Unification of Judicial Practice Concerning Parental Responsibility in the European Union – Challenges Applying Regulation Brussels II Bis

1. Beaumont, Paul. R., and Lara Walker. “Shifting the Balance Achieved by the Abduction Convention: the Contrasting Approaches of the European Court of Human Rights and the European Court of Justice.” Journal of Private International Law Vol. 7, No. 2 (August, 2011): 231-249.10.5235/174410411796868689Search in Google Scholar

2. Beaumont, Paul R., and Peter E. McEleavy. The Hague Convention on International Child Abduction. Oxford University Press, 2004.Search in Google Scholar

3. Boele-Woelki, Katharina, and Cristina Gonzalez Beilfuss. Brussels II bis: Its Impact and Application in Member States. Antwerpen - Oxford: Intersentia, 2007.Search in Google Scholar

4. Fiorini, A. “Rome III Choice of Law in Divorce: is the Europeanization of Family Law Going Too Far?” International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family No. 22 (2008): 178-205.10.1093/lawfam/ebn006Search in Google Scholar

5. Francq, Stéphanie. “Parental Responsibility under ‘Brussels II’.” ERA Forum, Volume 4, Issue 1 (2003): 54-72.10.1007/s12027-003-0018-8Search in Google Scholar

6. Jarukaitis, Irmantas. Europos Sąjunga ir Lietuvos Respublika: konstituciniai narystės pagrindai (European Union and the Republic of Lithuania: constitutional elements of the membership). Vilnius: Justitia, 2011.Search in Google Scholar

7. Kruger, Thalia. Civil Jurisdiction Rules of the European Union and their Impact on Third States. Oxford University Press, 2008.Search in Google Scholar

8. Magnus, Ulrich, et al. Brussels II bis Regulation. Munich: Sellier European Law Publishers, 2012.10.1515/9783866539044Search in Google Scholar

9. Martiny, Dieter. “Hague Conventions in Private International Law and on International Civil Procedure”: 682-683. In: Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law. Vol. 4. Oxford University Press, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

10. McEleavy, Peter. “Brussels II bis: Matrimonial Matters, Parental Responsibility, Child Abduction and Mutual Recognition.” International and Comparative Law Quarterly Vol. 53, Issue 2 (April 2004): 503-512.10.1093/iclq/53.2.503Search in Google Scholar

11. Official information of the State Child Rights Protection and Adoption Service under the Ministry of Social Security and Labour // http://www.vaikoteises.lt (accessed May 29, 2014).Search in Google Scholar

12. Rauscher, Thomas. Europäisches Zivilprozeßrecht. Kommentar. 2. Auflage. Band 1. München: Sellier, European Law Publishers GmbH, 2006.Search in Google Scholar

13. Ripley, Peter. “A Defence of the Established Approach to the Grave Risk Exception in the Hague Child Abduction Convention.” Journal of Private International Law Vol. 4, No. 3 (December, 2008): 443-477.10.1080/17536235.2008.11424347Search in Google Scholar

14. Trimmings, Katarina. Children Abduction Within the European Union. Studies in Private International Law. Hart Publishing, 2013.Search in Google Scholar

15. Župan, Mirela. “EU Enforcement Mechanisms Serving the Best Interest of a Child.” Presentation in the conference “Enforcement of courts decisions as a condition for an effective judicial protection” which was held on 24‒25 of October 2013 in the Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Lithuania. Search in Google Scholar