[Alberich, R., Cardona, G., Rosselló, F. and Valiente, G. (2009). An algebraic metric for phylogenetic trees, Applied MathematicsLetters 22(9): 1320-1324.10.1016/j.aml.2009.03.003]Search in Google Scholar
[Aldous, D.J. (1991). The continuum random tree II: An overview, in M.T. Barlow and N. H. Bingham (Eds.), StochasticAnalysis, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 23-70.10.1017/CBO9780511662980.003]Search in Google Scholar
[Bansal, M., Burleigh, J.G., Eulenstein, O. and Fernández-Baca, D. (2010). Robinson-Foulds supertrees, Algorithms forMolecular Biology 5(1): 18.10.1186/1748-7188-5-18284695220181274]Search in Google Scholar
[Bansal, M.S., Dong, J. and Fernández-Baca, D. (2011). Comparing and aggregating partially resolved trees, TheoreticalComputer Science 412(48): 6634-6652.10.1016/j.tcs.2011.08.027]Search in Google Scholar
[Biedrzycki, R. and Arabas, J. (2012). KIS: An automated attribute induction method for classification of DNA sequences, International Journal of Applied Mathematicsand Computer Science 22(3): 711-721, DOI: 10.2478/v10006-012-0053-2.10.2478/v10006-012-0053-2]Search in Google Scholar
[Bininda-Emonds, O.R.P., Cardillo, M., Jones, K.E., MacPhee, R. D.E., Beck, R.M.D., Grenyer, R., Price, S.A., Vos, R.A., Gittleman, J.L. and Purvis, A. (2007). The delayed rise of present-day mammals, Nature 446(7135): 507-512.10.1038/nature0563417392779]Search in Google Scholar
[Blum, M.G.B., François, O. and Janson, S. (2006). The mean, variance and limiting distribution of two statistics sensitive to phylogenetic tree balance, The Annals of Applied Probability16(4): 2195-2214.10.1214/105051606000000547]Search in Google Scholar
[Boc, A., Philippe, H. and Makarenkov, V. (2010). Inferring and validating horizontal gene transfer events using bipartition dissimilarity, Systematic Biology 59(2): 195-211.10.1093/sysbio/syp10320525630]Search in Google Scholar
[Bogdanowicz, D. and Giaro, K. (2012). Matching split distance for unrooted binary phylogenetic trees, IEEE/ACM Transactionson Computational Biology and Bioinformatics9(1): 150-160.10.1109/TCBB.2011.4821383415]Search in Google Scholar
[Bogdanowicz, D., Giaro, K. and Wróbel, B. (2012). TreeCmp: Comparison of trees in polynomial time, Evolutionary Bioinformatics8: 475-487.10.4137/EBO.S9657]Search in Google Scholar
[Bolikowski, L. and Gambin, A. (2007). New metrics for phylogenies, Fundamenta Informaticae 78(2): 199-216.]Search in Google Scholar
[Boorman, S.A. and Olivier, D.C. (1973). Metrics on spaces of finite trees, Journal of Mathematical Psychology10(1): 26-59.10.1016/0022-2496(73)90003-5]Search in Google Scholar
[Bordewich, M. and Semple, C. (2005). On the computational complexity of the rooted subtree prune and regraft distance, Annals of Combinatorics 8(4): 409-423.10.1007/s00026-004-0229-z]Search in Google Scholar
[Brinkmeyer, M., Griebel, T. and Böcker, S. (2011). Polynomial supertree methods revisited, Advances in Bioinformatics2011: 524182.10.1155/2011/524182324959222229028]Search in Google Scholar
[Bryant, D. (1997). Building Trees, Hunting for Trees, and ComparingTrees-Theory and Methods in Phylogenetic Analysis, Ph.D. thesis, University of Canterbury, Christchurch.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cardona, G., Llabrés, M., Rosselló, F. and Valiente, G. (2009a). Metrics for phylogenetic networks I: Generalizations of the Robinson-Foulds metric, IEEE/ACM Transactions onComputational Biology and Bioinformatics 6(1): 46-61.10.1109/TCBB.2008.7019179698]Search in Google Scholar
[Cardona, G., Llabrés, M., Rosselló, F. and Valiente, G. (2009b). Metrics for phylogenetic networks II: Nodal and triplets metrics, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biologyand Bioinformatics 6(3): 454-469.10.1109/TCBB.2008.12719644173]Search in Google Scholar
[Cardona, G., Rossello, F. and Valiente, G. (2009). Comparison of tree-child phylogenetic networks, IEEE/ACM Transactionson Computational Biology and Bioinformatics6(4): 552-569.10.1109/TCBB.2007.7027019875855]Search in Google Scholar
[Cardona, G., Llabrés, M., Rosselló, F. and Valiente, G. (2010). Nodal distances for rooted phylogenetic trees, Journal ofMathematical Biology 61(2): 253-276.10.1007/s00285-009-0295-219760227]Search in Google Scholar
[Critchlow, D.E., Pearl, D.K. and Qian, C. (1996). The triples distance for rooted bifurcating phylogenetic trees, SystematicBiology 45(3): 323-334.10.1093/sysbio/45.3.323]Search in Google Scholar
[Darlu, P. and Guénoche, A. (2011). TreeOfTrees method to evaluate the congruence between gene trees, Journal ofClassification 28(3): 390-403.10.1007/s00357-011-9093-9]Search in Google Scholar
[Davies, T.J., Barraclough, T.G., Chase, M.W., Soltis, P.S., Soltis, D.E. and Savolainen, V. (2004). Darwin’s abominable mystery: Insights from a supertree of the angiosperms, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of theUnited States of America 101(7): 1904-1909.10.1073/pnas.030812710035702514766971]Search in Google Scholar
[Felsenstein, J. (2003). Inferring Phylogenies, Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fra˛ckiewicz, M. and Palus, H. (2011). KHM clustering technique as a segmentation method for endoscopic colour images, International Journal of Applied Mathematicsand Computer Science 21(1): 203-209, DOI: 10.2478/v10006-011-0015-0.10.2478/v10006-011-0015-0]Search in Google Scholar
[Gabow, H.N. and Tarjan, R.E. (1989). Faster scaling algorithms for network problems, SIAM Journal on Computing18(5): 1013-1036.10.1137/0218069]Search in Google Scholar
[Górecki, P. and Eulenstein, O. (2012). A Robinson-Foulds measure to compare unrooted trees with rooted trees, in L. Bleris, I.Mandoiu, R. Schwartz and J.Wang (Eds.), BioinformaticsResearch and Applications, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 7292, Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp. 115-126.10.1007/978-3-642-30191-9_12]Search in Google Scholar
[Gusfield, D. (1991). Efficient algorithms for inferring evolutionary trees, Networks 21(1): 19-28.10.1002/net.3230210104]Search in Google Scholar
[Hayes, M., Walenstein, A. and Lakhotia, A. (2009). Evaluation of malware phylogeny modelling systems using automated variant generation, Journal in Computer Virology5(4): 335-343.10.1007/s11416-008-0100-6]Search in Google Scholar
[Hillis, D.M., Heath, T.A. and John, K.S. (2005). Analysis and visualization of tree space, Systematic Biology54(3): 471-482.10.1080/10635150590946961]Search in Google Scholar
[Kennedy, M., Page, R. D.M. and Prum, R. (2002). Seabird supertrees: Combining partial estimates of procellariiform phylogeny, The Auk 119(1): 88-108.10.1093/auk/119.1.88]Search in Google Scholar
[Lin, Y., Rajan, V. and Moret, B.M.E. (2012). A metric for phylogenetic trees based on matching, IEEE/ACM Transactionson Computational Biology and Bioinformatics9(4): 1014-1022.10.1109/TCBB.2011.157]Search in Google Scholar
[Ma, B., Li, M. and Zhang, L. (1998). On reconstructing species trees from gene trees in term of duplications and losses, Proceedings of the 2nd Annual International Conferenceon Computational Molecular Biology, RECOMB’98, NewYork, NY, USA, pp. 182-191.]Search in Google Scholar
[McKenzie, A. and Steel, M. (2000). Distributions of cherries for two models of trees, Mathematical Biosciences164(1): 81-92.10.1016/S0025-5564(99)00060-7]Search in Google Scholar
[Munzner, T., Guimbretière, F., Tasiran, S., Zhang, L. and Zhou, Y. (2003). TreeJuxtaposer: Scalable tree comparison using focus+context with guaranteed visibility, ACM Transactionson Graphics 22(3): 453-462.10.1145/882262.882291]Search in Google Scholar
[Nguyen, N., Mirarab, S. and Warnow, T. (2012). MRL and SuperFine+MRL: New supertree methods, Algorithms forMolecular Biology 7(1): 3.10.1186/1748-7188-7-3]Search in Google Scholar
[Nye, T.M., Liò, P. and Gilks,W.R. (2006). A novel algorithm and web-based tool for comparing two alternative phylogenetic trees, Bioinformatics 22(1): 117-119.10.1093/bioinformatics/bti720]Search in Google Scholar
[Orlin, J.B. and Ahuja, R.K. (1992). New scaling algorithms for the assignment and minimum mean cycle problems, MathematicalProgramming 54(1-3): 41-56.10.1007/BF01586040]Search in Google Scholar
[Penny, D., Watson, E.E. and Steel, M.A. (1993). Trees from languages and genes are very similar, Systematic Biology42(3): 382-384.10.1093/sysbio/42.3.382]Search in Google Scholar
[Pompei, S., Loreto, V. and Tria, F. (2011). On the accuracy of language trees, PLoS ONE 6(6): e20109.10.1371/journal.pone.0020109]Search in Google Scholar
[Restrepo, G., Héber, M. and Llanos, E.J. (2007). Three dissimilarity measures to contrast dendrograms, Journal ofChemical Information and Modeling 47(3): 761-770.10.1021/ci6005189]Search in Google Scholar
[Robinson, D.F. and Foulds, L.R. (1981). Comparison of phylogenetic trees, Mathematical Biosciences53(1-2): 131-147.10.1016/0025-5564(81)90043-2]Search in Google Scholar
[Sackin, M.J. (1972). “Good” and “bad” phenograms, SystematicZoology 21(2): 225-226.]Search in Google Scholar
[Semple, C. and Steel, M. (2003). Phylogenetics, Oxford University Press, Oxford.]Search in Google Scholar
[Shao, K.-T. and Sokal, R.R. (1990). Tree balance, SystematicZoology 39(3): 266-276.10.2307/2992186]Search in Google Scholar
[Steel, M. A. and Penny, D. (1993). Distributions of tree comparison metrics-some new results, Systematic Biology42(2): 126-141.10.1093/sysbio/42.2.126]Search in Google Scholar
[Stockham, C., Wang, L.-S. and Warnow, T. (2002). Statistically based postprocessing of phylogenetic analysis by clustering, Bioinformatics 18(suppl 1): S285-S293.10.1093/bioinformatics/18.suppl_1.S285]Search in Google Scholar
[Suri, R. and Warnow, T. (2010). Spruce, Website, http://www.cs.utexas.edu/~phylo/software/spruce/.]Search in Google Scholar
[Swenson, M.S., Suri, R., Linder, C.R. and Warnow, T. (2011). An experimental study of Quartets MaxCut and other supertree methods, Algorithms for Molecular Biology6(1): 7.10.1186/1748-7188-6-7310164421504600]Search in Google Scholar
[Swofford, D. (2002). PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis UsingParsimony (*and other methods). Version 4, Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wang, J.T., Shan, H., Shasha, D. and Piel, W.H. (2005). Fast structural search in phylogenetic databases, EvolutionaryBioinformatics Online 1: 37-46. Williams, W.T. and Clifford, H.T. (1971). On the comparison of two classifications of the same set of elements, Taxon20(4): 519-522. ]Search in Google Scholar