Cite

1. Samson E, Guseva Canu I, Acker A, Laurier D, Tirmarche M, editors. Tracy U: The French cohort of uranium cycle workers [displayed 27 March 2013]. Available at http://www.irsn.fr/FR/Larecherche/publications-documentation/Publications_documentation/BDD_publi/DRPH/Documents/IRPA13-IRSN-poster-E-Samson-P01-67.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

2. Directive 2004/37/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the protection of workers from the risks related to exposure to carcinogens or mutagens at work (Sixth individual Directive within the meaning of Article 16(1) of Council Directive 89/391/EEC) (codified version) [displayed 27 March 2013]. Available at http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2004:229:0023:0034:EN:PDFSearch in Google Scholar

3. Guseva Canu I, Molina G, Goldberg M, Collomb P, David JC, Perez P, Paquet F, Tirmarche M. [Development of a job exposure matrix for the epidemiological follow-up of workers in the French nuclear industry, in French]. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique 2008;56:21-9. doi: 10.1016/j. respe.2007.11.001Search in Google Scholar

4. Guseva Canu I, Faust S, Knieczak E, Carles M, Samson E, Laurier D. Estimating historic exposures at the European Gaseous Diffusion Establishment. Int J Hyg Environ Health 2012 [displayed 27 March 2013]. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2012.07.00210.1016/j.ijheh.2012.07.00222939882Search in Google Scholar

5. Guseva Canu I, Paquet F, Goldberg M, Auriol B, Berard P, Collomb P, David JC, Molina G, Perez P, Tirmarche M. Comparative assessing for radiological, chemical, and physical exposures at the French uranium conversion plant: Is uranium the only stressor? Int J Hyg Environ Health 2009;212:398-413. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2008.09.00210.1016/j.ijheh.2008.09.00218977171Search in Google Scholar

6. Guseva Canu I, Laurier D, Caer-Lorho S, Samson E, Timarche M, Auriol B, Berard P, Collomb P, Quesne B, Blanchardon E. Characterisation of protracted low-level exposure to uranium in the workplace: A comparison of two approaches. Int J Hyg Environ Health 2010;213:270-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2010.02.00310.1016/j.ijheh.2010.02.00320363186Search in Google Scholar

7. Lombardi DA, Verma SK, Brennan MJ, Perry MJ. Factors influencing worker use of personal protective eyewear. Accid Anal Prev 2009;41:755-62. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2009.03.01710.1016/j.aap.2009.03.01719540964Search in Google Scholar

8. Hansia MR, Dickinson D. Hearing protection device usage at a South African gold mine. Occup Med 2010;60:72-4. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqp11410.1093/occmed/kqp11419666963Search in Google Scholar

9. Neitzel R, Seixas N. The effectiveness of hearing protection among construction workers. J Occup Environ Hyg 2005;2:227-38.10.1080/1545962059093215415788384Search in Google Scholar

10. Packham C. Gloves as chemical protection - Can they really work? Ann Occup Hyg 2006;50:545-8. doi:10.1093/annhyg/ mel033Search in Google Scholar

11. Pantalonia F, Capitaineb C, Le Duffc F, Stevea JM, Barberisa J. Tolerance physique au port de l’appareil respiratoire isolant chez les sapeurs-pompiers [Physical tolerance of fire fighters wearing self-contained breathing apparatus during training, in French]. Arch Mal Prof Environ 2010;71:790-7.Search in Google Scholar

12. Salazar MK, Takaro TK, Connon C, Ertell K, Pappas G, Barnhart S. A description of factors affecting hazardous waste workers’ use of respiratory protective equipment. Appl Occup Environ Hyg 1999;14:470-8.10.1080/104732299302675Search in Google Scholar

13. Turner NL, Hodous TK. Respiratory protection in the mining industry. Occup Med 1993;8:143-54.Search in Google Scholar

14. Morton LM, Cahill J, Hartge P. Reporting participation in epidemiologic studies: a survey of practice. Am J Epidemiol 2005;163:197-203. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwj03610.1093/aje/kwj03616339049Search in Google Scholar

15. Sneyd MJ, Cox B. Commentary: Decreasing response rates require investigators to quantify and report the impact of selection bias in case-control studies. Int J Epidemiol 2011;40:1355-7. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyr12310.1093/ije/dyr12322039195Search in Google Scholar

16. Persson R, Hansen AM, Garde AH, Kristiansen J, Nordander C, Balogh I, Ohlsson K, Ostergren PO, Orbak P. Can the job content questionnaire be used to assess structural and organizational properties of the work environment? Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2011;85:45-55. doi: 10.1007/s00420-011-0647-210.1007/s00420-011-0647-221573960Search in Google Scholar

17. Davis R. What do we know about hearing protector comfort? Noise Health. 2008;10:83-9.Search in Google Scholar

18. Kahan E, Ross E. Knowledge and attitudes of a group of South African mine workers towards noise induced hearing loss and the use of hearing protective devices. S Afr J Commun Disord 1994;41:37-47.10.4102/sajcd.v41i1.255Search in Google Scholar

19. Dolez PI, Vu-Khanh T. Recent developments and needs in materials used for personal protective equipment and their testing. Int J Occup Saf Ergon 2009;15:347-62.10.1080/10803548.2009.11076815Search in Google Scholar

20. Holmer I. Protective clothing in hot environments. Ind Health 2006;44:404-13.10.2486/indhealth.44.404Search in Google Scholar

21. Ilmarinen R, Makinen H, Lindholm H, Punakallio A, Kervinen H. Thermal strain in fire fighters while wearing task-fitted versus EN 469:2005 protective clothing during a prolonged rescue drill. Int J Occup Saf Ergon 2008;14:7-18.10.1080/10803548.2008.11076744Search in Google Scholar

22. Malchaire J, Kampman B, Havenith G, Gebhardt HJ. Criteria for estimating acceptable exposure times in hot work environment, a review. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2000;73:215-20.10.1007/s004200050420Search in Google Scholar

23. Malchaire J, Piette A, Kampmann B, Mehnert P, Gebhardt H, Havenith G, Den Hartog E, Holmer I, Parsons K, Alfano G, Griefahn B. Development and validation of the predicted heat strain model. Ann Occup Hyg 2001;45:123-35.10.1016/S0003-4878(00)00030-2Search in Google Scholar

24. Malchaire J, Kampmann B, Mehnert P, Gebhardt H, Piette A, Havenith G, Holmer I, Parsons K, Alfano G, Griefahn B. Assessment of the risk of heat disorders encountered during work in hot conditions. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2002;75:153-62.10.1007/s00420010028711954982Search in Google Scholar

25. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). Ionizing Radiation, Part 2: Some Internally Deposited Radionuclides. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum Vol 78. Lyon: IARC; 2001.Search in Google Scholar

26. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR). Effects of ionizing radiation - UNSCEAR 2006 Report to the General Assembly, New York (NY): United Nations; Volume I, 2008. 12p.Search in Google Scholar

27. Mancini G, Baldasseroni A, Laffi G, Curti S, Mattioli S, Violante FS. Prevention of work related eye injuries: Long term assessment of the effectiveness of a multicomponent intervention among metal workers. Occup Environ Med 2005;62:830-5. doi: 10.1136/oem.2004.01957010.1136/oem.2004.019570174092816299090Search in Google Scholar

28. Forrest KY, Cali JM, Cavill WJ. Use of protective eyewear in U.S. adults: results from 2002 national health survey. Ophtalmic Epidemiol 2008;15:37-41. doi: 10.1080/092865 80701609247Search in Google Scholar

ISSN:
0004-1254
Languages:
English, Slovenian
Publication timeframe:
4 times per year
Journal Subjects:
Medicine, Basic Medical Science, other