Open Access

Private Space in Soviet Cinema: Case Study of Riga

   | Feb 23, 2019

Cite

1. Bater, J.The Soviet City. Ideal and Reality. London: Edward Arnold Ltd, 1980. 196 p.Search in Google Scholar

2. Briņķis, J., Buka, O.Pilsētu un lauku apdzīvoto vietu kompleksu arhitektoniski telpiskā plānošana. Mācību grāmata. Rīga: RTU, 2016, pp. 14–15.Search in Google Scholar

3. Buchli, V. Khrushchev, Modernism, and the Fight against Petit-bourgeois Consciousness in the Soviet Home. Journal of Design History, Vol. 10, Issue 2, 1997, pp. 166–176.10.1093/jdh/10.2.161Search in Google Scholar

4. Buka, O., Volrāts, U.Pilsētbūvniecība. Rīga: Zvaigzne, 1987. 252 lpp.Search in Google Scholar

5. Bunkše, E. V. The Role of a Human Environment in Soviet Urban Planning. Geographical Review. Vol. 69, Issue 4, 1979, pp. 379‒394.10.2307/214802Search in Google Scholar

6. Clarke, D. B.The Cinematic City. London: Routledge, 1979, 264 p.Search in Google Scholar

7. Strautmanis, I., Krastiņš, J., Buka, O., Asaris G.Arhitektura sovetskoj Latvii (Страутманис И. А., Крастиньш Я. А., Бука О.М., Асарис Г. К. Архитектура советской Латвии). Moskva: Strojizdat, 1987, 319 p.Search in Google Scholar

8. Fedorov, A. The Mass and Individual Terror in the Mirror of the Soviet and Russian Cinema (the Feature Films of the Sound Period) and Media Literacy Education. European Research. Vol. 101, Issue 12, 2015, pp. 778–771. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.271793510.2139/ssrn.2717935Search in Google Scholar

9. French, R.A.Plans, pragmatism and people: the legacy of Soviet planning for today’s cities. London: UCL Press, 1995. 225 p.Search in Google Scholar

10. Gerasimova, K. Public privacy in the Soviet communal apartment. Socialist spaces: sites of everyday life in the Eastern Bloc [Crowley, D., Reid, S., eds.]. Oxford: Berg, 2002, pp. 207‒231.Search in Google Scholar

11. Gerchuk, I. The Aesthetics of Everyday Life in the Khrushchev Thaw in the USSR (1954–64). Style and Socialism. Modernity and Material Culture in Post-War Eastern Europe [Reid, S.E., Crowley, D., eds.]. Oxford: Berg, 2000. 228 p.Search in Google Scholar

12. Gentile, M., Sjöberg, Ö. Intra-urban Landscapes of Priority: The Soviet Legacy. Europe-Asia Studies, Vol. 58, Issue 5, 2006, pp. 701‒729. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966813060073126810.1080/09668130600731268Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

13. Gentile, M., Sjöberg, Ö. Space of Priority: The Geography of Soviet Housing Construction in Daugavpils, Latvia. Annals of Association of American Geographers, Vol. 100, Issue 1, 2010, pp. 112‒136. https://doi.org/10.1080/0004560090337899410.1080/00045600903378994Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

14. Grava, S. The urban heritage of the Soviet regime: the case of Riga Latvia. Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 59, Issue 1, 2007, pp. 9‒22. https://doi.org/10.1080/0194436930897584210.1080/01944369308975842Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

15. Hay, J. Piecing together what remains of the cinematic city. The Cinematic City [Clarke, D.B. ed.]. London: Routledge, 1997, pp. 211–214.Search in Google Scholar

16. Hazan, A.R., Lipton, H.L., Glantz, S.A. Popular films do not reflect current tabacco use. American Journal of Public Health. 84, 1994, pp. 998‒1000.10.2105/AJPH.84.6.998Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

17. Jász, B. Hidden Modernism: Architecture Theory of the Socialist Realist Gap. Periodica Polytechnica Architecture, Vol. 49, Issue 1, 2018, pp. 92–97. https://doi.org/10.3311/PPar.1216810.3311/PPar.12168Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

18. Kaganovsky, L. Postmemory, Counter-memory: Soviet Cinema of the 1960s. The Socialist Sixties: Crossing Borders in the Second World [Gorsuch, D. Koenker ed.]. Indiana: Indiana University Press, 2013, pp. 235‒243.Search in Google Scholar

19. Kennedy, C., Lukinbeal, C. Towards a holistic approach to geographic research on film. Progress in Human Geography, Vol. 21, Issue 1, 1997, pp. 33‒50. https://doi.org/10.1191/03091329767350306610.1191/030913297673503066Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

20. Lukinbeal, C. Cinematic Landscapes. Journal of Cultural Geography, Vol. 23, Issue 1, 2005, pp. 3‒22. https://doi.org/10.1080/0887363050947822910.1080/08873630509478229Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

21. Lukinbeal, C., Zimmermann, S.The Geography of Cinema – A Cinematic World. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag GmbH, 2008. 205 p.Search in Google Scholar

22. Mazierska, E. Squeezing Space, Releasing Space: Spatial Research in the Study of Eastern European Cinema. Cinema, State Socialism and Society in the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe, 19171989: Re-visions [S. Bahun, J. Haynes, eds.]. 2014, p. 9.Search in Google Scholar

23. Näripea, E. HOME and AWAY: Urban Representations in 1980s Soviet Estonian Cinema. Spec. issue of Place and Location: Studies in Environmental Aesthetics and Semiotics, 2003, pp. 405‒431.Search in Google Scholar

24. Näripea, E. Medieval socialist realism: Representations of Tallinn Old Town in Soviet Estonian feature films, 1969–1972. Spec. issue of Place and Location: Studies in Environmental Aesthetics and Semiotics, IV, 2004, pp. 121‒144.Search in Google Scholar

25. Näripea, E. National Space, (Trans)National Cinema. Estonian Film in the 1960s. A Companion to Eastern European Cinema [Imre, A., ed.]. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2014, pp. 244‒255.10.1002/9781118294376.ch13Search in Google Scholar

26. Novikova, I. The Cinematic City and Itineraries in Riga, Tallinn and Vilnius. Urban Semiotics: The City as a Cultural-Historical Phenomena. [Pilshchikov, I. ed.]. Tallinn: Tallinn University Press, 2015, pp. 119‒142.Search in Google Scholar

27. Oukaderova, L.The Cinema of the Soviet Thaw: Space, Materiality, Movement. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2017. 228 p.10.2307/j.ctt1zxz0fbSearch in Google Scholar

28. Prokhorov, A.Springtime for Soviet Cinema. Re/Viewing the 1960s. Pittsburgh: Russian Film Symposium, 2001. 50 p.Search in Google Scholar

29. Reid, S. The Khrushchev Kitchen: Domesticating the Scientific-Technological Revolution. Journal of Contemporary History, Vol. 40, Issue 2, 2005, pp. 289‒315. https://doi.org/10.1177/002200940505155410.1177/0022009405051554Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

30. Reid, S. Khrushchev Modern: Agency and Modernization in the Soviet Home. Cahiers Du Monde Russe, Vol. 47, Issue 1, 2006, pp. 227‒258.10.4000/monderusse.3800Search in Google Scholar

31. Reid, S. The meaning of home: “The only bit of the world you can have to yourself”. Borders of Socialism. [Siegelbaum, L. H. ed.]. Private Spheres of Soviet Russia. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006, pp. 145‒162.Search in Google Scholar

32. Reid, S. Communist Comfort: Socialist Modernism and the Making of Cosy Homes in the Khrushchev Era. Gender & History, Vol. 21, Issue 3, 2009, pp. 465‒498. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0424.2009.01564.x10.1111/j.1468-0424.2009.01564.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

33. Rose, G. Teaching visualised geographies: towards a methodology for the interpretation of visual materials. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, Vol. 20, Issue 3, 1996, pp. 281–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309826960870937310.1080/03098269608709373Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

34. Rose, G.Visual methodologies: An introduction to the interpretation of visual materials. London: Sage, 2007. 304 p.Search in Google Scholar

35. Roth-Ey, K. Finding a Home for Television in the USSR, 1950‒1970. Slavic Review, Vol. 66, Issue 2, 2007, pp. 278‒306. https://doi.org/10.2307/2006022110.2307/20060221Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

36. Rubīns, J.Rīgas dzīvojamais fonds 20. gadsimtā. Rīga: Jumava, 2004. 104 lpp.Search in Google Scholar

37. Rudovska, M. Expired Monuments: Case Studies on Soviet-era Architecture through the Kaleidoscope of Postcolonialism. Kunstiteaduslikke Uurimusi, Vol. 32, Issue 3/4, 2012, pp. 77–80.Search in Google Scholar

38. Sanders, R. Developing geographers through photography: enlarging concepts. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, Vol. 3, Issue 1, 2007, pp. 181–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309826060103311810.1080/03098260601033118Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

39. Scherbenok, A. This is not a pipe: Soviet Historical Reality and Spectatorial Belief in Perestroika and Post-Soviet Cinema. Slavonica, Vol. 17, Issue 2, 2011, pp. 145–155. https://doi.org/10.1179/136174211X1312274997432010.1179/136174211X13122749974320Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

40. Varga-Harris, C. Homemaking and the Aesthetic and Moral Perimeters of the Soviet Home During the Khrushchev Era. Journal of Social History, Vol. 41, Issue 3, 2008, pp. 561‒589. https://doi.org/10.1353/jsh.2008.005110.1353/jsh.2008.0051Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

41. Varga-Harris, C. Stories of House and Home: Soviet Apartment Life During the Khrushchev Years. New York: Cornell University Press, 2015. 296 p.10.7591/cornell/9780801453076.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
2255-8764
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
Volume Open
Journal Subjects:
Architecture and Design, Architecture, Urbanism, other