Open Access

A Three–Level Aggregation Model for Evaluating Software Usability by Fuzzy Logic

International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science's Cover Image
International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science
Information Technology for Systems Research (special section, pp. 427-515), Piotr Kulczycki, Janusz Kacprzyk, László T. Kóczy, Radko Mesiar (Eds.)

Cite

Albert, W. and Tullis, T. (2013). Measuring the User Experience, Collecting, Analyzing, and Presenting Usability Metrics (Interactive Technologies), 2nd Edition, Elsevier, Amsterdam.Search in Google Scholar

Allen, I.E. and Seaman, C. (2007). Likert scales and data analyses, Technical report, QP-Quality Progress, http://asq.org/quality-progress/2007/07/statistics/likert-scales-and-data-analyses.html.Search in Google Scholar

Bavdaž, M. (2010). Sources of measurement errors in business surveys, Journal of Official Statistics26(1): 25–42.Search in Google Scholar

Bavdaž, M., Biffignandi, S., Bolko, I., Giesen, D., Gravem, D. and Haraldsen, G. (2011). Final report integrating findings on business perspectives related to NSIS’ statistics, Technical report, Deliverable 3.2., FP7 Blue-Ets Project, European Commission, Brussels, https://cordis.europa.eu/project/rcn/94081/results/en?rcn=143042.Search in Google Scholar

Beliakov, G., Pradera, A. and Calvo, T. (2007). Aggregation Functions: A Guide for Practitioners, Springer-Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg.Search in Google Scholar

Calinescu, M. and Schouten, B. (2012). Adaptive survey designs that minimize nonresponse and measurement risk, Technical report, Statistics Netherlands, The Hague/Heerlen.Search in Google Scholar

Calvo, T., Kolesárová, A., Komorníková, M. and Mesiar, R. (2002). Aggregation operators: Properties, classes and construction methods, in T. Calvo et al. (Eds), Aggregation Operators: New Trends and Applications, Physica, Heidelberg, pp. 3–104.10.1007/978-3-7908-1787-4_1Search in Google Scholar

Dubois, D. and Prade, H. (2004). On the use of aggregation operations in information fusion processes, Fuzzy Sets and Systems142(1): 143–161.10.1016/j.fss.2003.10.038Search in Google Scholar

Dujmović, J. (2007). Continuous preference logic for system evaluation, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems15(6): 1082–1099.10.1109/TFUZZ.2007.902041Search in Google Scholar

Dujmović, J. (2018). Soft Computing Evaluation Logic: The LSP Decision Method and Its Applications, Wiley/IEEE Computer Society, Hoboken, NJ.10.1002/9781119256489Search in Google Scholar

Grabisch, M., Marichal, J.-L., Mesiar, R. and Pap, E. (2009). Aggregation Functions, Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9781139644150Search in Google Scholar

Greiner, L. and White, S. (2019). What is ITIL? Your guide to the it infrastructure library, in digital magazine CIO from IDG, https://www.cio.com/article/2439501/infrastructure-it-infrastructure-library-itil-definition-and-solutions.html.Search in Google Scholar

Gupta, M. and Qi, J. (1991). Theory of t-norms and fuzzy inference methods, Fuzzy Sets and Systems40(3): 431–450.10.1016/0165-0114(91)90171-LSearch in Google Scholar

Hensher, A., Rose, J. and Greene, W. (2015). Applied Choice Analysis, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9781316136232Search in Google Scholar

Herrera, F. and Martínez, L. (2001). A model based on linguistic 2-tuples for dealing with multigranular hierarchical linguistic contexts in multiexpert decision-making, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics B: Cybernetics31(2): 227–234.10.1109/3477.91534518244784Search in Google Scholar

ISACA (2018). Service it governance professionals, COBIT5, an ISACA framework, http://www.isaca.org/cobit/pages/default.aspx.Search in Google Scholar

ISO (2011). Systems and software engineering, ISO/IEC 25010:2011: Systems and software quality requirements and evaluation (square). System and software quality models, https://www.iso.org/standard/35733.html.Search in Google Scholar

ISO (2018). ISO, online browsing platform, ISO 9241-11:2018: Ergonomics of human–system interaction. Part 11: Usability: Definitions and concepts, https://www.iso.org/standard/63500.html.Search in Google Scholar

Kacprzyk, J. and Yager, R. (2001). Linguistic summaries of data using fuzzy logic, International Journal of General Systems30(2): 133–154.10.1080/03081070108960702Search in Google Scholar

Kacprzyk, J., Yager, R.R. and Zadrożny S. (2000). A fuzzy logic based approach to linguistic summaries of databases, International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science10(4): 813–834.Search in Google Scholar

Králiková, L. (2017). Testovanie efektívnosti softvéru v podnikovej praxi z hľadiska užívateľov (Software Effectiveness Testing in Business Practice from a User Perspective), Master thesis, University of Economics in Bratislava, Bratislava.Search in Google Scholar

Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes, Archives of Psychology22(140): 1–55.Search in Google Scholar

Miller, G. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information, Psychological Review63(2): 81–97.10.1037/h0043158Search in Google Scholar

Morente-Molinera, J., Kou, G., Pérez, I., Samuylov, K., Selamat, A. and Herrera-Viedma, E. (2018). A group decision making support system for the web: How to work in environments with a high number of participants and alternatives, Applied Soft Computing68: 191–201.10.1016/j.asoc.2018.03.047Search in Google Scholar

Olson, D. (1996). Decision Aids for Selection Problems, Springer-Verlag, London.10.1007/978-1-4612-3982-6Search in Google Scholar

Pavlík, L. (2018). Metrics for evaluating information systems, Posterus, Portl pre odborn publikovanie, http://www.posterus.sk/?p=18957.Search in Google Scholar

Piegat, A. and Pluciński, M. (2015). Computing with words with the use of inverse RDM models of membership functions, International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science25(3): 675–688, DOI:10.1515/amcs-2015-0049.10.1515/amcs-2015-0049Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Rakovská, E. and Hudec, M. (2020). Two approaches for the computational model for soft-ware usability in practice, in J. Kacprzyk et al. (Eds), Information Technology, System Research and Computational Physics, ITSRCP 2018, Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, Vol. 945, Springer, Cham, pp. 191–202.Search in Google Scholar

Ruspini, E. (1969). A new approach to clustering, Information and Control15(1): 22–32.10.1016/S0019-9958(69)90591-9Search in Google Scholar

Seffah, A., Kececi, N. and Donyaee, M. (2001). QUIM: A framework for quantifying usability metrics in software quality models, 2nd Asia-Pacific Conference on Quality Software, Hong Kong, pp. 311–318.Search in Google Scholar

Snijkers, G., Haraldsen, G., Jones, J. and Willimack, D. (2013). Designing and Conducting Business Surveys, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.10.1002/9781118447895Search in Google Scholar

Tudorie, C. (2008). Qualifying objects in classical relational database querying, in J. Galindo (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Fuzzy Information Processing in Databases, Information Science Reference, Hershey, pp. 218–245.10.4018/978-1-59904-853-6.ch009Search in Google Scholar

Yager, R. (1982). A new approach to the summarization of data, Information Sciences28(1): 69–86.10.1016/0020-0255(82)90033-0Search in Google Scholar

Yager, R. and Rybalov, A. (1996). Uninorm aggregation operators, Fuzzy Sets and Systems80(1): 111–120.10.1016/0165-0114(95)00133-6Search in Google Scholar

Zadeh, L. (1965). Fuzzy sets, Information and Control8(3): 338–353.10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-XSearch in Google Scholar

Zimmermann, H. (2001). Fuzzy Set Theory and Its Applications, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.10.1007/978-94-010-0646-0Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
2083-8492
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
4 times per year
Journal Subjects:
Mathematics, Applied Mathematics