[Abbas A., Zhang, L., & Khan, S. U. (2014). A literature review on the state-of-the-art in patent analysis. World Patent Information, 37, 3-13.10.1016/j.wpi.2013.12.006]Search in Google Scholar
[Aiginger, C., & Vogel, J. (2015). Competitiveness: From a misleading concept to a strategy supporting Beyond GDP goals. Competitiveness Review, 25(5), 497-523.10.1108/CR-06-2015-0052]Search in Google Scholar
[Aiginger, K., Bärenthaler-Sieber, S., & Vogel, J. (2013, October). Competitiveness under new perspectives. (WWW for Europe Working Paper No. 44). Vienna: WIFO.]Search in Google Scholar
[Archambault, É. (2002). Methods for using patents in cross-country comparisons. Scientometrics, 54(1), 15-30.10.1023/A:1015654903218]Search in Google Scholar
[Archibugi, D., & Pianta, M. (1996). Measuring technological change through patents and innovation surveys. Technovation, 16(9), 451-468.10.1016/0166-4972(96)00031-4]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Aschhoff, B., Crass, D., Cremers, K., Grimpe, Ch., & Rammer, Ch. (2010). European competitiveness in key enabling technologies. Centre for European Economic Research (ZEW). Retrieved from https://nanonet.pl/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/European-Competitiveness-in-Key-Enabling-Technologies.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[BMBF. (2013). Zukunftsbild Industrie 4.0. Berlin: Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chiappini, R. (2014). Persistence vs. mobility in industrial and technological specialisations: evidence from 11 Euro area countries. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 24(1), 159-187.10.1007/s00191-013-0331-7]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Choi, D., & Song, B. (2018). Exploring technological trends in logistics: Topic modeling-based patent analysis. Sustainability, 10(8), 1-26.10.3390/su10082810]Search in Google Scholar
[Cockburn, I., Henderson R., & Stern S. (2018). The impact of artificial intelligence on innovation. (NBER Working Paper, No. 24449). National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w2444910.3386/w24449]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Delgado, M., Ketels, Ch., Porter, M. E., & Stern, S. (2012). The determinants of national competitiveness. (NBER Working Paper No. 18249).10.3386/w18249]Search in Google Scholar
[Dernis, H., Guellec, D. & van Pottelsberghe, B. (2002). Using patent counts for cross-country comparisons of technology output. STI Review, 27, 129-146. Special Issue on New Science and Technology.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dziallas, M., & Blindt, K. (2019). Innovation indicators throughout the innovation process: An extensive literature analysis. Technovation, 80-81, 3-29.10.1016/j.technovation.2018.05.005]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[EC. (2010). Europe’s digital competitiveness report 2010. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.]Search in Google Scholar
[EC. (2015). Monitoring the digital economy & society 2016-2021. Brussels: European Commission, DG Communications Networks, Content & Technology.]Search in Google Scholar
[EC. (2018). Digital transformation scoreboard 2018. EU businesses go digital: Opportunities, outcomes and uptake internal market. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ernst, H., & Omland, N. (2011). The Patent Asset Index: A new approach to benchmark patent portfolios. World Patent Information, 33, 34-4110.1016/j.wpi.2010.08.008]Search in Google Scholar
[Fagerberg, J. (1996, September). Technology and competitiveness. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 12(3), 39-51. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/12.3.3910.1093/oxrep/12.3.39]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Ferraro, S., Dutt, P. K., & Kerikmäe, T. (2017). Using patent development, education policy and research and development expenditure policy to increase technological competitiveness of small European Union member states. Croatian International Relations Review, 23(78), 97-126.10.1515/cirr-2017-0009]Search in Google Scholar
[Grossman, G. E., & Helpman, E. (1989). Comparative advantage and long-run growth. (NBER Working Papers 2809). National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.10.3386/w2809]Search in Google Scholar
[Guellec, D., & Paunov, C. (2018). Innovation policy in the digital age. OECD Science, Technology and Innovation Policy Papers, 59.]Search in Google Scholar
[Haskel, J., & Westlake S. (2017). Capitalism without capital: The rise of the intangible economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.2307/j.ctvc77hhj]Search in Google Scholar
[Hemais, C. A., Barros, H. M., & Rosa, E. O. R. (2005, July). Technology competitiveness in emerging markets: The case of the Brazilian polymer industry. Journal of Technology Transfer, 30(3), 303-314.10.1007/s10961-005-0932-x]Search in Google Scholar
[Howells, J., & Michie, J. (1998). Technological competitiveness in an international arena. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 5(3), 279-293.10.1080/13571519884396]Search in Google Scholar
[Huang, M.-H., Chen, D.-Z., Shen, D., Wang, M. S., & Ye, F. Y. (2015). Measuring technological performance of assignees using trace metrics in three fields. Scientometrics, 104, 61-86.10.1007/s11192-015-1604-8]Search in Google Scholar
[IMD. (2017). IMD World Digital Competitiveness Ranking 2017. Lausanne: The IMD World Competitiveness Center. Retrieved from www.imd.org/wcc]Search in Google Scholar
[IMD (2018). IMD World Digital Competitiveness Ranking 2018. Lausanne: The IMD World Competitiveness Center. Retrieved from www.imd.org/wcc]Search in Google Scholar
[Kagermann, H., Helbig, J., Hellinger, A., & Wahlster, W. (2013). Recommendations for implementing the strategic initiative INDUSTRIE 4.0: Securing the future of German manufacturing industry. Final report of the Industrie 4.0 working group, Forschungsunion.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kim, J., & Lee, S. (2015). Patent databases for innovation studies: A comparative analysis of USPTO, EPO, JPO and KIPO. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 92(C), 332-34510.1016/j.techfore.2015.01.009]Search in Google Scholar
[Kowalski, A. M., Michorowska, B. (2014). Methods for measuring innovation. In M. A. Weresa (Ed.), Innovation, human capital and trade competitiveness. how are they connected and why do they matter? (pp. 74-78). Heidelberg, New York, London: Springer.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lee, Y.-G. (2009). What affects a patent’s value? An analysis of variables that affect technological, direct economic, and indirect economic value: An exploratory conceptual approach. Scientometrics, 79(3), 623-633.10.1007/s11192-007-2020-5]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Makhoba, X., & Pouris, A. (2019). A patentometric assessment of selected R&D priority areas in South Africa: A comparison with other BRICS countries. World Patent Information, 56, 20-28.10.1016/j.wpi.2018.10.001]Search in Google Scholar
[Marinova, D., & McAleer, M. (2003). Nanotechnology strength indicators: International rankings based on US Patents. Nanotechnology, 14(1), R1-R7(7).10.1088/0957-4484/14/1/201]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Mehrotra, D., Sabitha, S., Nagpal, R., & Mattas, N. (2016). Landscape analysis of patent dataset. Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 21, 211-225.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ménière, Y., Rudyk, I., & Valdes, J. (2017). Patents and the fourth industrial revolution. The inventions behind digital transformation. Munich: European Patent Office.]Search in Google Scholar
[Monaco, L., Bell, J. & Nyamwena, J. (2019, February 28). Understanding technological competitiveness and supply chain deepening in plastic auto components in Thailand: Possible lessons for South Africa. (CCRED Working Paper No. 1/2019). Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=3384027 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.338402710.2139/ssrn.3384027]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Montresor, S., & Quatraro, F. (2017). Regional branching and key enabling technologies: Evidence from European patent data. Economic Geography, 93(4), 367-396. doi: 10.1080/00130095.2017.132681010.1080/00130095.2017.1326810]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Morrar, R., Arman, H., & Mousa, S. (2017). The fourth industrial revolution (Industry 4.0): A social innovation perspective. Technology Innovation Management Review. Retrieved from file:///C:/Documents%20and%20Settings/bkam/Pulpit/Morrar_et_ al_TIMReview_November2017.pdf,17.02.2019.]Search in Google Scholar
[Narula, R., & Wakelin, K. (1998, September). Technological competitiveness, trade and foreign direct investment. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 9(3), 373-387.10.1016/S0954-349X(98)00034-4]Search in Google Scholar
[OECD. (2009). Patent Statistics Manual. Paris: OECD Publishing.10.1787/9789264056442-en]Search in Google Scholar
[OECD. (2017). OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2017: The digital transformation. Paris: OECD Publishing. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264268821-en10.1787/9789264268821-en]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[OECD. (2019). Digital innovation: Seizing policy opportunities. Paris: OECD Publishing. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1787/a298dc87-en10.1787/a298dc87-en]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Pantano, E., Priporas, K.-V., & Stylos, N. (2018). Knowledge Push Curve (KPC) in retailing: Evidence from patented innovations analysis affecting retailers’ competitiveness. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 44, 150-160.10.1016/j.jretconser.2018.06.004]Search in Google Scholar
[Patel, P., & Pavitt, K. (1991). Europe’s technological performance. In C. Freeman, M. Sharp, & W. Walker (Eds.), Technology and the future of Europe (pp. 35-58). London: Pinter.]Search in Google Scholar
[Planes-Satorra, S., & Paunov, C. (2019, May). The digital innovation policy landscape in 2019. OECD Science and Innovation Policy Papers, 71.]Search in Google Scholar
[Popp, D. (2005). Lessons from patents: Using patents to measure technological change in environmental models. Ecological Economics, 54(2-3), 209-226.10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.01.001]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Porter, M. E. (2008). On Competition. Boston: Harvard Business School Publishing.]Search in Google Scholar
[Porter, M. E., & Heppelmann, J. E. (2014, November). How smart, connected products are transforming competition. Harvard Business Review, 92(11), 64-88.]Search in Google Scholar
[Prud’homme, D. (2016). Dynamics of China’s provincial-level specialization in strategic emerging industries. Research Policy, 45(8), 1586-160310.1016/j.respol.2016.03.022]Search in Google Scholar
[Radman, G., & Belin, A. (2017). Competitiveness in technology and innovation: How to keep on?. International Journal of Digital Technology & Economy, 2(1), 45-56.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rassenfosse, G. de, Dernis, H., Guellec, D., Picci, L., & van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, B. (2013). The worldwide count of priority patents: A new indicator of inventive activity. Research Policy, 42(3), 720-737.10.1016/j.respol.2012.11.002]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Santos, C., Mehrsai, A., Barros, A. C. Araújo, M., & Ares, E. (2017). Towards Industry 4.0.: An overview of European strategic roadmaps. Procedia Manufacturing, 13, 972-979.10.1016/j.promfg.2017.09.093]Search in Google Scholar
[Schwab, K. (2016). The fourth industrial revolution. Geneva: World Economic Forum.]Search in Google Scholar
[Scotchmer, S. (2005). Innovation and incentives. Cambridge: MIT Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tijssen, R. & Winnink, J. (2018). Capturing ‘R&D excellence’: Indicators, international statistics, and innovative universities. Scientometrics, 114(2), 687-699.10.1007/s11192-017-2602-9]Search in Google Scholar
[Uchida, Y., & Cook, P. (2005). The effects of competition on technological and trade competitiveness. Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 45(2-3), 258-283.10.1016/j.qref.2004.12.003]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Ungerman, O., Dedkova, J. & Gurinova, K. (2018). The impact of marketing innovation on the competitiveness of enterprises in the context of Industry 4.0. Journal of Competitiveness, 10(2), 132-148.10.7441/joc.2018.02.09]Search in Google Scholar
[van Ark, B., Hao, J. X., Corrado, C., & Hulten, Ch. (2009). Measuring intangible capital and its contribution to economic growth in Europe. European Investment Bank, 14(1), 62-93.]Search in Google Scholar
[van Raan, A. F. J. (2017). Patent citations analysis and its value in research evaluation: A review and a new approach to map technology-relevant research. Journal of Data and Information Science, 2(1), 13-50.10.1515/jdis-2017-0002]Search in Google Scholar
[Wallusch, J. (2015). (Un)finished transition. Stock of knowledge in Poland, 1924-2012. Economics and Business Review, 15(1), 89-102. doi: 10.18559/ebr.2015.1.710.18559/ebr.2015.1.7]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[WEF. (2018). The Global Competitiveness Report 2018. Geneva: World Economic Forum.]Search in Google Scholar
[Weresa, M. A. (2010). Intellectual property rights and competitiveness: evidence from Poland. International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy, 6(4), 233-247.10.1504/IJFIP.2010.037469]Search in Google Scholar
[Weresa, M. A. (2019). Stan i bariery rozwoju Przemysłu 4.0 w Polsce. In A. M. Kowalski, M. A. Weresa (Eds.), Konkurencyjność międzynarodowa Polski w kontekście czwartej rewolucji przemysłowej i Przemysłu 4.0. Warszawa: Oficyna Wydawnicza SGH (forthcoming).10.33119/978-83-8030-385-0.2020]Search in Google Scholar
[Wisla, R., & Sierotowicz, T. (2016). Medical technological specializations of central and eastern European regions. Economics and Sociology, 9(3), 195-209. doi: 10.14254/2071-789X.2016/9-3/1710.14254/2071-789X.2016/9-3/17]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Zamora-Torres, A. (2014). Countries competitiveness on innovation and technology. Global Journal of Business Research, 8(5), 73-83.]Search in Google Scholar