Rosborough Formulation in Satellite Gravity Gradiometry

European Space Agency, (1999) Gravity field and steady-state Ocean Circulation mission. Reports for the Mission selection. The four candidate Earth explorer core missions. ESA SP-1233(1), European Space Agency.Search in Google Scholar

Kaula, W.M., (1966) Theory of satellite geodesy. Blaisdell Publishing Company.Search in Google Scholar

Klees, R., Koop, R., Visser, P., Van den Ijssel, J., (2000) Efficient gravity field recovery from GOCE gravity gradient observations. Journal of geodesy 74, 561-571.10.1007/s001900000118Search in Google Scholar

Lemoine, F.G., Kenyon, S.C., Factor, J.K., Trimmer, R.G., Pavlis, N.K., Chinn, D.S., Cox, C.M., Klosko, S.M., Luthcke, S.B., Torrence, M.H., others, (1998) The Development of the Joint NASA GSFC and the National Imagery and Mapping Agency(NIMA) Geopotential Model EGM 96. NASA.10.1007/978-3-662-03482-8_62Search in Google Scholar

Pail, R., Goiginger, H., Mayrhofer, R., Schuh, W.D., Brockmann, J.M., Krasbutter, I., Höck, E., Fecher, T., (2010) GOCE gravity field model derived from orbit and gradiometry data applying the time-wise method, in: Proceedings of the ESA Living Planet Symposium, ESA Publication SP-686, ESA/ESTEC, ISBN (Online). p. 978-92.Search in Google Scholar

Pail, R., Bruinsma, S., Migliaccio, F., Förste, C., Goiginger, H., Schuh, W.D., Höck, E., Reguzzoni, M., Brockmann, J.M., Abrikosov, O., others,(2011) First GOCE gravity field models derived by three different approaches. Journal of Geodesy 85, 819-843.10.1007/s00190-011-0467-xSearch in Google Scholar

Petrovskaya, M., Vershkov, A., (2006) Non-singular expressions for the gravity gradients in the local north-oriented and orbital reference frames. Journal of Geodesy 80, 117-127.10.1007/s00190-006-0031-2Search in Google Scholar

Reguzzoni, M., Tselfes, N., (2009) Optimal multi-step collocation: application to the spacewise approach for GOCE data analysis. Journal of Geodesy 83, 13-29.10.1007/s00190-008-0225-xSearch in Google Scholar

Reigber, C., Schwintzer, P., Lühr, H., (1999) The CHAMP geopotential mission. Boll Geof Teor Appl 40: 285-289.Search in Google Scholar

Rosborough, G.W., (1986) Satellite Orbit Perturbations due to Geopotential, CSR-86-1 Rummel, R., Van Gelderen M, Koop R, Schrama E, Sanso F, Brovelli M, Miggliaccio F, Sacerdote F, (1993) Spherical harmonic analysis of satellite gradiometry. Publ Geodesy 39, Netherlands Geodetic Commission , Delft.Search in Google Scholar

Rummel, R., Balmino, G., Johannessen, J., Visser, P., Woodworth, P., (2002) Dedicated gravity field missions-principles and aims. Journal of Geodynamics 33, 3-20.10.1016/S0264-3707(01)00050-3Search in Google Scholar

Rummel, R., Yi, W., Stummer, C., (2011) GOCE gravitational gradiometry. Journal of Geodesy 85: 777-790.10.1007/s00190-011-0500-0Search in Google Scholar

Sharifi, M.A., (2006) Satellite to satellite tracking in the space-wise approach. Ph.D. Thesis, university of Stuttgart, Germany.Search in Google Scholar

Sneeuw, N.J., (2000) A semi-analytical approach to gravity field analysis from satellite observations. Ph.D. Thesis, Technical university of Munchen, Germany.Search in Google Scholar

Sneeuw, N., (2003) Space-wise, time-wise, torus and Rosborough representations in gravity field modelling. Space science reviews 108, 37-46.10.1023/A:1026165612224Search in Google Scholar

Tapley, B.D., Bettadpur, S., Watkins, M., Reigber, C., (2004) The gravity recovery and climate experiment: Mission overview and early results. Geophys. Res. Lett 31, L09607.10.1029/2004GL019920Search in Google Scholar

Xu, C., Sideris, M., Sneeuw, N., (2008) The Torus Approach in Spaceborne Gravimetry, in: VI Hotine-Marussi Symposium on Theoretical and Computational Geodesy. pp. 23-28. Search in Google Scholar