Computer Program for Digital Data Analysis of Facebow Records – Part ІI

1. Alshali RZ, Yar R, Barclay C et al. Sagittal Condylar Angle and Gender Differences. J Prosthodont, 2013, 22 (7), 561-5.10.1111/jopr.12047Search in Google Scholar

2. Bhawsar SV, Marathe AS, Ansari SA. Evaluation of Hanau’s formula in determination of lateral condylar guidance: A clinical research study. J. Indian Prosthodont Soc, 2015, 15(4), 326-30.10.4103/0972-4052.161566Search in Google Scholar

3. Dixon DL. Overview of articulation materials and methods for the prosthodontic patient. J Prosthet Dent, 2000, 83(2), 235-247.10.1016/S0022-3913(00)80017-7Search in Google Scholar

4. dos Santos JJr, Nelson S, Nowlin T. Comparison of condylar guidance setting obtained from a wax record versus an extra-oral tracing: A pilot study. J Prosthet Dent, 2003, 89(1):54-59.10.1067/mpr.2003.11Search in Google Scholar

5. Caro AJ, Peraire M, Martinez-Gomis J et al. Reproducibility of lateral excursive tooth contact in a semi-adjustable articulator depending on the type of lateral guidance. J Oral Rehabil, 2005, 32(3), 174-9.10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01287.xSearch in Google Scholar

6. Celenza FV. An analysis of articulators. Dental clinics of North America, 1979, 23(2), 305-326.10.1016/S0011-8532(22)03198-6Search in Google Scholar

7. el-Gheriani AS, Winstanley RB. The Gothic arch (needle point) tracing and condylar inclination. J Prosthet Dent, 1987, 58(3), 638-42.10.1016/0022-3913(87)90400-8Search in Google Scholar

8. Freilich MA, Altieri JV, Wahle JJ. Principles for selecting inter-occlusal records for articulation of dentate and partially den-tate casts. J Prosthet Dent, 1992, 68(2),361-7.10.1016/0022-3913(92)90346-CSearch in Google Scholar

9. Jagger R, Klineberg I. Articulators, transfer records and study casts. In: Klineberg I, Eckert SE, eds. Functional Occlusion in Restorative Dentistry and Prosthodontics. St. Louis, MO: Elsevier, 2016, 119.Search in Google Scholar

10. Johnson A, Winstanley RB. Recording sagittal condylar angles using a mandibular facebow. J Oral Rehabil. 1997, 24(12), 904-8.Search in Google Scholar

11. Kalman L, Chrapka J, Joseph Y. Digitizing the facebow: a clinician/technician communication tool. Int J Prosthodont. 2016, 29(1), 35-7.Search in Google Scholar

12. Klein I. Temporomandibular joint. J Prosthet Dent, 1970, 24(4), 419-52Search in Google Scholar

13. Mishra A., Palaskar J. Effect of direct and indirect face-bow transfer on the horizontal condylar guidance values: a pilot study. Journal of Dental and Allied Sciences, 2014, 3 (1), 8-12.10.4103/2277-4696.156518Search in Google Scholar

14. Pitchford JH. A reevaluation of the axis-orbital plane and the use of orbitale in a facebow transfer record. J Prosthet Dent, 1991, 66(3), 349-355.10.1016/0022-3913(91)90262-USearch in Google Scholar

15. Posselt U, Nevstedt P. Registration of the condyle path inclination by intraoral wax records – its practical value. J Prosthet Dent, 1961, 11 (1), 43.10.1016/0022-3913(61)90108-1Search in Google Scholar

16. Prasad KD, Shah N, Hegde Ch. A clinico-radiographic analysis of sagittal condylar guidance determined by protrusive interocclusal registration and panoramic radiographic images in humans. Contemp Clin Dent. 2012, 3(4), 383-7.Search in Google Scholar

17. Preti G, Scotti R, Bruscagin C, Carossa S. A clinical study of graphic registration of the condylar path inclination. J Prosthet Dent, 1982, 48(2), 461-6.10.1016/0022-3913(82)90086-5Search in Google Scholar

18. Rathee M, Malik P. Significance of face bow for dental restorations. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education, 2014, 4(5), 1-4.10.9790/7388-04540104Search in Google Scholar

19. Zamacona JM, Otaduy E, Aranda E. Study of the sagittal condylar pathway in edentulous patients. J Prosthet Dent, 1992, 68 (2), 314-7.10.1016/0022-3913(92)90336-9Search in Google Scholar

20. Zarbah MA. Accuracy of cast articulation: A literature review. Ann Med Health Sci Res, 2018, 8(3), 151-156.Search in Google Scholar