Login
Register
Reset Password
Publish & Distribute
Publishing Solutions
Distribution Solutions
Subjects
Architecture and Design
Arts
Business and Economics
Chemistry
Classical and Ancient Near Eastern Studies
Computer Sciences
Cultural Studies
Engineering
General Interest
Geosciences
History
Industrial Chemistry
Jewish Studies
Law
Library and Information Science, Book Studies
Life Sciences
Linguistics and Semiotics
Literary Studies
Materials Sciences
Mathematics
Medicine
Music
Pharmacy
Philosophy
Physics
Social Sciences
Sports and Recreation
Theology and Religion
Publications
Journals
Books
Proceedings
Publishers
Blog
Contact
Search
EUR
USD
GBP
English
English
Deutsch
Polski
Español
Français
Italiano
Cart
Home
Journals
Archives of Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology
Volume 71 (2020): Issue 1 (March 2020)
Open Access
Cytotoxic and mutagenic potential of juglone: a comparison of free and nano-encapsulated form
Semiha Erisen
Semiha Erisen
,
Tülin Arasoğlu
Tülin Arasoğlu
,
Banu Mansuroglu
Banu Mansuroglu
,
İsmail Kocacaliskan
İsmail Kocacaliskan
and
Serap Derman
Serap Derman
| Apr 09, 2020
Archives of Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology
Volume 71 (2020): Issue 1 (March 2020)
About this article
Previous Article
Next Article
Abstract
Article
Figures & Tables
References
Authors
Articles in this Issue
Preview
PDF
Cite
Share
Article Category:
Original article
Published Online:
Apr 09, 2020
Page range:
69 - 77
Received:
Oct 01, 2019
Accepted:
Feb 01, 2020
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2478/aiht-2020-71-3344
© 2020 Semiha Erisen, Tülin Arasoğlu, Banu Mansuroglu, İsmail Kocacaliskan, Serap Derman, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Figure 1
Chemical structure of juglone (A) and poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) (B)
Figure 2
Particle size distribution (A), scanning electron microscopy image (B), FT-IR spectra (C), and release pattern (D) of nanoparticles
Figure 3
Viability of L929 fibroblasts treated with free and PLGA nanoparticle-coated juglone (JNP) after 24 h (A) and 48 h (B); Cell viability was measured with the MTT assay. Values are expressed as means of quadruple samples with standard error. *statistically significant differences between juglone and JNP (p<0.05)
Figure 4
Viability of alfalfa cells treated with free and PLGA nanoparticle-coated juglone (JNP) after 24 h (A) and 48 h (B); Cell viability was measured with the MTT assay. Values are expressed as means of triple samples with standard error. *statistically significant differences between juglone and JNP (p<0.05)
Figure 5
Potential mutagenicity in S. typhimurium TA98 treated with 0.31−10 μmol/L juglone: (A) TA98-S9 treated with JNPs; (B) TA98+S9 treated with JNPs; (C) TA98-S9 treated with free juglone; (D) TA98+S9 treated with free juglone; PC – positive control: 2-NF (2 μg/mL) and 4-NQO (0.1 μg/mL) without S9 and 2-AA (1 μg/mL) with S9; NC – negative control: water; *B value ≥0.99
Figure 6
Potential mutagenicity in S. typhimurium TA100 treated with 0.31−10 μmol/L juglone: (A) TA100-S9 treated with JNPs; (B) TA100+S9 treated with JNPs; (C) TA100-S9 treated with free juglone; (D) TA100+S9 treated with free juglone; PC – positive control: 2-NF (2 μg/mL) and 4-NQO (0.1 μg/mL) without S9 and 2-AA (2.5 μg/mL) with S9; NC – negative control: water; *B value ≥0.99
Physicochemical properties of juglone loaded PLGA nanoparticles
Encapsulating efficiency (%)
Drug loading (%)
Particle size (nm)
Zeta potential (mV)
Polydispersity index
29.95±2.8
15.42±2.1
213.33±5.2
-14.58±2.8
0.115±0.03