Solubility of Calcium Silicate Based Cements – a Comparative Study

1. Torabinejad M, Hong CU, McDonald F et al. Physical and chemical properties of a new root-end filling material. J. Endod. 1995, 21(7), 349-353.Search in Google Scholar

2. Camilleri J. Investigation of Biodentine as dentine replacement material. J. Dent. 2013, 41(7), 600-610.10.1016/j.jdent.2013.05.00323685034Search in Google Scholar

3. Asgary S, Shahabi S, Jafarzadeh T et al. The properties of a new endodontic material. J. Endod. 2008, 34(8), 990-993.Search in Google Scholar

4. Camilleri J. In: Mineral Trioxide Aggregate in dentistry from preparation to applications, 2014, Springer Heidelberg New York Dordrecht London10.1007/978-3-642-55157-4Search in Google Scholar

5. Primus MC, James L, Gutmann RYet al. Physical Properties of New Generation Tricalcium Silicate Dental Materials. Bioceram Dev Appl 2014, 4, (1), 2-9.Search in Google Scholar

6. Torabinejad M, Chivian N. Clinical application of mineral trioxide aggregate. J. Endod. 1999, 25(3), 197-205.Search in Google Scholar

7. Poggio C, Lombardini M, Alessandro C et al. Solubility of root-end-filling materials: A comparative study. J. Endod., 2007, 33(9), 1094-1097.10.1016/j.joen.2007.05.02117931941Search in Google Scholar

8. ANSI/ADA. Specification no. 57: endodontic sealing materials. Chikago, IL: ANSI/ADA; 2000Search in Google Scholar

9. Grech L, Mallia B, Camilleri J. Investigation of the physical properties of the calcium silicate cement-based root-end filling materials. Dent. Mater., 2013, 29, e20-28.10.1016/j.dental.2012.11.00723199808Search in Google Scholar

10. Saghiri MA, Godoy FG, Gutmann JL et al. The effect of solubility of nano-modified endodontic cements. J. Conserv. Dent., 2014, 17(1), 13-17.10.4103/0972-0707.124096391537624554853Search in Google Scholar

11. Danesh G, Dammaschke T, Gerth HU et al. A comparative study of selected properties of ProRoot mineral trioxide aggregate and two Portland cements. Int Endod J. 2006,39, 213-219.Search in Google Scholar

12. Fridland M, R. Rosado. MTA solubility: a long term study. J Endod. 2005, 31, 376-379.Search in Google Scholar

13. Singh S, Podar R, Dadu S et al. Solubility of a new calcium silicate-based root-end filling material. J. Pakistan Dent. Ass. 2015, 18,(2), 149-153.Search in Google Scholar

14. Kumari S, Mittal A, Dadu S et al. Comparative Evaluation of Physical and Chemical Properties of Calcium Silicate Based Root End Filling Materials (Mineral Trioxide Aggregate and Biodentine): An in vitro Study. Indian Journal of Dental Sciences, 2018, 10, (4), 197-202.10.4103/IJDS.IJDS_42_18Search in Google Scholar

15. Roberti Garcia, Lda F, Chinelatti MA, Rossetto HL et al. Solubility and desintegration of new calcium aluminate cement (EndoBinder) containing different radiopacifying agents. J. Endod. 2014, 40(2), 261-265.Search in Google Scholar

16. Borges AH, Pedro FL, Miranda CE et al. Comparative study of physico-chemical properties of MTA-based and Portland cements. Acta Odontol. Latinoam., 2010, 23(3), 175-181.Search in Google Scholar

17. Chang SW, Baek SH, Yang HC et al. Heavy metal analysis of ortho MTA and ProRoot MTA. J Endod. 2011, 37, (12), 1673–1676.Search in Google Scholar

18. Islam I, Chng HK, Yap AU. Comparison of the physical and mechanical properties of MTA and Portland cement. J Endod. 2006, 32, 193-197.Search in Google Scholar

19. Bortoluzzi EA, Broon NJ, Bramante CM et al. Sealing ability of MTA and radiopaque Portland cement with or without calcium chloride for root-end filling. J. Endod. 2006, 32(9), 897-900.Search in Google Scholar