Multilingualism in the EU and Consistency of Private Enforcement of Competition Law: Two Examples from CEE Countries

Almăşan, A. (2017). The Arbitrability of Articles 101 and 102 TFEU. In A. Almăşan, P. Whelan (Eds.), The Consistent Application of EU Competition Law: Substantive and Procedural Challenges. Cham: Springer, 141–161.10.1007/978-3-319-47382-6_8Search in Google Scholar

Basedow, J., Francq, S. & Idot, L. (2012). International Antitrust Litigation: Conflict of Laws and Coordination. Oxford–Portland: Hart Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Commission Recommendation of 11 June 2013 on common principles for injunctive and compensatory collective redress mechanisms in the Member States concerning violations of rights granted under Union Law (OJ L 201, 26.07.2013).Search in Google Scholar

Commission Staff Working Document – Practical guide “Quantifying harm in actions for damages based on breaches of Article 101 or 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union” (C (2013) 3440, 11.06.2013).Search in Google Scholar

Communication from the Commission on quantifying harm in actions for damages based on breaches of Article 101 or 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (OJ C 167, 13.06.2013).Search in Google Scholar

Conway, G. (2015). EU Law. London–New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315708256Search in Google Scholar

Directive 2014/104/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 November 2014 on certain rules governing actions for damages under national law for infringements of the competition law provisions of the Member States and of the European Union (OJ L 349, 5.12.2014).Search in Google Scholar

EEC Council Regulation No 1 determining the languages to be used by the European Economic Community (OJ 17, 6.10.1958)Search in Google Scholar

European Commission (2017). Transposition of the Directive in Member States. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/competition/antitrust/actionsdamages/directive_en.htmlSearch in Google Scholar

Judgment of the Supreme Court of Poland of 22 July 2008, II PK 360/07, published in Lex No. 500212.Search in Google Scholar

Modzelewska de Raad, M. (2017). Consensual Dispute Resolution in the Damages Directive: Implementation in CEE Countries. Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies 10(15), forthcoming.10.7172/1689-9024.YARS.2017.10.15.3Search in Google Scholar

Pais, S.O. & Piszcz, A. (2014). Package on Actions for Damages Based on Breaches of EU Competition Rules: Can One Size Fit All? Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies 7(10), 209–234.10.2139/ssrn.2741618Search in Google Scholar

Pärn-Lee, E. (2017). In A. Piszcz (Ed.), Implementation of the EU Damages Directive in Central and Eastern European Countries. Warsaw: University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management Press, 109–125.Search in Google Scholar

Petr, M. (2017). The Scope of Implementation of the Damages Directive in CEE States. Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies 10(15), forthcoming.10.7172/1689-9024.YARS.2017.10.15.1Search in Google Scholar

Piszcz, A. (2013). A few notes on the language of EU antitrust law in English-Polish translation. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 34(47) [DOI: 10.2478/slgr-2013-0028], 161–174.10.2478/slgr-2013-0028],161174Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Piszcz, A. (2016). Is this really a reform to facilitate follow-on actions for antitrust damages? Some thoughts on the Damages Directive. In S.O. Pais (Ed.), Competition law challenges in the next decade. Brussels: P.I.E. Peter Lang, 59–73.Search in Google Scholar

Piszcz, A. (2015). Piecemeal Harmonisation Through the Damages Directive? Remarks on What Received Too Little Attention in Relation to Private Enforcement of EU Competition Law. Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies 8(12), 79–98.10.7172/1689-9024.YARS.2015.8.12.4Search in Google Scholar

Piszcz, A. (2017). Quo vadis CEE? Summary. In A. Piszcz (Ed.), Implementation of the EU Damages Directive in Central and Eastern European Countries. Warsaw: University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management Press, 297–307.Search in Google Scholar

Piszcz, A. (2017a). Well Begun Is Half Done: Amendments to the Polish Legal Framework for Consensual Dispute Resolution Needed After Antitrust Damages Directive (2014/104/EU). Białystok Legal Studies 22(2), forthcoming.10.15290/bsp.2017.22.04.19Search in Google Scholar

Piszcz, A. & Wolski, D. (2017). Poland. In A. Piszcz (Ed.), Implementation of the EU Damages Directive in Central and Eastern European Countries. Warsaw: University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management Press, 211–236.Search in Google Scholar

Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on certain rules governing actions for damages under national law for infringements of the competition law provisions of the Member States and of the European Union (COM (2013) 404 final, 11.06.2013).Search in Google Scholar

Robertson, C. (2013). How the European Union functions in 23 languages. Synaps 28, 14–32.Search in Google Scholar

Simonsson, I. (2010). Legitimacy in EU Cartel Control. Oxford–Portland: Hart Publishing.10.5040/9781472560711Search in Google Scholar

Strand, M. (2016). Beyond the Competition Damages Directive: What Room for Competition Law Restitution? In M. Bergström, M. Iacovides, M. Strand (Eds.), Harmonising EU Competition Litigation: The New Directive and Beyond. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 279–294.Search in Google Scholar

Strand, M. (2017). The Passing-On Problem in Damages and Restitution Under EU Law. Cheltenham–Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.10.4337/9781786430182Search in Google Scholar

Tabory, M. (1980). Multilingualism in International Law and Institutions. Alphen aan den Rijn: Brill Archive.Search in Google Scholar

Tokarczyk, R. (2008). Komparatystyka prawnicza. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer.Search in Google Scholar

Turi, J.-G. (2012). Language Law and Language Rights, International Journal of Law, Language & Discourse, 2(4), 1–18.Search in Google Scholar

Ustawa z 17 listopada 1964 r. – Kodeks postępowania cywilnego (tekst jedn. Dz.U. z 2016 r., poz. 1822, z poźn. zm.).Search in Google Scholar

Ustawa z 21 kwietnia 2017 r. o roszczeniach o naprawienie szkody wyrządzonej przez naruszenie prawa konkurencji (Dz.U. z 2017 r., poz. 1132).Search in Google Scholar

Ustawa z 23 kwietnia 1964 r. – Kodeks cywilny (tekst jedn. Dz.U. z 2017 r., poz. 459, z poźn. zm.).Search in Google Scholar

Ustawa z 23 września 2016 r. o pozasądowymrozwiązywaniu sporów konsumenckich (Dz.U. z 2016 r., poz. 1823).Search in Google Scholar

Vlahek, A. & Podobnik, K. (2017). Slovenia. In A. Piszcz (Ed.), Implementation of the EU Damages Directive in Central and Eastern European Countries. Warsaw: University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management Press, 263–296.Search in Google Scholar

Wijckmans, F., Visser, M., Jaques, S. & Noël, E. (2015). The EU Private Damages Directive – Practical Insights. Minutes of the Closed Workshop 2015. Cambridge–Antwerp–Portland: Intersentia.Search in Google Scholar