Clinicians' Choices in Selecting Orthodontic Archwires

1. Kusy RP. A review of contemporary archwires: their properties and characteristics. AngleOrthod.1997;67(3):197-208.Search in Google Scholar

2. W. R. Proffi t and H. W. Fields. Contemporary Orthodontics. Mosby, St. Louis, Mo, USA, 3rd edition, 2000, 405-410.Search in Google Scholar

3. Abhishek Agwarwal , D. K. Agarwal. Newer orthodontic wires: A Revolution in orthodontics. The orthodontic Cyber Journal. April, 2011 Available from URL: http://orthocj.com/2011/04/newer-orthodontic-wires-a-revolutionin- orthodontics/Search in Google Scholar

4. Garrec Pascal, Jordan Laurence. Stiffness in bending of a superelastic Ni-Ti orthodontic wire as a function of cross sectional dimension. Angle Orthod. 2004;74:691-696.Search in Google Scholar

5. Kusy RP, Dilley GJ. Elastic modulus of a triple-stranded stainless steel archwire via three and four point bending. JDR. 1984;63:1232-1240.10.1177/00220345840630101401Search in Google Scholar

6. Miura F, Mogi M, Ohura Y, Hamanaka H. The super-elastic property of the Japanese NiTi alloy wire for use in orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1986;90:1:1-10.10.1016/0889-5406(86)90021-1Search in Google Scholar

7. Oltjen JM, Duncanson MG Jr, Ghosh J, Nanda RS, Currier GF. Stiffnessdeflection behavior of selected orthodontic wires. Angle Orthod. 1997;67:209-218.Search in Google Scholar

8. Kusy RP, Stush AM. Geometric and material parameters of nickel-titanium and a beta-titanium orthodontic archwire alloy. Dent Mater. 1987;3:207-217.10.1016/S0109-5641(87)80035-0Search in Google Scholar

9. Goldberg AJ, Burstone CJ. Status report on beta-titanium orthodontic wires. Council on dental materials, instruments, and equipment. J Am Dent Assoc. 1982;105:684-685.10.14219/jada.archive.1982.0418Search in Google Scholar

10. Johnson E, Lee RS. Relative stiffness of orthodontic wires. J Clin Orthod. 1989;23:353-363.Search in Google Scholar

11. Keim RG, Gottlieb EL, Nelson AH, Vogels DS. JCO A study of orthodontic diagnosis and treatment procedures. Part 1: Results and trends. J Clin Orthod. 2002;36:553-568.Search in Google Scholar

12. McNamara C, Drage JK, et al. An evaluation of clinicians’ choices when selecting archwires. Eur J Orthod. 2010;10:54-59.10.1093/ejo/cjp051Search in Google Scholar

13. Hansen JD, Kusy RP, Saunders CR. Archwire damage from ceramic brackets via notching. Orthod Rev. 1997;11:27-31.Search in Google Scholar

14. Burstone CJ. Variable-modulus orthodontics. Am J Orthod. 1981;80:1-16.10.1016/0002-9416(81)90192-5Search in Google Scholar

15. Kim H, Johnson JW. Corrosion of stainless steel, nickeltitanium, coated nickel-titanium, and titanium orthodontic wires. Angle Orthod. 1999;69:39-44.Search in Google Scholar

16. Andreasen GF, Morrow RE. Laboratory and clinical analyses of nitinol wire. Am J Orthod. 1978;73:142-151.10.1016/0002-9416(78)90184-7Search in Google Scholar

17. Ingram SB, Gipe DP, Smith RJ. Comparative range of orthodontic wires. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1986;90:296-307.10.1016/0889-5406(86)90086-7Search in Google Scholar

18. Wilcock AJ. Applied materials engineering for orthodontic wires. Aust Orthod J. 1989;11:22-29.Search in Google Scholar

19. Nanda RS, Ghosh J. Biomechanical considerations in sliding mechanics. In: Nanda E, ed. Biomechanics in Clinical Orthodontics. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders; 1997:188-217.Search in Google Scholar

20. Frank CA, Nikolai RJ. A comparative study of frictional resistances between orthodontic bracket and arch wire. Am J Orthod. 1980;78:593-609.10.1016/0002-9416(80)90199-2Search in Google Scholar

21. Eliades T, Athanasiou AE. In vivo aging of orthodontic alloys: implications for corrosion potential, nickel release, and biocompatibility. Angle Orthod. 2002;72:222-237.Search in Google Scholar

22. Watanabe I, Watanabe E. Surface changes induced by fl uoride prophylactic agents on titanium-based orthodontic wires. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003;123:653-656.10.1016/S0889-5406(03)00197-5Search in Google Scholar

23. Bratu CD, Pop RV, Pop SI, Bratu E A. Adjusting dento-alveolar morphology with orthodontic mini-implants (miniscrews). A clinical case report. Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2011;52(S3):1133-1137.Search in Google Scholar

24. McLaughlin R, Bennett J, Trevisi H. Systemized orthodontic treatment mechanics. Mosby, St. Louis, Mo, USA, 2001, 25-55.Search in Google Scholar