[1. Каламкаров ХА. Ортопедическое лечение с применением металлокерамических протезов, Москва, 1996, 175.]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Forna N. Protetica Dentară, Vol I, Editura Enciclopedica, Bucuresti, 2011, 254-265.]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Qamar K, Munir U, Naeem S. Role of cephalometery in evaluation of vertical dimension Pakistan Oral & Dental Journal, 2013;33(1):183-6.]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Mahmoud K. AL-Omiri. Relationship between Oral Health-Related Quality of Life, Satisfaction, and Personality in Patients with Prosthetic Rehabilitations, Journal of Prosthodontics by The American College of Prosthodontists, 2008;18:2-3.]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Grunberg O. Metode actuale de diagnostic în reabilitarea edentației, Doctoral Thessis, 2012, 5-8.]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Anderson JD. The need for criteria on reporting treatment outcomes, J Prosthet Dent 1998, 49-55.10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70193-3]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Simpson M, Buckman R, Stewart M, Maguire P, et al. Doctor–patient communication: the Toronto consensus statement, BMJ 1991, 303.10.1136/bmj.303.6814.1385]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Lahti S, Verkasalo M, Hausen H, Tuutti H. Ideal role behaviours as seen by dentists and patients themselves and by their role partners: do they differ?, Commun Dent Oral Epidemiol 1996;24(4): 245–8.]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Lings P, Evans P, Seamark D, et al. The doctor–patient relationship in US primary care, J R Soc Med 2003;96(4):180–4.]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Gale EN, Carlsson SG, Eriksson A, Jontell M. Effects of dentists’ behaviour on patients’ attitudes, J Am Dent Assoc 1984;109(3):444–6.]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Epstein A, Taylor W, Seage G. Effects of patients socio-economic status and physician’s training and practice on patient–doctor communication. Am J Med 1985;78(1):101-6.10.1016/0002-9343(85)90469-3]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Lahti S, Tuutti H, Hausen H, Kaarlanen R. Patients’ expectations of an ideal dentist and their views concerning the dentist they visited: do the views conform to the expectations and what determines how well they conform?”, Commun Dent Oral Epidemiol 1996;24(4):240–4.]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Lahti S, Tuutti H, Hausen H, Kaariainen R. Comparison of ideal and actual behavior of patients and dentists during dental treatment, Commun Dent Oral Epidemiol 1995;23(6):374–8.]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Inukai M, John MT, Igarashi Y, Baba K. Association between perceived chewing ability and oral health-related quality of life in partially dentate patients, Health Qual Life Outcomes 2010; 8:118.]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Petricevic N, Celebic A, Rener-Sitar K. A 3-year longitudinal study of quality-of-life outcomes of elderly patients with implant- and tooth-supported fixed partial dentures in posterior dental regions, Gerodontology 2012;29:956–63.]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Bratu D., Nussbaum R. Bazele clinice și tehnice ale protezării fixe, Editura Medicală, București, 2011, 27, 32, 36, 37-39.]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Galip G. The Science and Art of Porcelain Laminate Veneers, British Library Cataloguing, 2003, 157-159.]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Goldstein RE. Esthetics in Dentistry. 2nd ed. Hamilton, ON: BC Decker Inc, 1998, 17-49.]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Pjeturssona BE, Sailer I, Makarov NA. All-ceramic or metal-ceramic tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs)? A systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Part II: Multiple-unit FDPs, Dental Materials, 2015;31:624–39.]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Eliasson A, Arnelund CF, Johansson A. A clinical evaluation of cobaltchromium metal-ceramic fixed partial dentures and crowns: A three- to seven-year retrospective study, The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 2007;98:6-16.]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Rinke S, Gersdorff N, Lange K. Prospective evaluation of zirconia posterior fixed partial dentures: 7-year clinical results, Int J Prosthodont 2013;26:164–71.]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Sax C, Hammerle CH, Sailer I. 10-year clinical outcomes of fixed dental prostheses with zirconia frameworks. Int J Comput Dent 2011;14:183–202.]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Jei JB, Mohan J. Comparative Evaluation of Marginal Accuracy of a Cast Fixed Partial Denture Compared to Soldered Fixed Partial Denture Made of Two Different Base Metal Alloys and Casting Techniques: An In vitro Study, Indian Prosthodontic Society, 2014;14(1):104-9.]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Balshi TJ, Mingledorff EB. Maintenance procedures for patients after complete fixed prosthodontics, J Prosthet Dent 1977;37(4):420-31.]Search in Google Scholar
[25. Matekovits Gh., Iovănaş D., Szekely M., Goguţă L., Vişan L. Igiena buco-dentarâ a protezaţilor. Studiu longitudinal asupra punţilor dentare. Medicina-Trecut Prezent Viitor, Timişoara.,1998;2(4):371-7.]Search in Google Scholar
[26. Matekovits Gh., Kabai Z., Kurucz-Kovacs Sz. Evaluarea comportamenttilui clinic al aliajelor tip gaudent. Al V-lea simpozion internaţional al zilelor stomatologice bănăţene, 18-20 mai 2000.]Search in Google Scholar
[27. Street R. Information giving in medical consultations: the influence of patients communicative styles and personal characteristics, Soc Sci Med 1991;32(5):541-8.]Search in Google Scholar
[28. Street RL. Communicative styles and adaptations in physician–parent consultations, Soc Sci Med 1992;34(10):1155-63.]Search in Google Scholar
[29. Waitzkin H. Information giving in medical care, J Health Soc Behav 1985;26(2):81–101.]Search in Google Scholar
[30. Kaplan S, Greenfield S, Ware J. Assessing the effects of physician–patient interactions on the outcome of chronic disease, Med Care, 1989;27(3 Suppl):110-27.10.1097/00005650-198903001-000102646486]Search in Google Scholar
