Aesthetics of Sustainability and Architecture: An Overview

1. Throsby, D. Economic and culture, Cambridge, UK; Cambridge University Press, 2001, 228 p. Search in Google Scholar

2. Hillegas, J.V. Defining sustainability. 2010 [online]. Sustainability History Project [cited 02.07.2020]. https://sustainabilityhistory.org/defining-sustainability/ Search in Google Scholar

3. Brown, M., Haselsteiner, E., Apró, D., Kopeva, D., Luca, E., Pulkkinen, K., Vula Rizvanolli, B. Sustainability, restorative to regenerative. COST Action CA16114 RESTORE, Working Group One Report: Restorative Sustainability, 2018 [online, cited 03.03.2020]. https://www.eurestore.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Sustainability-Restorative-to-Regenerative.pdf Search in Google Scholar

4. Istiadji, A.D., Hardiman, G., Satwiko, P. What is the sustainable method enough for our built environment? IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 213, 2018, pp. 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/213/1/01201610.1088/1755-1315/213/1/012016 Search in Google Scholar

5. Guy, S., Farmer, G. Reinterpreting sustainable architecture: the place of technology. Journal of Architectural Education, Vol. 54, Issue 3, 2001, pp. 140–147. https://doi.org/10.1162/1046488015263245110.1162/10464880152632451 Search in Google Scholar

6. Berardi, U. Clarifying the new interpretations of the concept of sustainable building. Sustainable Cities and Society, Vol. 8, 2013, pp. 72–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2013.01.00810.1016/j.scs.2013.01.008 Search in Google Scholar

7. Cole, R. J. Regenerative design and development: Current theory and practice. Building Research & Information, Vol. 40, Issue 1, 2012, pp. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2012.61751610.1080/09613218.2012.617516 Search in Google Scholar

8. Wilkinson, S., Hajibandeh, M., Remoy, H. Sustainable development. In: Noguchi M. (ed.) ZEMCH: Toward the Delivery of Zero Energy Mass Custom Homes. Springer Tracts in Civil Engineering, Springer, 2016, pp. 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31967-4_110.1007/978-3-319-31967-4_1 Search in Google Scholar

9. Chen, C. CiteSpace II: detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 57, Issue 3, 2006, pp. 359–377. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.2031710.1002/asi.20317 Search in Google Scholar

10. Donovan, E. An evolution of sustainable aesthetics. Design to Thrive: PLEA 2017 Proceedings, 2017, pp. 208–215. Search in Google Scholar

11. Finocchiaro, L., Wago, I. S. Architectural design and aesthetics of Zero Emission Buildings: an analysis of perceived architectural qualities in the ZEB Living LAB in Trondheim. Design to Thrive: PLEA 2017 Proceedings, 2017, pp. 216–223. Search in Google Scholar

12. Čeněk, M. Architecture: concept, form and aesthetics from the perspective of sustainability. CESB 2013 PRAGUE - Central Europe Towards Sustainable Building 2013: Sustainable Building and Refurbishment for Next Generations, 2013, pp. 523–526. Search in Google Scholar

13. Gan, S., Zhang, H. The discussion of the concept of sustainable development of ecological architectural aesthetics. Advanced Materials Research, Vol. 598, 2012, pp. 8–11. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.598.810.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.598.8 Search in Google Scholar

14. Dekay, M. Five levels of sustainable design aesthetics. Perceiving and appreciating developmental complexity. 28th International PLEA Conference on Sustainable Architecture + Urban Design: Opportunities, Limits and Needs - Towards an Environmentally Responsible Architecture proceeding, 2012, pp. 7–12. Search in Google Scholar

15. Bothwell, K. The architecture of the passively tempered environment. In: Lee S. (ed.) Aesthetics of sustainable architecture. Rotterdam: 010 Publishers, 2011, pp. 66–78. Search in Google Scholar

16. Finocchicaro, L., Hestnes, A. G. Symbiosis and Mimesis in the Built Environment. In: Lee S. (ed.) Aesthetics of Sustainable Architecture. 010 Publishers, Rotterdam, 2011, pp. 259 –271. Search in Google Scholar

17. Hill, G. The aesthetics of architectural consumption. In: Lee S. (ed.) Aesthetics of sustainable architecture. Rotterdam: 010 Publishers, 2011, pp. 26 –40. Search in Google Scholar

18. Jauslin, D. Landscape aesthetics for sustainable architecture. In: Lee S. (ed.) Aesthetics of sustainable architecture. Rotterdam: 010 Publishers, 2011, pp. 109–119. Search in Google Scholar

19. Knowles, R. L. Solar aesthetic. In: Lee S. (ed.) Aesthetics of sustainable architecture. Rotterdam: 010 Publishers, 2011, pp. 50–65. Search in Google Scholar

20. Sauerbruch, M., Hutton, L. What does sustainability look like? In: Lee S. (ed.) Aesthetics of sustainable architecture. Rotterdam: 010 Publishers, 2011, pp. 41–49. Search in Google Scholar

21. Levit, R. Design’s new catechism. In: Preston, S. C., Naginski E. (eds.) The return to nature. Sustaining architecture in the face of sustainability. Routledge, 2014, pp. 9–19. Search in Google Scholar

22. Sunikka-Blank, M. The concept and aesthetics of sustainable building in Japan. In: Lee S. (ed.) Aesthetics of sustainable architecture. 010 Publishers, Rotterdam, 2011, pp. 186–197. Search in Google Scholar

23. Spirn, A. The poetics of city and nature: towards a new aesthetic for urban design. Landscape Journal, Vol. 7, Issue 2, 1988, pp. 108–126. https://doi.org/10.3368/lj.7.2.10810.3368/lj.7.2.108 Search in Google Scholar

24. Sheppard, S. R. J. Beyond visual resource management: emerging theories of an ecological aesthetic and visible stewardship. In: Sheppard, S.R.J., Harshaw, H. W. (eds.) Forests and landscapes– linking ecology, sustainablility, and aesthetics. New York, NY, CABI Publishing, 2001, pp. 149–172. Search in Google Scholar

25. Hemmati, M. Aesthetics of sustainability. The relation of aesthetics and environmental sustainability. MFNZFR, Vol. 35, Special Issue: Art, Nature, City, 2016, pp. 82–89. Search in Google Scholar

26. Di Carlo, I. The Aesthetics of Sustainability. Systemic thinking and self-organization in the evolution of cities. PhD thesis, University of Trento, IAAC, institute fro Advanced Architecture of Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain, The Bartlett, UCL, London, Uk, University of Innsbruck, Austria, 2016. Search in Google Scholar

28. Di Carlo, I. Aesthetics as an adaptive system. An evolutionary approach on aesthetics and sustainable city design. In: I. Di Carlo (ed.), The Aesthetic of Sustainability, Monograph.it, 2013, pp. 376–377. Search in Google Scholar

29. Marchand, A., Walker, S., De Coninck, P. The role of beauty for sustainability: a discussion on responsible consumption, aesthetics attitudes and product design. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, Vol. 99, 2006, pp. 371–380. https://doi.org/10.2495/RAV06037110.2495/RAV060371 Search in Google Scholar

30. Kagan, S. Aesthetics of sustainability: a transdisciplinary sensibility for transformative practices. Transdisciplinary Journal of Engineering & Science, Vol. 2, 2011, pp. 65–73. https://doi.org/10.22545/2011/0001410.22545/2011/00014 Search in Google Scholar

31. Wines, J. Green Architecture. Koln: Taschen, 2000, 240 p. Search in Google Scholar

32. Liu, Ch. Green architecture. Liaoning Science & Technology Pub., 2011, 272 p. Search in Google Scholar

33. Jodidio, P. 100 contemporary green buildings. Vol. 1–2, Koln: Taschen, 2013, 696 p. Search in Google Scholar

34. Helmke, J. Eco-visualization: aesthetics for sustainability. Urban Omnibus, 2013 [online, cited 02.07.2020]. https://urbanomnibus.net/2013/04/eco-visualization-aesthetics-for-sustainability/ Search in Google Scholar

35. Goodbun, J. Gregory Bateson’s critical cybernetics and ecological aesthetics of dwelling. Field, Vol. 4, Issue 1, 2010, pp. 35–46. Search in Google Scholar

36. Štelbienė, A. Architektūros kokybė. Etika, estetika ir tapatybė. Architektūros kokybės kriterijai. Mokslo straipsniū rinkinys, 2015, pp. 28–39. Search in Google Scholar

37. Kamicaityte-Virbasiene, J., Grazuleviciute-Vileniske, I. Premises for development of sustainable architecture in urban environment. Town Planning and Architecture, Vol. 33, Issue 4, 2009, pp. 363–363. Search in Google Scholar

38. CIB, Conseil International du Bâtiment. Towards sustainable and smart-eco buildings. Summary report on the EU-funded project smart-ECO buildings in the EU, Rotterdam, 2010 [online, cited 03.03.2020]. https://www.irbnet.de/daten/iconda/CIB18098.pdf Search in Google Scholar

39. Mačiulis, A. Šiuolaikinės Lietuvos architektūros meninės raiškos tendencijos. Vilnius: Technika. Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Doctoral Thesis, 2013, 197 p.10.20334/2181-M Search in Google Scholar

40. Puglisi, L. P. New directions in contemporary architecture: evolutions and revolutions in building design since 1988. New Jersey, U.S.: Willey, 2008. 240 p. Search in Google Scholar

41. Adrijauskas, A. Klasikinės Vakarū metafizinės estetikos ir meno filosofijos transformacijos: neklasikiniū principū sklaida. Estetikos ir meno filosofijos transformacijos / sudarytojas Antanas Andrijauskas, Vilnius: Kultūros, filosofijos ir meno institutas, 2005, pp. 12–71. Search in Google Scholar

42. Heymann, D. An un-flushable urinal. Places Journal, June 2012. https://doi.org/10.22269/12060710.22269/120607 Search in Google Scholar

43. Briggs, D. Aesthetic potentials in an open network inventory system. In: Lee S. (ed.) Aesthetics of Sustainable Architecture. Rotterdam: 010 Publishers, 2011, pp. 272–283. Search in Google Scholar