This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.
Braun, T., Glänzel, W., & Schubert A. (1989a). National publication patterns and citation impact in the multidisciplinary journals Nature and Science. Scientometrics, 17(1–2), 11–14.BraunT.GlänzelW.SchubertA.1989aNational publication patterns and citation impact in the multidisciplinary journals Nature and ScienceScientometrics171–2111410.1007/BF02017719Search in Google Scholar
Braun, T., Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (1989b). Some data on the distribution of journal publication types in the Science Citation Index database. Scientometrics, 15(5–6), 325–330.BraunT.GlänzelW.SchubertA.1989bSome data on the distribution of journal publication types in the Science Citation Index databaseScientometrics155–632533010.1007/BF02017057Search in Google Scholar
Campanario, J.M., Carretero, J., Marangon, V., Molina, A., & Ros, G. (2011). Effect on the journal impact factor of the number and document type of citing records: a wide-scale study. Scientometrics, 87, 75–84.CampanarioJ.M.CarreteroJ.MarangonV.MolinaA.RosG.2011Effect on the journal impact factor of the number and document type of citing records: a wide-scale studyScientometrics87758410.1007/s11192-010-0333-2Search in Google Scholar
Frandsen, T.F. (2008). On the ratio of citable versus non-citable items in economics journals. Scientometrics, 74, 439–451.FrandsenT.F.2008On the ratio of citable versus non-citable items in economics journalsScientometrics7443945110.1007/s11192-007-1697-9Search in Google Scholar
Garfield, E. (1987). Why are the impacts of the leading medical journals so similar and yet so different? Item-by-item audits reveal a diversity of editorial material. Current Contents, 2, 7–13.GarfieldE.1987Why are the impacts of the leading medical journals so similar and yet so different? Item-by-item audits reveal a diversity of editorial materialCurrent Contents2713Search in Google Scholar
Harzing, A.W. (2010). Working with ISI data: Beware of categorisation problems. Retrieved from http://www.harzing.com/ISI_categories.htm.HarzingA.W.2010Working with ISI data: Beware of categorisation problemsRetrieved fromhttp://www.harzing.com/ISI_categories.htmSearch in Google Scholar
Harzing, A.W. (2013). Document categories in the ISI Web of Knowledge: Misunderstanding the social sciences? Scientometrics, 94(1), 23–34.HarzingA.W.2013Document categories in the ISI Web of Knowledge: Misunderstanding the social sciences?Scientometrics941233410.1007/s11192-012-0738-1Search in Google Scholar
Haustein, S., Costas, R., & Larivière, V. (2015). Characterizing social media metrics of scholarly papers: The effect of document properties and collaboration patterns. PloS ONE, 10(3), e0120495.HausteinS.CostasR.LarivièreV.2015Characterizing social media metrics of scholarly papers: The effect of document properties and collaboration patternsPloS ONE103e012049510.1371/journal.pone.0120495436362525780916Search in Google Scholar
Kaneiwa, K., Adachi, J., Aoki, M., Masuda, T., Midorikawa, N., Tanimura, A., & Yamazaki, S. (1988). A comparison between the journals Nature and Science. Scientometrics, 13(3–4), 125–153.KaneiwaK.AdachiJ.AokiM.MasudaT.MidorikawaN.TanimuraA.YamazakiS.1988A comparison between the journals Nature and ScienceScientometrics133–412515310.1007/BF02017179Search in Google Scholar
Lewison, G. (2009). The percentage of reviews in research output: A simple measure of research esteem. Research Evaluation, 18(1), 25–37.LewisonG.2009The percentage of reviews in research output: A simple measure of research esteemResearch Evaluation181253710.3152/095820209X410406Search in Google Scholar
Michels, C., & Fu, J.Y. (2014). Systematic analysis of coverage and usage of conference proceedings in web of science. Scientometrics, 100(2), 307–327.MichelsC.FuJ.Y.2014Systematic analysis of coverage and usage of conference proceedings in web of scienceScientometrics100230732710.1007/s11192-014-1309-4Search in Google Scholar
Rousseau, R. (2009). The most influential editorials. In In Åström, F., Danell, R., & Larsen, Bl, et al. (Eds.) Celebrating Scholarly Communication Studies. A Festschrift for Olle Persson at His 60th Birthday (pp. 47–53). Leuven, Belgium: International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics.RousseauR.2009The most influential editorialsÅströmF.DanellR.LarsenBlCelebrating Scholarly Communication StudiesA Festschrift for Olle Persson at His 60th Birthday4753Leuven, BelgiumInternational Society for Scientometrics and InformetricsSearch in Google Scholar
Sigogneau, A. (2000). An analysis of document types published in journals related to physics: Proceeding publications recorded in the Science Citation Index database. Scientometrics, 47(3), 589–604.SigogneauA.2000An analysis of document types published in journals related to physics: Proceeding publications recorded in the Science Citation Index databaseScientometrics47358960410.1023/A:1005628218890Search in Google Scholar
van Leeuwen, T.N., Moed, H.F., & Reedijk, J. (1999). Critical comments on Institute for Scientific Information impact factors: a sample of inorganic molecular chemistry journals. Journal of Information Science, 25(6), 489–498.van LeeuwenT.N.MoedH.F.ReedijkJ.1999Critical comments on Institute for Scientific Information impact factors: a sample of inorganic molecular chemistry journalsJournal of Information Science25648949810.1177/016555159902500605Search in Google Scholar
van Leeuwen, T.N., van der Wurff, L.J., & de Craen, A.J.M. (2007). Classification of “research letters” in general medical journals and its consequences in bibliometric research evaluation processes. Research Evaluation, 16(1), 59–63.van LeeuwenT.N.van der WurffL.J.de CraenA.J.M.2007Classification of “research letters” in general medical journals and its consequences in bibliometric research evaluation processesResearch Evaluation161596310.3152/095820207X196786Search in Google Scholar
van Leeuwen, T., Costas, R., Calero-Medina, C., & Visser, M. (2013). The role of editorial material in bibliometric research performance assessments. Scientometrics, 95(2), 817–828.van LeeuwenT.CostasR.Calero-MedinaC.VisserM.2013The role of editorial material in bibliometric research performance assessmentsScientometrics95281782810.1007/s11192-012-0904-5Search in Google Scholar
Wang, Y.H., Fang, C., Sun, S.J., & Wang, X. (2008). Analysis of Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the United States (PNAS) (in Chinese). Chinese Journal of Scientific and Technical Periodicals, 29(4), 718–722.WangY.H.FangC.SunS.J.WangX.2008Analysis of Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the United States (PNAS) (in Chinese)Chinese Journal of Scientific and Technical Periodicals294718722Search in Google Scholar
Wang, X.W., Mao, W.L., Xu, S.M., & Zhang, C.B. (2014). Usage history of scientific literature: Nature metrics and metrics of Nature publications. Scientometrics, 98, 1923–1933.WangX.W.MaoW.L.XuS.M.ZhangC.B.2014Usage history of scientific literature: Nature metrics and metrics of Nature publicationsScientometrics981923193310.1007/s11192-013-1167-5Search in Google Scholar
Zhang, L., Rousseau, R., & Glänzel, W. (2011). Document-type country profiles. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(7), 1403–1411.ZhangL.RousseauR.GlänzelW.2011Document-type country profilesJournal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology6271403141110.1002/asi.21537Search in Google Scholar
Zuccala, A., & van Leeuwen, T.N. (2011). Book reviews in humanities research evaluations. Journal of the American Society of Information Science and Technology, 62, 1979–1991.ZuccalaA.van LeeuwenT.N.2011Book reviews in humanities research evaluationsJournal of the American Society of Information Science and Technology621979199110.1002/asi.21588Search in Google Scholar
