Attitudinal Reactance: Another Response to Influence Attempts in Websites

Adams, A.T., Costa, J., Jung, M.F., Choudhury, T., 2015. Mindless computing: designing technologies to subtly influence behavior. In: Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing, pp. 719-730.10.1145/2750858.2805843616977930294729Search in Google Scholar

Atkinson, R.K., Mayer, R.E., Merrill, M.M., 2005, Fostering social agency in multimedia learning: Examining the impact of an animated agent’s voice. Contemporary Educational Psychology 30, 117-139.10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.07.001Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Brehm, J.W., 1966, A theory of psychological reactance. Oxford, England: Academic Press. pp 135.Search in Google Scholar

Brehm, S.S., Brehm, J.W., 2013, Psychological reactance: A theory of freedom and control. Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

Brooke, J., 1996, SUS-A quick and dirty usability scale. Usability evaluation in industry 189, 4-7.Search in Google Scholar

Deci, E., Ryan, R., 1985, Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behaviour. Contemporary Sociology, 3, DOI. 10.2307/2070638 Plenum Press, New York.10.2307/2070638Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Dehn, D.M., Van Mulken, S., 2000, The impact of animated interface agents: a review of empirical research. International journal of human-computer studies 52, 1-22.10.1006/ijhc.1999.0325Search in Google Scholar

Dillard, J.P., Peck, E., 2000, Affect and persuasion: Emotional responses to public service announcements. Communication Research 27, 461-495.10.1177/009365000027004003Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Dillard, J.P., Shen, L., 2005, On the nature of reactance and its role in persuasive health communication. Communication Monographs 72, 144-168.10.1080/03637750500111815Search in Google Scholar

Edwards, S.M., Li, H., Lee, J.-H., 2002, Forced exposure and psychological reactance: Antecedents and consequences of the perceived intrusiveness of pop-up ads. Journal of Advertising 31, 83-95.10.1080/00913367.2002.10673678Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Ehrenbrink, P., Hillmann, S., Weiss, B., Möller, S., 2016. Psychological reactance in HCI: a method towards improving acceptance of devices and services. In: Proceedings of the 28th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction, pp. 478-482.10.1145/3010915.3010978Search in Google Scholar

Gasser, R., Brodbeck, D., Degen, M., Luthiger, J., Wyss, R., Reichlin, S., 2006, Persuasiveness of a mobile lifestyle coaching application using social facilitation. Persuasive technology, 27-38.10.1007/11755494_5Search in Google Scholar

Hodgins, H.S., Knee, C.R., 2002, The integrating self and conscious experience. Handbook of self-determination research, 87-100.Search in Google Scholar

Hossain, M.D., Moon, J., Yun, J.-w., Choe, Y.C., 2012, Impact of psychological traits on user performance in information systems delivering customer service: IS management perspective. Decision Support Systems 54, 270-281.10.1016/j.dss.2012.05.035Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Jaimes, L.G., Llofriu, M., Raij, A., 2014. A stress-free life: just-in-time interventions for stress via real-time forecasting and intervention adaptation. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Body Area Networks, pp. 197-203.10.4108/icst.bodynets.2014.258237Search in Google Scholar

Klein, C., 2016. The CASA Paradigm: Computers as Social Actors, and their Implications for Learning in the Twenty-First Century.Search in Google Scholar

Kwon, S.J., Chung, N., 2010, The moderating effects of psychological reactance and product involvement on online shopping recommendation mechanisms based on a causal map. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 9, 522-536.10.1016/j.elerap.2010.04.004Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Lane, N.D., Lin, M., Mohammod, M., Yang, X., Lu, H., Cardone, G., Ali, S., Doryab, A., Berke, E., Campbell, A.T., 2014, Bewell: Sensing sleep, physical activities and social interactions to promote wellbeing. Mobile Networks and Applications 19, 345-359.10.1007/s11036-013-0484-5Search in Google Scholar

Langer, E.J., 1992, Matters of mind: Mindfulness/mindlessness in perspective. Consciousness and cognition 1, 289-305.10.1016/1053-8100(92)90066-JSearch in Google Scholar

Louwerse, M.M., Graesser, A.C., Lu, S., Mitchell, H.H., 2005, Social cues in animated conversational agents. Applied Cognitive Psychology 19, 693-704.10.1002/acp.1117Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Lusk, M.M., Atkinson, R.K., 2007, Animated pedagogical agents: Does their degree of embodiment impact learning from static or animated worked examples? Applied Cognitive Psychology 21, 747-764.10.1002/acp.1347Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Mayer, R.E., Sobko, K., Mautone, P.D., 2003, Social cues in multimedia learning: Role of speaker's voice. Journal of Educational Psychology 95, 419.10.1037/0022-0663.95.2.419Search in Google Scholar

Milgram, S., Gudehus, C. 1978. Obedience to authority (Ziff-Davis Publishing Company).Search in Google Scholar

Mobiquity, 2014, Doctors Take Note: 70 Percent of People Track Their Health and Fitness Daily With Mobile Apps. [online]. Available from: http://www.mobiquityinc.com/doctors-takenote-70-percent-people-track-their-health-and-fitness-dailymobile-appsSearch in Google Scholar

Murray, K.B., Häubl, G., 2011, Freedom of choice, ease of use, and the formation of interface preferences. MIS Quarterly, 955-976.10.2307/41409968Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Nass, C., Moon, Y., 2000, Machines and mindlessness: Social responses to computers. Journal of social issues 56, 81-103.10.1111/0022-4537.00153Search in Google Scholar

Nass, C., Steuer, J., Tauber, E.R., 1994. Computers are social actors. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, pp. 72-78.10.1145/191666.191703Search in Google Scholar

Rains, S.A., 2013, The nature of psychological reactance revisited: a meta-analytic review. Human Communication Research 39, 47-73.10.1111/j.1468-2958.2012.01443.xSearch in Google Scholar

Reeves, B., Nass, C., 1996, The Media Equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. CSLI Publications and Cambridge University press.pp 305Search in Google Scholar

Roubroeks, M., Ham, J., Midden, C., 2011, When artificial social agents try to persuade people: The role of social agency on the occurrence of psychological reactance. International Journal of Social Robotics 3, 155-165.10.1007/s12369-010-0088-1Search in Google Scholar

Roubroeks, M., Midden, C., Ham, J., 2009. Does it make a difference who tells you what to do?: exploring the effect of social agency on psychological reactance. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Persuasive Technology, p. 15.10.1145/1541948.1541970Search in Google Scholar

Sammobile.com., 2015, Samsung removing bloat from Touch Wiz, making most of it downloadable. [online]. Available from: http://www.sammobile.com/2015/01/29/exclusivesams%0Aung-removing-bloat-from-touchwiz-making-mostofitdownloadable/. [Accessed 9 February 2016]Search in Google Scholar

Shen, L., 2015, Antecedents to psychological reactance: The impact of threat, message frame, and choice. Health communication 30, 975-985.10.1080/10410236.2014.91088225256920Search in Google Scholar

Shneiderman, B., 1997. Direct manipulation for comprehensible, predictable and controllable user interfaces. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Intelligent user interfaces, pp. 33-39.10.1145/238218.238281Search in Google Scholar

Sinclair, H.C., Felmlee, D., Sprecher, S., Wright, B.L., 2015, Don’t tell me who I can’t love: A multimethod investigation of social network and reactance effects on romantic relationships. Social Psychology Quarterly 78, 77-99.10.1177/0190272514565253Search in Google Scholar

Steindl, C., Jonas, E., Sittenthaler, S., Traut-Mattausch, E., Greenberg, J., 2015, Understanding Psychological Reactance. Zeitschrift für Psychologie.10.1027/2151-2604/a000222467553427453805Search in Google Scholar