Use of Microsatellites in Genetic Diversity Assessment, Parentage Testing and Individual Identification of the Kangal Shepherd Dog

1. Mellersh C: Give a dog a genome. Vet J 2008, 178:46-52.10.1016/j.tvjl.2007.06.02917851102Search in Google Scholar

2. Galibert F, Quignon P, Hitte C, André C: Toward understanding dog evolutionary and domestication history. C R Biol 2011, 334:190-196.10.1016/j.crvi.2010.12.01121377613Search in Google Scholar

3. Pedersen N, Liu H, Theilen G, Sacks B: The effects of dog breed development on genetic diversity and the relative influences of performance and conformation breeding. J Anim Breed Genet 2013, 130:236-248.10.1111/jbg.1201723679949Search in Google Scholar

4. Shannon LM, Boyko RH, Castelhano M, Corey E, Hayward JJ, McLean C, Whitea ME, Abi Saide M, Anitaf BA, Bondjengog NI, Caleroh J, Galovi A, Hedimbij M, Imamk B, Khalapl R, Lallym D, Mastan A, Oliveiraa KC, Pérezo L, Randallp J, Tamq NM, Trujillo-Cornejoo FJ, Valerianoh C, Sutterr NB, Todhunterc RJ, Bustamantes CD, Boykoa AR: Genetic structure in village dogs reveals a Central Asian domestication origin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2015, 112:13639-13644.10.1073/pnas.1516215112464080426483491Search in Google Scholar

5. Freedman AH, Schweizer RM, Ortega-Del Vecchyo D, Han E, Davis BW, Gronau I, Silva PM, Galaverni M, Fan Z, Marx P, Lorente-Galdos B, Ramirez O, Hormozdiari F, Alkan C, Vilà C, Squire K, Geffen E, Kusak J, Boyko AR, Parker HG, Lee C, Tadigotla V, Siepel A, Bustamante CD, Harkins TT, Nelson SF, Marques-Bonet T, Ostrander EA, Wayne RK, Novembre J: Demographically-based evaluation of genomic regions under selection in domestic dogs. PLoS Genet 2016, 12:e1005851.10.1371/journal.pgen.1005851477876026943675Search in Google Scholar

6. Wang GD, Zhai W, Yang HC, Wang L, Zhong L, Liu YH, Fan RX, Yin TT, Zhu CL, Poyarkov AD, Irwin DM, Hytönen MK, Lohi H, Wu CI, Savolainen P, Zhang YP: Out of southern East Asia: the natural history of domestic dogs across the world. Cell Res 2016, 26:21-33.10.1038/cr.2015.147481613526667385Search in Google Scholar

7. Ostrander EA, Wayne RK, Freedman AH, Davis BW: Demographic history, selection and functional diversity of the canine genome. Nature Rev Genet 2017, 18: 705-720.10.1038/nrg.2017.6728944780Search in Google Scholar

8. Parker HG, Dreger DL, Rimbault M, DavisBW, Mullen AB, Carpintero-Ramirez G, Ostrander EA: Genomic analyses reveal the influence of geographic origin, migration, and hybridization on modern dog breed development. Cell Rep 2017, 19:697-708.10.1016/j.celrep.2017.03.079549299328445722Search in Google Scholar

9. Bigi D, Marelli SP, Randi E, Polli M: Genetic characterization of four native Italian shepherd dog breeds and analysis of their relationship to cosmopolitan dog breeds using microsatellite markers. Animal 2015, 9:1921-1928.10.1017/S175173111500156126245492Search in Google Scholar

10. Dreger DL, Rimbault M, Davis BW, Bhatnagar A, Parker HG, Ostrander EA: Whole-genome sequence, SNP chips and pedigree structure: building demographic profiles in domestic dog breeds to optimize genetic-trait mapping. Dis Model Mech 2016, 9:1445-1460.10.1242/dmm.027037520089727874836Search in Google Scholar

11. Mastrangelo S, Biscarini F, Tolone M, Auzino B, Ragatzu M, Spaterna A, Ciampolini R: Genomic characterization of the Braque Français type Pyrénées dog and relationship with other breeds. PloS One 2018, 13:p.e0208548.10.1371/journal.pone.0208548628123030517199Search in Google Scholar

12. Yılmaz O, Ertürk YE, Çoşkun F, Ertuğrul M: Using livestock guardian dogs in Balkans. Agricult Forest 2015, 61:161-173.10.17707/AgricultForest.61.1.21Search in Google Scholar

13. Erdoğan M, Tepeli C, Brenig B, Akbulut M, Uğuz C, Savolainen P, Özbeyaz C: Genetic variability among native dog breeds in Turkey. Turk J Biol 2013, 37: 176-183.10.3906/biy-1203-64Search in Google Scholar

14. FCI-Standard N^o 331: Kangal Çoban Köpeği (Kangal Shepherd Dog). [http://www.fci.be/Nomenclature/Standards/331g02-en.pdf]Search in Google Scholar

15. Koban E, Saraç ÇG, Açan SC, Savolainen P, Togan İ: Genetic relationship between Kangal, Akbash and other dog populations. Discrete Appl Math 2009, 157:2335-2340.10.1016/j.dam.2008.06.040Search in Google Scholar

16. Yilmaz O, Ertugrul M: Determination of Kars Shepherd Dog Raised in Turkey. CJPAS 2012, p.2127.Search in Google Scholar

17. Cilek S, Kavak G: Some morphological characteristics of kangal shepherd dogs (Karabas) raised at villages by farmers in Kirikkale province. Asian J Anim Vet Adv 2012, 7:403-411.10.3923/ajava.2012.403.411Search in Google Scholar

18. Parker HG: Genomic analyses of modern dog breeds. Mamm Genome 2012, 23: 19-27.10.1007/s00335-011-9387-6355912622231497Search in Google Scholar

19. Budowle B, Garofano P, Hellman A, Ketchum M, Kanthaswamy S, Parson W, Van Haeringen W, Fain S, Broad T: Recommendations for animal DNA forensic and identity testing. Int J Legal Med 2005, 119:295-302.10.1007/s00414-005-0545-915834735Search in Google Scholar

20. Dimitrijevic V, Stevanovic J, Savic M, Petrujkic B, Simeunovic P, Milosevic I, Stanimirovic Z: Validation of 10 Microsatellite Loci for Their use in Parentage Verification and Individual Identification in the Yugoslavian Shepherd Dog Sharplanina. Ann Anim Sci 2013, 13:715-722.10.2478/aoas-2013-0047Search in Google Scholar

21. Excoffier L, Lischer HE: Arlequin suite ver 3.5: a new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Mol Ecol Resour 2010, 10:564-567.10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02847.x21565059Search in Google Scholar

22. DeNise S, Johnston E, Halverson J, Marshall K, Rosenfeld D, McKenna S, Sharp T, Edwards J: Power of exclusion for parentage verification and probability of match for identity in American kennel club breeds using 17 canine microsatellite markers. Anim Genet 2004, 35:14-17.10.1046/j.1365-2052.2003.01074.x14731224Search in Google Scholar

23. Völkel I: Untersuchungen zur molekulargenetischen Rassendifferenzierung bei Canis familiaris. PhD Thesis. Humboldt University of Berlin, 1-154, 2005.Search in Google Scholar

24. Truksa M, Urban T, Putnová L: Analysis of genetic diversity in Caucasian Shepherd Dog and Czech Terrier dog breeds using microsatellite loci. Biotech 2008, 1:409-411.Search in Google Scholar

25. Ganço L, Carvalho M, Serra A, Balsa F, Bento AM, Anjos MJ, Xufre A, Côrte-Real F: Genetic diversity analysis of 10 STR’s loci used for forensic identification in canine hair samples. Forensic Sci Int Genet Suppl Ser 2009, 2:288-289.10.1016/j.fsigss.2009.08.068Search in Google Scholar

26. Lüpke L, Distl O: Microsatellite marker analysis of the genetic variability in Hanoverian Hounds. J Anim Breed Genet 2005, 122:131-139.10.1111/j.1439-0388.2005.00501.x16130480Search in Google Scholar

27. Přibáňová M, Horak P, Schröffelová D, Urban T, Bechyňová R, Musilova L: Analysis of genetic variability in the Czech Dachshund population using microsatellite markers. J Anim Breed Genet 2009, 126:311-318.10.1111/j.1439-0388.2008.00772.x19630882Search in Google Scholar

28. Zenke P, Egyed B, Zöldág L, Pádár Z: Population genetic study in Hungarian canine populations using forensically informative STR loci. Forensic Sci Int Genet 2011, 5:pp. e31-e36.10.1016/j.fsigen.2010.03.01320457108Search in Google Scholar

29. Halverson JL: Microsatellite polymorphism in dog breeds-the AKC parent club study. In Proc. 27th ISAG Conference of Animal Genetics 2000, pp 19.Search in Google Scholar