[
1. Lynch, K. The Image of the City. Cambridge: The M.I.T Press, 1960. 208 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
2. Benjamin, W. The Arcades Project. Cambridge: Belknap Press, 2002. 1088 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
3. Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S., Silverstein, M., Jacobson, M., Fiks-dahl-King, I., Angel, S. Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction. New York: Oxford University Press, 1977. 1171 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
4. Ostwald, M. J., Vaughan, J. Fractal dimension of architecture. 2016. 423 p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32426-510.1007/978-3-319-32426-5
]Search in Google Scholar
[
5. Carmona, M., Heath, T., Oc, T., Tiesdell, S. Public Places – Urban Spaces. Oxford: Architectural Press, 2003. 394 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
6. Gehl, J. Cities for People (1st Edition). Washington: Island Press; 2010. 288 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
7. Kaplan, S. Aesthetics, Affect, and Cognition Environmental Preference from an Evolutionary Perspective. Environment and Behavior, 1987, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 3–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/001391658719100110.1177/0013916587191001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
8. Kaplan, R., Kaplan, S., Brown, T. Environmental Preference: A Comparison of Four Domains of Predictors. Environment and Behavior, SAGE Journals, September 1989, Vol. 21, No. 5, pp. 509–530. https://doi.org/10.1177/001391658921500110.1177/0013916589215001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
9. Csikszentmihalyi, M. Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. New York: Harper and Row, 1990. 336 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
10. Zaleckis, K., Matijošaitienė, I. Hidden urban revolution in Kaunas downtown area: 1935–1988–2011. Proceedings: Eighth International Space Syntax Symposium. Edited by M. Greene, J. Reyes and A. Castro. Santiago de Chile: PUC 87. 2012. pp. 8227:1–8227:16.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
11. Turner A., Doxa M., O’Sullivan D., Penn A. From isovists to visibility graphs: a methodology for the analysis of architectural space. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 2001, Vol. 28, pp. 103–121. https://doi.org/10.1068/b268410.1068/b2684
]Search in Google Scholar
[
12. Tahar, B., Brown, F. The visibility graph: An approach for the analysis of traditional domestic M’zabite spaces. Proceedings: 4th International Space Syntax Symposium, London, 2003. Held at UCL, Vol. II, p. 56.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
13. Zaleckis, K. Role of the urban green structure in creation of preferred urban environment. COST C 11 Green structures and urban planning, 2003, pp. 249–255.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
14. Wiener J. M., Franz G., Rossmanith N., Reichelt A., Mallot H. A., Bulthoff H. H. Isovist analysis captures properties of space relevant for locomotion and experience. ISSN 1468-4233, Perception, 2007, Vol. 36, pp. 1066–1083. https://doi.org/10.1068/p558710.1068/p5587
]Search in Google Scholar
[
15. Hölscher, C., Meilinger, T., Vrachliotis, G., Brösamle, M.,&Knauff, M. Finding the Way Inside: Linking Architectural Design Analysis and Cognitive Processes. (Editors: C. Freksa, M. Knauff, B. Krieg-Brückner, B.. Nebel,&T. Barkowsky), Spatial Cognition IV - Reasoning, Action, Interaction. International Conference Spatial Cognition 2004, Vol. 3343 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Berlin: Springer. pp. 1–23.10.1007/978-3-540-32255-9_1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
16. Shokouhi, M. Legible cities: The role of visual clues and pathway configuration in legibility of cities. 4th International Space Syntax Symposium, London, 2003. pp. 71.1–71.14.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
17. Kim, Y. O.,&Penn, A. Linking the Spatial Syntax of Cognitive Maps To the Spatial Syntax of the Environment. Environment&Behavior, 2004, Vol. 36, Issue 4, pp. 483–507. https://doi.org/10.1177/001391650326138410.1177/0013916503261384
]Search in Google Scholar