[Allen, Cynthia. 1997. Middle English case loss and the ‘creolization’ hypothesis. English Language and Linguistics 1(1). 63–89. DOI: 10.1017/S136067430000036810.1017/S1360674300000368]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Bech, Kristin & George Walkden. 2016. English is (still) a West Germanic language. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 39(1). 65–100. DOI: 10.1017/S033258651500021910.1017/S0332586515000219]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Bradley, Henry. 1904. The making of English. London: Macmillan.]Search in Google Scholar
[Braunmüller, Kurt. 1996. Forms of language contact in the area of the Hanseatic League: Dialect contact phenomena and semicommunication. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 19(2). 141–154. DOI: 10.1017/S033258650000336X10.1017/S033258650000336X]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Braunmüller, Kurt. 2002. Language contact during the Old Nordic period I: Within the British Isles, Frisia and the Hanseatic League. In Oscar Bandle, Kurt Braunmüller, Ernst Håkon Jahr, Allan Karker, Hans-Peter Naumann & Ulf Teleman (eds.), The Nordic languages: An international handbook of the history of the North Germanic languages, vol. 1, 1028–1039. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI: 10.1515/9783110197051-11410.1515/9783110197051-114]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Braunmüller, Kurt. 2007. Receptive multilingualism in Northern Europe in the Middle Ages: A description of a scenario. In Jan D. ten Thije & Ludger Zeevaert (eds.), Receptive multilingualism: Linguistic analyses, language policies and didactic concepts, 25–47. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/hsm.6.04bra10.1075/hsm.6.04bra]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Breitbarth, Anne. 2014. Dialect contact and the speed of Jespersen’s Cycle in Middle Low German. Taal en Tongval 66. 1–20. DOI: 10.5117/TET2014.1.BREI10.5117/TET2014.1.]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Brooks, N. P. 1979. England in the ninth century: The crucible of defeat. Transactions of the Royal Historical Society 29. 1–20. DOI: 10.2307/367911010.2307/3679110]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Buccini, Anthony F. 1992. Southern Middle English hise and the question of pronominal transfer in language contact. In Rosina Lippi-Green (ed.), Recent developments in Germanic linguistics, 11–32. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/cilt.93.04buc10.1075/cilt.93.04buc]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Burchfield, Robert W. 1985. The English language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Coetsem, Frans, van. 1988. Loan phonology and the two transfer types in language contact. Dordrecht: Foris.10.1515/9783110884869]Search in Google Scholar
[Coetsem, Frans, van. 2000. A general and unified theory of the transmission process in language contact. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dahl, Östen. 1979. Typology of sentence negation. Linguistics 17(1–2). 79–106. DOI: 10.1515/ling.1979.17.1-2.7910.1515/ling.1979.17.1-2.79]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Dance, Richard. 2012. English in contact: Norse. In Alexander Bergs & Laurel J. Brinton (eds.), English historical linguistics: An international handbook, vol. 2, 1724–1737. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI: 10.1515/9783110251609.172410.1515/9783110251609.1724]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Emonds, Joseph & Jan Terje Faarlund. 2014. English: The language of the Vikings. Olomouc: Palacký University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Eythórsson, Thórhallur. 2002. Negation in C: The syntax of negated verbs in Old Norse. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 25(2). 190–224. DOI: 10.1080/03325860232109336410.1080/033258602321093364]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Fischer, Olga. 2013. The role of contact in English syntactic change in the Old and Middle English periods. In Daniel Schreier & Marianne Hundt (eds.), English as a contact language, 19–40. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511740060.00210.1017/CBO9780511740060.002]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Frisch, Stefan. 1997. The change in negation in Middle English: A NEGP licensing account. Lingua 101(1–2). 21–64. DOI: 10.1016/S0024-3841(96)00018-610.1016/S0024-3841(96)00018-6]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Görlach, Manfred. 1986. Middle English – a creole? In Dieter Kastovsky & Aleksander Szwedek (eds.), Linguistics across historical and geographical boundaries, 329–344. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI: 10.1515/9783110856132.32910.1515/9783110856132.329]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Hadley, Dawn. 1997. “And they proceeded to plough and to support themselves”: The Scandinavian settlement of England. Anglo-Norman England 19. 69–96.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hock, Hans Henrich. 1986. Principles of historical linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110871975]Search in Google Scholar
[Hogg, Richard M. 2004. The spread of negative contraction in early English. In Anne Curzan & Kimberley Emmons (eds.), Studies in the history of the English language II: Unfolding conversations, 459–482. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI: 10.1515/9783110897661.45910.1515/9783110897661.459]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Holman, Katherine. 2001. Defining the Danelaw. In James Graham-Campbell, Richard Hall, Judith Jesch & David N. Parsons (eds.), Vikings and the Danelaw: Select papers from the proceedings of the Thirteenth Viking Congress, 1–11. Oxford: Oxbow Books.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ingham, Richard. 2006. Negative concord and the loss of the negative particle ne in Late Middle English. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 42. 77–97.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ingham, Richard. 2008. Contact with Scandinavian and Late Middle English negative concord. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 44. 121–137.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ingham, Richard. 2013. Negation in the history of English. In David Willis, Christopher Lucas & Anne Breitbarth (eds.), The history of negation in the languages of Europe and the Mediterranean. Vol. 1: Case studies, 119–150. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199602537.003.000410.1093/acprof:oso/9780199602537.003.0004]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Iyeiri, Yoko. 1992. Negative constructions in selected Middle English verse texts. Ph.D. dissertation, University of St Andrews.]Search in Google Scholar
[Iyeiri, Yoko. 2001. Negative constructions in Middle English. Fukuoka: Kyushu University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jack, George B. 1978. Negation in later Middle English prose. Archivum Linguisticum 9. 58–72.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jespersen, Otto. 1917. Negation in English and other languages. Copenhagen: A. F. Høst.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jespersen, Otto. 1938. Growth and structure of the English language. Oxford: Blackwell.]Search in Google Scholar
[Johannesson, Nils-Lennart. 2005. Old English versus Old Norse vocabulary in the Ormulum: The choice of third person plural personal pronouns. Ms., Stockholm University. https://www.orrmulum.net/ormproj/info/heore97_rev.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[Kastovsky, Dieter. 2006. Vocabulary. In Richard Hogg & David Denison (eds.), A history of the English language, 199–270. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511791154.005]Search in Google Scholar
[Kroch, Anthony & Ann Taylor. 2000. Penn-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Middle English Prose. 2nd edition. https://www.ling.upenn.edu/hist-corpora/PPCME2-RELEASE-3/index.html]Search in Google Scholar
[Laing, Margaret. 1997. A fourteenth-century sermon on the number seven in Merton College, Oxford, MS 248. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 98(2). 99–134.]Search in Google Scholar
[Laing, Margaret. 2002. Corpus-provoked questions about negation in early Middle English. Language Sciences 24(3–4). 297–321. DOI: 10.1016/S0388-0001(01)00035-310.1016/S0388-0001(01)00035-3]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Laing, Margaret. 2013–. A linguistic atlas of Early Middle English. Version 3.2. https://www.lel.ed.ac.uk/ihd/laeme2/laeme2_framesZ.html]Search in Google Scholar
[Laing, Margaret & Roger Lass. 2008–. A linguistic atlas of Early Middle English. Introduction. https://www.lel.ed.ac.uk/ihd/laeme2/laeme_intro_ch4.html]Search in Google Scholar
[Leslie, Stephen, Bruce Winney, Garrett Hellenthal, Dan Davison, Abdelhamid Boumertit, Tammy Day, Katarzyna Hutnik, Ellen C. Royrvik, Barry Cunliffe, Wellcome Trust Case Consortium 2, International Multiple Sclerosis Genetics Consortium, Daniel J. Lawson, Daniel Fallush, Colin Freeman, Matti Pirinen, Simon Myers, Mark Robinson, Peter Donnelly & Walter Bodmer. 2015. The fine-scale genetic structure of the British population. Nature 519. 309–314. DOI: 10.1038/nature1423010.1038/14230]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Levin, Samuel R. 1958. Negative contraction: An Old and Middle English dialect criterion. The Journal of English and Germanic Philology 57(3). 492–501.]Search in Google Scholar
[Loyn, Henry R. 1977. The Vikings in Britain. New York: St. Martin’s Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lucas, Christopher. 2009. The development of negation in Arabic and Afro-Asiatic. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Cambridge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lucas, Christopher. 2012. Contact-induced grammatical change: Towards an explicit account. Diachronica 29(3). 275–300. DOI: 10.1075/dia.29.3.01luc10.1075/dia.29.3.01luc]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Lucas, Christopher. 2014. Contact-induced language change. In Claire Bowern & Bethwyn Evans (eds.), The Routledge handbook of historical linguistics, 519–536. London: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315794013.ch2410.4324/9781315794013.ch24]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Lutz, Angelika. 2012. Norse influence on English in the light of general contact linguistics. In Irén Hegedűs & Alexandra Fodor (eds.), English historical linguistics 2010: Selected papers from the Sixteenth International Conference on English Historical Linguistics (ICEHL 16), Pécs, 23–27 August 2010, 15–41. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/cilt.325.01lut10.1075/cilt.325.01lut]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Lutz, Angelika. 2013. Language contact and prestige. Anglia 131(4). 562–590. DOI: 10.1515/anglia-2013-006510.1515/anglia-2013-0065]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[McIntosh, Angus, Michael L. Samuels & Michael Benskin. 1986. A linguistic atlas of Late Mediaeval English. Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[McWhorter, John. 2002. What happened to English? Diachronica 19(2). 217–272. DOI: 10.1075/dia.19.2.02wha10.1075/dia.19.2.02wha]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Miller, D. Gary. 2012. External influences on English: From its beginnings to the Renaissance. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199654260.001.000110.1093/acprof:oso/9780199654260.001.0001]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Mitchell, Bruce. 1994. The Englishness of Old English. In Malcolm Godden, Douglas Gray & Terry Hoad (eds.), From Anglo-Saxon to Early Middle English: Studies presented to E. G. Stanley, 163–181. Oxford: Clarendon.]Search in Google Scholar
[Peters, Hans. 1981. Zum skandinavischen Lehngut im Altenglischen. Sprachwissenschaft 6. 85–124.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pons-Sanz, Sara. 2007. Norse-derived vocabulary in late Old English texts: Wulfstan’s works, a case study. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/nss.2210.1075/nss.22]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Pons-Sanz, Sara. 2013. The lexical effects of Anglo-Scandinavian linguistic contact on Old English. Turnhout: Brepols.10.1484/M.SEM-EB.5.106260]Search in Google Scholar
[Poussa, Patricia. 1982. The evolution of Early Standard English: The creolization hypothesis. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 14. 69–85.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sawyer, Peter H. 1971. The age of the Vikings. (2nd edn.) London: Arnold.]Search in Google Scholar
[Smits, Caroline. 1998. Two models for the study of language contact: A psycho-linguistic perspective versus a socio-cultural perspective. In Monika S. Schmid, Jennifer R. Austin & Dieter Stein (eds.), Historical linguistics, 1997: Selected papers from the 13th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Düsseldorf, 10–17 August 1997, 377–391. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/cilt.164.24smi10.1075/cilt.164.24smi]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Studer-Joho, Nicole. 2014. Diffusion and change in Early Middle English: Methodological and theoretical implications from the LAEME corpus of tagged texts. Tübingen: Francke Verlag.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sykes, Bryan. 2006. Blood of the Isles: Exploring the genetic roots of our tribal history. London: Bantam.]Search in Google Scholar
[Thomason, Sarah Grey & Terrence Kaufman. 1988. Language contact, creolization, and genetic linguistics. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.10.1525/9780520912793]Search in Google Scholar
[Townend, Matthew. 2002. Language and history in Viking Age England: Linguistic relations between speakers of Old Norse and Old English. Turnhout: Brepols.10.1484/M.SEM-EB.5.106296]Search in Google Scholar
[Trips, Carola. 2002. From OV to VO in Early Middle English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/la.6010.1075/la.60]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Trudgill, Peter. 2011. Sociolinguistic typology: Social determinants of linguistic complexity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Van Bergen, Linda. 2008. Negative contraction and Old English dialects: Evidence from glosses and prose. Part I. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 109(3). 275–312.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wallage, Phillip. 2005. Negation in early English: Parametric variation and grammatical competition. Ph.D. dissertation, University of York.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wallage, Phillip. 2008. Jespersen’s Cycle in Middle English: Parametric variation and grammatical competition. Lingua 118(5). 643–674. DOI: 10.1016/j.lingua.2007.09.00110.1016/j.lingua.2007.09.001]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Wallage, Phillip. 2013. Functional differentiation and grammatical competition in the English Jespersen Cycle. Journal of Historical Syntax 2(1). 1–25.]Search in Google Scholar
[Winford, Donald. 2003. An introduction to contact linguistics. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.]Search in Google Scholar
[Winford, Donald. 2005. Contact-induced changes: Classification and processes. Diachronica 22(2). 373–427. DOI: 10.1075/dia.22.2.05win10.1075/dia.22.2.05win]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar