[1. Bannister, F., & Connolly, R. (2015). The great theory hunt: Does e-government really have a problem?, Government Information Quarterly, 32, 1-11.10.1016/j.giq.2014.10.003]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Bonsón, E., Torres, L., Royo, S., & Flores, F. (2012). Local e-government 2.0: Social media and corporate transparency in municipalities, Government Information Quarterly, 29, 123-132.]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Boughzala, I., Janssen, M., Assar, S. (2015). E-Government 2.0: Back to Reality, a 2.0 Application to Vet (Chapter 1), In I. Boughzala, M. Janssen, Assar S. (Ed.), Case Studies in e-Government 2.0 - Changing Citizen Relationships (pp. 1-14), Online: Springer International Publishing Switzerland, ISBN 978-3-319-08081-9 (eBook).]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Colesca, S.E. (2009). Increasing E-Trust: A Solution to Minimize Risk in EGovernment Adoption, Journal of Applied Quantitative Methods, 4(1), 31-44.]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Didraga, O., & Brandas, C. (2014). Study on the E-Government State of Play in Romania, Proceedings of the Multidisciplinary Academic Conference on Economics, Management and Marketing (MAC-EMM 2014), December 5-6, 2014, Prague, Czech Republic.]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Didraga, O., & Brandas, C. (2015). Comparative Study on E-Government Indicators between Romania and the European Union, Informatica Economica Journal, 19(1), 67-76.10.12948/issn14531305/19.1.2015.06]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Dixon, B. (2010). Towards E-Government 2.0: An Assessment of Where EGovernment 2.0 is and Where It Is Headed, Public Administration & Management, 15(2), 418-454.]Search in Google Scholar
[8. European Commission (2014). Delivering the European Advantage? ‘How European Governments can and should benefit from innovative public services’ - eGovernment Benchmark - May 2014, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, ISBN 978-92-79-38052-5.]Search in Google Scholar
[9. European Commission (2015a), Digital Agenda Scoreboard 2014 - Romania, Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/digital-agenda/en/scoreboard/romania Accessed 18 March 2015.]Search in Google Scholar
[10. European Commission (2015b), eGovernment in Romania, Edition 12.0 - eGovernement Factsheets, January 2015, Retrieved from https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/sites/default/files/egov_in_romania_-_january_2015_-_v.12.0_final.pdf Accessed 21 March 2015.]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Gatman, A. (2011). e-Government - Assisting Reformed Public Administration in Romania, Romanian Journal of Economics, 32, 1(41), 216-242.]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Georgescu, M., & Popescul, D. (2014). The uncertainty of using Web 2.0 Technologies in E-Government development. Romania‟s Case, Procedia Economics and Finance, 15, 769-776.]Search in Google Scholar
[13. ISO (2009). ISO 31000:2009. Risk management - Principles and guidelines, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization.]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Khalil, O.E.M. (2011). E-Government Readiness: Does national culture matter?, Government Information Quarterly, 28, 388-399.10.1016/j.giq.2010.06.011]Search in Google Scholar
[15. MCSI (2015). Strategia Națională privind Agenda Digitală pentru România 2020 - Februarie 2015, Retreieved from http://www.mcsi.ro/CMSPages/GetFile.aspx?nodeguid=0617c1d7-182f-44c0-a978-4d8653e2c31d Accessed 10 April 2015 ]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Meijer, A.J., Koops, B.-J., Pieterson, W., Overman, S., & ten Tije, S. (2012). Government 2.0: Key Challenges to Its Realization, Electronic Journal of EGovernment, 10(1), 59-69.]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Savoldelli, A., Codagnone, C., & Misuraca, G. (2014). Understanding the egovernment paradox: Learning from literature and practice on barriers to adoption, Government Information Quarterly, 31, S63-S71.10.1016/j.giq.2014.01.008]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Stoica, O. (2009). E-Government Implementation in Romania. From National Success to International Example, Retrieved from http://www.nispa.org/conf_paper_detail.php?cid=17&p=1549&pid=166, Accessed 21 March 2015.]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Sun, P.-L., Ku, C.-Y., & Shih, D.-H. (2015). An implementation framework for E-Government 2.0, Telematics and Informatics, 32, 504-520.10.1016/j.tele.2014.12.003]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Tesu, M.D. (2012). Developing E-Government for Better Public Services Within European Union, Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, 7(2), 79-88.]Search in Google Scholar
[21. United Nations (2014). E-Government Survey 2014 - E-Government for the Future We Want, New York: United Nations, ISBN: 978-92-1-123198-4, available online: http://www.unpan.org/e-government.]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Victorian Government - Department of Premier and Cabinet (2010a). Government 2.0 Projects in VPS: an introduction to managing risk, Retrieved from http://www.vic.gov.au/blog/social-media-guides/government-2-0-projects-vpsintroduction-managing-risk/ Accessed 20 April 2015.]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Victorian Government - Department of Premier and Cabinet (2010b). Victorian Public Service - Government 2.0 Risk Register and Management Plan, Retrieved from http://www.vic.gov.au/blog/social-media-guides/victorian-public-servicegovernment-2-0-risk-register-management-plan/ Accessed 20 April 2015. ]Search in Google Scholar
