Taking the Two-Elements Theory of International Customary Law Seriously – Problems with Double Counting

Aust A, Modern Treaty Law and Practice (2007).10.1017/CBO9780511811517Search in Google Scholar

Goldsmith JL, Posner EA, ‘Understanding the Resemblance Between Modern and Traditional Customary International Law’ (2000) 40 Virginia Journal of International Law 645.10.2139/ssrn.145972Search in Google Scholar

Hart HLA, Concept of law (1961).Search in Google Scholar

Jennings R, Watts A, Oppenheim’s International Law – Volume 1 – Peace – Introduction and Part I (1996).Search in Google Scholar

Kelsen H, The Pure Theory of Law (1967).10.1525/9780520312296Search in Google Scholar

Koskienniemi M, From Apology to Utopia – Structure of International Legal Argument (2007).10.1017/CBO9780511493713Search in Google Scholar

Kwiecień R, Teoria i filozofia prawa międzynarodowego – Problemy wybrane (2011).Search in Google Scholar

Lauterpacht H, ‘The Nature of International Law and General Jurisprudence’ (1932) 37 Economica 315.10.2307/2548592Search in Google Scholar

Lefkowitz D, ‘The Source of International Law: Some Philosophical Reflections’ in S Besson, J Tasioulas (eds) The Philosophy of International Law (2010) 200.Search in Google Scholar

Lepard BD, Customary International Law – A New Theory with Practical Applications (2010).10.1017/CBO9780511804717Search in Google Scholar

Mendelson M, ‘The International Court of Justice and the sources of international law’ in Fifty years of the International Court of Justice (1996).10.1017/CBO9780511560101.007Search in Google Scholar

Nolte G, ‘Report 3. Subsequent Agreement and Subsequent Practice of States Outside of Judicial or Quasi-judicial Proceedings’ in G Nolte (ed), Treaties and Subsequent Practice (2013) 350.10.1093/law/9780199679195.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Orakhelashvili A, The Interpretation of Acts and Rules in Public International Law (2008).10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199546220.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Postema GJ ‘Custom in international law: a normative practice account’ in A Perreau-Saussine, JB Murphy (eds) The Nature of Customary Law – Legal Historical and Philosophical Perspectives (2007) 296.10.1017/CBO9780511493744.013Search in Google Scholar

Sadler GT, The Relation Custom to Law (1919).Search in Google Scholar

Savigny FC, System of the Modern Roman Law (1867).Search in Google Scholar

Shapiro SJ, ‘What is the Internal Point of View?’ (2006) 75 Fordham Law Review 1162.10.2139/ssrn.937337Search in Google Scholar

Slama JL, ‘Opinio Juris in Customary International Law’, (1990) 15 Oklahoma City University Law Review 648.Search in Google Scholar

Walden RM, ‘Customary International Law: a Jurisprudential Analysis’(1978) 13 Israel Law Review 97.10.1017/S0021223700006117Search in Google Scholar

Waldron J, Law and Disagreement (2004).Search in Google Scholar

Wolfke K, Custom in Present International Law (2^nd ed 1993).Search in Google Scholar