[Aguilera, R. V., Judge, W. Q., & Terjesen, S. A. (2018). Corporate governance deviance. Academy of Management Review, 43(1), 87-109.10.5465/amr.2014.0394]Search in Google Scholar
[Atkinson, A., Kochetova-Kozloski, N., & Webb, R. (2012, January 14). Strategic performance information and Canadian board involvement in strategy related issues: A field study. (CAAA Annual Conference 2012 Proceedings).10.2139/ssrn.1985228]Search in Google Scholar
[Atwal, N., Butler, M., Mattoo, D., & Wood, M. (2019). Can there be a universal framework of good governance?. Governing Higher Education Today: International Perspectives, 140-147.10.4324/9780429429972-10]Search in Google Scholar
[Babelyte-Labanauske, K., & Kriauciunas, A. (2018, July). Edith Penrose and Jeffrey Pfeffer and Gerald J. Salancik: Is there room for complementarity?. (Academy of Management Proceedings No. 1, p. 15702). Briarcliff Manor, NY: Academy of Management.10.5465/AMBPP.2018.15702abstract]Search in Google Scholar
[Bailey, B., & Peck, S. (2013). Boardroom strategic decision-making style: Understanding the antecedents. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 21(2), 131-146.10.1111/corg.12008]Search in Google Scholar
[Bainbridge, S. (2015). The board of directors. In J. Gordon, & W. Ringe (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of corporate law and governance. Oxford: Oxford Handbooks Online.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198743682.013.20]Search in Google Scholar
[Banzato, C., & Volpp, J. (2016). Implications of theory and research on strategic leadership. A critical review. Revista Ibero-Americana de Estrategia, 15(3), 119-131.10.5585/ijsm.v15i3.2331]Search in Google Scholar
[Black, B., De Carvalho, A. G., Khanna, V. S., Kim, W.,& Yurtoglu, B. B. (2018). Which aspects of corporate governance matter in emerging markets: Evidence from Brazil, India, Korea and Turkey. Northwestern Law and Econ Research Paper, 14-22.10.2139/ssrn.3058081]Search in Google Scholar
[BOE. (2010). Real Decreto Legislativo 1/2010. Ley de Sociedades de Capital. España. Retrieved from: https://www.boe.es/buscar/pdf/2010/BOE-A-2010-10544-consolidado.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[BOE. (2014). Ley 31/2014. Modificaciones a la Ley de Sociedades. España. Retrieved from: https://www.boe.es/boe/dias/2014/12/04/pdfs/BOE-A-2014-12589.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[Booth-Bell, D. (2018). Social capital as a new board diversity rationale for enhanced corporate governance. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 18(3), 425-439.10.1108/CG-02-2017-0035]Search in Google Scholar
[Brauer, M., & Schmidt, S. (2008). Defining the role of boards and measuring their effectiveness. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 8(5), 649-660.10.1108/14720700810913304]Search in Google Scholar
[Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. (2017). The entrepreneurial imperatives of strategic leadership. In M. A. Hitt, R. D. Ireland, S. M. Camp, & D. L. Sexton (Eds.), Strategic entrepreneurship: Creating a new mindset (pp. 307-327). Oxford: John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9781405164085.ch14]Search in Google Scholar
[Daily, C., McDougall, P., Covin, J., & Dalton, D. (2002). Governance and strategic leadership in entrepreneurial firms. Journal of Management, 28(3), 387-412.10.1177/014920630202800307]Search in Google Scholar
[Demirag, I. (Ed.). (2018). Corporate social responsibility, accountability and governance: Global perspectives. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781351281720]Search in Google Scholar
[Dimopoulos, T., & Wagner, H. F. (2016). Corporate governance and CEO turnover decisions. Swiss Finance Institute Research Paper, 1, 12-16.]Search in Google Scholar
[Du Plessis, J. J., Hargovan, A., & Harris, J. (2018). Principles of contemporary corporate governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108329453]Search in Google Scholar
[Evans, G. L. (2014). A mega review of cultural studies: Linking leadership to corporate governance. The Poznan University of Economics Review, 14(1), 76.]Search in Google Scholar
[Evans, G., & Letza, S. (2017). Introduction to the special issue on corporate governance. Economics and Business Review, 3(1), 2-6.10.18559/ebr.2017.1.1]Search in Google Scholar
[Ferguson, C. S. (2019). Assessing the KING IV Corporate Governance Report in relation to business continuity and resilience. Journal of Business Continuity and Emergency Planning, 13(2), 174-185.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ferkins, L., Shilbury, D., & McDonald, G. (2005). The role of the board in building strategic capability: Towards an integrated model of sport governance research. Sport Management Review, 8(3), 195-225. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/S1441-3523(05)70039-510.1016/S1441-3523(05)70039-5]Search in Google Scholar
[Garg, S., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (2017). Unpacking the CEO-board relationship: How strategy making happens in entrepreneurial firms. Academy of Management Journal, 60(5), 1828-1858.10.5465/amj.2014.0599]Search in Google Scholar
[Hendry, K., Kiel, G., & Nicholson, G. (2009). How boards strategize: A strategy as practice view. Long Range Planning, 43(1), 33-56. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2009.09.00510.1016/j.lrp.2009.09.005]Search in Google Scholar
[Heracleous, L. (1999). The board of directors as leaders of the organization. Corporate Governance. An International Review, 7(3), 28-39. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8683.0015710.1111/1467-8683.00157]Search in Google Scholar
[Hillman, A. J., Withers, M. C., & Collins, B. J. (2009). Resource dependence theory: A review. Journal of Management, 35(6), 1404-1427.10.1177/0149206309343469]Search in Google Scholar
[Hopt, K. J. (2019). Comparative company law 2018. European Corporate Governance Institute-Law Working Paper, (460), 1-75.10.2139/ssrn.3421389]Search in Google Scholar
[Ingley, C., & Van der Walt, N. (2001). The strategic board: The changing role of directors in developing and maintaining corporate capability. Corporate Governance, 9(3), 15-23.]Search in Google Scholar
[Institute of Directors. (2001). The company director’s guide. London: England.]Search in Google Scholar
[Institute of Directors. (2016). King report on corporate governance for South Africa. Johannesburg: IOD.]Search in Google Scholar
[Knapp, M. (2018). What we can learn from corporate governance. In M. Knapp (Ed.), Enterprise portfolio governance (pp. 111-140). Singapore: Springer.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lussier, R., & Achua, C. (2010). Leadership, theory, applications and skill development (4th ed.). Mason, OH: South-Western.]Search in Google Scholar
[Malewska, K., & Sajdak, M. (2014) The intuitive manager and the concept of strategic leadership. Management, 18(2), 44-58. https://doi.org/10.2478/manment-2014-004110.2478/manment-2014-0041]Search in Google Scholar
[Manna, A., Sahu, T. N., & Gupta, A. (2019). Governance-led corporate performance: Theory and practice. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing.]Search in Google Scholar
[McCahery, J. A., Sautner, Z., & Starks, L. T. (2016). Behind the scenes: The corporate governance preferences of institutional investors. The Journal of Finance, 71(6), 2905-2932.10.1111/jofi.12393]Search in Google Scholar
[Memili, E., Fang, H. C., & Butner, H. (2017). Women family member involvement in corporate governance: A longitudinal study of publicly-traded family firms. (United States Association for Small Business and Entrepreneurship. Conference Proceedings, p. 937). United States Association for Small Business and Entrepreneurship.]Search in Google Scholar
[Moloi, T., & Adelowotan, M. (2019). Corporate governance principles and practices disclosed in the South African technical vocational education and training colleges’ annual reports. Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues, 22(3), 1-15.]Search in Google Scholar
[OECD. (2015). G20/OECD principles of corporate governance. Paris: OECD Publishing.10.1787/9789264241725-en]Search in Google Scholar
[Omar, O. A., Sell, D., & Rover, A. J. (2017, September). The information asymmetry aspect of agency theory in business compliance contexts: A systematic review. (Congresso Internacional de Conhecimento e Inovação–Ciki No. 1, 8-21).]Search in Google Scholar
[Panda, B., and Leepsa, N. M. (2017). Agency theory: Review of theory and evidence on problems and perspectives. Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, 10(1), 74-95.10.1177/0974686217701467]Search in Google Scholar
[Pfeffer, J., and Salancik, G. R. (1977). Organizational context and the characteristics and tenure of hospital administrators. Academy of Management Journal, 20(1), 74-88.10.2307/255463]Search in Google Scholar
[Pitelis, C. N., and Wagner, J. D. (2019). Strategic shared leadership and organizational dynamic capabilities. The Leadership Quarterly, 30(2), 233-242.10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.08.002]Search in Google Scholar
[Pugliese, A., Bezemer, P. J., Zattoni, A., Huse, M., Van den Bosch, F. A, & Volberda, H. W. (2009). Boards of directors’ contribution to strategy: A literature review and research agenda. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(3), 292-306.10.1111/j.1467-8683.2009.00740.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Quong, T., & Walker, A. (2010). Seven principles of strategic leadership. ISEA, 38(1), 22-34. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228506732_Seven_principles_of_strategic_leadership]Search in Google Scholar
[Ravasi, D., & Zattoni, A. (2006). Exploring the political side of board involvement in strategy: A study of mixed-ownership institutions. Journal of Management Studies, 43(8), 1671-1702.10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00659.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Rojas, C. R. (2017). Eclipse of the public corporation revisited: Concentrated equity ownership theory. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2970402]Search in Google Scholar
[Roy, M. C., Roy, M. J., & Bouchard, L. (2017). Improving board knowledge with information and communication technologies. Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 15(4), 215-224.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ruigrok, W., Peck, S., & Keller H. (2006). Board characteristics and involvement in strategic decision making: Evidence from Swiss companies. Journal of Management Studies, 43(5), 1201-1226.10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00634.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Shaukat, A., Qiu, Y., & Trojanowski, G. (2016). Board attributes, corporate social responsibility strategy, and corporate environmental and social performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 135(3), 569-585.10.1007/s10551-014-2460-9]Search in Google Scholar
[Shi, W., Connelly, B. L., & Hoskisson, R. E. (2017). External corporate governance and financial fraud: Cognitive evaluation theory insights on agency theory prescriptions. Strategic Management Journal, 38(6), 1268-1286.10.1002/smj.2560]Search in Google Scholar
[SIB. (2016). Resolución JM-62-2016. Reglamento de Gobierno Corporativo. Guatemala. Retrieved from https://www.sib.gob.gt/c/document_library/get_file?folderId=3632929andname=DLFE-26423.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[Subramanian, S. (2018). Stewardship theory of corporate governance and value system: The case of a family-owned business group in India. Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, 11(1), 88-102.10.1177/0974686218776026]Search in Google Scholar
[United States Army War College. (2010). Strategic leadership primer (3rd ed.). Carlisle, PA: Author. Retrieved from https://publications.armywarcollege.edu/pubs/3516.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[Veldman, J., & Willmott, H. (2016). The cultural grammar of governance: The UK code of corporate governance, reflexivity, and the limits of ‘soft’ regulation. Human Relations, 69(3), 581-603.10.1177/0018726715593160]Search in Google Scholar
[Vera, D., & Crossan, M. (2004). Strategic leadership and organizational learning. Academy of Management Review, 29(2), 222-240.10.2307/20159030]Search in Google Scholar
[Wesley, C., & Plaskoff, J. (2017). The reintroduction of Jewish covenantal theory as a form of corporate governance. (Academy of Management Proceedings No. 1, p. 16423). Briarcliff Manor, NY: Academy of Management.10.5465/AMBPP.2017.16423abstract]Search in Google Scholar
[Yukl, G. (2013). Leadership in Organizations (8th ed). Boston, MA: Pearson.]Search in Google Scholar