Cognitive rhetoric of effect: energy flow as a means of persuasion in inaugurals

BARTLETT, T., 2014. Analysing power in language. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781315851938Search in Google Scholar

BAUMLIN, J., 2007. Ethos. In: Th. Sloane, ed. Encyclopedia of rhetoric. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 278-292.Search in Google Scholar

BIRIA, R. and MOHAMMADI, A., 2012. The sociopragmatic function of inaugural speech: A critical discourse analysis approach. Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 44, pp. 1290-1302.10.1016/j.pragma.2012.05.013Search in Google Scholar

BONNEFILLE, S., 2012. Obama’s and Sarkozy’s remarks at the U.N.’s Climate Change summit: A contest between figurative and literal language?” In: A. Kwiatkowska, ed. Texts and minds: Papers in cognitive poetics and rhetoric. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, pp. 225-243.Search in Google Scholar

BURKE, K., 1969. A rhetoric of motives. California: University of California Press.Search in Google Scholar

CAMPBELL, K. K., 2007. Modern rhetoric. In: Th. Sloane, ed. Encyclopedia of rhetoric. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 517-527.Search in Google Scholar

CAMPBELL, K. K. and JAMIESON, K. H., 1986. Inaugurating the presidency. In: H. Simons, A. Aghazarian, eds. Form, genre, and the study of political discourse. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, pp. 203-225.Search in Google Scholar

CRAIG, R., 2007. Communication. In: Th. Sloane, ed. Encyclopedia of rhetoric. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 125-146.Search in Google Scholar

DODGE, E. and Lakoff, G., 2005. Image schemas: From linguistic analysis to neural grounding. In: B. Hampe, ed. From perception to meaning: Image schemas in cognitive linguistics. Berlin, N.Y: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 57-92.10.1515/9783110197532.1.57Search in Google Scholar

ENOS, R. L. and Fahnestock, J., 2007. Arrangement. In: Th. Sloane, ed. Encyclopedia of rhetoric. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 49-53.Search in Google Scholar

GOMOLA, A., 2012. Cognitive mechanisms at work and their perlocutionary effect in Catholic preaching. A case study. In: A. Kwiatkowska, ed. Texts and minds: Papers in cognitive poetics and rhetoric. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, pp. 287-298.Search in Google Scholar

HAMILTON, C., 2003. Genetic Roulette: On the cognitive rhetoric of biorisk. In: R. Dirven, R. Frank, M. Pütz, eds. Cognitive models in language and thought. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 353-393.10.1515/9783110892901.353Search in Google Scholar

HAMILTON, C., 2005. A cognitive rhetoric of poetry and Emily Dickinson. Language and Literature, vol. 14, pp. 279-294.10.1177/0963947005054482Search in Google Scholar

HAMILTON, C., 2012. Tony Blair’s cognitive rhetoric. In: A. Kwiatkowska, ed. Texts and minds: Papers in cognitive poetics and rhetoric. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, pp. 201-225.Search in Google Scholar

JOHNSON, M., 1987. The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226177847.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

JOHNSON, M., 2005. The philosophical significance of image schemas. In: B. Hampe, ed. From perception to meaning: Image schemas in cognitive linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 15-34.10.1515/9783110197532.1.15Search in Google Scholar

KENNEDY, G., 2007. Classical rhetoric. In: Th. Sloane, ed. Encyclopedia of rhetoric. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 104-125.Search in Google Scholar

KWIATKOWSKA, A., 2012. From the editor. In: A. Kwiatkowska, ed. Texts and minds: Papers in cognitive poetics and rhetoric. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, pp. 7-10.10.3726/978-3-653-04564-2Search in Google Scholar

LEITH, S., 2012. You talkin’ to me? London: Profiles Books.Search in Google Scholar

LDCE., 2003. Longman dictionary of contemporary English. Harlow: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

MAILLAT, D. and OSWALD, S., 2013. Editorial. Biases and constraints in communication: Argumentation, persuasion and manipulation. Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 59, pp. 137-140.10.1016/j.pragma.2013.08.014Search in Google Scholar

MCLUHAN, M., 1997. Understanding media: The extensions of man. Cambridge (Mass.): The MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

OAKLEY, T., 2005. Force-dynamic dimensions of rhetorical effect. In: B. Hampe, ed. From perception to meaning: Image schemas in cognitive linguistics. Berlin, N.Y.: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 444-473.10.1515/9783110197532.5.443Search in Google Scholar

O’KEEFE, D., 2007. Persuasion. In: Th. Sloane, ed. Encyclopedia of rhetoric. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 595-603.Search in Google Scholar

PERELMAN, Ch. and OLBRECHTS-TYTECA, L., 1969. The New rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Search in Google Scholar

POTAPENKO, S., 2012. Modest or determined? Cognitive-rhetorical analysis of the effects of President Obama’s inaugural and congressional speech. In: A. Kwiatkowska, ed. Texts and minds: Papers in cognitive poetics and rhetoric. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, pp. 243-258.Search in Google Scholar

REISIGL, M., 2010. Rhetoric of political speeches. In: R. Wodak, V. Koller, eds. Handbook of communication in the public sphere. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 243-269.10.1515/9783110198980.3.243Search in Google Scholar

TABAKOWSKA, E., 2012. Rhetoric: “the most valuable gift of gods” or “the art of deception”? In: A. Kwiatkowska, ed. Texts and minds: Papers in cognitive poetics and rhetoric. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, pp.273-286.Search in Google Scholar

TALMY, L., 2000. Force dynamics in language and cognition. Concept structuring systems. vol. 1. Cambridge (Mass.): The MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

TURNER, M., 1991. Reading minds: The study of English in the age of cognitive science. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9780691227788Search in Google Scholar

VAN EEMEREN, F. and GROOTENDORST, R., 2004. A systematic theory of argumentation: The pragma-dialectical approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511616389Search in Google Scholar

WESLEY, J., 2014. The qualitative analysis of political documents. In: K. Bertie, I. Maks, A. van Elfrinkhof, eds. From text to political position: Text analysis across disciplines. Amsterdam, Phil.: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp.135-159.Search in Google Scholar

WESTNEY, P., 1994. Rules and pedagogical grammar. In: T. Odlin, ed. Perspectives on pedagogical grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 72-96.10.1017/CBO9781139524605.006Search in Google Scholar

WODAK, R., 2011. The discourse of politics in action. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Search in Google Scholar