The Use of Unimatrix^R Matrix System for Restoration of Interdental Contact Points – Case Report

1. Calabrese M. The Importance of the Contact Point in Class Ii Restorations. Dental News. 2013 06/01;20:30-4.10.12816/0003052Search in Google Scholar

2. Quadir F, Ali Abidi SY, Ahmed S. Overhanging amalgam restorations by undergraduate students. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2014 Jul;24(7):485-8.Search in Google Scholar

3. El-Shamy H, Saber MH, Dörfer CE, El-Badrawy W, Loomans BA. Influence of volumetric shrinkage and curing light intensity on proximal contact tightness of class II resin composite restorations: in vitro study. Oper Dent. 2012 Mar-Apr;37(2):205-1010.2341/11-269-L22313267Search in Google Scholar

4. Cho SD, Browning WD, Walton KS. Clinical use of a sectional matrix and ring. Oper Dent. 2010 Sep-Oct;35(5):587-91.10.2341/09-338-T20945751Search in Google Scholar

5. Sadaf D, Ahmad MZ, Gaikwad RN, Arjumand B. Comparison of two different matrix band systems in restoring two surface cavities in posterior teeth done by senior undergraduate students at Qassim University, Saudi Arabia: A randomized controlled clinical trial. Indian J Dent Res. 2018 Jul-Aug;29(4):459-464.10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_26_1730127197Search in Google Scholar

6. de la Peña VA, García RP, García RP. Sectional matrix: Step-by-step directions for their clinical use. British Dental Journal. 2016 2016/01/01;220(1):11-4.10.1038/sj.bdj.2016.1826768458Search in Google Scholar

7. Chaple Gil AM. Modification of Class II technique of cavities restoration using composites. Revista Habanera de Ciencias Médicas. 2015;14(3):348-56.Search in Google Scholar

8. Romero MF, Haddock F, Todd M. Combination of centripetal and successive layering techniques for a stress-reduced posterior direct composite restoration. Gen Dent. 2017 May-Jun;65(3):72-6.Search in Google Scholar

9. Kampouropoulos D, Paximada C, Loukidis M, Kakaboura A. The influence of matrix type on the proximal contact in Class II resin composite restorations. Oper Dent. 2010 Jul-Aug;35(4):454-62.10.2341/09-272-L20672731Search in Google Scholar

10. Wirsching E, Loomans BA, Klaiber B, Dörfer CE. Influence of matrix systems on proximal contact tightness of 2- and 3-surface posterior composite restorations in vivo. J Dent. 2011 May;39(5):386-90.10.1016/j.jdent.2011.03.00121414384Search in Google Scholar