[Agamben, Giorgio. 1999. Potentialities: Collected Essays in Philosophy. Stanford: Stanford University Press.10.1515/9780804764070]Search in Google Scholar
[Aumont, Jacques. 2014. Le cinéma, un art d’apparition [Cinema: An Art of the Apparition]. In Que peut une image? [What Can an Image Do?], eds. Diane Dufour and Christine Vidal, 88–106. Paris: LE BAL-Textuel-Centre national des arts plastiques.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bataille, Georges. 1985 [1929]. Formless. In Vision of Excess. Selected Writings, 1927–1939, 31–32. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bellour, Raymond. 2002. L’Entre-Images [Between-the-Images]. Paris: La Différence.]Search in Google Scholar
[Benjamin, Walter. 1985 [1931]. A Small History of Photography. In One Way Street and Other Writings, 240–258. London: Verso.]Search in Google Scholar
[Benjamin, Walter. 1992 [1936]. The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction. In Illuminations, 214–218. London: Fontana.]Search in Google Scholar
[Beugnet Martine. 2017. L’attrait du flou [The Attraction of the Blur]. Crisnée: Yellow Now.]Search in Google Scholar
[Brenez, Nicole. 1998. De la figure en général et du corps en particulier. Invention figurative au cinéma [On the Figure in General and the Body in Particular: Figurative Invention in Cinema]. Bruxelles: De Boeck.10.3917/dbu.brene.1998.01]Search in Google Scholar
[Chik, Caroline. 2011. L’Image paradoxale. Fixité et mouvement [The Paradoxical Image: Fixity and Movement]. Lille: Presses du Septentrion.10.4000/books.septentrion.46661]Search in Google Scholar
[Daney, Serge. 1993. L’Exercice a été profitable, Monsieur [The Exercise was Profitable, Sir]. Paris: POL.]Search in Google Scholar
[Didi-Huberman, Georges. 2000. Devant le temps [Facing Time]. Paris: Les éditions de minuit.]Search in Google Scholar
[Didi-Huberman, Georges. 1990. Devant l’image [Facing the Image]. Paris: Les éditions de minuit.]Search in Google Scholar
[Donahue, Neil, H., ed. 1995. Invisible Cathedrals. The Expressionist Art History of Wilhelm Worringer. University Park, PA: Penn State University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mulvey, Laura. 2006. Death 24x a Second: Stillness and the Moving Image. London: Reaktion Books.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pethő, Ágnes. 2010. Intermediality in Film: a Historiography of Methodologies. Acta Universitatis Sapientiae: Film and Media Studies vol. 2: 39–72.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pethő, Ágnes. 2011. Cinema and Intermediality. The Passion for the In-Between. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.]Search in Google Scholar
[Shaviro, Steven. 2016. Splitting the Atom: Post-Cinematic Articulations of Sound and Vision. In Post-Cinema: Theorizing 21st-Century Film, eds. Shane Denson and Julia Leyda, 362–397. Falmer: Reframe Books.]Search in Google Scholar
[Simondon, George. 1958. Du mode d’existence des objets techniques [The Mode of Existence of Technical Objects]. Paris: Aubier.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sobchack, Vivian. 2004. Carnal Thoughts: Embodiment and Moving Image Culture. Berkeley: University of California Press.10.1525/9780520937826]Search in Google Scholar
[Steyerl, Hito. 2009. In Defense of the Poor Image. E-Flux Journal no. 10 (November): 1–9. https://www.e-flux.com/journal/10/61362/in-defense-of-the-poor-image/. Last accessed 19. 07. 2019.]Search in Google Scholar
[Worringer, Wilhelm. 1978 [1907]. Abstraction et Empathie: contribution à la psychologie du style [Abstraction and Empathy: A Contribution to the Psychology of Style]. Paris: Klincksieck.]Search in Google Scholar
[Williams, Linda. 1991. Film Bodies: Gender, Genre, and Excess. Film Quarterly vol. 44, no. 4 (Summer): 2–13.]Search in Google Scholar
