal.html.]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Criminal proceedings against Bent Falbert and Others Request for a preliminary ruling from the Københavns Byret. CJEU Case C-255/16 (Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 20 December 2017).]Search in Google Scholar
[14. De Voogd v Police and the Border Guard. Estonian Supreme Court ruling RKHKo 3-3-1-75-15 (2016).]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society (Copyright Directive). Official Journal of the European Union, L 167, 22.6.2001, p. 10–19.]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Directive 2002/21/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services (Framework Directive). Official Journal of the European Union, L 108, 24.4.2002, p. 33–50 // ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2002/21/oj.]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Directive 2009/110/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2009 on the taking up, pursuit and prudential supervision of the business of electronic money institutions amending Directives 2005/60/EC and 2006/48/EC and repealing Directive 2000/46/EC (Text with EEA relevance) (E-Money Directive). Official Journal of the European Union, L 267 (10.10.2009): 7–17.]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Directive (EU) 2009/24/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the legal protection of computer programs (Codified version) (Text with EEA relevance). Official Journal of the European Union, L 111, 5.5.2009, p. 16–22.]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Directive (EU) 2015/849 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 2015 on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purposes of money laundering or terrorist financing, amending Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council, and repealing Directive 2005/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Commission Directive 2006/70/EC (4th AML Directive). Official Journal of the European Union L 141, 5.6.2015, p. 73–117.]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Directive (EU) 2016/1148 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 July 2016 concerning measures for a high common level of security of network and information systems across the Union (NIS Directive). Official Journal of the European Union, L 194, 19.7.2016, p. 1–30 // ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2016/1148/oj.]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Directive (EU) 2018/843 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2018 amending Directive (EU) 2015/849 on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purposes of money laundering or terrorist financing, and amending Directives 2009/138/EC and 2013/36/EU (5th AML Directive). Official Journal of the European Union L 156, 19.6.2018, p. 43–74.]Search in Google Scholar
[22. EDate Advertising GmbH and Others v X and Société MGN Limited. Joined Cases C-509/09 and C-161/10 (Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 25 October 2011).]Search in Google Scholar
[23. European Commission, European Parliament v Council of the European Union. CJEU C-114/12 (Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 4 September 2014).]Search in Google Scholar
[24. European Commission v Federal Republic of Germany. CJEU Case C 109/02 (Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 23 October 2003).]Search in Google Scholar
[25. European Commission v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg. CJEU Case C-502/13 (Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 5 March 2015).]Search in Google Scholar
[26. European Commission v Kingdom of Sweden. CJEU C 480/10 (Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 25 April 2013).]Search in Google Scholar
[27. European Commission v Republic of France. CJEU Case C-479/13 (Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 5 March 2015).]Search in Google Scholar
[28. Finanzamt Gladbeck v Edith Linneweber and Finanzamt Herne-West v Savvas Akritidis. CJEU Joined Cases C-453/02 and C-462/02 (Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 17 February 2005).]Search in Google Scholar
[29. Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Prevention Act of Estonia. Rahapesu ja terrorismi rahastamise tõkestamise seadus, RT I, 06.07.2016, 13.]Search in Google Scholar
[30. Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Prevention Act of Estonia. Rahapesu ja terrorismi rahastamise tõkestamise seadus, RT I, 17.11.2017, 2.]Search in Google Scholar
[31. Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Prevention Act of Estonia. Rahapesu ja terrorismi rahastamise tõkestamise seadus, RT I 2008, 3, 21.]Search in Google Scholar
[32. Opinion of Advocate General Kokott in Skatteverket v David Hedqvist. CJEU Case C-264/14 (16 July 2015).]Search in Google Scholar
[33. Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive (EU) 2015/849 on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purposes of money laundering or terrorist financing and amending Directive 2009/101/EC (Proposal). COM/2016/0450 final - 2016/0208 (COD).]Search in Google Scholar
[34. Republic of Poland v European Parliament and Council of the European Union. CJEU Case C-5/16 (Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 21 June 2018).]Search in Google Scholar
[35. Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Den Haag (Netherlands) lodged on 16 April 2018 Nederlands Uitgeversverbond, Groep Algemene Uitgevers v Tom Kabinet Internet BV, Tom Kabinet Holding BV, Tom Kabinet Uitgeverij BV. CJEU Case C-263/18.]Search in Google Scholar
[36. Skatteverket v David Hedqvist. CJEU Case C-264/14 (Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 22 October 2015).]Search in Google Scholar
[37. Technische Universität Darmstadt v Eugen Ulmer KG. CJEU Case C-117/13 (Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) 11 September 2014).]Search in Google Scholar
[38. UsedSoft GmbH v Oracle International Corp. CJEU Case C 128-11 (Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) 3 July 2012).]Search in Google Scholar
