Evaluation of working length determination based on the analysis of cone-beam computed tomographic images and an electronic apex locator: a retrospective study^*

1. George R. Precision of multi-frequency electronic apex locators. Evid Based Dent 2016;17(3):86-7.10.1038/sj.ebd.640119027767118Search in Google Scholar

2. Razavian H, Mosleh H, Khazaei S, Vali A. Electronic apex locator: A comprehensive literature review – Part II: Effect of different clinical and technical conditions on electronic apex locator's accuracy. Dent Hypotheses 2014;5(4):133-141.10.4103/2155-8213.140588Search in Google Scholar

3. ElAyouti A, Dima E, Ohmer J, Sperl K, von Ohle C, Löst C. Consistency of apex locator function: a clinical study. J Endod 2009;35(2):179-81.10.1016/j.joen.2008.10.01719166768Search in Google Scholar

4. Janner SFM, Jeger FB, Lussi A, Bornstein MM. Precision of endodontic working length measurements: A pilot investigation comparing conebeam computed tomography scanning with standard measurement techniques. J Endod 2011;37(8):1046-51.10.1016/j.joen.2011.05.00521763892Search in Google Scholar

5. Jeger FB, Janner SFM, Bornstein MM, Lussi A. Endodontic working length measurement with preexisting cone-beam computed tomography scanning: A prospective, controlled clinical study. J Endod 2012;38(7):884-8.10.1016/j.joen.2012.03.02422703648Search in Google Scholar

6. Martins JNR, Marques D, Mata A, Caramês J. Clinical efficacy of electronic apex locators: Systematic review. J Endod 2014;40(6):759-77.10.1016/j.joen.2014.03.01124862702Search in Google Scholar

7. Chaudhary S, Gharti A, Adhikari B. An in vivo comparison of accuracy of two electronic apex locators in determining working length using stainless steel and nickel titanium files. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent 2018;10:75-82.10.2147/CCIDE.S158882596880429861643Search in Google Scholar

8. Üstün Y, Aslan T, Şekerci AE, Sağsen B. Evaluation of the reliability of cone-beam computed tomography scanning and electronic apex locator measurements in working length determination of teeth with large periapical lesions. J Endod 2016;42(9):1334-7.10.1016/j.joen.2016.06.01027484249Search in Google Scholar

9. Yılmaz F, Kamburoğlu K, Şenel B. Endodontic working length measurement using cone-beam computed tomographic images obtained at different voxel sizes and field of view, periapical radiography, and apex locator: a comparative ex vivo study. J Endod 2017;43(1):152-6.10.1016/j.joen.2016.09.01927986097Search in Google Scholar

10. de Morais ALG, de Alencar AHG, Estrela CR, Decurcio DA, Estrela C. Working length determination using cone-beam computed tomography, periapical radiography and electronic apex locator in teeth with apical periodontitis: A clinical study. Iran Endod J 2016;11(3):164-8.Search in Google Scholar

11. Ghule KD, Naik S. Comparing the accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography and electronic apex locator for root canal length determination in primary teeth. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2019;37(2):157-61.10.4103/JISPPD.JISPPD_148_19Search in Google Scholar

12. Mrasori S, Budina R, Dragidella F. In vitro evaluation of three electronic apex locators using conventional methods and cone beam computed tomography. Minerva Stomatol 2014;63(7-8):259-66.Search in Google Scholar

13. Dutta K, Desai PD, Das UK, Sarkar S. Comparative evaluation of three methods to measure working length – manual tactile sensation, digital radiograph, and multidetector computed tomography: An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent 2017;20(2):76-80.10.4103/JCD.JCD_4_16556424828855751Search in Google Scholar

14. Lucena C, López JM, Martín JA, Robles V, González-Rodríguez MP. Accuracy of working length measurement: Electronic apex locator versus conebeam computed tomography. Int Endod J 2014;47(3):246-56.10.1111/iej.1214023772839Search in Google Scholar

15. Metska ME, Liem VML, Parsa A, Koolstra JH, Wesselink PR, Ozok AR. Cone-beam computed tomographic scans in comparison with periapical radiographs for root canal length measurement: An in situ study. J Endod 2014;40(8):1206-9.10.1016/j.joen.2013.12.03625069934Search in Google Scholar

16. Aktan AM, Yildirim C, Karataşlıoğlu E, Çiftçi ME, Aksoy F. Effects of voxel size and resolution on the accuracy of endodontic length measurement using cone beam computed tomography. Ann Anat 2016;208:96-102.10.1016/j.aanat.2016.05.00527339301Search in Google Scholar

17. Connert T, Hülber JM, Godt A, Löst C, ElAyouti A. Accuracy of endodontic working length determination using cone beam computed tomography. Int Endod J 2014;47(7):698-703.10.1111/iej.1220624134733Search in Google Scholar

18. Tsesis I, Blazer T, Ben-Izhack G, Taschieri S, Del Fabbro M, Corbella S, et al. The precision of electronic apex locators in working length determination: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. J Endod 2015;41(11):1818-23.10.1016/j.joen.2015.08.01226409810Search in Google Scholar

19. Amin J, Lines J, Milosevic MP, Park A, Sholapurkar A. Comparison of accuracy and reliability of working length determination using cone beam computed tomography and electronic apex locator: a systematic review. J Contemp Dent Pract 2019;20(9):1118-23.10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2651Search in Google Scholar