Contemporary Challenges in Planning for Shrinkage of Historic Places: A Review

1. Bontje, M. Facing the challenge of shrinking cities in East Germany: The case of Leipzig. GeoJournal, Vol. 61, No. 1, 2004, pp. 13–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-005-0843-210.1007/s10708-005-0843-2Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

2. Hollander, J. B., Pallagst, K., Schwarz, T., Popper, F. J. Planning Shrinking Cities [online]. SSRN Scholarly Paper [cited 02.01.2019.]. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network, 2009. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=1616130Search in Google Scholar

3. Pallagst, K. Shrinking cities: planning challenges from an international perspective. Cities Growing Smaller. Kent State University’s Cleveland Urban Design Collaborative, 2008. pp. 6–16.Search in Google Scholar

4. Li, H., Mykhnenko, V. Urban shrinkage with Chinese characteristics. The Geographical Journal, Vol. 184, No. 4, 2018, pp. 398–412. https://doi.org/10.1111/geoj.1226610.1111/geoj.12266Search in Google Scholar

5. Mohdin, A. The fastest shrinking countries on earth are in Eastern Europe [online]. Quartz [cited 15.11.2018.]. 24 January 2018. https://qz.com/1187819/country-ranking-worlds-fastest-shrinking-countries-are-in-eastern-europe/Search in Google Scholar

6. Biswas, A. K., Tortajada, C., Stavenhagen, M. In an urbanizing world, shrinking cities are a forgotten problem [online]. World Economic Forum [cited 30.11.2018.]. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2018/03/managing-shrinking-cities-in-an-expanding-world/Search in Google Scholar

7. Bliss, L. How Much Does Sprawl Cost American Commuters? [online]. CityLab [cited 02.01.2019.], 8 June 2016. http://www.citylab.com/design/2016/06/cost-of-sprawl-us-commuters/486170/Search in Google Scholar

8. Carruthers, J. I., Ulfarsson, G. F. Urban Sprawl and the Cost of Public Services. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, Vol. 30, No. 4, 2018, p. 503–522. https://doi.org/10.1068/b1284710.1068/b12847Search in Google Scholar

9. Castells, M. European Cities, the Informational Society, and the Global Economy. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, Vol. 84, No. 4, 1993, pp. 247–257. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9663.1993.tb01767.x10.1111/j.1467-9663.1993.tb01767.xSearch in Google Scholar

10. Delvac, W. F., Escherich, S., Hartman, B.Affordable housing through historic preservation: a case study guide to combining the tax credits. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Cultural Resources, Preservation Assistance: National Trust for Historic Preservation, 1994, 74 p. ISBN 978-0-16-045258-1.Search in Google Scholar

11. Rhule, J. Richard Florida, the Creative Class and Gentrification [online]. The Shifting Human City: Essay Series on Current and Future PolicySearch in Google Scholar

12. Housing policy in the EU member states [online]. European Parliament [cited 15.11.2018.]. Directorate General for Research, Working Document, Social Affairs Series, 1996. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/workingpapers/soci/w14/text1_en.htmSearch in Google Scholar

13. Robbins, J. A Short History of Urban Planning. Drawn from: Richard LeGates and Frederic Stout, “Modernism and Early Urban Planning”; Paul Knox, “Urbanization”; Barry Cullingworth, “Planning in the USA.” [online]. SlidePlayer [cited 02.01.2019.]. https://slideplayer.com/slide/11249140/Search in Google Scholar

14. Haines, A., Walbrun, K., Kemp, S., Roffers, M.Land use resource guide: a guide to preparing the land use element of a local comprehensive plan. University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point/Extension, Center for Land Use Education, 2005, 124 p.Search in Google Scholar

15. Beyer, S. Inclusionary Zoning Is Rent Control 2.0, 2015 [online]. Forbes [cited 30.11.2018.]. https://www.forbes.com/sites/scottbeyer/2015/05/27/inclusionary-zoning-is-rent-control-2-0/Search in Google Scholar

16. Boone, A. The Overlooked Cities of the Rust Belt, 2017 [online]. CityLab [cited 15.11.2018.]. https://www.citylab.com/life/2017/09/the-overlooked-cities-of-the-rust-belt/538479/Search in Google Scholar

17. Houghton, L., Tuffley, D. Towards a Methodology of Wicked Problem Exploration through Concept Shifting and Tension Point Analysis. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Vol. 32, No. 3, 2015, pp. 283–297. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.222310.1002/sres.2223Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

18. Hollander, J. B., Cahill, B. Confronting Population Decline in the Buffalo, New York, Region: A Close Reading of the “Erie-Niagara Framework for Regional Growth.” Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, Vol. 28, No. 3, 2011, pp. 252–267.10.1017/CBO9781139150781.012Search in Google Scholar

19. Blyth, R. What does Brexit mean for Planning and Planners? 2016 [online]. Royal Town Planning Institute [cited 08.12.2018.]. https://www.rtpi.org.uk/briefing-room/rtpi-blog/what-does-brexit-mean-for-planning-and-planners/Search in Google Scholar

20. Florida, R. Cities and the Creative Class. City & Community, Vol. 2, No. 1, 2003, pp. 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6040.0003410.1111/1540-6040.00034Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

21. Skaburskis, A. The Origin of “Wicked Problems.” Planning Theory & Practice. Vol. 9, No. 2, 2008, pp. 277–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/1464935080204165410.1080/14649350802041654Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

22. Higgins, B. (ed.). Annotated Sample Inclusionary Housing Ordinance [online]. The California Inclusionary Housing Reader [cited 02.01.2019.]. Sacramento, CA: Institute for Local Self Government, 2003. pp. 121–148. https://www.ca-ilg.org/sites/main/files/file-attachments/resources__California_Inclusionary_Housing_Reader.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

23. Martinez-Fernandez, C., Weyman, T., Fol, S. et. al. Shrinking cities in Australia, Japan, Europe and the USA: From a global process to local policy responses. Progress in Planning, Vol. 105, 2016, pp. 1–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2014.10.00110.1016/j.progress.2014.10.001Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

24. Three Most Influential Planning Cases of 2015: Affordable Housing, Historic Preservation and Limits to Local Government Decision-Making, 2015 [online]. Oregon Chapter of the American Planning Association [cited 30.11.2018.]. http://www.oregonapa.org/three-most-influential-planning-cases-of-2015-affordable-housing-historic-preservation-and-limits-to-local-government-decision-making/Search in Google Scholar

25. Tiebout, C. M. A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures. Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 64, No. 5, 1956, pp. 416–424. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/25783910.1086/257839Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

26. Smith, S. Why I don’t like Inclusionary Zoning, 2010 [online]. Market Urbanism [cited 30.11.2018.]. http://marketurbanism.com/2010/12/28/whyi-dont-like-inclusionary-zoning/Search in Google Scholar

27. Metcalf, G. The Path to a Livable City, 2002 [online]. Livable City [cited 02.01.2019.]. https://sfenuf.net/PDFs/path%20to%20a%20livable%20city.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

28. Vicenzotti, V., Qviström, M. Zwischenstadt as a travelling concept: towards a critical discussion of mobile ideas in transnational planning discourses on urban sprawl. European Planning Studies, Vol. 26, No. 1, 2018, pp. 115–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2017.137508210.1080/09654313.2017.1375082Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

29. Zellner, M., Campbell, S. D. Planning for deep-rooted problems: What can we learn from aligning complex systems and wicked problems? Planning Theory & Practice. Vol. 16, No. 4, 2015, pp. 457–478. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2015.108436010.1080/14649357.2015.1084360Search in Google Scholar

30. Camillus, J. C. Strategy as a Wicked Problem, 2008 [online]. Harvard Business Review [cited 02.01.2019.]. https://hbr.org/2008/05/strategy-as-a-wicked-problemSearch in Google Scholar

31. Conklin, E. J.Dialogue mapping: building shared understanding of wicked problems. Chichester, England; Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2006, 242 p. ISBN 978-0-470-01768-5.Search in Google Scholar

32. Conklin, J. Wicked Problems and Social Complexity [online]. CogNexus Institute, 2010. [cited 30.11.2018.]. http://cognexus.org/wpf/wickedproblems.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

33. Degrace, P., Stahl, L. H.Wicked problems, righteous solutions: a catologue of modern software engineering paradigms. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1990. ISBN 978-0-13-590126-7.Search in Google Scholar

34. Rittel, H.W.J., Webber, M.M. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, Vol. 4, No. 2, 1973, pp. 155–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0140573010.1007/BF01405730Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

35. Hartmann, T. Wicked problems and clumsy solutions: Planning as expectation management. Planning Theory, Vol. 11, No. 3, 2012, pp. 242–256. https://doi.org/10.1177/147309521244042710.1177/1473095212440427Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

36. Tietjen, A., Jørgensen, G. Translating a wicked problem: A strategic planning approach to rural shrinkage in Denmark. Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol. 154, 2016, pp. 29–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.01.00910.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.01.009Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

37. Houghton, L., Tuffley, D. Towards a Methodology of Wicked Problem Exploration through Concept Shifting and Tension Point Analysis: Concept Shifting and Tension Point Analysis. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Vol. 32, No. 3, 2015, pp. 283–297. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.222310.1002/sres.2223Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

38. Wong, E. Wicked Problems: 5 Steps to Help You Tackle Wicked Problems by Combining Systems Thinking with Agile Methodology, 2018 [online]. The Interaction Design Foundation [cited 02.01.2019.]. https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/article/wicked-problems-5-steps-to-help-you-tackle-wicked-problems-by-combining-systems-thinking-with-agile-methodologySearch in Google Scholar

39. Hooke, W. Wicked problems, 2010 [online]. Living on the Real World [cited 08.12.2018.]. https://www.livingontherealworld.org/wicked-problems/Search in Google Scholar

40. Zhang, J., Kim, Y. Digital government and wicked problems: Solution or problem? Information Polity. Vol. 21, No. 3, 2016, pp. 215–221. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-16039510.3233/IP-160395Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

41. ‘Problem’ populations, ‘problem’ places [online]. OpenLearn [cited 02.01.2019.]. https://www.open.edu/openlearn/people-politics-law/politics-policy-people/sociology/problem-populations-problem-places/content-section-0Search in Google Scholar

42. Nunns, P., Denne, T. The costs and benefits of urban development: A theoretical and empirical synthesis, 2016 [online]. New Zealand Association of Economists [cited 02.01.2019.]. https://www.nzae.org.nz/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Nunns-and-Denne-urban-growth-costs-and-benefits-NZAE-v2.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

43. Haase, D. Shrinking Cities, Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services [online]. Urbanization, Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: Challenges and Opportunities [cited 02.01.2019.]. Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands, 2013. pp. 253–274. ISBN 978-94-007-7087-4. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-94-007-7088-1_1210.1007/978-94-007-7088-1_12Search in Google Scholar

44. Colini, L. EU Urban Agenda: The challenge of “affordable housing” in Europe, 2016 [online]. URBACT [cited 02.01.2019.]. http://urbact.eu/eu-urban-agenda-challenge-affordable-housing-europeSearch in Google Scholar

45. Kauko, T. Sustainable Development of the Built Environment: The Role of the Residential/Housing Sector. Sustainable Development - Education, Business and Management - Architecture and Building Construction - Agriculture and Food Security. 2012, pp. 161–174. https://doi.org/10.5772/2787310.5772/27873Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

46. Rhodes, J., Russo, J. Shrinking ‘Smart’?: Urban Redevelopment and Shrinkage in Youngstown, Ohio. Urban Geography, Vol. 34, No. 3, 2013, pp. 305–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2013.77867210.1080/02723638.2013.778672Open DOISearch in Google Scholar