[Andkjeer Olsen, Ursula. 2008. Havet er en scene. [The sea is a stage] Kobenhavn: Gyldendal.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bakhtin, M. M. 1981. The Dialogical Imagination. Austin: Texas UP. ]Search in Google Scholar
[-. 1984. Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics. Minnesota: Minnesota UP.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bruhn, Jorgen. 2010. Heteromediality. In Media Borders, Multimodality and Intermediality, ed. Lars Elleström, 225-236. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230275201_16]Search in Google Scholar
[Clover. Carol J. 1992. Men, Women, and Chainsaws: Gender in the Modern Horror Film. Princeton: Princeton University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dahl. Christian. Unpublished ms: “Scandinavian Misanthropy and Transgression: The Poetics of Matias Faldbakken.” Debord, Guy. 1970 [1967]. The Society of the Spectacle. TVans. Fredv Perlman and Jon Supak. New York: Black and Red.]Search in Google Scholar
[Easton Ellis. Bret. 1991. American Psycho. New York: Vintage Books.]Search in Google Scholar
[Elleström. Lars. 2010. The Modalities of Media. A Model for Understanding Intermedial Relations. In Media Borders. Multimodality and Intermediality, ed. Lars Elleström, 11-19. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230275201_2]Search in Google Scholar
[-. 2011. Visuell ikonicitet i lyrik: en intermedial och semiotisk undersökning med speciellt fokus pă svensksprăkig lyrik frán sent 1900-tal. Hedemora: Gidlunds förlag.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fangel, Gitte. 2005. “Jeg har slugt for mange svaner og for fá som - interview med Ursula Andkjeer Olsen og Adda Djorup.” <http://www.litteratursidendk/artikler/jeg-har-slugt-mange-svaner-og-faa-soem-interview-med-ursula-andkfaer-olsen-og-adda-dfoerup (Accessed 16 April 2012.) Florida. Richard. 2005. The Flight of the Creative Class. The New Global Competition for Talent. New York: HarperCollins.]Search in Google Scholar
[Frye, Northrop. 1957. Anatomy of Criticism. Princeton: Princeton UP.10.1515/9781400866908]Search in Google Scholar
[Helbig, J. 2008. Intermedialitât - eine spezifische Form des Medienkontakts oder globaler Oberbegriff? In Media Encounters and Media Theories, ed. Jürgen E. Müller, 79-87. Münster: Nodus.]Search in Google Scholar
[Koebner, Thomas, ed. 1989. Laokoon und kein Ende: Der Wettstreit der Kiinste, Litteratur und andere Kiinste. München: Edition Text und Kritik.]Search in Google Scholar
[Krauss, Rosalind. 1999. A Voyage on the North Sea. Art in the Age of the Post- Medium Condition. London: Thames & Hudson. ]Search in Google Scholar
[-. 2006. Two Moments from the Post-Medium Condition. October vol. 116: 55-62.10.1162/octo.2006.116.1.55]Search in Google Scholar
[Kulish, Nicholas. 2006. “Television you can’t put down.” The New York Times, September 10. <http://www.nytimes.eom/2006/09/l0/opinion/l0sun3.html?r=l (Accessed September 1, 2012.) ]Search in Google Scholar
[Malvik, Anders Skare. 2010. Naivismus. Nihilismus, Negation - zur Asthetik in Abo Rasuls Unfun. In Figuren des Dazwischen. Naivităt in Kunst, Pop- und Populărkultur, eds. Stefan Krankenhagen und Hans-Otto Hügel, 109-133. Wilhelm Fink Verlag.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mitchell W. J. T. 1994. Picture Theory: Essays on Visual and Verbal Representation. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press. ]Search in Google Scholar
[-. 2005. There Are No Visual Media. Journal of Visual Culture vol. 4 no. 2: 257-266.10.1177/1470412905054673]Search in Google Scholar
[Pethő Ágnes. 2010. Intermediality in Film. A Historiography of Methodologies. Acta Universitatis Sapientiae. Film and Media Studies vol. 2: 39-72. ]Search in Google Scholar
[-. 2011. Cinema and Intermediality. The Passion for the In-between. Newcastle on Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rajewsky, Irina. 2002. Intermedialitat. [Intermediality] Tübingen: A. Francke Verlag.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rasul. Abo. 2001. The Cocka Hola Company. Skandinaidsk misantropi. Oslo: Cappelen. ]Search in Google Scholar
[-. 2002. Macht und Rebel. Skandinavisk misantropi 2. Oslo: Cappelen. ]Search in Google Scholar
[-. 2008. Unfun. Skandinavisk misantropi 3. Oslo: Cappelen.]Search in Google Scholar
[Relihan. Joel. 1993. Ancient Menippean Satire. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schnitzler. Andreas. 2007. Der Wettstreit der Kiinste. Berlin: Reimer Verlag.]Search in Google Scholar
[Spielmann, Yvonne. 1997. Intermedialitat. Das System Peter Greenaway. [Intermediality. The Peter Greenaway system] München: W. Fink. ]Search in Google Scholar
[-. 2010. New and Novelty in Contemporary Media Cultures. Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Film and Media Studies vol. 3: 7-18. -. 2010. Hybridkultur. Berlin: Suhrkamp Taschenbuch.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schröter, Jens. 2010. The Politics of Intermediality - New and Novelty in Contemporary Media Cultures. Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Film and Media Studies, vol. 2: 107-124.]Search in Google Scholar
[Stein Larsen, Peter. 2009. Dromme og dialoger. To poetiske traditioner omkring 2000. Odense: Svddansk Universitetsforlag.]Search in Google Scholar
[Vignes, Jean. 1985. Culture et histoire dans la Satvre Menippee. In Etudes sur la Satyre Mennippée, eds. Frank Lestringant and Daniel Menager. 151-199. Geneva: Droz.]Search in Google Scholar
[Voigts-Virchow, Eckart. 1991. Metadaptation: Adaptation and Intermediality - Cock and Bull. Journal of Adaptation in Film & Performance, vol. 2, no. 2: 137-152.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wolf, Werner. 2010. Intermedialitat und mediale Dominanz typologisch, funktionsgeschichtlich und akademisch-institutionell betrachtet. In Der Neue Wettstreit der Kiinste. Legitimation und Dominanz im Zeichen der Intermedialitat, eds. Uta Degner and Norbert Christian Wolf, 241-260. Bielefeld: Transcript. 10.1515/transcript.9783839414439.241]Search in Google Scholar
