[Apajalahti J., Kettunen A., Grahamh H. (2004). Characteristics of gastrointestinal microbial communities, with special reference to the chicken. World’s Poultry Sci. J., 60: 223–232.]Search in Google Scholar
[Barko P.C., Mc Michael M.A., Swanson K.S., Williamson D.A. (2018). The gastrointestinal microbiome: A Review. J. Vet. Intern. Med., 32: 9–25.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bervoets L., Van Hoorenbeeck K., Kortleven I., Van Noten C., Hens N., Vael C., Goossens H., Desager K.N., Vankerckhoven V. (2013). Differences in gut microbiota composition between obese and lean children: a cross-sectional study. Gut Pathog., 5: 10.]Search in Google Scholar
[Borda-Molina D., Vital M., Sommerfeld V., Rodehutscord M., Camarinha-Silva A. (2016). Insights into broilers’ gut microbiota fed with phosphorus, calcium and phytase supplemented diets. Front. Microbiol., 7: 2033.]Search in Google Scholar
[Borda-Molina D., Seifert J., Camarinha-Silva A. (2018). Current perspective of the chicken gastrointestinal tract and its microbiome. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J., 16: 131–139.]Search in Google Scholar
[Campanaro S., Treu L., Kougias P.G., de Francisci D., Valle G., Angelidaki I. (2016). Metagenomic analysis and functional characterization of the biogas microbiome using high through-put shotgun sequencing and a novel binning strategy. Biotechnol. Biofuels, 9: 26.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chistoserdova L. (2009). Functional metagenomics: recent advances and future challenges. Bio- technol. Genet. Eng. Rev., 26: 335–352.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cho I., Blaser M.J. (2012). The human microbiome: At the interface of health and disease. Nat. Rev. Genet., 13: 260–270.]Search in Google Scholar
[Choi K.Y., Lee T.K., Sul W.J. (2015). Metagenomic analysis of chicken gut microbiota for improving metabolism and health of chickens – a review. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci., 28: 1217–1225.]Search in Google Scholar
[Clavijo V., Florez M.J.V. (2018). The gastrointestinal microbiome and its association with the control of pathogens in broiler chicken production: A review. Poultry Sci., 97: 1006–1021.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cole J.R., Wang Q., Fish J.A., Chai B., Mc Garrell D.M., Sun Y., Brown T., Porras-Alfaro A., Kuske C.R., Tiedje J.M. (2014). Ribosomal Database Project: Data and tools for high throughput rRNA analysis. Nucleic Acids Res., 42: D633–D642.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cruaud R., Vigneron A., Lucchetti-Miganeh C., Ciron P.E., Godfroy A., Cambon-Bonavita M.A. (2014). Influence of DNA extraction method, 16S rRNA targeted hypervariable regions, and sample origin on microbial diversity detected by 454 pyrosequencing in marine chemo-synthetic ecosystems. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 80: 4626–4639.]Search in Google Scholar
[Danzeisen J.L., Kim H.B., Isaacson R.E., Tu Z.J., Johnson T.J. (2011). Modulations of the chicken cecal microbiome and metagenome in response to anticoccidial and growth promoter treatment. PLoS One, 6: e27949.]Search in Google Scholar
[De Cesare A., Sirri F., Manfreda G., Moniaci P., Giardini A., Zampiga M., Meluzzi A. (2017). Effect of dietary supplementation with Lactobacillus acidophilus D2/CSL (CECT 4529) on caecum microbiome and productive performance in broiler chickens. PloS One, 12: e0176309.]Search in Google Scholar
[De Maesschalck C., Eeckhaut V., Maertens L., De Lange L., Marchal L., Nezer C., De Baere S., Croubels S., Daube G., Dewulf J., Haesebrouck F., Ducatelle R., Taminau B., Van Immerseel F. (2015). Effects of xylo-oligosaccharides on broiler chicken performance and microbiota. J. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 81: 5880–5888.]Search in Google Scholar
[Den Besten G., van Eunen K., Groen A.K., Venema K., Reijngoud D-J., Bakker B.M. (2013). The role of short-chain fatty acids in the interplay between diet, gut microbiota, and host energy metabolism. J. Lipid Res., 54: 2325–234.]Search in Google Scholar
[Deusch S., Tilocca B., Camarinha-Silva A., Seifert J. (2015). News in livestock research – Use of omics-technologies to study the microbiota in the gastrointestinal tract of farm animals. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J., 13: 55–63.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ding J., Zhao L., Wang L., Zhao W., Zhai Z., Leng L., Wang Y., He C., Zhang Y., Zhang H., Li H., Meng H. (2016). Divergent selection-induced obesity alters the composition and functional pathways of chicken gut microbiota. Genet. Select. Evol., 48: 93.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ducatelle R., Goossens E., De Meyer F., Eeckhaut V., Antonissen G., Haeseb-rouck F., Van Immerseel F. (2018). Biomarkers for monitoring intestinal health in poultry: present status and future perspectives. Vet. Res., 849: 43.]Search in Google Scholar
[Handelsman J., Rondon M.R., Brady S.F., Clardy J., Goodman R.M. (1998). Molecular biological access to the chemistry of unknown soil microbes: a new frontier for natural products. Chem. Biol., 5: R245–R249.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hang J., Desai V., Zavajevski N., Yang Y., Lin X., Satya R.V., Martinez L.J., Blaylock J.M., Jarman R.G., Thomas S.J., Kuschner R.A. (2014). 16S rRNA gene pyrosequencing of reference and clinical samples and investigation of the temperature stability of microbiome profiles. Microbiome, 2: 31.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hooper L.V., Gordon J.I. (2001). Commensal host-bacterial relationships in the gut. Science, 292: 1115–1118.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hou Q., Kwok L.Y., Zheng Y., Wang L., Guo Z., Zhang J., Huang W., Wang Y., Leng L., Li H., Zhang H. (2016). Differential fecal microbiota are retained in broiler chicken lines divergently selected for fatness traits. Sci. Rep., 6: 37376.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hume M.E. (2011). Historic perspective: Probiotics, prebiotics, and other alternatives to antibiotics. Poultry Sci., 90: 2663–2669.]Search in Google Scholar
[Huyghebaert G., Ducatelle R., van Immerseel F. (2011). An update on alternatives to antimicrobial growth promoters for broilers. Vet. J., 187: 182–188.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jankowski J., Zduńczyk Z., Mikulski D., Przybylska-Gornowicz B., Sosnowska E., Juśkiewicz J. (2013). Effect of whole wheat feeding on gastrointestinal tract development and performance of growing turkeys. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 185: 150–159.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jumpertz R., Le D.S., Turnbaugh P.J., Trinidad C., Bogardus C., Gordon J.J., Krakoff J. (2011). Energy-balance studies reveal associations between gut microbes, caloric load, and nutrient absorption in humans. Am. J. Clin. Nutr., 94: 58–65.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kers J.G., Velkers F.C., Fischer E.A., Hermes G.D., Stegman J.A., Smidt H. (2018). Host and environmental factors affecting the intestinal microbiota in chickens. Front. Microbiol., 9: 235.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kunin V., Engelbrektson A., Ochman H., Hugenholtz P. (2010). Wrinkles in the rare biosphere: Pyrosequencing errors can lead to artificial inflation of diversity estimates. Environ. Microbiol., 12: 118–123.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lee K-C., Kil D.Y., Sul W.J. (2017). Cecal microbiome divergence of broiler chickens by sex and body weight. J. Microbiol., 55: 939–945.]Search in Google Scholar
[Liu L., Li Y., Li S., Hu N., He Y., Pong R., Lin D., Lu L., Law M. (2012). Comparison of next-generation sequencing systems. BioMed Res. Int., 2012: 251364.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lu J., Idris U., Harmon B., Hofacre C., Maurer J.I., Lee M.D. (2003). Diversity and succession of the intestinal bacterial community of the maturing broiler chicken. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 69: 6816–6824.]Search in Google Scholar
[Marchesi J.R., Ravel J. (2015). The vocabulary of microbiome research: a proposal. Microbiome, 3: 31.]Search in Google Scholar
[Meyer A., Todt C., Mikkelsen N.T., Lieb B. (2010). Fast evolving 18S rRNA sequences from Solenogastres (Mollusca) resist standard PCR amplification and give new insights into mollusk substitution rate heterogeneity. BMC Evol. Biol., 10: 70.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mignon-Grasteau S., Narcy A., Rideau N., Chantry-Darmon C., Boscher M-Y., Sellier N., Chabault M., Konsak-Ilievski B., Le Bihan-Duval E., Gabriel I. (2015). Impact of selection for digestive efficiency on microbiota composition in the chicken. PLOS One, 10: e0135488.]Search in Google Scholar
[Millet S., van Oeckel M.J., Aluwé M., Delezie E., De Brabander D.L. (2010). Prediction of in vivo short-chain fatty acid production in hindgut fermenting mammals: problems and pitfalls. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr., 50: 605–619.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mohinudeen C., Joe M.M., Benson A., Tongmin S. (2017). An overview of Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) technologies to study the molecular diversity of genome. Microbial Applications, 1: 295–317.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nielsen H.B., Almeida M., Juncker A.S., Rasmussen S., Li J., Sunagawa S., etal. (2014). Identification and assembly of genomes and genetic elements in complex metagenomic samples without using reference genomes. Nat. Biotechnol., 32: 822–828.]Search in Google Scholar
[Oakley B.B., Lillehoj H.S., Kogut M.H., Kim W.K., Pedroso M.A., Lee M.D., Collett S.R., Johnson T.J., Cox N.A. (2014). The chicken gastrointestinal microbiome. FEMS Microbiol. Lett., 360: 100–112.]Search in Google Scholar
[Olnood C.G., Beski S.S.M., Iji P.A., Choct.M. (2015). Delivery routes for probiotics. Effects on broiler performance, intestinal morphology and gut microflora. Anim. Nutr., 1: 192–202.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pan D., Yu Z. (2014). Intestinal microbiome of poultry and its interaction with host and diet. Gut Microbes, 5: 108–119.]Search in Google Scholar
[Qu A., Brulc J.M., Wilson M.K., Law B.F., Theoret J.R., Joens L.A., Konkel M.E., Angly F., Dinsdale E.A., Edwards R.A., Nelson K.E., White B.A. (2008). Comparative metagenomics reveals host specific metavirulomes and horizontal gene transfer elements in the chicken cecum microbiome. PLoS One, 3: e2945.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ranjitkar S., Lawley B., Tannock G., Engberg R.M. (2016). Bacterial succession in the broiler gastrointestinal tract. Appl. Environ. Microb., 82: 2399–2410.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rehman H., Vahjen W., Awad W.A., Zentek J. (2007). Indigenous bacteria and bacterial metabolic products in the gastrointestinal tract of broiler chickens. Arch. Anim. Nutr., 6: 319–335.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rougière N., Malbert C.H., Rideau N., Cognié J., Carré B. (2002). Comparison of gizzard activity between chickens from genetic D+ and D-lines selected for divergent digestion efficiency. Poultry Sci., 91: 460–467.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ruiz R., Peinado M.J., Aranda-Olmedo I., Abecia L., Suarez-Pereira E., Ortiz Mel-let C., Garcia Fernandez J.M., Rubio L.A. (2015). Effect of feed additives on ileal mucosa-associated microbiota composition of broiler chickens. J. Anim. Sci., 93: 3410–3420.]Search in Google Scholar
[Salanitro J.P., Fairchilds I.G., Zgornicki Y.D. (1974). Isolation, culture characteristics, and identification of anaerobic bacteria from the chicken cecum. Appl. Microbiol., 27: 678–687.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schloss P.D., Handelsman J. (2003). Biotechnological prospects from metagenomics. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol., 14: 303–310.]Search in Google Scholar
[Scholz M.B., Lo C.C., Chain P.S. (2012). Next generation sequencing and bioinformatic bottle-necks: the current state of metagenomic data analysis. Curr. Opin. Biotech., 23: 9–15.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sergeant M.J., Constantinidou C., Cogan T.A., Bedford M.R., Penn C.W., Pallen M.J. (2014). Extensive microbial and functional diversity within the chicken cecal microbiome. PloS One, 9: e91941.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sharpton T.J. (2014). An introduction to the analysis of shotgun metabolomic data. Front. Plant Sci., 209: 1–14.]Search in Google Scholar
[Siegerstetter S-C., Petri R.M., Magowan E., Lawlor P.G., Zebeli Q., O’Connel N.E., Metzler-Zebeli B.U. (2018). Feed restriction modulates the fecal microbiota composition, nutrient retention, and feed efficiency in chicken divergent in residual feed intake. Front. Mibrobiol. 9: 2698.]Search in Google Scholar
[Singh K.M., Shah T.M., Reddy B., Deshpande S., Rank D.N., Joshi C.G. (2014). Taxonomic and gene-centric metagenomics of the fecal microbiome of low and high feed conversion ratio (FCR) broilers. J. Appl. Genet., 55: 145–154.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sitnicka D., Figurska K., Orzechowski S. (2010). Functional analysis of genes. Adv. Cell Biol., 2: 1–16.]Search in Google Scholar
[Song J., Xiao K., Ke Y.L., Jiao L.F., Hu C.H., Diao Q.Y., Shi B., Zou X.T. (2014). Effect of a probiotic mixture on intestinal microflora, morphology, and barrier integrity of broilers subjected to heat stress. Poultry Sci., 93: 581–588.]Search in Google Scholar
[Stanley D., Geier M.S., Hughes R.J., Denman S.E., Moore R.J. (2013). Highly variable microbiota development in the chicken gastrointestinal tract. PLoS One, 8: e84290.]Search in Google Scholar
[Stanley D., Hughes R.J., Moore R.J. (2014). Microbiota of the chickens gastrointestinal tract: Influence on health, productivity and disease. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 98: 4301–4310.]Search in Google Scholar
[Thomas T., Gilbert J., Meyer F. (2012). Metogenomics – A quide from sampling to data analysis. Microb. Inform. Exp., 2: 3.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tillman G.E., Haas G.J., Wise M.G., Oakley B., Smith M.A., Siragusa G.R. (2011). Chicken intestine microbiota following the administration of lupulone, a hop-based antimicrobial. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol., 77: 395–403.]Search in Google Scholar
[Torok V.A., Ophei K., Loo M., Hughes R.J. (2008). Application of methods for identifying broiler chicken gut bacterial species linked with increased energy metabolism. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 74: 783–791.]Search in Google Scholar
[Torok V.A., Hughes R.J., Mikkelsen L.L., Perez-Maldonado R., Balding K,Macal-pine R., Percy N.J., Ophel-Keller K. (2011). Identification and characterization of potential performance-related gut microbiotas in broiler chickens across various feeding trials. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 77: 5868–5878.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tremaroli V., Bäckhed F. (2012). Functional interactions between the gut microbiota and host metabolism. Nature, 489: 242.]Search in Google Scholar
[Turnbaugh P.J., Ley R.E., Hamady M., Fraser-Liggett C.M., Knight R.Gordon J.I. (2007). The human microbiome project. Nature, 449: 804–810.]Search in Google Scholar
[Vincent A.T., Derome N., Boyle B., Culley A.I., Charette S.J. (2017). Next-generation sequencing (NGS) in the microbiological world: how to make the most of your money. J. Microbiol. Meth., 138: 60–71.]Search in Google Scholar
[Walugembe M., Rothschild M.F., Persia M.E. (2014). Effects of high fiber ingredients on the performance, metabolizable energy and fiber digestibility of broiler and layer chicks. Anim. Feed Sci. Tech., 188: 46–52.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wang W-L., Xu S-Y., Ren Z-G., Tao L., Jiang J-W., Zheng S-S. (2015). Application of metagenomics in the human gut microbiome. World J. Gastroentero., 21: 803–814.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wei S., Morrison M., Yu Z. (2013). Bacterial census of poultry intestinal microbiome. Poultry Sci., 92: 671–683.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wilkinson T.J., Cowan A.A., Vallin H.E., Onime L.A., Oyama L.B., Cameron S.L., Gonot C., Moorby J.M., Waddams K., Theobald V.J., Leemans D., Bowra S., Nixey C., Huws S.A. (2017). Characterization of the microbiome along the gastrointestinal tract of growing turkeys. Front Microbiol., 8: 1089; doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01089. eCollection 2017.10.3389/fmicb.2017.01089547988628690591]Search in Google Scholar
[Willems O.W., Miller S.P., Wood B.J. (2013). Aspects of selection for feed efficiency in meat producing poultry. World’s Poultry Sci. J., 69: 77–88.]Search in Google Scholar
[Yao C.K., Muir J.G., Gibson P.R. (2016). Review article: insights into colonic protein fermentation, its modulation and potential health implications. Aliment Pharmacol. Ther., 43: 181–196.]Search in Google Scholar
[Yeoman C.J., Cjia N., Jeraldo P., Sipos M., Goldenfield N., White B.A. (2012). The microbiome of the chicken gastrointestinal tract. An. Health Res. Rev., 13: 89–99.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zduńczyk Z., Jankowski J., Mikulski D., Przybylska-Gornowicz B., Sosnows-ka E., Juśkiewicz J. (2013). Gastrointestinal morphology and function in turkeys fed diets diluted with whole grain wheat. Poultry Sci., 92: 1799–1811.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zduńczyk Z., Jankowski J., Rutkowski A., Sosnowska E., Drażbo A., Juśkiewicz J. (2014). The composition and enzymatic activity of gut microbiota in laying hens fed diets supplemented with blue lupine seeds. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 191: 57–66.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zduńczyk Z., Jankowski J., Kaczmarek S., Juśkiewicz J. (2015). Determinants and effects of postileal fermentation in broilers and turkeys part 1: Gut microbiota composition and its modulation by feed additives. World’s Poultry Sci. J., 71: 37–47.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zduńczyk Z., Krawczyk M., Mikulski D., Jankowski J., Przybylska-Gornowicz B., Juśkiewicz J. (2016). Beneficial effects of increasing dietary levels of yellow lupine (Lupinus luteus) seed meal on productivity parameters and gastrointestinal tract physiology in eight-week-old turkeys. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 211: 189–198.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zduńczyk Z., Mikulski D., Jankowski J., Przybylska-Gornowicz B., Sosnowska E., Juśkiewicz J., Słomiński B.A. (2018). Effects of dietary inclusion of high- and low- tannin faba bean (Vicia faba L.) seeds on microbiota, histology and fermentation processes of the gastrointestinal tract in finisher turkeys. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 240: 184–196.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zhao L., Wang G., Siegel P., He C., Wang H., Zhao W., Zhai Z., Tian F., Ahao J., Zhang H., Sun Z., Chen W., Zhang Y., Meng H. (2013). Quantitative genetic background of the host influences gut microbiomes in chickens. Sci. Rep., 3: 1–6.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zhao P.Y., Li H.L., Mohammadi M., Kim H. (2016). Effect of dietary lactulose supplementation on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, meat quality, relative organ weight, and excreta microflora in broilers. Poultry Sci., 95: 84–89.]Search in Google Scholar
