Tracheal intubation with channeled vs. non-channeled videolaryngoscope blades

1. Apfelbaum JL, Hagberg CA, Caplan RA, Blitt CD, Connis RT, Nickinovich DG, et al. Practice guidelines for management of the difficult airway: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Management of the Difficult Airway. Anesthesiology 2013; 118: 251-270. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31827773b223364566Search in Google Scholar

2. Ducharme S, Kramer B, Gelbart D, Colleran C, Risavi B, Carlson JN. A pilot, prospective, randomized trial of video versus direct laryngoscopy for paramedic endotracheal intubation. Resuscitation 2017; 114: 121-126. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation. 2017.03.022Search in Google Scholar

3. Lewis SR, Butler AR, Parker J, Cook TM, Smith AF. Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for adult patients requiring tracheal intubation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; 11: CD011136. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011136.pub2Search in Google Scholar

4. Parasa M, Yallapragada SV, Vemuri NN, Shaik MS. Comparison of GlideScope video laryngoscope with Macintosh laryngoscope in adult patients undergoing elective surgical procedures. Anesth Essays Res 2016; 10: 245-249. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.167840Search in Google Scholar

5. Biro P, Fried E, Schlaepfer M, Kristensen MS. A new retrograde transillumination technique for videolaryngoscopic tracheal intubation. Anaesthesia 2018; 73: 474-479. doi: 10.1111/anae.14217Search in Google Scholar

6. Valencia JA, Pimienta K, Cohen D, Benitez D, Romero D, Amaya O, et al. A comparison of King Vision video laryngoscopy and direct laryngoscopy as performed by residents: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Anesth 2016; 35: 571-575. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.07.03927871595Search in Google Scholar

7. Cooper RM. Strengths and limitations of airway techniques. Anesthesiol Clin 2015; 33: 241-255. doi: 10.1016/j.anclin.2015.02.006Search in Google Scholar

8. Alvis BD, Hester D, Watson D, Higgins M, St Jacques P. Randomized controlled trial comparing the McGrath MAC video laryngoscope with the King Vision video laryngoscope in adult patients. Minerva Anestesiol 2016; 82: 30-35Search in Google Scholar

9. Kleine-Brueggeney M, Greif R, Schoettker P, Savoldelli GL, Nabecker S, Theiler LG. Evaluation of six videolaryngoscopes in 720 patients with a simulated difficult airway: a multicentre randomized controlled trial. Br J Anaesth 2016; 116: 670-679. doi: 10.1093/bja/aew058Search in Google Scholar

10. Kriege M, Alflen C, Noppens RR. Using King Vision video laryngoscope with a channeled blade prolongs time for tracheal intubation in different training levels, compared to nonchanneled blade. PLoS One 2017; 12: e0183382. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183382.Search in Google Scholar