Olanzapine has been approved for use in patients with schizophrenia, bipolar I disorder, and resistant depression. Long-term treatment can increase the levels of liver enzymes in up to 50 % of patients and impair the liver function, leading to clinically visible hepatitis with jaundice. The time to the onset of liver injury varies between a few weeks and a year (1). It is therefore important to detect adverse drug reaction early, especially in genetically susceptible individuals. Liver function in patients receiving psychotropic drugs such as olanzapine is usually monitored through blood liver enzymes, namely aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (2). Some authors claim that an earlier and even more specific marker of liver injury is alpha-glutathione-S-transferase (α-GST), since it is highly concentrated in liver cell cytosol, widely distributed throughout the liver, and rapidly released from damaged hepatocytes into the plasma in large quantities, yet has a short half-life in plasma (3, 4). Furthermore, α-GST is not elevated in cases of muscle damage, haemolysis, or extrahepatic inflammation such as rheumatoid arthritis, and is therefore more liver-specific than aminotransferases (5). Even so, it is not routinely tested in clinics.
Recent research (6, 7) has established an association between genetic polymorphisms regulating GST (and other drug-metabolising) enzymes and the incidence of drug-induced liver injury (6, 7), as the GST superfamily plays a vital role in reducing oxidative liver cell injury and in the efficacy of drug treatment (8, 9). Cytosolic GSTs are divided into eight sub-classes and are highly polymorphic. Gene deletions caused by homozygous null mutation of
Another important enzyme involved in DNA repair is 8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase 1 (OGG1). It is responsible for the base excision of 7,8-dihydro-8-oxoguanine (8-OHG or 8-OHdG), the most critical DNA lesion resulting from oxidative stress caused by ROS. Its repair ability, however, may depend on the
There are several studies associating schizophrenia with
The study population consisted of 30 patients aged 18–65 years with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorders diagnosed at the Necmettin Erbakan University Psychiatry Clinic in Konya, Turkey according to the criteria of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders IV (18).
Before the treatment started they were naïve to olanzapine. The treatment consisted of olanzapine alone over three months, and its use was verified with serum measurements. Excluded were the patients who had a concurrent psychiatric disorder, a history of drug dependence or mental retardation, and who were taking other potentially hepatotoxic substances. Table 1 shows their demographic particulars.
Demographic and clinical characteristics of studied population (N=30)
36.7±14.1/19–63 | |
Men | 8 (26.7 %) |
Women | 22 (73.3 %) |
64.8±12.3 | |
165.1±8.0 | |
23.9±4.6 | |
10 (33.3 %) |
The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Keçiören Education and Research Hospital (approval No. B.10.4. ISM.4.06.68.49), and written consent was obtained for all participants before admission to the study.
For genotyping and enzyme determination we collected venous blood (9 mL) in EDTA tubes for biochemical and DNA analyses before olanzapine treatment (T1, baseline), 10±3 days after starting olanzapine treatment (T2), and 3±1 months after treatment (T3), based on previously published studies (19, 20).
DNA was isolated from the whole blood using the sodium perchlorate/chloroform method described in detail earlier (21). For
A partial gene deletion at the
The
An
To genotype for the
Serum olanzapine concentrations were measured with liquid chromatography–electrospray-ionisation-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-ESI-MS/MS) (Shimadzu LCMS-8030, Tokyo, Japan) following the validated method of Uřinovská et al. (23) with slight modifications as described earlier (24).
Serum levels of ALT and AST of patients were obtained from the hospital, whereas serum α-GST was measured with the enzyme-linked immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Microplate Assay for GSTA Product Number: GS41, Oxford Biomedical Research Inc., Oxford, MI, USA).
First we ran the power analysis with the G*power tool, release 3.1 (Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany) (25), which yielded a range from 0.85 to 0.93, confirming that our sample size was sufficient for further analysis. The obtained data were further analysed using the IBM SPSS Statistics version 17.0 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA). Genotype distribution was checked against the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. The normality of distribution was determined with the Shapiro-Wilk test and the homogeneity of variances with the Levene test. Where applicable, descriptive statistics for continuous variables were expressed as means ± standard deviations (SD) or medians and quartile 1–3 range. The number of cases and percentages were used for categorical data. Mean differences between groups were compared using the Student’s
Table 2 shows mean olanzapine maintenance doses and the distribution of gene polymorphisms in the study population. We found no deviation from the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium for any of the genotypes studied.
Olanzapine maintenance doses and distribution of gene polymorphisms in the study population (N=30)
0.13±0.052 | |
0.42±0.565 | |
Positive | 12 (40.0 %) |
Null | 18 (60.0 %) |
Positive | 22 (73.3 %) |
Null | 8 (26.7 %) |
14 (46.7 %) | |
16 (53.3 %) | |
16 (53.3 %) | |
14 (46.7 %) |
Table 3 shows that the first 10±3 days of treatment with olanzapine increased the levels of all enzymes compared to their baseline values (T2 vs T1). However, only ALT rose significantly at T2 compared to T1 and dropped to baseline levels at T3, whereas the other two enzymes did not change significantly.
Liver enzyme levels in olanzapine-treated patients (N=30) measured at three time points
2.1 (1.4–3.4) | 3.4 (1.9–6.8) | 2.8 (1.7–4.9) | 0.239 | |
17.0 (11.0–20.2)a | 25.0 (17.7–44.5)a, b | 17.0 (13.7–24.0)b | ||
19.5 (15.7–27.0) | 25.0 (17.0–39.2) | 19.0 (17.0–25.0) | 0.692 |
T1 – before treatment (baseline); T2 – after 10±3 days of treatment; T3 – after 3±1 months of treatment.
statistically significant difference between T1 and T2 (p=0.006; Friedman test).
statistically significant difference between T2 and T3 (p=0.008; Friedman test)
Serum ALT was above the upper limit of normal (ULN of <40 U/L) in seven patients at T2 and in one patient at T3. Only one patient had ALT>2xULN at T2 (clinically mild elevation).
Serum AST levels were above ULN of <40 U/L in six patients at T2 and in one patient at T3. All elevations were below <2×ULN.
Tables 4–6 show no significant associations between gene polymorphisms and the levels of liver enzymes measured at the three time points, save for the association between the
Association between gene polymorphisms and α-GST levels (μg/L) measured at the three time points in olanzapine-treated patients (N=30)
Positive | 1.7 (1.0–3.3) | 2.8 (1.7–4.7) | 2.2 (1.7–5.7) | 0.717 |
Null | 2.5 (1.4–3.5) | 4.2 (2.1–7.2) | 2.9 (2.0–4.3) | 0.311 |
p-value** | 0.368 | 0.415 | 0.692 | |
Positive | 2.0 (1.3–2.8) | 2.9 (1.9–4.4) | 2.9 (2.1–4.9) | 0.186 |
Null | 4.0 (1.4–9.8) | 6.4 (2.1–10.1) | 1.8 (1.4–6.5) | 0.607 |
p-value** | 0.118 | 0.156 | 0.420 | |
1.9 (1.3–2.8) | 2.9 (1.8–6.2) | 3.3 (1.7–6.5) | 0.395 | |
2.6 (1.4–4.2) | 4.0 (2.3–7.0) | 2.4 (1.7–3.4) | 0.305 | |
p-value** | 0.377 | 0.313 | 0.334 | |
2.8 (1.7–4.3) | 3.6 (1.9–7.4) | 2.9 (2.0–4.3) | 0.646 | |
1.6 (1.1–2.6) | 3.4 (1.8–6.2) | 2.3 (1.6–6.1) | 0.257 | |
p-value** | 0.077 | 0.580 | 0.728 |
T1 – before treatment (baseline); T2 – after 10±3 days of treatment; T3 – after 3±1 months of treatment.
difference between time points within each gene polymorphism (significant if p<0.025; Friedman test, Bonferroni correction).
difference between gene polymorphisms within each time point (significant if p<0.0167; Mann-Whitney
Association between gene polymorphisms and ALT levels (U/L) measured at the three time points in olanzapine-treated patients (N=30)
Positive | 16.5 (12.2–18.5) | 30.0 (15.7–43.2) | 19.0 (10.7–25.7) | 0.090 |
Null | 17.5 (11.0–24.5) | 23.5 (17.7–46.0) | 16.0 (14.0–22.2) | 0.183 |
p-value** | 0.632 | 0.917 | 0.819 | |
Positive | 16.5 (11.0–19.0) | 23.5 (16.7–34.2) | 18.0 (14.7–23.2) | 0.153 |
Null | 17.5 (11.5–33.7) | 35.0 (18.7–46.0) | 14.5 (10.2–24.7) | 0.223 |
p-value** | 0.344 | 0.504 | 0.504 | |
17.0 (13.2–25.2) | 21.0 (16.7–34.7) | 17.0 (13.7–29.0) | 0.323 | |
15.0 (11.0–19.0) | 27.5 (19.0–45.5)a | 18.0 (11.7–23.7)a | ||
p-value** | 0.608 | 0.355 | 0.822 | |
16.5 (11.2–18.7) | 24.5 (17.2–38.5) | 17.0 (14.2–20.0) | 0.170 | |
17.0 (10.7–26.7) | 26.5 (17.2–51.0) | 19.0 (12.2–29.5) | 0.211 | |
p-value** | 0.918 | 0.697 | 0.697 |
statistically significant difference between T2 and T3 (p=0.003). T1 – before treatment (baseline); T2 – after 10±3 days of treatment; T3 – after 3±1 months of treatment.
difference between time points within each gene polymorphism (significant if p<0.025; Friedman test, Bonferroni correction).
difference between gene polymorphisms within each time point (significant if p<0.0167; Mann-Whitney
Association between gene polymorphisms and AST levels (U/L) measured at three predetermined time points in olanzapine-treated patients (N=30)
Positive | 21.5 (16.5–29.2) | 24.5 (16.0–39.7) | 22.0 (16.2–32.0) | 0.770 |
Null | 19.0 (14.0–26.2) | 25.5 (17.0–39.2) | 19.0 (17.7–21.0) | 0.765 |
p-value** | 0.545 | 0.662 | 0.305 | |
Positive | 19.5 (15.7–24.5) | 22.5 (16.7–39.2) | 19.0 (16.7–25.0) | 0.955 |
Null | 23.0 (15.0–35.7) | 33.0 (21.2–47.2) | 20.5 (18.0–30.2) | 0.368 |
p-value** | 0.420 | 0.185 | 0.565 | |
19.0 (15.7–25.0) | 24.5 (18.2–37.7) | 20.5 (17.0–29.7) | 0.982 | |
22.5 (15.0–27.0) | 27.5 (17.0–39.7) | 19.0 (16.5–21.7) | 0.399 | |
p-value** | 0.608 | 0.580 | 0.334 | |
19.0 (15.7–26.2) | 25.5 (17.5–39.7) | 19.5 (18.0–21.7) | 0.814 | |
21.0 (15.5–30.2) | 23.0 (16.5–39.2) | 19.0 (16.0–30.7) | 0.801 | |
p-value** | 0.667 | 0.580 | 0.984 |
T1 – before treatment (baseline); T2 – after 10±3 days of treatment; T3 – after 3±1 months of treatment.
* difference between time points within each gene polymorphism (significant if p<0.025; Friedman test, Bonferroni correction).
** difference between gene polymorphisms within each time point (significant if p<0.0167; Mann-Whitney
Previous studies have generally evaluated the importance of α-GST in individuals with acute and chronic liver disease (such as hepatitis, chronic liver disease and cirrhosis) and compared it with ALT and AST. It has been suggested that α-GST may be used to confirm ALT and AST results in hepatocellular damage, that is, as an indicator of advanced damage (26). A few case studies of olanzapine (27, 28) report patients developing olanzapine-induced elevation of liver enzymes and liver-related diseases, but the underlying mechanism was unknown. These enzymes returned to normal levels after the drug was discontinued.
Our findings do not confirm our hypothesis that olanzapine treatment significantly increases serum α-GST early into the treatment or that it can serve as an earlier biomarker of liver injury than ALT or AST in these patients. Instead, ALT turned out to be the only significant early biomarker of liver injury, however mild, which is in line with several earlier reports (20, 29).
Furthermore, we found no significant association between gene polymorphisms and liver enzyme levels, save for the one between the
Even so, our study points to the need to monitor all three enzymes in clinical practice to minimise the risk of liver injury in patients receiving long-term olanzapine treatment and is in line with a number of (case) reports of transient liver biochemistry abnormalities in olanzapine patients (27, 28, 30, 31, 32). More importantly, though, it calls for an investigation in a much larger sample to identify the real risks. Besides a small sample, our study is also limited in the sense that we have not considered other risk factors, such as obesity or age, since our study period was relatively short.
Considering that the changes in ALT, AST, and α-GST levels were not significant, we cannot claim that olanzapine induced liver damage. However, the three biomarkers showed a similar rise and fall pattern, which suggests that α-GST could be used to monitor liver damage in olanzapine treatment along with ALT and AST. ALT turned out to be a superior biomarker to α-GST or AST, and the