[1. Thacker SB, Stroup D, Chang M. Continuous electronic heart rate monitoring for fetal assessment during labor. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2001:CD000063.10.1002/14651858.CD000063]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Henderson Z, Ecker JL. Fetal scalp blood sampling - Limited role in contemporary obstetric practice: Part II. Lab Med 2003;34: 594-600.10.1309/GR5QVQWCJHYU370W]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Garite TJ, Dildy GA, McNamara H et al. A multicenter controlled trial of fetal pulse oximetry in the management of nonreassuring fetal heart rate patterns. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;183: 1049-58.10.1067/mob.2000.110632]Search in Google Scholar
[4. East CE, Colditz PB, Begg LM, Brennecke SP. Update on intrapartum fetal pulse oximetry. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2002;42: 119-24.10.1111/j.0004-8666.2002.00119.x]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Porreco RP, Boehm FH, Dildy GA et al. Dystocia in nulliparous patients monitored with fetal pulse oximetry. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;190: 113-7.10.1016/S0002-9378(03)00855-X]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Bloom ST, Spong CY, Thom E et al. Fetal pulse oximetry and Caesarean delivery. N Engl J Med 2006; 355: 2195-2202.10.1056/NEJMoa061170]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Amer-Wahlin I, Hellsten C, Noren H, Hagberg H, Herbst A et al. Intrapartum fetal monitoring: Cardiotocography versus cardiotocography plus ST analysis of the fetal ECG. A Swedish randomized controlled trial. Lancet 2001; 358: 534-8.]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Rosen K, Amer-Wahlin I, Luzietti R, Noren H. Fetal ECG waveform analysis. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2004, 18: 485-514.10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2004.02.008]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Ojala K, Vaarasmaki M, Makikallio K, Valkama M, Tekay A. A comparison of intrapartum automated fetal electrocardiography and conventional cardiotocography- a randomised controlled study BJOG 2006;113: 419-23.]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Westerhuis M, Porath M, Molb BW, Kwee A. Correspondence: A comparison of intrapartum automated fetal electrocardiography and conventional cardiotocography- a randomised controlled study. BJOG 2006; DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01029.x10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01029.x]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Westerhuis M, Kwee A, van Ginkel A, Drogtrop A, Gyselaers W, Visser G. Limitations of ST analysis in clinical practice: three cases of intrapartum metabolic acidosis. BJOG 2007;114: 1194-1201.10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01236.x]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Seelbach-Gobel B, Heupel M, Kuhnert M, Butterwegge M. The prediction of fetal acidosis by means of intrapartum fetal pulse oxymetry. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;180: 73-81.10.1016/S0002-9378(99)70153-5]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Sundstrom AK, Rosen D, Rosen KG. Fetal Surveillance. Neoventa Medical AB 2006, Textbook. CLD30020144R1A: 40.]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Skupski DW, Rosenburg CR, Eglinton GS. Intrapartum fetal stimulation tests: a metaanalysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;99: 129-134.]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Schmidt S, Koslowski S, Sierra F, Meyer-Wittkopf M, Heller G. Clinical usefulness of pulse oximetry in the fetus with no-reassuring heart rate pattern? J Perinat Med 2000;28: 298-305.]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Dokus K, Zubor P, Visnovsky J, Biringer K, Danko J. [Diagnostic accuracy of fetal pulse oximetry in detection of fetal intrapartum hypoxia]. Article in Slovak. Gynekolog 2010;19: 96-101.]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Amer-Wahlin I, Arulkumaran S, Hagberg H, Marsal K, Visser G. Fetal electrocardiogram: ST waveform analysis in intrapartum surveillance. BJOG 2007;114: 1191-1193.10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01479.x223930417877671]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Westerhuis M, Kwee A, van Ginkel A, Drogtrop A, Gyselaers W, Visser G. Limitations of ST analysis in clinical practice: three cases of intrapartum metabolic acidosis. BJOG 2007;114: 1194-1201.10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01236.x17501963]Search in Google Scholar
[19. East CE, Colditz PB. Intrapartum oximetry of the fetus. Anesth Analg. 2007 Dec;105(6 Suppl): S59-65.10.1213/01.ane.0000268493.90073.f318048901]Search in Google Scholar