[BARNWAL, B.K. – SHARMA, M.P. 2005. Prospects of biodiesel production from vegetable oils in India. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. In Elsevier, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 363–378. https://ideas.repec.org/s/eee/rensus.html10.1016/j.rser.2004.05.007]Search in Google Scholar
[BAUM, S. – BOLTE, A. – WEIH, M. 2012. Short Rotation Coppice (SRC) Plantations Provide Additional Habitats for Vascular Plant Species in Agricultural Mosaic Landscapes. In Bioenerg. Res., 2012, no. 5, pp. 573. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-012-9195-110.1007/s12155-012-9195-1]Search in Google Scholar
[BROWN, M. E. – FUNK, C. C. 2008. Food Security Under Climate Change NASA Publications. 131. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nasapub/131]Search in Google Scholar
[BUŠIĆ, A. – KUNDAS, S. – MORZAK, G. – BELSKAYA, H. – MARĐETKO, N. – ŠANTEK, M.I. – KOMES, D. – NOVAK, S. – ŠANTEK, B. 2018. Recent Trends in Biodiesel and Biogas Production. In Food Technol Biotechnol., vol. 56, 2018, no. 2, pp. 152–173. https://doi.org/10.17113/ftb.56.02.18.554710.17113/ftb.56.02.18.5547611799130228791]Search in Google Scholar
[CERVERÓ, J.M. – COCA, J. – LUQUE, S.2008. Production of biodiesel from vegetable oils. In Grasas Aceites, vol. 59, 2008, no. 1, pp. 76–83. https://doi.org/10.3989/gya.2008.v59.i1.49410.3989/gya.2008.v59.i1.494]Search in Google Scholar
[CHRISTERSSON, L. 2005. Plant physiological aspects of woody biomass production for energy purposes. In Verma, K.S. – Khurana, D.K. – Christersson, L. eds. Short rotation forestry for industrial and rural development. Nauni, Solan, Himachal Pradesh, India, Indian Society of Tree Scientists, 2005.]Search in Google Scholar
[COLLINS JOHNSON, N. 1993. Can Fertilization of Soil Select Less Mutualistic Mycorrhizae? In Ecological Applications, vol. 3, 1993, no. 4, pp. 749–757. https://doi.org/10.2307/194210610.2307/194210627759303]Search in Google Scholar
[COOPER, P.J.M. – LEAKEY, R.R.B. – RAO, M.R. – REYNOLDS L. 1996. Agroforestry and the mitigation of land depletion in the humid and sub-humid tropics of Africa. In Experimental Agriculture, 1996, no. 32, pp. 235–290.]Search in Google Scholar
[DIMITRIOU, I. – ARONSSON, P. 2004. Nitrogen leaching from Short-Rotation Willow Coppice after intensive irrigation with wastewater. In Biomass and bioenergy, vol. 26, 2004, no. 5, pp. 433–441.]Search in Google Scholar
[ECHEREME, C.B. – IGBOABUCHI, N.A. – IZUNDU, A.I. 2018. Phytoremediation of Heavy Metals and Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs): A Review. In Ijsrm. Human, vol. 10, 2018, no. 4, pp. 107–125. www.ijsrm.humanjournals.com]Search in Google Scholar
[EISENHAUER, N. 2018. Aboveground-belowground interactions drive the relationship between plant diversity and ecosystem function. In Research Ideas and Outcomes, 4:e23688. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.4.e2368810.3897/rio.4.e23688]Search in Google Scholar
[ELBERSEN, B. – STARTISKY, I. – HENGEVELD, G. – MART-JAN SCHELHAAS, M-J. – NAEFF, H. 2012. Atlas of EU biomass potentials Deliverable 3.3: Spatially detailed and quantified overview of EU biomass potential taking into account the main criteria determining biomass availability from different sources. Biomass role in achieving the Climate Change & Renewables EU policy targets. Demand and Supply dynamics under the perspective of stakeholders. IEE 08 653 SI2. 529 241. https://ec.europa.eu/energy/intelligent/projects/sites/iee-projects/files/projects/documents/biomass_futures_atlas_of_technical_and_economic_biomass_potential_en.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[FAAIJ, A.P.C. 2006. Modern biomass conversion technologies. In Mitig. Adapt. Strat. Global Change., 2006, no. 11, pp. 335–367.]Search in Google Scholar
[FACCIOTTO, G. – MINOTTA, G. – PARIS, P. – PELLERI, F. 2014. Tree farming, Agroforestry and the New Green Revolution. A necessary alliance. Proceeding of the II International Congress of Silviculture: Designing the future of the forestry sector; Florence, vol. 2, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.4129/2cis-gf-tre]Search in Google Scholar
[FARGIONE, J.E. – COOPER, T.R. – FLASHPOHLER, D.J. – HILL, J. – LEHMAN, C. – McCOY, T. – MCLEOD, S. – NELSON, E.J. – OBERHAUSER, K.S. – TILMAN, D. 2009. Bioenergy and Wildlife: Threats and Opportunities for Grassland Conservation. In BioScience, vol. 59, 2009, no. 9, pp. 767–777. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2009.59.9.810.1525/bio.2009.59.9.8]Search in Google Scholar
[GUPTA, N. – KHAN, D.K. – SANTRA, S.C. 2009. Prevalence of intestinal helminth eggs on vegetables grown in wastewater-irrigated areas of Titagarh, West Bengal, India. In Food Control, 2009, no. 20, pp. 942–945.]Search in Google Scholar
[GYULAI, G. – BITTSÁNSZKY, A. – SZABÓ, Z. – WATERS, L. JR. – GULLNER, G. – KAMPFL, G. – HELTAI, G. – KOMÍVES, T. 2013. Phytoextraction potential of wild type and 35S-gshI transgenic poplar trees (Populus × Canescens) for environmental pollutants herbicide paraquat, salt sodium, zinc sulfate and nitric oxide in vitro. In International Journal of Phytoremediation, vol. 16, 2013, no. 4. https://doi.org/10.1080/15226514.2013.78355310.1080/15226514.2013.78355324912238]Search in Google Scholar
[HAMELINCK, C.N. – SUURS, R.A.A. – FAAIJ, A.P.C. 2004. Techno-economic analysis of international bio-energy trade chains. In Biomass Bioenergy, 2004, no. 29, pp. 114–134.]Search in Google Scholar
[LATZ, E. – EISENHAUER, N. – RALL, B. – ALLAN, E. – ROSCHER, C. – SCHEU, S. – JOUSSET, A. 2012. Plant diversity improves protection against soil-borne pathogens by fostering antagonistic bacterial communities. In Journal of Ecology, vol. 100, 2012, no. 3, pp. 597–604. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2011.01940.x10.1111/j.1365-2745.2011.01940.x]Search in Google Scholar
[LEAKEY, R.R.B. 1996. Definition of agroforestry revisited. In Agroforestry Today, vol. 8, 1996, no. 1, pp. 5–7.]Search in Google Scholar
[MÁTRAI, K. – SZEMETHY, L. – TÓTH, P. – KATONA, K. – SZÉKELY, J. 2004. Resource use by red deer in lowland nonnative forests, Hungary. In Journal of Wildlife Management, vol. 68, 2004, no. 4, pp. 879–888.]Search in Google Scholar
[McCALMONT, J.P. – HASTINGS, A. – McNAMARA, N.P. – RICHTER, G.M. – ROBSON, P. – DONNISON, I.S. – CLIFTON-BROWn, J. 2017. Environmental costs and benefits of growing Miscanthus for bioenergy in the UK. In Glob Change Biol Bioenergy, vol. 9, 2017, no. 3, pp. 489–507. Epub 2015 Aug 18. Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12294 PMID: 2833155110.1111/gcbb.12294534028028331551]Search in Google Scholar
[MERINO, I. – CAMPOS, V.M. – CASADO, R. – PACIOS, L.F. – GOMEZ, L. 2008. Review. Phytoremediation of organic pollutants. In Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, vol. 6, 2008, no. S1, pp. 38. https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/200806S1-37210.5424/sjar/200806S1-372]Search in Google Scholar
[NÉMETHY, S. – WAŁAS, B. 2016. Bioenergy crops as new components of rural and agricultural landscapes: environmental and social impact, conservation, cultural heritage and economy. In Journal of Central European Green Innovation, (JCEGI 3(TI)) HU, Hungary. ISSN 2064-3004.]Search in Google Scholar
[NÉMETHY, S. 2018. Bioenergetika társadalmi, gazdasági és környezeti kontextusban (Bioenergetics in the context of society, economy and environment). In Magyar Tudomány (Hungarian Science), vol. 179, 2018, no. 8, pp. 1232–1243.]Search in Google Scholar
[NÉMETHY, S. 2019. Ásványi alapú talajjavító anyagok jelentősége a szőlészetekben (The importance of mineral-based soil improvement substances in viticulture. In Hungarian). In Értékálló Aranykorona, országos mezőgazdasági szaklapm vol. 19, 2019, no. 3, pp. 16–18. ISSN 1586-9652.]Search in Google Scholar
[OELBERMANN, M. – VORONEY, R.P. – GORDON, A.M. 2004. Carbon sequestration in tropical and temperate agroforestry systems: a review with examples from Costa Rica and southern Canada. In Agric. Ecosyst. Environ, 2004, no. 104, pp. 359–377.]Search in Google Scholar
[PACHECO, P. – WARDELL, A. – GERMAN, L. – JOHNSON, F.X. – NEIL, B. – van GELDER, J.W. – SCHWAIGER, H.P. – SCHONEWELD, G.C. – OBIDZINSKI, K. – GUARIGUATA, M. R. 2012. Synthesis: Bioenergy, Sustainability and Trade-offs: Can we Avoid Deforestation while Promoting Biofuels? In CIFOR Infobriefs, 2012, no. 54. www.cifor.org]Search in Google Scholar
[PANORAS, A. – A. ZDRAGAS. – A. ILIAS, K. 1998. Anagnostopoulos Microbiological quality criteria for municipal wastewater reuse in agriculture. In Geothenical Scientific Issues, vol. 9, 1998, no. 31, pp. 90–103.]Search in Google Scholar
[PANORAS, A. – EVGENIDIS, G. – BLADENOPOULOU, S. – MELIDIS, V. – DOITSINIS, A. – SAMARAS, I. – ZDRAGKAS, A. – MATSI, Th. 2003. Corn irrigation with reclaimed municipal wastewater. Selected from papers presented at the 7th Conference on Environmental Science and Technology, 3–6 September 2001, Ermoupolis, Syros island, Greece. In Global Nest: The Int. J., vol. 5, 2003, no. 1, pp. 39–45.]Search in Google Scholar
[PERTTU, K. – OBARSKA-PEMPKOWIAK, H. eds. 1998. Sewage treatment by means of pine, willow, reed and grass vegetation filters. Proceedings of a joint Polish-Swedish workshop in Starbienino, Poland, 25–28 May 1997. Department of Short Rotation Forestry, Report No. 61. Uppsala, Sweden, SLU.]Search in Google Scholar
[QADIR, M. – WICHELNS, D. – RASCHID-SALLY, L. – McCORNICK, P. G. – P. DRECHSEL, P. – BAHRI, A. – MINHAS, P. S. 2010. The challenges of wastewater irrigation in developing countries. In Agricultural Water Management, 2010, no. 97, pp. 561–568.]Search in Google Scholar
[SMEETS, E.M.W. – FAAIJ, A.P.C. – LEWANDOWSKI, I.M. – TURKENBURG, W.C. 2007. A bottom up quick scan and review of global bio-energy potentials to 2050. In Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., 2007, no. 33, pp. 56–106, 329, 790–792.]Search in Google Scholar
[SOMERVILLE, C. – YOUNGS, H. – TAYLOR, C. – DAVIS, S.C. – LONG, S.P. 2010. Feedstocks for lignocellulosic biofuels. In Science, vol. 329, 2010, no. 5993, pp. 790–792. https://dopi.org/10.1126/science.1189268.]Search in Google Scholar
[SOVACOOL, B.K. – MURKHERJEE, I. 2011. Conceptualizing and measuring energy security: A synthesized approach. In Energy, vol. 36, 2011, no. 8, pp. 5343–5355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2011.06.04310.1016/j.energy.2011.06.043]Search in Google Scholar
[SUN, W.H. – LO, J.B. – ROBERT, F.M. – CHITTARANJAN, R. – CHUNGSHIH TANG. 2004. Phytoremediation of petroleum hydrocarbons in tropical coastal soils I. selection of promising woody plants. In Environ Sci & Pollut Res, 2004, no. 11, pp. 260. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0297963410.1007/BF0297963415341316]Search in Google Scholar
[SZEMETHY, L. – MÁTRAI, K. – KATONA, K. – OROSZ, Sz. 2003. Seasonal home range shift of red deer hinds, Cervus elaphus: are there feeding reasons? In Folia Zoologica, vol. 52, 2003, no. 3, pp. 249–258.]Search in Google Scholar
[TARR, N.M. – RUBINO, M.J. – COSTANZA, J.K. – McKERROW, A.J. – COLLAZO, J.A. – ABT, R.C. 2017. Projected gains and losses of wildlife habitat from bioenergy-induced landscape change. In GCB Bioenergy, 2017, no. 9, pp. 909–923. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.1238310.1111/gcbb.12383]Search in Google Scholar
[VERMEULEN, S.J. – AGGARWAL, P.K. – AINSLIE, A. – ANGELONE, C. – CAMPBELL, B.M. – CHALLINOR, A.J. – HANSEN, J.W. – INGRAM, J.S.I. – JARVIS, A. – KRISTJANSON, P. – LAU, C. – NELSON, G.C. – THORNTON, P.K. – WOLLENBERG, E. 2012. Options for support to agriculture and food security under climate change. In Environmental Science & Policy, vol. 15, 2012, no. 1, pp. 136–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2011.09.00310.1016/j.envsci.2011.09.003]Search in Google Scholar
[WATANABE, M. 1997. Phytoremediation on the bank of commercialization. In Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 31, 1997, no. 4, pp. 182A–186A.10.1021/es972219s21650618]Search in Google Scholar
[WEIH, M. – GLYNN, C. – BAUM, C. 2019. Willow Short-Rotation Coppice as Model System for Exploring Ecological Theory on Biodiversity-Ecosystem Function. In Diversity, vol. 11, 2019, no. 8, pp. 125. https://doi.org/10.3390/d1108012510.3390/d11080125]Search in Google Scholar