Administrative Processes as an Anti-Corruption Tool? A View from Public Employees in the Baltic States

1. Anechiarico, Frank, and James B. Jacobs. How corruption control makes government ineffective. Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press, 1996.Search in Google Scholar

2. Bardhan, Pranap. “Corruption and development: A review of issues.” Journal of Economic Literature 35 (3) (1996): 1320–1346.Search in Google Scholar

3. Batory, Agnes. “Post-accession malaise? EU conditionality, domestic politics and anti-corruption policy in Hungary.” Global Crime 11 (2010): 164–177.10.1080/17440571003669183Search in Google Scholar

4. Becker, Gary and George J. Stigler. “Law enforcement, malfeasance and the compensation of enforcers.” Journal of Legal Studies 3 (1974): 1–19.10.1086/467507Search in Google Scholar

5. Bryer, Thomas A. “Explaining responsiveness in collaboration: Administrator and citizen role perceptions.” Public Administration Review 69(2) (2009): 271–283.10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.01973.xSearch in Google Scholar

6. Caiden, Gerald E., and Naomi J. Caiden. “Administrative corruption.” Public Administration Review 37 (1977): 301–309.10.2307/974828Search in Google Scholar

7. Charron, Nicholas, Lewis Dijkstra, and Victor Lapuente. “Regional governance Matters: Quality of Government within European Union Member States.” Regional Studies 48 (2014): 68–90.10.1080/00343404.2013.770141Search in Google Scholar

8. Christensen, Jørgen G. “Pay and prerequisites for government executives”: 102–129: In: B. Guy Peters and Jon Pierre, eds. The SAGE handbook of public administration. 2^nd ed. London: SAGE, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

9. Cooper, Terry. L. “Hierarchy, virtue, and the practice of public administration: A perspective for normative ethics.” Public Administration Review 47 (1987): 320–328.10.2307/975312Search in Google Scholar

10. Council of Europe. GRECO RESOLUTION (97) 24 “On the twenty guiding principles for the fight against corruption” (1997) // https://rm.coe.int/CoERMPublicCommonSearchServices/DisplayDCTMContent? documentId=09000016806dd0ea.Search in Google Scholar

11. Dahlström, Carl, Victor Lapuente, and Jan Teorell. “The merit of meritocratization: Politics, bureaucracy, and the institutional deterrents of corruption.” Political Research Quarterly 65 (2012): 656–668.10.1177/1065912911408109Search in Google Scholar

12. De Graaf, Gjalt. “A report on reporting: Why peers report integrity and law violations in public organizations.” Public Administration Review 70 (2010): 767–779.10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02204.xSearch in Google Scholar

13. Demmke, Christoph, and Timo Moilanen. Civil services in the EU of 27: Reform outcomes and the future of the civil service. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 2010.10.3726/978-3-653-00038-2Search in Google Scholar

14. Drechsler, Wolfgang. “Governance, good Governance, and government: The case for Estonian administrative capacity.” Trames (2004): 388–396.Search in Google Scholar

15. Drechsler, Wolfgang. “The re-emergence of Weberian public administration after the fall of New Public Management: The Central and Eastern European perspective.” Halduskultuur – Administrative Culture 6 (2005): 94–108.Search in Google Scholar

16. Evans, Peter, and James E. Rauch. “Bureaucracy and growth: A cross-national analysis of the effects of ‘Weberian’ state structures on economic growth.” American Sociological Review 64 (1999): 748–765.10.2307/2657374Search in Google Scholar

17. Gingerich, David W. “Governance indicators and the level of analysis problem: Empirical findings from South America.” British Journal of Political Science 43 (2012): 505–540.10.1017/S0007123412000403Search in Google Scholar

18. Guy, Mary. “Mom work versus dad work in local government.” Administration and Society 49 (2016): 48–64 // DOI:10.1177/0095399716641989.10.1177/0095399716641989Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

19. Hassan, Shahidul, Bradley E. Wright, and Gary Yukl. “Does ethical leadership matter in government? Effects on organizational commitment, absenteeism, and willingness to report ethical problems.” Public Administration Review 74 (2014): 333–343.10.1111/puar.12216Search in Google Scholar

20. Hofmann, Herwig C.H. “Mapping the European administrative space.” West European Politics 31 (2008): 662–676.10.1080/01402380801905918Search in Google Scholar

21. Holmes, Leslie. Rotten states? Corruption, post-communism and neoliberalism. Duke UP: Durham 2006.10.1515/9780822387732Search in Google Scholar

22. Hunt, Jennifer. “Why are some public officials more corrupt than others?”: 323–351. In: Susan Rose-Ackerman, ed. International handbook on the economics of corruption. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing 2006.10.3386/w11595Search in Google Scholar

23. Jansone, Dace, and Iveta Reinholde. “Politico-administrative relations: The case of Latvia”: 203-225. In: Tony Verheijen, ed. Politico-administrative relations. Who rules? Bratislava: NISPAcee, 2001.Search in Google Scholar

24. Jávor, István, and David Janicsics. “The role of power in organizational corruption: An empirical study.” Administration and Society 48 (2016): 527–58.10.1177/0095399713514845Search in Google Scholar

25. Johannsen, Lars, and Karin Hilmer Pedersen. “Korruption i post-kommunistiske lande: et forbigående eller permanent fænomen” (Corruption in post-communist countries). Nordisk Østforum 22, No. 3-4 (2008): 271–287 [in Danish].Search in Google Scholar

26. Johannsen, Lars, and Karin Hilmer Pedersen. “The institutional roots of anti-corruption policies: comparing the three Baltic states.” Journal of Baltic Studies 42 (2011): 329–346.10.1080/01629778.2011.597128Search in Google Scholar

27. Johannsen, Lars, and Karin Hilmer Pedersen. “Path making: Democracy in the Baltic States twenty years after.” Politics in Central Europe 7 (2011): 57–73.Search in Google Scholar

28. Johannsen, Lars, and Karin Hilmer Pedersen. “How to combat corruption: Assessing anti-corruption measures from a civil servant’s perspective.” Halduskultuur – Administrative Culture 13 (2012): 130–146.Search in Google Scholar

29. Johannsen, Lars, Karin Hilmer Pedersen, and Saulius Pivoras. “Falling between two stools – the case of the Lithuanian civil servant reform of 2013.” Journal of comparative politics 8 (2015): 34–48.Search in Google Scholar

30. Johannsen, Lars, Eva Maria Olafsson, and Karin Hilmer Pedersen. “Women the fairer sex: Gendered attitudes towards corruption and experiences with bribery”: 121–130. In: Brenda Davis, ed. Corruption: Political, economic and social issues. Nova Science Publishers, Inc., 2016.Search in Google Scholar

31. Karklins, Rasma. “Typology of post-communist corruption.” Problems of post-communism Vol. 49 (2002): 22–32.10.1080/10758216.2002.11655993Search in Google Scholar

32. Kathi, Pradeep C., and Terry L. Cooper. “Democratizing the administrative state: connecting neighborhood councils and city agencies.” Public Administration Review 65 (2005): 559–567.10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00483.xSearch in Google Scholar

33. Klitgaard, Robert. Controlling corruption. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1988.10.1525/9780520911185Search in Google Scholar

34. Knack, Stephen. “Measuring corruption: A critique of indicators in Eastern Europe and Central Asia.” Journal of Public Policy 27 (2007): 255–291.10.1017/S0143814X07000748Search in Google Scholar

35. Lambsdorff, Johan G. The institutional economic of corruption and reform: Theory, evidence and policy. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2007.10.1017/CBO9780511492617Search in Google Scholar

36. Latham, Gary P., and Edwin A. Locke. “Self-regulation through goal setting.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50 (1991): 212–247.10.1016/0749-5978(91)90021-KSearch in Google Scholar

37. Lazareviciute, Ieva, Jovita Tirviene, and Jonas Poniskaitis. “Politico-administrative relations in Lithuania”: 226–267. In: Tony Verheijen, ed. Politico-administrative Relations Who rules? Bratislava: NISPAcee, 2001.Search in Google Scholar

38. Liu, Cheol, and John. L. Mikesell. “The impact of public officials? Corruption on the size and allocation of U.S. state spending.” Public Administration Review 74 (2014): 346–359.10.1111/puar.12212Search in Google Scholar

39. Maegher, Patrick. “Anti-corruption agencies: Theory Versus Reality” The Journal of Policy Reform 8 (2005): 69–103.10.1080/1384128042000328950Search in Google Scholar

40. March, James G., and Johan P. Olsen. Rediscovering institutions: The organizational basis of politics. New York: Free Press 1989.Search in Google Scholar

41. Mbaku, John M. “Bureaucratic corruption in Africa: The futility of cleanups.” Cato Journal 16 (1996): 99–118.Search in Google Scholar

42. Meyer-Sahling, Jan-Hinrik, and Kim S. Mikkelsen. “Civil service laws, merit, politicization, and corruption: The perspective of public officials from five East European countries.” Public administration 94 (2016): 1105–1123.10.1111/padm.12276Search in Google Scholar

43. Miller, William L., Åse B. Grodeland, and Tatyana Y. Koshechkina. A culture of corruption? Coping with government in post-communist Europe. NY: Central European University Press, 2001.10.1515/9789633865095Search in Google Scholar

44. Mishra, Ajit. “Corruption, hierarchies and bureaucratic structure”: 189–215: In: Susan Rose-Ackerman, ed. International handbook on the economics of corruption. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2006.Search in Google Scholar

45. Montinola, Gabriella R., and Robert W. Jackman. “Sources of corruption: A cross-country study.” British Journal of Political Science 32 (2002): 147–170.10.1017/S0007123402000066Search in Google Scholar

46. Muhhina, Kristina. “Governing ‘Transition’: The Discoursive Construction of Public Administration in Post-Cold War Estonia.” Administration and Society 49 (2017): 575–611.10.1177/0095399715581036Search in Google Scholar

47. Mungiu-Pippidi, Alina. The quest for good governance. How societies develop control of corruption. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2015.10.1017/CBO9781316286937Search in Google Scholar

48. Nakrošis, Vitalis. “The quantitative and qualitative analysis of public administration reforms in post-communist countries.” Baltic Journal of Political Science 6 (2017): 7–28.10.15388/BJPS.2017.6.10741Search in Google Scholar

49. Nakrošis, Vitalis, and Mantas Budraitis. “Longitudinal change in Lithuanian agencies: 1990-2010.” International Journal of Public Administration 35 (2012): 820–831.10.1080/01900692.2012.715566Search in Google Scholar

50. Navot, Doron, Yaniv Reingewertz, and Nissim Cohen. “Speed or greed? High wages and corruption among public servants.” Administration and Society 48 (2016): 580–601.10.1177/0095399715623313Search in Google Scholar

51. Nørgaard, Ole, and Lars Johannsen. The Baltic States after independence. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1999.Search in Google Scholar

52. Nunberg, Barbara. Ready for Europe. Public administration reform and European Union accession in Central and Eastern Europe. Washington DC: The World Bank, 2000.Search in Google Scholar

53. O’Dwyer, Conor. Runaway state-building. Patronage, politics and democratic development. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins, 2006.Search in Google Scholar

54. Olsen, Johan. P. “The ups and downs of bureaucratic organization.” Annual Review of Political Science 11 (2008): 13–37.10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.060106.101806Search in Google Scholar

55. Osborne, Stephen P. “Editorial. The new public governance?” Public Management Review 8 (2006): 277–387.10.1080/14719030600853022Search in Google Scholar

56. Osborne, Stephen P. “Delivering public services: Time for a new theory?” Public Management Review 12 (2010): 1–10 // DOI: 10.1080/147190303495232.10.1080/147190303495232Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

57. Ostrom, Elinor. “Analyzing collective action.” International Association of Agricultural Economists 41 (2010): 155–166.10.1111/j.1574-0862.2010.00497.xSearch in Google Scholar

58. Painter, Martin, and B Guy. Peters. Tradition and public administration. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.10.1057/9780230289635Search in Google Scholar

59. Palidauskaite, Jolanta. “The Value Profile of Civil Servants in new European Democracies through the Lens of Embedded Ethics”: 186–207. In: Michiels S. de Vries and Pan S. Kim, eds. Value and Virtue in Public Administration. A comparative Perspective. London; Palgrave Macmillan, 2011.Search in Google Scholar

60. Panagiotou, Ritsa A. “Estonia’s success: Prescription or legacy?” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 34 (2001): 261–277.10.1016/S0967-067X(01)00005-8Search in Google Scholar

61. Pedersen, Karin Hilmer, and Lars Johannsen. “European values and practices in post-communist public administration. The Baltic States”: 219–241: In: Patrick Overeem and Fritz. Sager, eds. The European public servant. A shared administrative identity. ECPR press, 2015.Search in Google Scholar

62. Pedersen, Karin Hilmer, and Lars Johannsen. “Where and how you sit. How civil servants view citizens’ participation.” Administration & Society 48 (2016): 104–129.10.1177/0095399714555753Search in Google Scholar

63. Perry, James L., Annie Hondeghem, and Lois R. Wise. “Revisiting the motivational bases of public service: Twenty years of research and an agenda for the future.” Public Administration Review 70 (2010): 681–690.10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02196.xSearch in Google Scholar

64. Persson, Anna, Bo Rothstein, and Jan Teorell. “Why anticorruption reforms fail— systemic corruption as a collective action problem.” Governance 26 (2013): 449–471.10.1111/j.1468-0491.2012.01604.xSearch in Google Scholar

65. Peters, B. Guy. “Managing horizontal government: The politics of co-ordination.” Public Administration 76 (1998): 295–311.10.1111/1467-9299.00102Search in Google Scholar

66. Pollitt, Christopher, and Gert Bouckaert. Public management reform: A comparative analysis – New Public Management, governance, and the neo-Weberian state. 3^rd ed. Oxford: Oxford: University Press, 2011.Search in Google Scholar

67. Randma-Liiv, Tiina, and Jane Järvalt. “Public personnel policies and problems in the new democracies of Central and Eastern Europe.” Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice 13 (2011): 35–49.10.1080/13876988.2011.538537Search in Google Scholar

68. Randma-Liiv, Tiina. “Demand- and supply-based policy transfer in Estonian public administration.” Journal of Baltic Studies 36 (2005): 467–487.10.1080/01629770500000211Search in Google Scholar

69. Randma-Liiv, Tiina. “Performance management in transitional administration: Introduction of pay-for-performance in the Estonian civil service.” Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis 7 (2005): 95–115.10.1080/13876980500084733Search in Google Scholar

70. Rauch, James E., and Peter B. Evans. “Bureaucratic structure and bureaucratic performance in less developed countries.” Journal of Public Economics 75 (2000): 49–71.10.1016/S0047-2727(99)00044-4Search in Google Scholar

71. Rijckegman, Caroline von, and Beatrice Weder. “Corruption and the rate of temptation: Do low wages in the civil service cause corruption?” IMF Working Paper 73 (Washington, D.C., IMF, 1997).Search in Google Scholar

72. Rose-Ackerman, Susan. “Which bureaucracies are less corruptible?”: 803–826. In: Arnold J. Heidenheimer, Michael Johnston, and Victor T. LeVine, eds. Political corruption. A handbook. New Braunswik and Oxford: Transaction Publishers, 1989 [1978].Search in Google Scholar

73. Rothstein, Bo, and Jan Teorell. “What is quality of government? A theory of impartial government institutions.” Governance 21 (2008): 165–190.10.1111/j.1468-0491.2008.00391.xSearch in Google Scholar

74. Rothstein, Bo. “What is the opposite of corruption?” Third World Quarterly 35 (2014): 737–752.10.1080/01436597.2014.921424Search in Google Scholar

75. Rubin, Ellen V., and Andrew Whitford. “Effects of the institutional design of the civil service: Evidence from corruption.” International Public management Journal 11 (2008): 404–425.10.1080/10967490802491095Search in Google Scholar

76. Sarapuu, Külli. “Administrative structures in times of changes: The development of Estonian ministries and government agencies 1990-2010.” International Journal of Public Administration 35 (2012): 808–819.10.1080/01900692.2012.715561Search in Google Scholar

77. SIGMA. “European principles for public administration.” Sigma Papers No. 27 (1999) // http://www.oecd.org/site/sigma/publicationsdocuments/36972467.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

78. Sootla, Georg. “Evolution of roles of politicians and civil servants during the post-communist transition in Estonia”: 107–146: In: Tony Verheijen, ed. Who rules? Politico-administrative relations. Bratislava: NISPAcee, 2001.Search in Google Scholar

79. Sööt, Mari-Liis, and Kadri Rootalu. “Institutional trust and opinions of corruption.” Public Administration and Development 32 (2012): 82–95 // DOI: 10.1002/pad.61610.1002/pad.616Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

80. Treisman, Daniel. “The causes of corruption: A cross-national study.” Journal of Public Economics 76 (2000): 399–457.10.1016/S0047-2727(99)00092-4Search in Google Scholar

81. Treisman, Daniel. “What have we learned about the causes of corruption from ten years of cross-national empirical research?” Annual Review of Political Science 10 (2007): 211–244.10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.081205.095418Search in Google Scholar

82. Weber, Max. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Ed. Guenther Roth and Claus Wittich. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2013 [1968].Search in Google Scholar

83. Wei, Shang-Jin. “Corruption in economic development: Beneficial grease, minor annoyance, or major obstacle?” Policy research working paper No. WPS 2048 (Washington DC, World Bank, 1999) // http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/175291468765621959/Corruption-in-economic-development-beneficial-grease-minor-annoyance-or-major-obstacle.10.1596/1813-9450-2048Search in Google Scholar

84. Yang, Kaifeng, and Kathe Callahan. “Citizen involvement efforts and bureaucratic responsiveness: Participatory values, stakeholder pressures, and administrative practicality.” Public Administration Review 67 (2007): 249–264.10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00711.xSearch in Google Scholar

85. Zhang, Yahong, and Kaifeng Yang. “Citizen participation in the budget process: The effect of city managers.” Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting and Financial Management 21 (2009): 289–317.10.1108/JPBAFM-21-02-2009-B006Search in Google Scholar