“And this is the view from outside my window”: On text and image interplay in university website blogs

BARTHES, R., 1997a [1961]. The photographic message. In: R. Barthes, ed. Image-music-text. London: Fontana, pp. 15-31.Search in Google Scholar

BARTHES, R., 1997b [1964]. Rhetoric of the image. In R. Barthes, ed. Image-music-text. London: Fontana, pp. 32-51.Search in Google Scholar

BATEMAN, J., 2011. The decomposability of semiotic modes. In: K. L. O’Halloran and B. A. Smith, eds. Multimodal studies. Exploring issues and domains. London: Routledge, pp. 17-38.Search in Google Scholar

BATEMAN, J., 2014. Text and image: A critical introduction to the visual/verbal divide. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781315773971Search in Google Scholar

BATEMAN, J. and WILDFEUER, J., 2014. A multimodal discourse theory of visual narrative.10.1016/j.pragma.2014.10.001Search in Google Scholar

Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 74, pp. 180-208.Search in Google Scholar

BAZERMAN, C. and PRIOR, P., eds. 2004. What writing does and how it does it: An introduction to analyzing texts and textual practices. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.10.4324/9781410609526Search in Google Scholar

HALLIDAY, M. A. K. and HASAN, R., 2013 [1976] Cohesion in English. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781315836010Search in Google Scholar

HALLIDAY, M. A. K. 1978. Language as social semiotic. London: Edward Arnold.Search in Google Scholar

HALLIDAY, M. A. K. and MATTHIESSEN, C. M. I. M. 2004. An introduction to functional grammar (3rd ed.). London: Hodder Education Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

HERRING, S. C. et al. 2005. Weblogs as a bridging genre. Information Technology & People, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 142-171.Search in Google Scholar

HOEY, M. 1986. The discourse colony: A preliminary study of a neglected discourse type. In: M. Coulthard, ed. Talking about text. Studies presented to David Brazil on his retirement. Birmingham: Birmingham Instant Print Ltd., pp. 1-26.Search in Google Scholar

HOEY, M. 2001. Textual interaction. An introduction to written discourse analysis. London and New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

IEDEMA, R. et al. 1994. Media literacy. Sydney: Disadvantaged Schools Programme, NSW Department of School Education.Search in Google Scholar

JAKOBSON, R., 1971. Selected writings II. Word and language. The Hague: Mouton & Co.10.1515/9783110873269Search in Google Scholar

KRESS, G., 2009. What is mode? In: C. Jewitt, ed. The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 54-68.Search in Google Scholar

KRESS, G. 2010. Multimodality. A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. Abingdon: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

KRESS, G. and VAN LEEUWEN, T., 2006 [1996]. Reading images. The grammar of visual design. Abingdon: Routledge.10.4324/9780203619728Search in Google Scholar

LEMKE, J., 2012. Multimedia and discourse analysis. In: P. J. Gee and M. Handford, eds. The Routledge handbook of discourse analysis. London: Routledge, pp. 79-89.Search in Google Scholar

MARTINEC, R. and SALWAY, A. 2005. A system for image-text relations in new (and old) media. Visual Communication, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 337-371. [Accessed 20 April 2016]. Available at: http://vcj.sagepub.com/content/4/3/33710.1177/1470357205055928Search in Google Scholar

O’HALLORAN, K. L., ed. 2004. Multimodal discourse analysis. London and New York: Continuum.Search in Google Scholar

O’HALLORAN, K. L., 2008. Systemic functional-multimodal discourse analysis (SF-MDA): Constructing ideational meaning using language and visual imagery. Visual Communication, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 443-475.10.1177/1470357208096210Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

O’HALLORAN, K. L., 2012. Halliday and multimodal semiotics. SemiotiX new series: A globalSearch in Google Scholar

information bulletin. Semiotix XN-7 2012). [Accessed 15 August 2016]. Available at: http://www.semioticon.com/semiotix/2012/03/halliday-and-multimodal-semiotics/Search in Google Scholar

SCHMID, H. J. 1998. Constant and ephemeral hypostatization: thing, problem and other shell nouns. In: B. Caron, ed. Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Linguists (Paris, July 22-25, 1997), CD-ROM. Amsterdam: Elsevier. [Accessed 10 February 2017]. Available at: http://www.anglistik.unimuenchen.de/personen/professoren/schmid/schmid_publ/hypostatization.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

SCHMID, H. J. 2000. English abstract nouns as conceptual shells. From corpus to cognition, Berlin - New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110808704Search in Google Scholar

TÁRNYIKOVÁ, J. 2008. Role strukturních stereotypů v textu. In: C. Hopkinson, R. Tomášková and S. Wilamová, eds. Autorský záměr a jeho cesta k adresátovi. Komunikační a textové strategie v masmediálním, komerčním a akademickém diskursu. Ends and means in language: Communication and textual strategies in mass media, commercial and academic discourse. Ostrava: Filozofická fakulta Ostravské univerzity v Ostravě, pp. 64-67.Search in Google Scholar

TOMÁŠKOVÁ, R. 2012. Structural and cognitive stereotyping in lifestyle magazines for women. In: O. Dontcheva-Navratilova and R. Povolná, eds. Discourse interpretation: Approaches and applications. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 209-222.Search in Google Scholar

TOMÁŠKOVÁ, R. 2015. A walk through the multimodal landscape of university websites. Brno Studies in English, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 77-100.Search in Google Scholar

TOMÁŠKOVÁ, R. 2016. The polyphony of a super-genre: Blogs as a source of heteroglossia in university websites. In: R. Tomášková, Ch. Hopkinson and G. Zapletalová, eds. Professional genres from an interpersonal perspective. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 198-225.Search in Google Scholar