Cite

1. Urist MR. Bone formation by autoinduction. Science 1965, 150:893-899.10.1126/science.150.3698.893Search in Google Scholar

2. Reddi AH, Weintroub S, Muthukumaran N. Biologic principles of bone induction. Orthopedic Clinics of North America. 1987, 18: 207-212.10.1016/S0030-5898(20)30384-9Search in Google Scholar

3. Block MS, Baughman DG. 2005 Reconstruction of severe anterior maxillary defects using distraction osteogenesis, bone grafts and implants. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005, 63:291-297.Search in Google Scholar

4. Oda T, Suzuki H, Yokota M, Ueda M. Horizontal alveolar distraction of the narrow maxillary ridge for implant placement. J. Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004, 62: 1530-1534.10.1016/j.joms.2004.07.00915573354Search in Google Scholar

5. Buser D, Dula K, Hess D, Hirt HP, Belser UC. Localized ridge augmentation with autografts and barrier membranes. Periodontology 1999, 19: 151-163.10.1111/j.1600-0757.1999.tb00153.x10321222Search in Google Scholar

6. Von Arx T, Buser D. Horizontal ridge augmentation using autogenous block grafts and the guided bone regeneration technique with collagen membranes: a clinical study with 42 patients. Clinical Oral Implants Research 2006, 17: 359-366.10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01234.x16907765Search in Google Scholar

7. Hammerle CH, Jung RE, Feloutzis A. Asystematic review of the survival of implants in bone sites augmented with barrier membranes (guided bone regeneration) in partially edentulous patients. Journal of Clinical Periodontology2002, 29 (Suppl 3): 226-231.10.1034/j.1600-051X.29.s3.14.x12787222Search in Google Scholar

8. Gottlow J. Guided tissue regeneration using bioresorbable and non-resorbable devices: Initial healing and long-term results. Journal of Periodontology 1993, 64: 1157-1165.10.1902/jop.1993.64.11s.11578295105Search in Google Scholar

9. Hardwick R, Scantlebury TV, Sanches R, Whitley N, Ambruster J. Membrane design criteria for guided bone regeneration of the alveolar ridge In: Buser D, Dahlin C, Schenk RK. Guided bone regeneration in Implant Dentistry 1994, Chicago, Berlin, Quintessence: 101-136.Search in Google Scholar

10. Pitaru S, Tal H, Soldinger M, Grosskopf A, Noff M.Partial regeneraton of collagen tissues using collagen barriers: initial observation in canine. Journal of Periodontology 1988, 59: 380-386.10.1902/jop.1988.59.6.3803164780Search in Google Scholar

11. Tal H, Kozlovsky A, Artzi Z, Nemcovsky CE, Moses O. Long-term biodegradation of cross-linked and non cross-linked collagen barriers in human guided bone regeneration. Clinical Oral Implants Research 2008a, 19: 295-302.10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01424.x18190562Search in Google Scholar

12. Moses O, Pitaru S, Artzi Z, Nemcovsky C. Healing of dehiscence type defects in implants placed together with different barrier membranes: a comparative clinical study. Clinical Oral Implants Research 2005, 16: 210-219.10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01100.x15777331Search in Google Scholar

13. Rothamel D, Schwarz F, Sculean A, Monika H, Scherbaum W, Becker J. Biocompatibility of various collagen membranes in cultures of human PDL fibroblasts and human osteoblastlike cells. Clinical Oral Implants Research 2004, 15: 443-449.10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01039.x15248879Search in Google Scholar

14. Owens KW, Yukna RA. Collagen membrane resorption in dogs. A comparative study. Implant Dentistry 2001, 10: 49-56.10.1097/00008505-200101000-0001611307648Search in Google Scholar

15. Rothamel D, Schwartz F, Sager M, Herten M, Sculea A, Becker J Biodegradation of differently cross-linked collagen membranes: an experimental study in the rat. Clinical Oral Implants Research 2005, 16:369-378.10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01108.x15877758Search in Google Scholar

16. Schwartz F, Rothamel D, Herten M, Sager M, Becker J.Angiogenesis pattern of native and cross-linked collagen membranes: an immunohistochemical study in the rat. Clinical Oral Implants Research 2006, 17: 403-409.10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01225.x16907771Search in Google Scholar

17. Tal H, Kozlovsky A, Artzi Z, Nemcovsky CE, Moses O. Cross-linked and non crosslinked collagen barrier membranes disintegrate following surgical exposure to the oral environment. Histological study in cat. Clinical Oral Implants Research 2008b, 19: 760-766.10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01546.x18720556Search in Google Scholar

18. Kozlovsky A, Abodi G, Moses O, Tal H, Artzi Z, Weinreb M, Nemcovsky CE Biodegradation of a resorbable collagen membrane (Bio-gide) applied in a double layer technique in rats. Clin Oral Implants Research 2009, Oct 20 (10): 1116-1123.10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01740.x19719734Search in Google Scholar

19. Schenek RK, Buser D, hardwick WR Dablin C. Healing pattern of bone regeneration in membrane-protected defects: a histologic study in the canine mandible. International Journal of Oral and maxillofacial Implants 1994, 9(1): 13-29.Search in Google Scholar

20. Colangelo P, PiatteliA, Barrucci S, Trisi P, Formisano G, Caiazza S. Bone regeneration guided by resorbable collagen membranes in rabbits: a pilot study. Implant Dent 1993, 2: 101-105.10.1097/00008505-199305000-000078242012Search in Google Scholar

21. Zitzmann NU, Naef R, Scharer P. Resorbable versus nonresorbable membranes in combination with Bio-oss for guided bone regeneration. International Journal of Oral and maxillofacial Implants 1997, 12. 844-852.Search in Google Scholar

22. Oh TJ, Meraw SJ, Lee EJ, Gianobile WV, Wang HL. Comparative analysis of collagen membranes for the treatment of implant dehiscence defects. Clinical Oral Implants Research 2003, 14: 80-90. 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.140111.x12562369Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
1820-7448
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
4 times per year
Journal Subjects:
Medicine, Veterinary Medicine