[ALMONACID, F. – RUS, C. – PEREZ-HIGUERAS, P. – HONTONA, L. 2011. Calculation of the energy provided by a PV generator. Comparative study: conventional methods vs artificial neutral network. In Energy, vol. 36, pp. 375–384.10.1016/j.energy.2010.10.028]Search in Google Scholar
[ATSU, D. – SERES, I. – FARKAS, I. 2017. Performance evaluation of solar photovoltaic modules under real conditions. In Book of Abstracts, 23th Workshop on Energy and Environment, Gödöllő, Hungary, November 30-December 1, 2017, p. 20.]Search in Google Scholar
[AYOMPE, L. M. – DUFFY, A. – MCCORMACK, S. J. – CONLON, M. 2011. Measured performance of a 1.72 kW rooftop grid connected photovoltaic system in Ireland. In Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 816–825.10.1016/j.enconman.2010.08.007]Search in Google Scholar
[BALASKA, A. – TAHRI, A. – TAHRI, F. – STAMBOULI, A. B. 2017. Performance assessment of five different module technologies under outdoor conditions in Algeria. In Renewable Energy, vol. 107, pp. 53–60.10.1016/j.renene.2017.01.057]Search in Google Scholar
[BASOGLU, M. E. – KAZDALOGLU, A. – ERFIDAN, T. – BILGIN, M. Z. – CAKIR, B. 2015. Performance analysis of different photovoltaic module technologies under Izmit, Kocaeli climate conditions. In Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 52, pp. 357–365.10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.108]Search in Google Scholar
[BILČÍK, M. – BOŽIKOVÁ, M. – PETROVIČ, A. – MALÍNEK, M. – CVIKLOVIČ, V. – OLEJÁR, M. – ARDONOVÁ, V. 2018. Analysis of selected photovoltaic panels operating parameters as a function of partial shading and intensity of reflected radiation. In Acta Technologica Agriculturae, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 14–17.10.2478/ata-2018-0003]Search in Google Scholar
[CAÑETE, C. – CARRETERO, J. – SIDRACH-DE-CARDONA, M. 2014. Energy performance of different photovoltaic module technologies under outdoor conditions. In Energy, vol. 65, pp. 295–302.]Search in Google Scholar
[CARR, A. J. – PRYOR, T. 2004. A comparison of the performance of different PV module types in temperate climates. In Solar Energy, vol. 76, pp. 285–294.10.1016/j.solener.2003.07.026]Search in Google Scholar
[CRISTINA, C. – JESUS, C. – MARIANO, S. 2014. Energy performance of different photovoltaic module technologies under outdoor conditions. In Energy, vol. 65, pp. 295–302.10.1016/j.energy.2013.12.013]Search in Google Scholar
[DEL CUETO, J. 2002. Comparison of energy production and performance from flat plate photovoltaic module technologies deployed at fixed tilt. In Proceedings of the 29th IEEE photovoltaic specialists conference (2002), pp. 1523–1526.]Search in Google Scholar
[DUFFIE, J. A. – BECKMAN, W. A. 2006. Solar Engineering of Thermal Processes. New York, Wiley. 928 pp. ISBN 0-471-69867-9.]Search in Google Scholar
[DURISCH, W. – BITNAR, B. J. – MAYOR, H. – KIESS, K. – LAM, J. 2007. Efficiency model for photovoltaic modules and demonstration of its application to energy yield estimation. In Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, vol. 91, pp. 79–84.10.1016/j.solmat.2006.05.011]Search in Google Scholar
[INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY (IEA). 2014. Technology Roadmap. Solar Photovoltaic Energy.]Search in Google Scholar
[KING, R. R. – BHUSARI, D. – LARRABEE, D. – LIU, X. Q. – REHDER, E. – EDMONDSON, K. – COTAL, H. – JONES, R. K. – ERMER, J. H. – FETZER, C. M. – LAW, D. C. – KARAM, N. H. 2012. Solar cell generations over 40% eciency. In Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications, vol. 20, pp. 801–815.10.1002/pip.1255]Search in Google Scholar
[SHARMA, V. – KUMAR, A. – SASTRY, O. – CHANDEL, S. 2013. Performance assessment of different solar photovoltaic technologies under similar outdoor conditions. In Energy, vol. 58, pp. 511–518.10.1016/j.energy.2013.05.068]Search in Google Scholar
[SINGH, G. 2013. Solar power generation by PV (photovoltaic) technology: a review. In Energy, vol. 53, pp. 1–13.10.1016/j.energy.2013.02.057]Search in Google Scholar
[YE, J. Y. – REINDL, T. – ABERLE, A. G. – WALSH, T. M. 2014. Performance degradation of various PV module technologies in tropical Singapore. In IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics, vol. 4, pp. 1288–1294.10.1109/JPHOTOV.2014.2338051]Search in Google Scholar