Cite

Elander J, Robinson G, Mitchell K, Morris J. An assessment of the relative influence of pain coping, negative thoughts about pain, and pain acceptance on health-related quality of life among people with haemophilia. Pain 2009; 145: 169–75. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2009.06.004.ElanderJRobinsonGMitchellKMorrisJAn assessment of the relative influence of pain coping, negative thoughts about pain, and pain acceptance on health-related quality of life among people with haemophiliaPain20091451697510.1016/j.pain.2009.06.00419573989Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Van Galen KPM, Sanders YB, Vojinovic U, et al. Joint bleeds in von Willebrand disease patients have significant impact on quality of life and joint integrity: a cross-sectional study. Haemophilia 2015; 21: e185–e192. doi: 10.1111/hae.12670.Van GalenKPMSandersYBVojinovicUJoint bleeds in von Willebrand disease patients have significant impact on quality of life and joint integrity: a cross-sectional studyHaemophilia201521e185e19210.1111/hae.1267025854528Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Forsyth AL, Witkop M, Lambing A, et al. Associations of quality of life, pain, and self-reported arthritis with age, employment, bleed rate, and utilization of haemophilia treatment center and health care provider services: results in adults with haemophilia in the HERO study. Patient Prefer Adherence 2015; 9: 1549–60. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S87659.ForsythALWitkopMLambingAAssociations of quality of life, pain, and self-reported arthritis with age, employment, bleed rate, and utilization of haemophilia treatment center and health care provider services: results in adults with haemophilia in the HERO studyPatient Prefer Adherence2015915496010.2147/PPA.S87659463141926604708Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Witkop M, Lambing A, Divine G, et al. A national study of pain in the bleeding disorders community: a description of haemophilia pain. Haemophilia 2012; 18: e115–e119. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2011.02709.x.WitkopMLambingADivineGA national study of pain in the bleeding disorders community: a description of haemophilia painHaemophilia201218e115e11910.1111/j.1365-2516.2011.02709.x22171646Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Holstein K, Klamroth R, Richards M, et al. Pain management in patients with haemophilia: a European survey. Haemophilia 2012; 18: 743–52. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2012.02808.x.HolsteinKKlamrothRRichardsMPain management in patients with haemophilia: a European surveyHaemophilia2012187435210.1111/j.1365-2516.2012.02808.x22530627Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Riley RR, Witkop M, Hellman E, Akins S. Assessment and management of pain in haemophilia patients. Haemophilia 2011; 17: 839–45. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2011.02567.x.RileyRRWitkopMHellmanEAkinsSAssessment and management of pain in haemophilia patientsHaemophilia2011178394510.1111/j.1365-2516.2011.02567.x21645179Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Humphries TJ, Kessler CM. The challenge of pain evaluation in haemophilia: can pain evaluation and quantification be improved by using pain instruments from other clinical situations? Haemophilia 2013; 19: 181–7. doi: 10.1111/hae.12023.HumphriesTJKesslerCMThe challenge of pain evaluation in haemophilia: can pain evaluation and quantification be improved by using pain instruments from other clinical situations?Haemophilia201319181710.1111/hae.1202323039033Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Young G, Tachdjian R, Baumann K, Panopoulos G. Comprehensive management of chronic pain in haemophilia. Haemophilia 2014; 20: e113–e120. doi: 10.1111/hae.12349.YoungGTachdjianRBaumannKPanopoulosGComprehensive management of chronic pain in haemophiliaHaemophilia201420e113e12010.1111/hae.1234924372731Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Witkop M, Lambing A, Kachalsky E, et al. Assessment of acute and persistent pain management in patients with haemophilia. Haemophilia 2011; 17 (4): 612–19. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2010.02479.x.WitkopMLambingAKachalskyEAssessment of acute and persistent pain management in patients with haemophiliaHaemophilia20111746121910.1111/j.1365-2516.2010.02479.x21323802Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

de Moerloose P, Fischer K, Lambert T, et al. Recommendations for assessment, monitoring, and follow-up of patients with haemophilia. Haemophilia 2012; 18 (3): 319–25. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2011.02671.x.de MoerloosePFischerKLambertTRecommendations for assessment, monitoring, and follow-up of patients with haemophiliaHaemophilia20121833192510.1111/j.1365-2516.2011.02671.x21992772Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Williams AC, Craig KD. Updating the definition of pain. Pain 2016; 157 (1): 2420–23. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000613.WilliamsACCraigKDUpdating the definition of painPain2016157124202310.1097/j.pain.000000000000061327200490Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Fillingim RB, Loesser JD, Barion R, Edwards RR. Assessment of chronic pain: domains, methods, and mechanisms. J Pain 2016; 17 (9 Suppl): T10–20. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2015.08.010.FillingimRBLoesserJDBarionREdwardsRRAssessment of chronic pain: domains, methods, and mechanismsJ Pain2016179 SupplT102010.1016/j.jpain.2015.08.010501065227586827Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Turk DC, Fillingim RB, Ohrbach R, Patel KV. Assessment of psychosocial and functional impact of chronic pain. J Pain 2016; 17 (9 Suppl): T21–49. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2016.02.006.TurkDCFillingimRBOhrbachRPatelKVAssessment of psychosocial and functional impact of chronic painJ Pain2016179 SupplT214910.1016/j.jpain.2016.02.00627586830Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Auerswald G, Dolan G, Duffy A, et al. Pain and pain management in haemophilia. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 2016; 27 (8): 845–54. doi: 10.1097/MBC.0000000000000571.AuerswaldGDolanGDuffyAPain and pain management in haemophiliaBlood Coagul Fibrinolysis20162788455410.1097/MBC.0000000000000571508756627439216Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Lambing A, Witkop M, Humphries TJ. Complementary and alternative therapy (CAM) in haemophilia pain management: a review of published literature. J Haem Pract 2019; 6 (1): 7–18. doi: 10.17225/jhp00122.LambingAWitkopMHumphriesTJComplementary and alternative therapy (CAM) in haemophilia pain management: a review of published literatureJ Haem Pract20196171810.17225/jhp00122Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Street RL. How clinician-patient communication contributes to health improvement: modeling pathways from talk to outcome. Patient Educ Couns 2013; 92: 286–91. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.05.004.StreetRLHow clinician-patient communication contributes to health improvement: modeling pathways from talk to outcomePatient Educ Couns2013922869110.1016/j.pec.2013.05.00423746769Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Feldman-Stewart D, Brundage MD. A conceptual framework for patient-provider communication: a tool in the PRO research tool box. Qual Life Res 2009; 18 (1): 109–14. doi: 10.1007/s11136-008-9417-3.Feldman-StewartDBrundageMDA conceptual framework for patient-provider communication: a tool in the PRO research tool boxQual Life Res20091811091410.1007/s11136-008-9417-319043804Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Dorflinger L, Kerns RD, Auerbach SM. Providers’ roles in enhancing patients’ adherence to pain self-management. Transl Behav Med 2013; 3 (1): 39–46. doi: 10.1007/s13142-012-0158-z.DorflingerLKernsRDAuerbachSMProviders’ roles in enhancing patients’ adherence to pain self-managementTransl Behav Med201331394610.1007/s13142-012-0158-z371799724073159Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Zanetti CA, Taylor N. Value in co-creation in healthcare through positive deviance. Healthc (Amst) 2016; 4: 277–81. doi: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2016.06.003.ZanettiCATaylorNValue in co-creation in healthcare through positive devianceHealthc (Amst)201642778110.1016/j.hjdsi.2016.06.00327469440Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Ruben MA, Meterko M, Bokhour BG. Do patient perceptions of provider communication relate to experiences of physical pain? Patient Educ Couns 2018; 101 (2): 209–13. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.08.002.RubenMAMeterkoMBokhourBGDo patient perceptions of provider communication relate to experiences of physical pain?Patient Educ Couns201810122091310.1016/j.pec.2017.08.00228803029Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Heckman BW, Mathew AR, Carpenter MJ. Treatment burden and treatment fatigue as barriers to health. Curr Opin Psychol 2015; 1 (5): 31–36. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.03.004.HeckmanBWMathewARCarpenterMJTreatment burden and treatment fatigue as barriers to healthCurr Opin Psychol201515313610.1016/j.copsyc.2015.03.004Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Valderas JM, Ferrer M, Mendivil J, et al; Scientific Committee on “Patient-Reported Outcomes” of the IRYSS Network. Development of EMPRO: a tool for the standardized assessment of patient-reported outcome measures. Value Health 2008; 11 (4): 700–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00309.x.ValderasJMFerrerMMendivilJScientific Committee on “Patient-Reported Outcomes” of the IRYSS NetworkDevelopment of EMPRO: a tool for the standardized assessment of patient-reported outcome measuresValue Health2008114700810.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00309.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

Izumi S, Vandermause R, Benavides-Vaello S. Adapting cognitive interviewing for nursing research. Res Nurs Health 2013; 36 (6): 623–33. doi: 10.1002/nur.21567.IzumiSVandermauseRBenavides-VaelloSAdapting cognitive interviewing for nursing researchRes Nurs Health20133666233310.1002/nur.21567Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Knafl K, Deatrick J, Gallo A, et al. The analysis and interpretation of cognitive interviews for instrument development. Res Nurs Health 2007; 30 (2): 224–34. doi: 10.1002/nur.20195.KnaflKDeatrickJGalloAThe analysis and interpretation of cognitive interviews for instrument developmentRes Nurs Health20073022243410.1002/nur.20195Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Drennan J. Cognitive interviewing: verbal data in the design and pretesting of questionnaires. J Adv Nurs 2003; 42 (1): 57–63.DrennanJCognitive interviewing: verbal data in the design and pretesting of questionnairesJ Adv Nurs2003421576310.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02579.xSearch in Google Scholar

Smith BH, Penny KI, Purves AM, et al. The Chronic Pain Grade questionnaire: validation and reliability in postal research. Pain 1997; 71: 141–7.SmithBHPennyKIPurvesAMThe Chronic Pain Grade questionnaire: validation and reliability in postal researchPain199771141710.1016/S0304-3959(97)03347-2Search in Google Scholar

Von Korff M, Ormel J, Keefe FJ, Dworkin SF. Grading the severity of chronic pain. Pain 1992; 50: 133–49.Von KorffMOrmelJKeefeFJDworkinSFGrading the severity of chronic painPain1992501334910.1016/0304-3959(92)90154-4Search in Google Scholar

Hawker GA, Mian S, Kendzerska T, French M. Measures of adult pain: Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS Pain), Numeric Rating Scale for Pain (NRS Pain), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), Chronic Pain Grade Scale (CPGS), Short Form-36 Bodily Pain Scale (SF-36 BPS), and Measure of Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP). Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2011; 63 (Suppl 11): S240–52. doi: 10.1002/acr.20543.HawkerGAMianSKendzerskaTFrenchMMeasures of adult pain: Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS Pain), Numeric Rating Scale for Pain (NRS Pain), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), Chronic Pain Grade Scale (CPGS), Short Form-36 Bodily Pain Scale (SF-36 BPS), and Measure of Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP)Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)201163Suppl 11S2405210.1002/acr.2054322588748Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Salaffi FF, Stancati AF, Grassi W. Reliability and validity of the Italian version of the Chronic Pain Grade questionnaire in patients with musculoskeletal disorders. Clin Rheumatol 2006;25: 619–31. doi: 10.1007/s10067-005-0140-y.SalaffiFFStancatiAFGrassiWReliability and validity of the Italian version of the Chronic Pain Grade questionnaire in patients with musculoskeletal disordersClin Rheumatol2006256193110.1007/s10067-005-0140-y16421646Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Witkop M, Neff A, Buckner TW, et al. Self-reported prevalence, description and management of pain in adults with haemophilia: methods, demographics and results from the Pain, Functional Impairment, and Quality of life (P-FiQ) study. Haemophilia 2017; 23: 556–65. doi: 10.1111/hae.13214.WitkopMNeffABucknerTWSelf-reported prevalence, description and management of pain in adults with haemophilia: methods, demographics and results from the Pain, Functional Impairment, and Quality of life (P-FiQ) studyHaemophilia2017235566510.1111/hae.1321428419637Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Wallny T, Hess L, Seuser A, et al. Pain status of patients with severe haemophilic arthropathy. Haemophilia 2001; 7 (5): 453–58. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2516.2001.00540.x.WallnyTHessLSeuserAPain status of patients with severe haemophilic arthropathyHaemophilia2001754535810.1046/j.1365-2516.2001.00540.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

Häuser W, Schmutzer G, Hilbert A, Brähler E, Henningsen P. Prevalence of chronic disabling noncancer pain and associated demographic and medical variables: a cross-sectional survey in the general German population. Clin J Pain 2015;31: 886–92. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000173.HäuserWSchmutzerGHilbertABrählerEHenningsenPPrevalence of chronic disabling noncancer pain and associated demographic and medical variables: a cross-sectional survey in the general German populationClin J Pain2015318869210.1097/AJP.0000000000000173Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Burton CD, Entwistle VA, Elliott AM, et al. The value of different aspects of person-centred care: a series of discrete choice experiments in people with long-term conditions. BMJ Open 2017; 7(4): e015689. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015689.BurtonCDEntwistleVAElliottAMThe value of different aspects of person-centred care: a series of discrete choice experiments in people with long-term conditionsBMJ Open201774e01568910.1136/bmjopen-2016-015689Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Registered Nurses’ Association of Ontario. Assessment and Management of Pain. Clinical Best Practice Guidelines. Third edition. ON: Registered Nurses’ Association of Ontario; 2013. Available from https://rnao.ca/sites/rnao-ca/files/AssessAndManagementOfPain2014.pdf (accessed 11 March 2020).Registered Nurses’ Association of OntarioAssessment and Management of Pain. Clinical Best Practice GuidelinesThird editionONRegistered Nurses’ Association of Ontario2013Available from https://rnao.ca/sites/rnao-ca/files/AssessAndManagementOfPain2014.pdf (accessed 11 March 2020).Search in Google Scholar

Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN). Management of Chronic Pain: A National Clinical Guideline. SIGN 136. Revised edition, August 2019. Available from: https://www.sign.ac.uk/sign-136-management-of-chronic-pain (accessed 11 March 2020).Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN)Management of Chronic Pain: A National Clinical GuidelineSIGN 136. Revised edition, August 2019. Available from: https://www.sign.ac.uk/sign-136-management-of-chronic-pain (accessed 11 March 2020).Search in Google Scholar

Hooten M, Thorson D, Bianco J, et al; Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement. Pain: Assessment, Non-Opioid Treatment Approaches and Opioid Management. Updated August 2017. Available from: http://www.icsi.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Pain.pdf (accessed 11 March 2020).HootenMThorsonDBiancoJInstitute for Clinical Systems ImprovementPain: Assessment, Non-Opioid Treatment Approaches and Opioid Management. Updated August 2017. Available from: http://www.icsi.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Pain.pdf (accessed 11 March 2020).Search in Google Scholar

Brod M, Tesler LE, Christensen TL. Qualitative research and content validity: developing best practices based on science and experience. Qual Life Res 2009; 18(9): 1263–78. doi: 10.1007/s11136-009-9540-9.BrodMTeslerLEChristensenTLQualitative research and content validity: developing best practices based on science and experienceQual Life Res200918912637810.1007/s11136-009-9540-9Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Melzack R. The McGill Pain Questionnaire: major properties and scoring methods. Pain 1975; 1(3): 227–99.MelzackRThe McGill Pain Questionnaire: major properties and scoring methodsPain1975132279910.1016/0304-3959(75)90044-5Search in Google Scholar

Cleeland CS. Pain assessment in cancer. In: Osoba D, ed. Effect of Cancer on Quality of Life. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, Inc.; 1991: 293–305.CleelandCSPain assessment in cancerIn:OsobaDed.Effect of Cancer on Quality of LifeBoca Raton, FLCRC Press, Inc.199129330510.1201/9781003068648-21Search in Google Scholar

Edwards N. Barker PM. The importance of context in implementation research. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2014; 67 (Suppl 2): S157–62. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000000322.EdwardsNBarkerPMThe importance of context in implementation researchJ Acquir Immune Defic Syndr201467Suppl 2S1576210.1097/QAI.000000000000032225310123Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

eISSN:
2055-3390
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
Volume Open
Journal Subjects:
Medicine, Basic Medical Science, other, Clinical Medicine, Pharmacy, Pharmacology