Open Access

Trapping Aliens: Understanding the Complexities of Controlling Introduced Freshwater Crayfish in the United Kingdom

   | Jan 18, 2017

Cite

1. Adams W., Perrow M. and Carpenter A., 2004 – Conservatives and champions: river managers and the river restoration discourse in the United Kingdom, Environment and Planning A, 36, 1929-1942.10.1068/a3637Search in Google Scholar

2. Barrientos R., Merino-Aguirre R., Fletcher D. and Almeida D., 2014 – Eurasian otters modify their trophic niche after the introduction of non-native prey in Mediterranean fresh waters, Biological Invasions, 16, 1573-1579.10.1007/s10530-013-0622-9Search in Google Scholar

3. Beck U., 1992 – Risk Society, Towards a new modernity, Sage Publications, New York, 260.Search in Google Scholar

4. Blanco-Garrido F., Prenda J. and Narvaez M., 2008 – Eurasian otter (Lutra lutra) diet and prey selection in Mediterranean streams invaded by centrarchid fishes, Biological Invasions, 10, 641-648.10.1007/s10530-007-9158-1Search in Google Scholar

5. Bremner A. and Park K., 2007 – Public attitudes to the management of invasive-non-native species in Scotland, Biological Conservation, 139, 306-314.10.1016/j.biocon.2007.07.005Search in Google Scholar

6. CABI, 2015 – Procambarus fallax f. virginalis (Marmorkrebs) in Invasive Species Compendium, Wallingford, UK: CAB International. www.cabi.org/isc.Search in Google Scholar

7. Clay X., 2011 – Catch and eat crayfish to help the environment, The Telegraph Newspaper, September 2nd 2011, http://www.telegraph.co.uk/foodanddrink/8734885/Catch-and-eat-crayfish-to-help-the-environment.html (accessed 16/08/2016).Search in Google Scholar

8. Clout M., 2002 – Biodiversity loss caused by invasive alien invertebrates, Zeitschrift für Jagdwissenschaft, 48, 51-58.10.1007/BF02192392Search in Google Scholar

9. Coblentz B., 1990 – Exotic organisms: a dilemma for conservation biology, Conservation Biology, 4, 261-265.10.1111/j.1523-1739.1990.tb00287.xSearch in Google Scholar

10. Crandall K. and Buhay J., 2008 – Global diversity of crayfish (Astacidae, Cambaridae and Parastacidae – Decapoda) in freshwater, Hydrobiologia, 595, 295-301.10.1007/s10750-007-9120-3Search in Google Scholar

11. Crang M., 1997 – Analysing qualitative materials, in Methods in Human Geography Research, Flowerdew R. and Martin D. (eds), Addison Wesley Longman Ltd., Essex, UK, 218-232.Search in Google Scholar

12. Davies C., 2008 – The ultimate ethical meal: a grey squirrel, The Observer Newspaper, Sunday 11th May 2008, http://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2008/may/11/recipes.foodanddrink (accessed 16/08/2016).Search in Google Scholar

13. Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, 2003 – Review of non-native species policy: report of the working group, Defra, London, 30.Search in Google Scholar

14. Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, 2008 – The invasive non-native species framework strategy for Great Britain, Defra, London, 42.Search in Google Scholar

15. Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, 2009 – Wildlife management and invasive non-native species, Defra, London, 147.Search in Google Scholar

16. Dryzek J., 1997 – The Politics of the Earth: Environmental Discourses, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 288.Search in Google Scholar

17. Environment Agency, 2009 – River Basin Management Plan – Anglian River Basin Region, Environment Agency, Bristol, 68.Search in Google Scholar

18. Environment Agency, 2010a – Apply for a consent to trap non-native crayfish, http://www.environment-agency.gov.uk/homeandleisure/recreation/fishing/119096.aspx (accessed 27/08/2010).Search in Google Scholar

19. Environment Agency, 2010b – Crayfish catch return form, http://www.environmentagency.gov.uk/static/documents/Leisure/C_C_R_F__09.pdf (accessed 27/08/2010).Search in Google Scholar

20. European Union, 2000 – Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:32000L0060:EN:NOT (WWW, accessed 27/08/2010).Search in Google Scholar

21. Fasham M. and Trumper K., 2001 – Review of non-native species legislation and guidance, Defra, Bristol, 145.Search in Google Scholar

22. Freeman M., Turnbull J., Yeomans W. and Bean C., 2010 – Prospects for management strategies of invasive crayfish populations with an emphasis on biological control, Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 20, 211-223.10.1002/aqc.1065Search in Google Scholar

23. Gozlan R., Burnard D., Andreou D. and Britton J. R., 2013 – Understanding the threats posed by non-native species: public vs. conservation managers, PLoS ONE, 8, 1, e53200.10.1371/journal.pone.0053200354700523341931Search in Google Scholar

24. Gutiérrez-Yurrita P., Martínez J., Bravo-Utrera M., Montes C., Ilhéu M. and Bernardo J., 1999 – The status of crayfish populations in Spain and Portugal in Gherhardi F. and Holdich D. (eds), Crayfish in Europe as alien species. How to make the best of a bad situation? Balkema A. A., Rotterdam (Crustacean Issues, 11), 161-190.10.1201/9781315140469-12Search in Google Scholar

25. Hall M., 2003 – Editorial: The native, naturalised and exotic – plants and animals in human history, Landscape Research, 28, 5-9.10.1080/01426390306534Search in Google Scholar

26. Hein C., Vander Zanden M. J. and Magnuson J., 2007 – Intensive trapping and increased fish predation cause massive population decline of an invasive crayfish, Freshwater Ecology, 52, 1134-1146.10.1111/j.1365-2427.2007.01741.xSearch in Google Scholar

27. Her Majesty’s Stationary Office (HMSO), 1996 – Statutory Instrument 1996 no. 1104, The Prohibition of Keeping of Live Fish (Crayfish) Order 1996, http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si1996/Uksi_19961104_en_1.htm (accessed 27/08/2010).Search in Google Scholar

28. Hickley P. and Chare S., 2004 – Fisheries for non-native species in England and Wales: angling or the environment? Fisheries Management and Ecology, 11, 203-212.10.1111/j.1365-2400.2004.00395.xSearch in Google Scholar

29. Hill A. and Lodge D., 1994 – Diel changes in resource demand – competition and predation in species replacement among crayfishes, Ecology, 75, 2118-2126.10.2307/1941615Search in Google Scholar

30. Holdich D., Rogers D. and Reynolds J., 1999a – Native and alien crayfish in the British Isles, in Gherhardi F. and Holdich D. (eds), Crayfish in Europe as alien species. How to make the best of a bad situation? Balkema A. A., Rotterdam (Crustacean Issues, 11), 231-236.Search in Google Scholar

31. Holdich D., Gydemo R. and Rogers D., 1999b – A review of possible methods for controlling nuisance populations of alien crayfish, in Gherhardi F. and Holdich D. (eds), Crayfish in Europe as alien species. How to make the best of a bad situation? Balkema A. A., Rotterdam (Crustacean Issues, 11), 245-270.10.1201/9781315140469-16Search in Google Scholar

32. Holdich D., Reynolds J., Souty-Grosset C. and Sibley P., 2009 – A review of the ever increasing threat to European crayfish from non-indigenous crayfish species, Knowledge and Management of Aquatic Ecosystems, 11, 394-395.10.1051/kmae/2009025Search in Google Scholar

33. Joint Nature Conservation Committee, 2010 – 1092 White-clawed (or Atlantic stream) crayfish Austropotamobius pallipes, http://www.jncc.gov.uk/protectedsites/sacselection/species.asp?FeatureIntCode=S1092 (accessed 27/08/2010).Search in Google Scholar

34. Jones P. J. S., 2008 – Fishing industry and related perspectives on the issues raised by no-take marine protected area proposals, Marine Policy, 32, 749-758.10.1016/j.marpol.2007.12.009Search in Google Scholar

35. Juliano S., Lounibos L. P., Nishimura N. and Greene K., 2010 – Your worst enemy could be your best friend: predator contributions to invasion resistance and persistence of natives, Oecologia, 162, 709-718.10.1007/s00442-009-1475-x282196719841945Search in Google Scholar

36. Kerby J., Riley S., Kats L. and Wilson P., 2005 – Barriers and flow as limiting factors in the spread of an invasive crayfish (Procambarus clarkii) in southern California streams, Biological Conservation, 126, 402-409.10.1016/j.biocon.2005.06.020Search in Google Scholar

37. Leach M. and Scoones I., 2005 – Science and citizenship in a global context, in Leach M., Scoones I. and Wynne B. (eds), Science and Citizens: Globalization and the challenge of Engagement, Zed Books, London, 15-40.10.5040/9781350222458.ch-002Search in Google Scholar

38. Lindqvist O. and Huner J., 1999 – Life history characteristics of crayfish: what makes some of them good colonisers? in Gherhardi F. and Holdich D. (eds), Crayfish in Europe as alien species, How to make the best of a bad situation? Balkema A. A., Rotterdam (Crustacean Issues, 11), 22-30.Search in Google Scholar

39. Lowery R. and Holdich D., 1988 – Pacifastacus leniusculus in North America and Europe, with details of distribution of introduced and native crayfish species in Europe, in Freshwater crayfish: biology, management and exploitation, Holdich D. and Lowery R. (eds), Croom Helm, London, 283-326.Search in Google Scholar

40. Mack R., Simberloff D., Lonsdale W. M., Evans B., Clout M. and Bazzaz F., 2000 – Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences and control, Ecological Applications, 10, 689-710.10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[0689:BICEGC]2.0.CO;2Search in Google Scholar

41. Manchester S. and Bullock J., 2000 – The impacts of non-native species on UK biodiversity and the effectiveness of control, Journal of Applied Biology, 37, 845-864.10.1046/j.1365-2664.2000.00538.xSearch in Google Scholar

42. Millenium Ecosystem Assessment, 2005b – Ecosystems and wellbeing: wetlands and water synpaper, World Resources Institute, Washington D.C., 80.Search in Google Scholar

43. Momot W., 1998 – An example of how exploitation can increase production and yield in a northern crayfish (Orconectes virilis) population, Canadian Special Publication of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 125, 225-233.Search in Google Scholar

44. Moorhouse T. and Macdonald D., 2015 – Are invasives worse in freshwater than terrestrial ecosystems? Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews-Water, 2, 1-8.10.1002/wat2.1059Search in Google Scholar

45. Musseau C., Boulenger C., Crivelli A., Lebel I., Pascal M., Boulêtreau S. and Santoul F., 2015 – Native European eels as a potential biological control for invasive crayfish, Freshwater Biology, 60, 636-645.10.1111/fwb.12510Search in Google Scholar

46. Natural History Museum, 2008 – The commercial exploitation of Thames mitten crabs: a feasibility study – report to Defra, NHM, London, 81.Search in Google Scholar

47. Non-Native Species Secretariat, 2009 – Be Plant Wise, http://www.nonnativespecies.org/beplantwise/, (accessed 27/08/2010).Search in Google Scholar

48. Non-Native Species Secretariat, 2010 – UK Non-native organism risk assessment scheme – Pseudorasbora parva – Topmouth gudgeon, https://secure.fera.defra.gov.uk/nonnativespecies/index.cfm?sectionid=51 (accessed 27/08/2010).Search in Google Scholar

49. Non-Native Species Secretariat, 2011 – UK Non-native organism risk assessment scheme – Pacifastacus leniusculus – signal crayfish, http://www.nonnativespecies.org/factsheet/factsheet.cfm?speciesId=2498 (accessed 16/8/2016), 14.Search in Google Scholar

50. Non-Native Species Secretariat, 2015 – The Great Britain Invasive Non-native Species Strategy, August 2015, Animal and Plant Health Agency, Sand Hutton, York, 11.Search in Google Scholar

51. Peay S., 2001 – Eradication of alien crayfish populations, R&D Technical Report W1-037/TR1, Environment Agency, Bristol, 60.Search in Google Scholar

52. Peay S., Hiley P. D., Collen P. and Martin I., 2006 – Biocide treatment of ponds in Scotland to eradicate signal crayfish, Bulletin Francais de la Peche et de la Pisciculture, 380-381, 1363-1379.10.1051/kmae:2006041Search in Google Scholar

53. Peay S., 2010 – Invasive non-indigenous crayfish species in Europe: recommendations on managing them, Knowledge and Management of Aquatic Ecosystems, 394-395, 03.10.1051/kmae/2010009Search in Google Scholar

54. Peay S. and Dunn A., 2014 – The behavioural response of the invasive signal crayfish Pacifastacus leniusculus to experimental dewatering of burrows and its implications for eradication treatment and management of ponds with crayfish, Ethology Ecology and Evolution, 26, 277-298.10.1080/03949370.2014.903379Search in Google Scholar

55. Poulin B., Lefebvre G. and Crivelli A., 2006 – The invasive red swamp crayfish as a predictor of Eurasian bittern density in the Camargue, France, Journal of Zoology, 273, 98-105.10.1111/j.1469-7998.2007.00304.xSearch in Google Scholar

56. Rabeni C., 1992 – Trophic linkage between stream centrarchids and their crayfish prey, Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science, 49, 1714-1721.10.1139/f92-190Search in Google Scholar

57. Ramsar Convention, 2003 – New guidelines for management planning for Ramsar sites and other wetlands – COP 8, Valencia, Spain. http://www.ramsar.org/cda/en/ramsar-activities-new-guidelines-for/main/ramsar/1-63%5E20857_4000_0__ (accessed 28/08/2010).Search in Google Scholar

58. Reeve I. D., 2004 – The removal of the North American signal crayfish (Pacifastacus leniusculus) from the River Clyde, Scottish Natural Heritage Commissioned Report no. 020 (ROAME no. F00LI12), 55.Search in Google Scholar

59. Reyes-García V., Menendez-Baceta G., Aceituno-Mata L., Acosta-Naranjo R., Calvet-Mir L., Domínguez P., Garnatje T., Gómez-Baggethun E., Molina-Bustamante M., Molina M., Rodríguez-Franco R., Serrasolses G., Vallès J. and Pardo-de-Santayana M., 2015 – From famine foods to delicatessen: Interpreting trends in the use of wild edible plants through cultural ecosystem services, Ecological Economics, 120, 303-311.10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.11.003Search in Google Scholar

60. Robson C., 2007 – How to do a Research Project – A Guide for Undergraduates, Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, 176.Search in Google Scholar

61. Roy H., Preston C., Harrower C., Rorke S., Noble D., Sewell J., Walker K., Marchant J., Seeley B., Bishop J., Jukes A., Musgrove A., Pearman D. and Booy O., 2014 – GB Non-native Species Information Portal: documenting the arrival of non-native species in Britain, Biological Invasions, 16, 2495-2505.10.1007/s10530-014-0687-0Search in Google Scholar

62. Scholtz G., Braband A., Tolley L., Reimann A., Mittemann B., Lukhaup C., Steuerwald F. and Vogt G., 2003 – Parthenogenesis in an outsider crayfish, Nature, 421, 806.10.1038/421806a12594502Search in Google Scholar

63. Selge S., Fischer A. and van der Wal R., 2011 – Public and professional views on invasive non-native species – A qualitative social scientific investigation, Biological Conservation, 144, 3089-3097.10.1016/j.biocon.2011.09.014Search in Google Scholar

64. Stebbing P., Watson G., Bentley M., Fraser D., Jennings R, Rushton S. and Sibley P., 2002 – Chemical ecology: A role in the control of non-native species of crayfish? in Management and Conservation of Crayfish – Proceedings of a conference held on 7th November 2002 Holdich D. and Sibley P. (eds), Environment Agency, Bristol, 175-184.Search in Google Scholar

65. Stebbing P., Longshaw M. and Scott A., 2014 – Review of methods for the management of non-indigenous crayfish, with particular reference to Great Britain, Ethology, Ecology and Evolution, 26, 204-231.10.1080/03949370.2014.908326Search in Google Scholar

66. Stokes K., O’Neill K., Montgomery W., Dick J., Maggs C. and McDonald R., 2006 – The importance of stakeholder engagement in invasive species management: a cross-jurisdictional perspective in Ireland, Biodiversity and Conservation, 15, 2829-2852.10.1007/s10531-005-3137-6Search in Google Scholar

67. Stokes K., O’Neill K., Montgomery W., Dick J., Maggs C. and McDonald R., 2006 – The importance of stakeholder engagement in invasive species management: a cross-jurisdictional perspective in Ireland, Biodiversity and Conservation, 15, 2829-2852.10.1007/s10531-005-3137-6Search in Google Scholar

68. Taugbøl T. and Skurdal J., 1999 – The future of native crayfish in Europe: How to make the best of a bad situation? in Gherhardi F. and Holdich D. (eds), Crayfish in Europe as alien species. How to make the best of a bad situation? Balkema A. A., Rotterdam (Crustacean Issues, 11), 271-280.10.1201/9781315140469-17Search in Google Scholar

69. Taugbøl T., 2004 – Exploitation is a prerequisite for conservation of Astacus astacus, Bulletin français de la pêche et de la pisciculture, 372-373, 275-279.10.1051/kmae:2004002Search in Google Scholar

70. Valentine G., 1997 ‒ “Tell me about: using interviews as a research methodology”, in Methods in Human Geography Research, Flowerdew R. and Martin D. (eds), Addison Wesley Longman Ltd., Essex, UK, 110-128.Search in Google Scholar

71. Van Eijck M. and Roth W.-M., 2007 ‒ Keeping the local local: recalibrating the status of science and traditional ecological knowledge (TEK) in education, Science Education, 91, 926-947.10.1002/sce.20227Search in Google Scholar

72. West R., 2009 – Non-native crayfish: a new approach to trapping: A review of signal crayfish trapping on the River Lark at Barton Mills, Suffolk from 2001-2009, Lark Angling and Preservation Society, 14.Search in Google Scholar

73. Williams F., Eschen R., Harris A., Djeddour D., Pratt C., Shaw R., Varia S., Lamontagne-Godwin J., Thomas S. and Murphy S., 2010 – The economic of invasive non-native species on Great Britain, CABI project report CAB/001/09, Project VM10066, 198.Search in Google Scholar

74. Wynne B., 1992 – Misunderstood misunderstanding: social identities and public uptake of science, Public Understanding of Science, 1, 281-304.10.1088/0963-6625/1/3/004Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
2344-3219
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
2 times per year
Journal Subjects:
Life Sciences, Ecology