Preschoolers’ Metaphor Comprehension. Methodological Issues in Experimental Pragmatics

Beaty, Roger E. –Paul J. Silvia. 2013. Metaphorically speaking: Cognitive abilities and the production of figurative language. Memory and Cognition 41(2): 255–267.10.3758/s13421-012-0258-5Search in Google Scholar

Camp, Elisabeth. 2009. Two varieties of literary imagination: Metaphor, fiction, and thought experiments. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 33: 107–130.10.1111/j.1475-4975.2009.00186.xSearch in Google Scholar

Carriedo, Nuria Antonio Corral–Pedro R. Montoro–Laura Herrero–Patricia Ballestrino–Iraia Sebastián. 2016. The development of metaphor comprehension and its relationship with relational verbal reasoning and executive function. PLOS ONE 11(3): e0150289. DOI: 10.1371/journal. pone. 0150289 (Last accessed: 17 June 2019).10.1371/journal.pone.0150289Search in Google Scholar

Corsi, Philip Michael. 1972. Human Memory and the Medial Temporal Region of the Brain. Doctoral Thesis at McGill University (Canada). http://digitool.library.mcgill.ca/R/?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=93903&local_base=GEN01-MCG02 (Last accessed: 17 June 2019).Search in Google Scholar

Deckert, Matthias–Michaela Schmoeger–Ines Schaunig-Busch–Ulrike Willinger. 2018. Metaphor processing in middle childhood and at the transition to early adolescence: The role of chronological age, mental age, and verbal intelligence. Journal of Child Language 18: 1–34.10.1017/S0305000918000491Search in Google Scholar

Gardner, Howard–Ellen Winner. 1978. The development of metaphoric competence: Implications for humanistic disciplines. Critical Inquiry 5(1): 123–141.10.1086/447976Search in Google Scholar

Gardner, Howard–Mary Kircher–Ellen Winner–David Perkins. 1975. Children’s metaphoric productions and preferences. Journal of Child Language 2: 125–141.10.1017/S0305000900000921Search in Google Scholar

Gibbs, Raymond W, Jr. –Teenie Matlock. 2008. Metaphor, imagination, and simulation: Psycholinguistic evidence. In Raymond W. Gibbs, Jr. 2008 (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought, 161–176. New York, NY, US: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816802.011 (Last accessed: 17 June 2019).10.1017/CBO9780511816802.011(Lastaccessed:17June2019)Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Giora, Rachel. 1997. Understanding figurative and literal language: The graded salience hypothesis. Cognitive Linguistics 8(3): 183–206.10.1515/cogl.1997.8.3.183Search in Google Scholar

Giora, Rachel. 2002. Optimal innovation and pleasure. In Oliviero Stock, Carlo Strapparva, Anton Nijholt (eds), Processing of The April Fools’ Day Workshop on Computational Humour, April 2002, 11–28. Trento, Italy: ITC-itst.10.2165/00024666-200201000-00007Search in Google Scholar

Giora, Rachel–Ofer Fein–Ann Kronrod–Idit Elnatan–Noa Shuval–Adi Zur. 2004. Weapons of mass distraction: Optimal innovation and pleasure ratings. Metaphor and Symbol 19(2): 115–141.10.1207/s15327868ms1902_2Search in Google Scholar

Kalandadze, Tamar–Courtenay Norbury–Terje Nærland–Kari-Anne B. Næss. 2018. Figurative language comprehension in individuals with autism spectrum disorder: A meta-analytic review. Autism 22(2): 99–117.10.1177/1362361316668652Search in Google Scholar

Kasirer, Anat–Nira Mashal. 2014. Verbal creativity in autism: Comprehension and generation of metaphoric language in high-functioning autism spectrum disorder and typical development. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 8. Article 615. doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00615 (Last accessed: 17 June 2019).10.3389/fnhum.2014.00615Search in Google Scholar

Kő, Natasa–Andrea Mészáros–Sándor Rózsa–Csilla Szabó–Renálta Mlinkó. 2015. WPPSI-IV Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence – Fourth edition, technical and interpretative manual; Hungarian adaptation. Budapest: OS Hungary Tesztfejlesztő.Search in Google Scholar

Kövecses, Zoltán. 2010 [2002]. Metaphor. A Practical Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff, George–Mark L. Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lorusso, Maria Luisa. 2007. APL-Medea. Abilità Pragmatiche Del Linguaggio. Firenze: Giunti OS.Search in Google Scholar

Mashal, Nira. 2013. The role of working memory in the comprehension of unfamiliar and familiar metaphors. Language and Cognition 5(4): 409–436.10.1515/langcog-2013-0024Search in Google Scholar

Mashal, Nira–Anat Kasirer. 2011. Thinking maps enhance metaphoric competence in children with autism and learning disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities 32: 2045–2054. DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2011.08.012 (Last accessed: 30 June 2019).10.1016/j.ridd.2011.08.012(Lastaccessed:30June2019)Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Melogno, Sergio–Maria A. Pinto–Gloria DiFilippo. 2017. Sensory and physico-psychological metaphor comprehension in children with ASD: A preliminary study on the outcomes of a treatment. Brain Sciences 7(7): 85. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci7070085 (Last accessed: 17 June 2019).10.3390/brainsci7070085(Lastaccessed:17June2019)Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Melogno, Sergio–Maria A. Pinto–Margherita Orsolini. 2017. Novel metaphors comprehension in a child with high-functioning autism spectrum disorder: A study on assessment and treatment. Frontiers in Psychology 7. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.02004 (Last accessed: 17 June 2019).10.3389/fpsyg.2016.02004(Lastaccessed:17June2019)Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Müller, Ulrich–Philip D. Zelazo–Leah E. Lurye–Dana P. Liebermann. 2008. The effect of labeling on preschool children’s performance in the Dimensional Change Card Sort Task. Cognitive Development 23: 395–408.10.1016/j.cogdev.2008.06.001Search in Google Scholar

Özcaliskan, Seyda. 2005. On learning to draw the distinction between physical and metaphorical motion: Is metaphor an early emerging cognitive and linguistic capacity? Journal of Child Language 32(2): 291–318.10.1017/S0305000905006884Search in Google Scholar

Pinto, Maria A. –Sergio Melogno–Paolo Iliceto. 2008. TCM Junior. Test di Comprensione Delle Metafore. Scuola dell’infanzia e Scuola Primaria. Roma: Carocci Faber.Search in Google Scholar

Pouscoulous, Nausicaa. 2011. Metaphor: For adults only? Belgian Journal of Linguistics 25: 64–92.10.1075/bjl.25.04pouSearch in Google Scholar

Sperber, Dan–Deirdre Wilson. 1996 [1995]. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Stöver, Hanna. 2010. Metaphor and Relevance Theory: A New Hybrid Model. PhD thesis. University of Bedfordshire. http://hdl.handle.net/10547/145619 (Last accessed: 17 June 2019).Search in Google Scholar

Tendahl, Markus. 2009 [2006]. A Hybrid Theory of Metaphor. Relevance Theory and Cognitive Linguistics. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230244313Search in Google Scholar

Wilson, Deirdre. 2011. Parallels and differences in the treatment of metaphor in relevance theory and cognitive linguistics. Intercultural Pragmatics 8(2): 177–196.10.1515/iprg.2011.009Search in Google Scholar

Winner, Ellen. 1979. New names for old things: The emergence of metaphoric language. Journal of Child Language 6: 469–491.10.1017/S030500090000249XSearch in Google Scholar

Zelazo, Philip D. 2006. The Dimensional Change Card Sort (DCCS): A method of assessing executive function in children. Nature Protocol 1(1): 297–301. DOI: 10.1038/nprot.2006.46 (Last accessed: 17 June 2019).10.1038/nprot.2006.46(Lastaccessed:17June2019)Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Zheng, Qin–Zhongheng Jia–Dandan Liang. 2015. Metaphor and metonymy comprehension in Chinese-speaking children with high-functioning autism. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders 10: 51–58.10.1016/j.rasd.2014.11.007Search in Google Scholar