Open Access

Barriers to the implementation of point-of-care ultrasonography by physiotherapists in haemophilia treatment centres in Canada: a modified Delphi approach


Cite

Physiotherapist-performed point-of-care ultrasonography (POC-US) can help to provide more sensitive physical examinations in haemophilia care; however, it is not yet routinely used for this purpose. Identifying barriers to its implementation is an important first step towards improving the physical examination of haemophilia patients.© Shutterstock
Physiotherapist-performed point-of-care ultrasonography (POC-US) can help to provide more sensitive physical examinations in haemophilia care; however, it is not yet routinely used for this purpose. Identifying barriers to its implementation is an important first step towards improving the physical examination of haemophilia patients.© Shutterstock

Figure 1

Knowledge-to-Action (KTA) Framework [23]The KTA Framework shown here has been modified to conceptualise the gap regarding the implementation of physiotherapyperformed POC-US. Text in the green ovals indicates current knowledge in the field of POC-US and the work to date on training and implementation of the tool. The turquoise star indicates the focus of this study at the level of barriers to knowledge use.
Knowledge-to-Action (KTA) Framework [23]The KTA Framework shown here has been modified to conceptualise the gap regarding the implementation of physiotherapyperformed POC-US. Text in the green ovals indicates current knowledge in the field of POC-US and the work to date on training and implementation of the tool. The turquoise star indicates the focus of this study at the level of barriers to knowledge use.

Figure 2

Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) [24,25]The areas highlighted with blue ovals highlight the three constructs investigated in this study within the CFIR to identify and achieve a consensus on the barriers and facilitators to the implementation of physiotherapy-performed POC-US in haemophilia care.
Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) [24,25]The areas highlighted with blue ovals highlight the three constructs investigated in this study within the CFIR to identify and achieve a consensus on the barriers and facilitators to the implementation of physiotherapy-performed POC-US in haemophilia care.

Results from Delphi Round 3

SCORE 3
MBS25TH75THOR 4 ON
ITEMNMEDIAN%ILE%ILEMBS (%)
Q1201.01.02.05
Q2201.01.02.014
Q3201.01.02.010
Q4201.01.01.00
Q5211.01.02.019
Q6212.01.03.034
Q7214.03.04.081
Q8161.01.02.00
Q9201.01.02.014
Q10191.01.01.00
Q11161.01.02.00
Q12182.01.02.010
Q13212.01.03.043
Q14171.01.01.00
Q15Consensus achieved in Round #2
Q16211.01.01.00
Q17171.01.02.05
Q18201.01.02.010
Q19204.03.04.086
Q20211.01.01.00
Q21201.01.02.010
Q22181.01.01.00
Q23171.01.02.05
Q24191.01.02.00
Q25201.01.02.019
Q26211.01.01.05
Q27181.01.02.010
Q28212.01.02.015
Q29Consensus achieved in Round #2

Results from Delphi Round 2

SCORE 3
MBS25TH75THOR 4 ON
ITEMNMEDIAN%ILE%ILEMBS (%)
Q1211.01.02.010
Q2211.01.02.015
Q3202.01.02.010
Q4191.01.01.00
Q5211.01.02.019
Q6212.02.03.048
Q7213.02.04.071
Q8181.01.02.010
Q9201.01.02.010
Q10181.01.01.00
Q11161.01.02.05
Q12182.01.02.010
Q13213.02.04.062
Q14181.01.02.00
Q15214.03.04.076
Q16201.01.01.510
Q17191.01.02.010
Q18201.01.02.010
Q19213.03.04.076
Q20211.01.01.00
Q21201.01.02.00
Q22191.01.01.05
Q23141.01.02.010
Q24161.01.01.55
Q25202.01.03.028
Q26211.01.01.00
Q27181.01.02.010
Q28211.01.02.024
Q29214.02.04.071

Results from Delphi Round 1

SCORE 3
MBS25TH75THOR 4 ON
ITEMNMEDIAN%ILE%ILEMBS (%)
Q1181.51.02.020
Q2171.01.02.010
Q3162.01.02.015
Q4191.01.02.05
Q5201.01.02.020
Q6202.01.03.030
Q7202.01.53.040
Q8162.01.52.015
Q9191.01.02.020
Q10181.01.02.00
Q11112.01.02.05
Q12142.51.03.035
Q13202.51.03.050
Q14161.01.02.05
Q15203.02.04.055
Q16201.01.02.05
Q17141.01.02.010
Q18181.01.01.010
Q19192.01.03.045
Q20191.01.01.00
Q21192.01.02.010
Q22151.01.02.05
Q23122.01.02.010
Q24132.01.02.05
Q25171.01.02.020
Q26201.01.01.05
Q27141.01.02.00
Q28202.01.03.030
Q29203.02.04.060

Instructions: We would like to know the extent to which you think each of the following situations is a barrier to physiotherapists’ (PT) use of research related to Point-of-Care Ultrasonography and the ability to use this research in support of implementation of the tool (POC-US) to alter/enhance clinical practice. For each item, circle the number of the response that best represents your view. Thank you for sharing your views with us.

THIS IS A BARRIER
TO NOEXTENTTO ALITTLEEXTENTTO AMODERATEEXTENTTO AGREATEXTENTNOOPINION
1. Research reports/articles are not readily available at my HTC12345
2. Implications for practice are not made clear12345
3. Statistical analyses are not understandable12345
4. The research is not relevant to the PT’s practice in the HTC12345
5. The PT is unaware of the research12345
6. The HTC facilities are inadequate for implementation12345
7. The PT does not have time to read research related to POC-US12345
8. The research in POC-US has not been replicated12345
9. The PT feels the benefits of changing practice will be minimal12345
10. The PT is uncertain whether to believe the results of the research12345
11. The research in POC-US has methodological inadequacies12345
12. The relevant literature is not compiled in one place12345
13. The PT does not feel he/she has enough authority to change patient care procedures12345
14. The PT feels the literature is not generalizable to their HTC12345
15. The PT is isolated from knowledgeable colleagues with whom to discuss POC-US12345
16. The PT sees little benefit for self12345
17. Research reports/articles in POC-US are not published fast enough12345
18. Hematologists will not cooperate with POC-US implementation12345
19. Administration will not allow POC-US implementation12345
20. The PT does not see the value of research and POC-US in the HTC12345
21. There is not a documented need to change practice12345
22. The conclusions drawn from the research are not justified12345
23. The literature in POC-US reports conflicting results12345
24. The research in POC-US is not reported clearly and readably12345
25. Other staff are not supportive of POC-US implementation12345
26. The PT is unwilling to change/try new ideas12345
27. The amount of research in POC-US is overwhelming12345
28. The PT does not feel capable of evaluating the quality of the research in POC-US12345
29. There is insufficient time on the job to implement new ideas12345

j.jhp00146.tab.005.w2aab3b7c52b1b6b1ab2b2b1b8Aa

TO NOEXTENTTO ALITTLEEXTENTTO AMODERATEEXTENTTO AGREATEXTENTNOOPINION
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
eISSN:
2055-3390
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
Volume Open
Journal Subjects:
Medicine, Basic Medical Science, other, Clinical Medicine, Pharmacy, Pharmacology