Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), in spite of enormous progress in interventional cardiology, is still a procedure of choice in treatment of multi-vessel coronary artery disease (MVD) with diffuse atherosclerotic plaques [1]. It must be stressed that the optimal choice of aorto-coronary grafts to achieve permanent good outcomes is as important as technical surgical skills to perform successful CABG [2]. An importance of complete revascularization, defined as grafting all severely stenotic and occluded arteries, with respect to clinical improvement of coronary artery disease (CAD) was supported in the previous reports [3]. Moreover, occlusion of aorto-coronary bypasses makes cardiologists and/or cardiac surgeons to perform repeat and less effective revascularization procedures [4].
Currently, three types of vessels are routinely employed in CABG procedures: internal thoracic (ITA), radial arteries (RA) and saphenous veins (SV). Undoubtedly, the best vascular conduit with excellent long-term prognosis is ITA, especially implanted to the left anterior descending artery (LAD) [5]. RA and particularly SV are considered as worse aorto-coronary grafts than ITA. Additionally, cardiac surgeons still debate which vessels should be used to bypass other coronary arteries [6, 7]. It was proved that preoperative clinical and demographic status of patients undergoing CABG was also of importance with respect to conduits fate [8, 9, 10]. Moreover, the process of graft failure is multifactorial and thus many theories describing physiological properties of the aforementioned vessels have been proposed to explain such differences, including variability in expression of matrix metalloproteinases (MMP) together with their tissue inhibitors (TIMP), other cytokines as well as biologically active proteins within the vascular walls [11, 12, 13].
Many cell lines were considered to be involved in a phenomenon of graft failure [14, 15, 16]. More researchers stress a crucial role of macrophages in pathogenesis of aorto-coronary grafts failure [17, 18]. It was previously found that distribution of macrophages, defined as CD68+ cells, differed between vessels with favorable and poor long-term outcomes [19]. The vascular segments with relatively high representation of macrophages in the inner vascular layers were found to be more prone to development of preterm graft disease related to early CAD symptoms recurrence.
The purpose of this study was to find any ultrastructural differences in CD68+ cells between routinely used aortocoronary bypass grafts.
This study involved 50 patients (37 male (74%) and 13 women (26%) with the mean age of 63.4±9.2 years who underwent elective CABG procedures with the simultaneous application of RA and SV segments.
During CABG procedures, surplus segments of vessels used as aorto-coronary grafts and at least one centimeter in length were taken for ultrastructural studies. The arterial grafts were harvested pedicled with the surrounding tissues to avoid any accidental microinjuries. All vessels were obtained in the standard manner applying a full skin incision over the entire course of them. Moreover, measures such as avoidance of touching (‘no-touch method’), excessive manipulation and dilatation as well as high-energy electrocauthery were applied to minimize surgical trauma.
Vessels with macroscopic abnormalities such as signs of atherosclerosis (only in RA segments), inflammation, abnormally dilated or with iatrogenic injuries were not used both by surgeons as well as for ultrastructural examinations.
Following macroscopic inspection harvested vascular segments were divided into two parts, one for analysis in transmission electron microscopy (TEM) were immersed in phosphate-buffered 2.5% glutaraldehyde (0.05 M, pH 7.4) while the another one in freshly prepared Boiun solution for light microscopy. The further preparatory steps for microscopic examination were previously described in the details [18].
In immunohistochemical analysis the Dako REAL EnVision Detection System, Peroxidase/DAB, Rabbit/Mouse, K5007 (Dako, Copenhagen, Denmark) and mouse monoclonal anti-CD68 antibodies in dilution 1:100 (M0814, Dako) were used. Additionally, to identify macrophages in the vascular wall an eliminating assay with the following specific antibodies for lymphocyte subpopulations such as anti-CD20cy (1:400 dilution, M0755, Dako), anti-CD3 (1:50 dilution, M7254, Dako), anti-CD8 (1:100 dilution, M7103, Dako) and anti-CD30 (1:40 dilution, M0751, Dako) was carried out [18]. The peroxidase reaction was developed using diaminobenzidine.
Transverse vascular sections were analyzed under a brightfield microscope - Olympus BX 50 (OLYMPUS Optical Europe, Germany) equipped with a Mirax-Midi scanner (Carl Zeiss Microimaging GmbH, Germany), coupled with a Panoramic Viewer, version 1.15.4, software (3DHISTECH Ltd., Budapest, Hungary). All of the analyses were performed blind using coded samples and included positive and negative controls. The negative controls consisted of sections incubated with nonimmune IgG1 (X0931, Dako) as well as sections in which the primary or secondary antibodies were omitted. In addition, serial sections were stained in subsequent experiments as positive controls and to determine the consistency of staining. The cells presenting expression of CD68 protein were counted first throughout the vessel wall then within the consecutive layers: the
For transmission electron microscopy (TEM), vascular samples were prepared in steps described previously [16]. Ultrathin sections were mounted on mesh nickel grids, counterstained with uranyl acetate then lead citrate and eventually examined using a JEM-1010 (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) TEM. Typical utrastructural features of macrophages were assessed separately in all layer of the vascular wall and special attention was paid to cell membrane and cytoplasmic organella with respect to their biological activity.
First, continuous variables were checked for normality with the use of the Shapiro-Wilk test. Those satisfying normal distribution criteria were presented as the means with standard deviations (sd). The remaining continuous data were expressed as medians with 25th to 75th percentiles and then compared by means of the nonparametric Mann-Witney U test. A p value below 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Analysis was performed with the use of statistical software Statistica 10.0 for Windows (StatSoft, Inc., Tulsa, OK, USA).
The research related to human use has been complied with all the relevant national regulations, institutional policies and in accordance the tenets of the Helsinki Declaration, and has been approved by the authors’ institutional review board or equivalent committee. The study protocol was approved by the Local Bioethical Committee (No 1201/08) and all patients expressed written consent to participate in this study.
Expression of CD68 protein was noted in all segments of the examined vascular segments although their number was in the wide range, in RA between 15 and 244 while 28 through 289 in SV. Median (25th; 75th percentile) of a total number of CD68+ cells, considered as macrophages, on the vascular transverse sections was smaller in RA (66 (43; 108)) than in SV (95 (67; 135)) (p<0.05) (
Histological analysis revealed that not only the absolute number of CD68+ cells in the consecutive layers but also their percentage rate differed significantly between RA and SV. In the latter one, more macrophages were found in the inner strata of their vascular wall. In RA, markedly more CD68+ cells were found in the
An absolute number and percentage rate of CD68+ cells in the vascular layers
# | RA [N=50] | SV [N=50] | P VALUE |
---|---|---|---|
3 (2; 13) | 13 (9; 23) | < 0.001 | |
0.08 (0.02; 0.12) | 0.19 (0.14; 0.21) | 0.004 | |
12 (6; 19) | 30 (17; 43) | 0.002 | |
0.20 (0.10; 0.24) | 0,31 (0.23; 0.36) | 0.002 | |
54 (28; 90) | 45 (32; 74) | 0.015 | |
0.72 (0.60; 0.82) | 0.50 (0.42; 0.58) | <0.001 |
# data are presented expressed as medians with percentiles (25th; 75th)
Detailed analysis of microelectrophotography of cells equipped with ultrastructures typical for macrophages revealed marked differences between these located in
Macrophages in the
Otherwise, the vast majority of macrophages in the
In the subendothelial layer, macrophages were embedded between collagen fibers. Similarly to the arterial wall, the majority of cells detected as macrophages in the
In the
The findings of this study should be treated as complementary one for the previous articles focused on degeneration of aorto-coronary grafts and published by the same research team [13, 19, 20]. There it was pointed that macrophages may play a crucial role in grafts disease eventually leading to their occlusions and clinically recurrence of CAD symptoms [13]. Earlier conclusions were confined to statements about association between CD68+ cells distribution within vascular wall and good/ poor long-term outcomes [20]. Aorto-coronary conduits associated with poor angiographic and clinical outcomes usually had more macrophages in
However, it must be stressed that vascular segments obtained for this study were not applied as aorto-coronary grafts before. We can not exclude that surgical interposition of the vascular conduits into arterial circulation between ascending aorta and coronary arteries may change completely potential for transformation into more active cells. Maybe pronounced infiltration by cells with phagocytic activity is a marker of some processes (mechanical or metabolic microinjuries, infection or inflammation, thrombus formation) that had place before surgery and vessel harvesting. Although grafts were harvested with ‘no-touch’ technique and additional protective measures were applied, surgical microinjuries of harvested vascular segments were still possible.
Our finding may be an important voice in the discussion about the second best aorto-coronary graft after ITA. Even nowadays after publications of many clinical data, there is still no common consensus if RA or SV should be preferred [23, 24]. Our findings may be treated as background for claiming that RA seems to be better aorto-coronary graft than SV because more active macrophages located in both the
The authors of this study are aware of limitations. First, this study is solely histological and ultrastructural analysis but the findings were not referred to the clinical outcomes. Due to complex study protocol and application of sophisticated scientific tools, a total number of transverse vascular sections had to be reduced to 50 in each group (RA and SV). Moreover, the examination were performed on the vessels before insertion them into aorto-coronary circulation as it was mentioned before. From ethical point of view it would not be possible to harvest such vessels from patients after a given period of follow-up. Application of experimental animal model, although valuable, would not be directly transferable to the human beings. At last, there are known drawbacks of immunohistochemical analysis of protein expression. However, two authors of this paper invited for research cooperation are histologists with great experience in the aforementioned method of protein expression analysis. Their expertise has been supported by numerous publications in the international and high-impacted peer-reviewed journals [10, 11, 28, 29].
Ultrastructural characteristics of both forms of macrophages infiltrating wall of aorto-coronary grafts is similar irrespective of the vessel type. More active cells in the inner layers of the venous conduits may contribute to their inferior outcomes compared to the arteries.